Monday, December 23, 2013

Environmental Fascists Move to Ban Plastic Gift Cards

The left's environmental fascists go after another hugely popular capitalist standby, the plastic gift card. Nothing is off limits to these assholes. Any product or capitalist innovation that proves popular or highly successful is targeted for destruction. And this time? The stinking retail gift card? How low can retarded leftists go? And we're supposed to go back to gift certificates? That might be hard on trees, you know? And plastic gift cards are recyclable, doh! Maybe a recycling campaign would have been better than assassinating this simple retail purchasing device.

Leftists are vile people out to destroy virtually everything of convenience and utility in the modern capitalist economy.

At LAT, "Retailers seek 'green' alternative to plastic gift cards":
Like millions of Americans, Jessica Hamilton of Pasadena will buy her friends and family a handful of gift cards this holiday season, drawn by their convenience.

Yet Hamilton, who carries reusable bags when she goes shopping, is bothered by the thought of all of that plastic ending up in landfills along with worn-out hotel key cards, credit cards and the like.

In 2012, the global card industry produced 33 billion cards, according to the International Card Manufacturers Assn. Most of those cards contained polyvinyl chloride, a plastic that contains pollutants that are harmful to the environment and is slow to decompose.

"If they had something more eco-friendly, that would make me shop at one place over another," Hamilton said.

Increasingly, card manufacturers and retailers are listening, offering more alternatives to plastic cards. High-end grocery store Whole Foods Market Inc. did away with plastic cards in 2011 and replaced them with paper gift cards.

"Generally, at Whole Foods, we like to think green ... but we were producing tons and tons of waste from PVC cards and that wasn't in line with what we want to do," said Marushka Bland, gift cards project manager for the Austin, Texas, company. Last year, Whole Foods launched a gift card during the holiday season made with wood from sustainably managed forests in Europe.

The cards, produced by Colorado-based Sustainable Cards, are made with 30% less energy than plastic cards and are compostable.

Whole Food's commitment to reducing its environmental impact played a role in the decision to get rid of plastic cards, Bland said, but the change was also an effort to give their customers what they want.

"If one of our customers is environmentally conscious and doesn't want to give a plastic card, then we love to give our customer the opportunity to make a purchase they can feel good about," Bland said. And retailers have excellent reasons to make their customers feel good about gift cards.

Shoppers will buy nearly $30 billion in gift cards this holiday season, spending an average of about $163 on the items, a 4% increase from last year, according to an annual survey sponsored by the National Retail Federation.

Retailers get value out of marketing themselves as "environmentally friendly" through recycling and other programs, said Bob Engle, vice president of biopolymers at Metabolix, a Massachusetts company that produces a bioplastic alternative to the plastic typically used in cards.

But alternative cards have shortcomings.

In 2007, Target began using cards made out of a biodegradable material produced by Metabolix but terminated the deal because of the high price of production.

Although a pound of polyvinyl chloride costs a little over $1, Metabolix's alternative costs almost $2. And one wooden card made by Sustainable Cards costs 10 cents to 15 cents while a plastic card runs 7 cents to 12 cents for orders of 100,000.

Polyvinyl chloride is also readily available around the world, easy to produce, durable and easily recyclable, said Al Vrancart, an industry adviser and founder of the International Card Manufacturers Assn.

"PVC is a product that's been around a long time and served us well," he said.

But the industry, Vrancart said, is attempting to move in a more sustainable direction, adopting eco-friendly standards that, when met, result in a "green" certification for a product.
Continue reading.

Apparently demand for traditional gift cards is extremely robust, despite the idiotic "green alternative" movement pushed by the depraved enviro-fascists. Sometimes common sense and decency wins out, but never doubt the tenacity of the regressive leftists.

White House Quietly Delays #ObamaCare Enrollment Deadline

Quietly? Or secretly?

Either way, another sign things are totally FUBAR.

At Jammie, "Due to Underwhelming Demand, Obama ‘Secretly’ Extends ObamaCare Enrollment Period."

And at the Wall Street Journal, "For Health Coverage Starting Jan. 1, Deadline Extended a Day: March 31 Is Next Key Date in Signing Up for Insurance":
Federal officials delayed the deadline to sign up for Jan. 1 coverage through the end of Christmas Eve.

The deadline was originally set for midnight on Dec. 23, but contractors managing the site changed configurations to allow users to sign up for the first wave of health-law coverage through Dec. 24, people familiar with the matter said.

