Monday, October 5, 2009

Queens 'Tin Can' Anarchist Held One Pound of Liquid Mercury

Last Thursday F.B.I. agents searched the home of Elliot Madison of Queens. The search was part of a "text-message and Twitter" investigation surrounding the anarchist G-20 protests in Pittsburgh in September. As the New York Times reports:

The man, Elliot Madison, 41, a social worker who has described himself as an anarchist, had been arrested in Pittsburgh on Sept. 24 and charged with hindering apprehension or prosecution, criminal use of a communication facility and possession of instruments of crime. The Pennsylvania State Police said he was found in a hotel room with computers and police scanners while using the social-networking site Twitter to spread information about police movements.
This is an extremely interesting story. The police found a number of items during the search, including a photograph of Vladimir Lenin. Most troubling, according to the New York Post, police confiscated one pound of liquid mercury in Madison's home, as well as two boxes of ammunition. Other items, such as machetes, were considered outside of the scope of the warrant and not seized.

It turns out that Madison was working for
Tin Can Comms Collective, an anarchist cell with a self-proclaimed mission to destroy the state. According the their website:

Tin Can Comms Collective is a collection of communication rebels seeking to provide useful free tools for activists fighting the State and Capitalism. We are an anarchist group that has come together to help with the communication infrastructure for the the Anti-G-20 protests this September in Pittsburgh, because: People and Information want to be Free!
Also, the Socialist Webzine explains what went down during the events, "G20 Riots in Pittsburgh – How I organized Them Via Twitter." The author of that post writes at his own website, No-State.com. Here's his bio:

I renounced my American citizenship in protest of what has become an American Empire, a nation that I see riding an express train to police state dictatorship with flags flying, anthems blaring and deluded, complicit masses cheering it along the track. Hopefully, others will be motivated to do the same by my example, though I recognize inertia as the most powerful force in human affairs.

My political philosophy — which could be variously termed anarchism, anarcho-capitalism or individualist anarchism — informs this decision, but it is my disgust over what America has become — in bloody, murderous, thieving contrast to what it professes — which motivates it.
The guy has also written:

Where there are those who are subjugated beneath the boot heel of power, by “democratic” means or otherwise, I shall support their resistance, their condemnation, their denunciation and their renunciation.
All this helps put the significance of the Queens raid in perspective. Liquid mercury is used in bomb construction. It is used in ignition switches and electrical contact triggers for explosive devices. In some bombs liquid mercury serves as a detonator for motion-activated explosions -- that is, should someone touch and move a suspicious package, the movement would cause the mercury to complete the electical charge and the bomb would explode. This is why explosive devices must be defused without being moved.

It's easy to see why police were
alarmed by the discovery. Madison's home is a terrorist supply depot for the anarcho-communists organizing campaigns against "state power." It remains to be seen how large the movement becomes. The Tin Can Comms Collective was first organized for Republican National Convention in 2004, but the anarchists have been holding massive demonstrations since the Seattle anti-globalization violence in 1999.

Firedoglake writes a post in defense of the G-20 anarcho-text-messaging systems as a matter of free speech. Of course, that's to be expected from one of the more hardline blogs of the radical netroots. Like the anarchists, "Hammering" Jane Hamsher's gang is out to destroy America.

21 comments:

  1. This is the reason why my own political spectrum is like it is.

    Years ago the "graph" was circular but was changed to linear to "show the difference". Anarchy is full right and communism is far left. In the circular graph, communism and anarchy are nearly the same.

    I wonder why it is now on a linear graph with the two seemingly light years apart.

    Anarchists and Commies are nearly one in the same...they deserve each other.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I call them "anarcho-communists," Mark. They're really the same in my book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I call them "anarcho-communists," Mark. They're really the same in my book.

    Wait...so commies who support Big Brother government which has almost complete control over society and the economy are now the same as people who DESPISE government and attack it to gain back their freedom? How in god's name does that make any sense?

    Funny, that you label him as a "anarcho-communist," yet he describes himself as "anarcho-capitalist." Face it, Donald, this guy's on YOUR side of the spectrum. Hell, his complaint against "police state dictatorship" almost makes him sound like a Tea Partier.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're high, BioBrain. They go by "anarcho-communists' themselves, and the dude kept Lenin pictures at his house. In fact, let's call them "anarcho-nihilist-communists," since your kind was out on the streets in Pittsburgh.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You're high, BioBrain. They go by "anarcho-communists' themselves...

    Sorry Donald. I guess you're right. As it turns out, the blog where I read a quote of an anarchist describing his philosophy as "anarcho-capitalism" is totally full of shit and can't be trusted in the least.

    And yeah, in case you didn't get the joke, that was a link to your blog. In fact, this very post. You quoted an anarcho-capitalist referring to himself as an anarcho-capitalist, and then call him an anarcho-communist...twice. And to think you TEACH this stuff. Were I this ignorant of my own field, I'd have starved to death years ago. I guess it helps to work in a profession that lacks right answers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh, right, Biobrain. A self-proclaimed "anarchy-capitalist" publishes his work at the Socialist Webzine. Hey, that's a real endorsement for capitalism! Obviously, these idiots will co-opt the language of respectable ideologies to fool other idiots like yourself.

    Man, you're too much, unbelievable really.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are so erratic and hostile, Dr. Bio-Brain, you only attack and have no defense. Lay off Maestro Donald until you can offer a serious point. The only “Big Brother government which has almost complete control over society” is your Messianic Machine of Obamanation, Pea-Brain.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, right, Biobrain. A self-proclaimed "anarchy-capitalist" publishes his work at the Socialist Webzine.

    Well, you might conceivably have a point there, except that Gogulski doesn't post there. He posted that at HIS blog and they reprinted it at the Socialist website. Trust me, I did a search and saw that he's never written anything else for the Socialist website. He wrote that for his own blog, not theirs.

    Sorry pal, but this guy's on your side. He's anti-government and doesn't think democracy gives government the right to tell other people how to live. And I've read the same thing from your commenters as well as from Glenn Beck, who insist that Obama's agenda isn't legitimate even if he was democratically elected. I defy you to find ONE liberal who'd say such a thing. As you're well aware, liberals support big government; while this guy opposes it. He's on your side.

    And hey, look, there are jerkoffs like this on both sides of the spectrum. There are anarcho-commies who somehow imagine that the world would be more fair if we got rid of government, just as there are anarcho-capitalists who think the world would be more free if we got rid of government; and I happen to think BOTH groups are crazy bozos.

    I don't know why you insist on imagining that everyone on your side is good while all the bozos are on our side, but it's nothing but a fantasy. Face it, the extreme conservative position is anarchy, as they believe that all government is evil; and that's just an extreme extension of your own position. That's simply undeniable.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The only “Big Brother government which has almost complete control over society” is your Messianic Machine of Obamanation, Pea-Brain.

    Wow, Rusty. Way to prove my point. As I was saying, you guys believe that liberals support big government which should have power over our lives, while anarchists OPPOSE government and don't want it to run our lives. Yet, you imagine these people to be the same? Guess what, peebrain: They're complete and total opposites and the freedom-loving anarchists are on YOUR side.

    To quote from An Anarchist's Declaration:
    •Where a tyrant, a majority, a plurality, or a minority presume to grant you power over me, or over anyone else, I shall condemn it, resist it, renounce it and denounce it.

    •Where there are those who are subjugated beneath the boot heel of power, by “democratic” means or otherwise, I shall support their resistance, their condemnation, their denunciation and their renunciation.

    •I shall make no compromise with evil.

    And heck, that sounds just like your average tea-partier to me.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Honestly - what I get from reading the self described 'anarcho-capitalist' is that he is terribly confused. I don't think he knows anarchy from his own a$$hole. What he says - and what he does - well they just don't add up. There is a contradiction there and I think it stems from his own ignorance.

    The fact that he is ignorant is not surprising - I've had to deal with some unbelievable ignorance recently - being called a 'commie' by a socialist for one example.

    Anyhoo - I wonder why an anarchist would have a picture of Lenin? Why would an anarchist supply bombs to anarcho communists? He's just plain stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wow, Donald Douglas, can you really be that dense? Mike is a well known anarcho-capitalist and a pretty well-know follower of the very Murray N. Rothbard you try to quote against him.

    You are dishonestly trying to call him a commie because your puny neo-con mind can't wrap itself around the thought that believers in the free market might choose to fight against the state with other who hold that same goal, even if they don't see eye to eye.

    I suppose the Centre for Liberty, Mises, Naomi Wolfe, Lew Rockwell and Raason are all commies too for supporting the G20 protesters and speaking out against the egregious police state tactics taken by the cops in Pittsburgh?

    You really haven't got a clue about the various forms of anarchism do you? Yet you assume you can lecture about it.

    You neo-cons are really that dumb.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Anarcho-capitalism is an individualist anarchist political philosophy that advocates the elimination of the state and the elevation of the sovereign individual in a free market. In an anarcho-capitalist society, law enforcement, courts, and all other security services are provided by voluntarily-funded competitors such as private defense agencies rather than through compulsory taxation, and money is privately produced in an open market. Because personal and economic activities are regulated by the natural laws of the market through private law rather than through politics, victimless crimes, and crimes against the state are rendered moot."

    Sound like a neocon's wet dream? It is.

    From what I can see, though, all this Tea Party, down-with-the-state stuff that's coming from the political Right is just a lot of hot air being blown while they wait for a return to the status quo. It's pretty naive to think that the Neocons want to actually change anything themselves. Their plan is just to sit around and whine for a few years while they wait for things to move in their direction.

    To continue my earlier metaphor, they are political masturbators. All the revolution you could want without the actual consequences and mess of a revolution.