"Anticipating high demand and the fact that consumers may be enrolling from multiple time zones, we have taken steps to make sure that those who select a plan through tomorrow will get coverage for Jan 1," Julie Bataille, director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service's Office of Communications, said in a statement.

The extension was needed in part because technical problems continue to limit the volume of users that can navigate the site at once, and officials worried people attempting to sign up Monday might not be able to do so. The site has had a record day, with more than one million visits by midmorning, federal officials said on Twitter.

Consumers seeking coverage should attempt to sign up today anyway, Ms. Bataille said. "If you are aiming to get coverage January 1, you should try to sign up today."

News of the change was earlier reported by the Washington Post.

The change follows weeks of last-minute policy shifts for the administration. Last week, for instance, with only days before the enrollment deadline, the Obama administration said people whose plans were canceled would be exempted from a requirement that people buy coverage or pay a fee next year.
Continue reading.

The ASA's Boycott of Israel is Anti-Semitism Pure and Simple

From Professor Michael Curtis, at the Commentator, "Deschooling America, and the world, over Israel":
The disgraceful resolution of the American Studies Association (ASA) passed on December 15, 2013 honoring the call from “Palestinian civil society” to support the academic boycott of Israel has brought to the forefront a problem that ought to disturb all concerned with the educational system in the United States and elsewhere.

Once upon a time one assumed that college faculty members were paid to address and make statements on subjects on which they had some competence. The ASA has shown that this practice is no longer the case. With the enthusiasm of short- sighted detectives the members of ASA have obeyed the call of a Palestinian lobby group to pursue an academic boycott of a country of which they have little or no scholarly knowledge.

Moreover, that pursuit has no relevance to the supposed concerns of American Studies. Parents of students attending classes taught by the 1252 of the eligible 3853 members who voted for the resolution might legitimately inquire about what goes on in the learning and teaching behavior of this faculty.

The problem is acute. Of the 18 members of the ASA National Council who voted unanimously to endorse the boycott resolution, none appears to have any connection with Middle East studies. At least seven appear to have gender studies and sexual politics as a major, or one of their major, interests. The others state their primary research interests are race, film, “imperialism,” and Hawaiian and Latino cultural studies....

It is important to note that the ASA boycott follows the call, if not the exact words of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel.

This Campaign, started in 2004, is a remarkable demonstration of the Palestinian Narrative of Victimhood with its half-truths and falsehoods. Referring to the democratic State of Israel, and ignoring the increasing visibility and role of Israel Arabs in Israeli life, including the many Arabs who attend Israeli universities, it speaks of the “entrenched system of racial discrimination and segregation against the Palestinian citizens of Israel, which resembles the defunct apartheid system in South Africa.”

In addition to the offensiveness and inaccuracy of this assertion, the Campaign called for no participation in any form of academic and cultural cooperation, collaboration or joint projects with Israeli institutions.

Everyone concerned with educational issues must be distressed that a body called the American Studies Association responds to a call from a foreign lobbying body in almost identical language and what can only be regarded as an obsequious tone. Since the members who voted for boycott have shown no interest in issuing statements relating to any of the other 192 countries in the world, what can be their motive in passing this resolution against Israel?

It is not unfair to wonder if the ASA has become infected by the virus of antisemitism.

The academic servility continues. It has now been announced by Chadwick Allen,  professor at  Ohio State University and president of the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association (NAISA), a group with 747 members, that the association has decided to boycott Israeli academic institutions.

He states that the association will support the boycott that  “was initiated by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel.”

Again, an academic group is taking a stand while in total ignorance of the reality of life in Israel and areas occupied by the Palestinians. They appear unaware of Israeli basic principles such as protection of free speech and assembly, rights that extend to the Arab population in Israel as they do to everyone else.

Instead, the NAISA speaks of the “legal structures of the Israeli state that systematically discriminate against Palestinian and other indigenous peoples.”

Apparently, and incomprehensibly for an Association supposedly concerned with indigenous studies, it is unaware that the only “indigenous peoples” in the area are Jews.
Continue reading.

An outstanding, penetrating essay that simply nails it. Tweet this piece and spread the word on the ASA's campaign of anti-Semitic totalitarianism. It's bad not just for educational establishments, it's bad for freedom and decency in the world.

Sunday, December 22, 2013

King Barack Moves to Crush Federal Judge Who Dares Rein-In Obama Monarchy's Surveillance Absolutism

It's no joke at the headline above.