    The problem they have here is that there are people who actually want to change things in a way that might actually be mistaken for a revolution, and that has the neocons scared ("Actual revolution, ew! That's not American!"). Why would they be scared when they obviously want an end to big government, you ask? Because they still have a love affair with big tanks and big guns, uber law enforcement and force, in general. Once things swing their way again (they hope), they want to say that America is a badass, Muslim-killing, Christianity-spreading, bomb-dropping son-of-a-bitch again.

    Where, anarcho-capitalists would rather not have either type of lying, crazy asshole in charge, the neocons still have hope that one of theirs will bumble his way back into power again.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I wonder why an anarchist would have a picture of Lenin? Why would an anarchist supply bombs to anarcho communists? He's just plain stupid.

    Grizzly Mama - Do you really think that communists all have pictures of Lenin and no one else would? We're just talking about one picture. That's really not terribly surprising. Frankly, I can't believe any news article would bother mentioning such an unimportant fact.

    As for the bomb claim that Donald emphasized, that seems to only come from the NY Post, which is a tabloid; and they haven't mentioned it again in several days. The NY Times doesn't mention mercury being found, and neither article says he was charged with having bombs or bomb materials, while both articles say he was released on bail almost immediately. He's only being charged with Twittering, not bomb making; despite Donald's emphasis of it. I seriously doubt he was making bombs.

    But as for anarchists being stupid and confused, well DUH, they're anarchists. I've generally found that the people who support anarchy would be the first ones against the wall if anarchy became real. And the people who did best would be the folks with lots of guns, friends, and money; and anarchy wouldn't last long.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You seem to be suffering from the classical liberalism fallacy. Governments are not instituted to protect rights, they are instituted for the benefit of those who run the governments. The surplus order of these police rioting and invading homes and accusing people of listening to the radio (!) isn't any different from "real" anarchy. Your government is a boot smashing a human face, forever, and that is not orderly.

    A pound of mercury is about 1.18 fluid ounces. Not much liquid. See, mercury is very dense, about 13.5 times denser than water. A pound of water is a pint (a pint's a pound the world around) so you take 16 fluid ounces found in a pint and divide by 13.5. You get 1.18 fluid ounces. Tiny. About 33 millilitres for those of you who go metric. Probably a standard size for chemistry lab supply stores, or apothecary supply, or wherever you people get your alchemy stuff these days.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Interesting - thank you both. I must ruminate.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Is market-anarchism really so hard to grasp?
    But I guess that's getting ahead of myself. I should start with this; instead of playing you're left-right word games, why don't you go out and learn something about the philosophy and come back with some valid critiques?
    Wait, most mainstream political commentators don't bother with the underpinnings of their own positions, so that might be too much to ask. Work on understanding the difference between your rhetoric and facts and then try again.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "He's anti-government and doesn't think democracy gives government the right to tell other people how to live."

    Damn good thing we are not a "democracy," as I, too, am against government, or anyone else, using force (which is usually government) forcing people who have done nothing to interfere with the rights of others how to live their lives.

    Apparently, you think government does have that right.

    Little wonder you support the concept of "mob rule."

    Careful, lest you and your ilk discover the hard way what the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution was really all about.

    I'll give you a hint here, Bent Brain:

    It had absolutely nothing to do with deer hunting and target practice, and everything to do with defending our freedoms and liberties (two concepts you are clearly ignorant of) from any and all threats.

    Just sit and chew on that one for a while, when the top of your head isn't otherwise pressed against Obama's liver.

    -Dave

    ReplyDelete
  18. PlanetaryJim wrote "A pound of water is a pint. (A pint's a pound, the world around.)"

    Codswallop. "A pint of water/weighs a pound and a quarter".

    Now, Americans using devalued measures is one thing, but to back up US-centrism with claims of universality is beyond absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Damn good thing we are not a "democracy,"...

    Per Wikipedia:
    "Democracy is a system of government in which either the actual governing is carried out by the people governed (direct democracy), or the power to do so is granted by them (as in representative democracy)."

    Soooo, what system of government do you imagine we have, if not a "democracy"?

    Beyond that, yes I DO think that our government can force us to do things. For example, I believe that they can compel people to join the army when they are drafted and force them into prison when they murder people, or when they commit treason. Perhaps you're against such ideas, but I'm not.

    And look, if you don't like living in a country that is governed by people we elect, there's one obvious option: Leave. But, if you prefer treason, that's fine. Just don't expect me to join you, traitor.

    If you're interested in learning more about how our system works, try this:
    Democracy is Theft

    ReplyDelete
  20. Well, at least the hypocrisy of the soviet, er bourgeois, concept of "freedom" is on display yet again. Namely, that it's all good and well so long as it's used solely on a non-interference basis to the communist party, er capitalist ruling elite.

    As soon as someone says something that goes against that order, well then, freedom is obviously going too far!

    Totalitarianism, anyone?

    ReplyDelete