With the administration's new sexual-harassment rules sweeping across college civil rights offices nationwide, a report yesterday at College Insurrection likened the administration's policies to "those of the English Star Chamber or Spanish Inquisition of the 16th century..."

And so now here comes the New York Times with a report on King Barack's program to shut down a federal judge who dared rule against the royal court's unprecedented system of spying on his majesty's subjects.

See, "White House Tries to Prevent Judge From Ruling on Surveillance Efforts":
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration moved late Friday to prevent a federal judge in California from ruling on the constitutionality of warrantless surveillance programs authorized during the Bush administration, telling a court that recent disclosures about National Security Agency spying were not enough to undermine its claim that litigating the case would jeopardize state secrets.

In a set of filings in the two long-running cases in the Northern District of California, the government acknowledged for the first time that the N.S.A. started systematically collecting data about Americans’ emails and phone calls in 2001, alongside its program of wiretapping certain calls without warrants. The government had long argued that disclosure of these and other secrets would put the country at risk if they came out in court.

But the government said that despite recent leaks by Edward J. Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor, that made public a fuller scope of the surveillance and data collection programs put in place after the Sept. 11 attacks, sensitive secrets remained at risk in any courtroom discussion of their details — like whether the plaintiffs were targets of intelligence collection or whether particular telecommunications providers like AT&T and Verizon had helped the agency.

“Disclosure of this still-classified information regarding the scope and operational details of N.S.A. intelligence activities implicated by plaintiffs’ allegations could be expected to cause extremely grave damage to the national security of the United States,” wrote the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr.

So, he said, he was continuing to assert the state secrets privilege, which allows the government to seek to block information from being used in court even if that means the case must be dismissed. The Justice Department wants the judge to dismiss the matter without ruling on whether the programs violated the First or Fourth Amendment.

The filings also included similar declarations from earlier stages of the California litigation, which were classified at the time and shown only to the court but were declassified on Friday. The judge, Jeffrey S. White of the Northern District of California, had ordered the government to evaluate how the disclosures since Mr. Snowden’s leaks had affected its earlier invocations of the state secrets privilege.

The plaintiffs have until late January to file a response. Cindy Cohn, the legal director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is leading one of the cases, called the government’s assertion “very troubling.” She said that despite the Snowden revelations, it was still essentially saying, “We can’t say whether the American people have been spied on by their government.”
More at the link.

King Barack pretends to be a democratically-elected head-of-government, and the American people pretend to be the popular sovereigns of an advanced democratic republic. In the end, it all works out. The people have "voted" for the obliteration of their freedom.

No matter your ideology or your position on the liberty vs. security debate, this administration's obscene, crushing hubris should really take your breath away. King Barack once campaigned on returning government to the people. The reality is he's stealing American freedom and sovereignty right before our very eyes.

Sunday Cartoons

At Flopping Aces, "Sunday Funnies."

 photo Pajamas-590-LI_zpsdb88b425.jpg

Also at Randy's Roundtable, "Friday Nite Funnies," and Reaganite Republican, "Reaganite's SUNDAY FUNNIES."

CARTOON CREDIT: Legal Insurrection, "Branco Cartoon – The Pajama Game."

Rule 5 Holiday Cheer — #Rule5

With Rosie Jones and India Reynolds, two of my favorite British Page 3 models (via Rosie on Twitter).

And ICYMI, "Rosie in Red, White, and Blue."

Rosie and India photo Bb8AlXUIAAAmilH_zpsa6ccb33a.jpg
Now, getting to the roundup, I'm pleased to include Becca Lower this week, who offers a patriotic --- and very hot --- entry, "Who Says Cheerleaders are Dumb? (Photo)."

Plus, from our old standby, Pirate's Cove, "Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup," and "If All You See……is horrible Bad Weather creating PVC clothing and plastic candy canes, you might just be a Warmist."

Over at Blackmailers Don't Shoot, "Rule 5 Friday, Inked Girls Edition," and "This Week in News, Politics and Rule 5."

Subject to Change has, "In the Kitchen."

More at Knuckledraggin', "Your Good Morning Girl."

At Randy's Roundtable, "Thursday Nite Tart: Sarah Mutch."

Now over at Odie's, "Deep Thought ~OR~ Rule 5 Woodsterman Style."

And at Camp of the Saints, "Rule 5 Christmas Countdown: 21-Dec-13."

Reaganite has the "★ 2013 Wardrobe Malfunction Awards ★."

At Diogenes' Middle Finger, "A Good Monday Morning."

Fan of Glamor brings some "Bath-time with Jodie Gasson."

In a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World has "The Friday Pin Up."

From Drunken Stepfather, "Steplinks of the Day."

And see Proof Positive, "Best of the Web* Linkaround," and "Friday Night Babe: Michelle Borth!"

See also the Hostages, "Big Boob Sunday."

At 90 Miles From Tyranny, "Morning Mistress," and "Hot Pick of the Late Night."

From Dana Pico, "Rule 5 Blogging: Estonia."

EBL has, "Turns out A&E may need Duck Dynasty more than Duck Dynasty needs A&E..."

A View from the Beach has, "Forecast: Light Obamacare Schadenfreude."

And at American Perspective, "Blamers Can't Stop Blaming (Pic)."

Goodstuff's has, "GOODSTUFF'S BLOGGING MAGAZINE (Twisted Christmas Issue)."

Soylent has, "Your Breakfast Buffet."

Now, from Daley Gator, "DaleyGator DaleyBabe Chloe Bennett."

Plus, at Barnorama, "Emily Ratajkowski Photos" (via Linkiest).

Over at Egotastic!, check out, "Miranda Kerr See-Through Lace Lingerie for Terry Richardson Shoot," and "Thank God It’s Funbags! Ali Rose on Roller Skates to Get Your Weekend Boogie On."

Finally, go to the Rule 5 blog-father's, the Other McCain, "FMJRA 2.0: Painkiller."

And drop your links in the comments if I've missed you and I'll get you linked up at the next roundup!

Hamas, Islamic Jihad Cheer Bat Yam Bus-Bomb Terror Attack

At the Jerusalem Post, "Hamas, Islamic Jihad 'welcome' terror attack on Bat Yam bus":
Passengers narrowly escape bomb after alert passenger spots suspicious package on back seat, bomb exploded moments after passengers get off bus; Islamic Jihad source says he hopes attack will usher the return of suicide bombings.
Right. Because these people are all about peace in the Middle East, or something.

More at the Times of Israel, "Disaster averted as bomb explodes on bus after passengers evacuated."

And at Atlas Shrugs, "JIHAD TERROR ATTACK IN ISRAEL: BOMB ON BUS INJURES POLICE BOMB SQUAD OFFICER."



Justine Sacco Apologizes

She's issued a statement to ABC News, "Justine Sacco, Fired After Tweet on AIDS in Africa, Issues Apology" (via Memeorandum):
Words cannot express how sorry I am, and how necessary it is for me to apologize to the people of South Africa, who I have offended due to a needless and careless tweet," Sacco said. "There is an AIDS crisis taking place in this country, that we read about in America, but do not live with or face on a continuous basis. Unfortunately, it is terribly easy to be cavalier about an epidemic that one has never witnessed firsthand.

For being insensitive to this crisis -- which does not discriminate by race, gender or sexual orientation, but which terrifies us all uniformly -- and to the millions of people living with the virus, I am ashamed.

This is my father's country, and I was born here. I cherish my ties to South Africa and my frequent visits, but I am in anguish knowing that my remarks have caused pain to so many people here; my family, friends and fellow South Africans. I am very sorry for the pain I caused.


More at Legal Insurrection, "The worst Twitter day of all time."

It's worth noting that Sacco was an Obama-cheering, pro-abortion Democrat. So, once again we see the  biggest racists on the left.

Why the American Studies Association's Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions is So Utterly Ridiculous

From Martin Kramer, at Blazing Cat Fur:
I am now subject to a boycott by the American Studies Association (ASA), an organization of professors that includes roughly 5,000 members. The resolution, passed by the organization's rank-and-file on Dec. 15, supposedly doesn't apply to individuals, but it applies to me.
[…]
Since I am the president of Shalem College in Jerusalem, an accredited Israeli academic institution, I'm clearly subject to the ASA boycott. And while my fledgling liberal arts college doesn't have any "formal collaborations" with the ASA, it's the thought that counts...
Continue reading.

Claudia Romani's Winter Sizzle in Miami Beach

She looks great.

At London's Daily Mail, "Making them green with envy! Model Claudia Romani sizzles on Miami Beach in head-turning thong bikini."

Woman With Painful Skin Condition Fights Back Against Online Bullies

Well you have to fight these bullies, especially leftist bullies, who're the worst.

At London's Daily Mail, "'I fought back with awesome': Woman who lives with painful skin condition shames the bullies of Reddit who thought her picture was a laughing matter."

Arapahoe's Claire Davis Has Died

So sad. A loss of innocence, and for what?

At the Los Angeles Times, "Arapahoe High School shooting victim Claire Davis dies." And at Fire Andrea Mitchell, "Claire Davis dead after socialist Karl Pierson shot her."

Also at London's Daily Mail, "Colorado school shooting victim Claire Davis, 17, DIES surrounded by family eight days after she was gunned down by schoolmate."

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Researcher Kathleen Geier (@Kathy__Gee) Slams 'Very Privileged' Family Cancelled Under #ObamaCare

You'd think a "public policy researcher" like this Kathleen Geier, writing at the Washington Monthly, would do what public policy researchers are supposed to do: evaluate the alternatives, especially with a cost-benefit analysis. But Ms. Geier doesn't do that. She just slams this "very privileged" family covered at the New York Times for "whining about the ACA." See, "The New York Times and the ACA: the yuppie whine-athon continues." (Via Memeorandum.)

Well, okay. I hate whiners too. But you'd think Ms Geier might actually examine the complaints of the family, the Chapmans, to see if they're so unreasonable to warrant the very privileged whiners smear. It turns out that there's nothing particularly special about them. They're another family that's unfairly lost their health insurance because of the disastrous ObamaCare redistribution scheme, but reading Geier's post you'd never know it unless you clicked through to the New York Times, "New Health Law Frustrates Many in Middle Class":
Ginger Chapman and her husband, Doug, are sitting on the health care cliff.

The cheapest insurance plan they can find through the new federal marketplace in New Hampshire will cost their family of four about $1,000 a month, 12 percent of their annual income of around $100,000 and more than they have ever paid before.

Even more striking, for the Chapmans, is this fact: If they made just a few thousand dollars less a year — below $94,200 — their costs would be cut in half, because a family like theirs could qualify for federal subsidies.

The Chapmans acknowledge that they are better off than many people, but they represent a little-understood reality of the Affordable Care Act. While the act clearly benefits those at the low end of the income scale — and rich people can continue to afford even the most generous plans — people like the Chapmans are caught in the uncomfortable middle: not poor enough for help, but not rich enough to be indifferent to cost.

“We are just right over that line,” said Ms. Chapman, who is 54 and does administrative work for a small wealth management firm. Because their plan is being canceled, she is looking for new coverage for her family, which includes Mr. Chapman, 55, a retired fireman who works on a friend’s farm, and her two sons. “That’s an insane amount of money,” she said of their new premium. “How are you supposed to pay that?”

An analysis by The New York Times shows the cost of premiums for people who just miss qualifying for subsidies varies widely across the country and rises rapidly for people in their 50s and 60s. In some places, prices can quickly approach 20 percent of a person’s income.

Experts consider health insurance unaffordable once it exceeds 10 percent of annual income. By that measure, a 50-year-old making $50,000 a year, or just above the qualifying limit for assistance, would find the cheapest available plan to be unaffordable in more than 170 counties around the country, ranging from Anchorage to Jackson, Miss...
If you continue reading it notes that the Chapmans were paying $665.00 a month for their previous insurance, so they're looking at a $335.00 a month increase in premiums, which for their family is a big hit. They qualify for the "catastrophic" plans the administration is now making more widely available under its so-called "fix" to the insurance mandate announced Thursday night, but the up-front costs in those plans are huge, so there's little that's beneficial to them under the administration's reforms (despite the president's endless lies about how people will be better off under the ACA).

But for as long as I can remember, good public policy has been predicated on middle class support. Social Security, for all its flaws, has long been a popular program with Americans very resistant to removing its bottom-line old-age income guarantee for retirees. What the White House is discovering now is what most "public policy researchers" take for granted: that policy changes that impose massive costs on the largest voting demographic are likely to generate enormous political repercussions. To put things more plainly, ObamaCare doesn't work and the public's not pleased. We're watching the predicted "death spiral" unfold right before our eyes. Frankly, any "public policy researcher" worth her salt would know this, but when the pursuit of equality becomes a quasi-religious mission of emancipation for the poor and "underprivileged," facts and basic common sense --- to say nothing of basic decency --- no longer matter.

BONUS: As I mentioned last night, some progressives have responded to the failure of ObamaCare by barking about nationalizing health care along the lines of Britain's NIH. And here's Atrios doing it in light of NYT's latest report, "Health Care Is Expensive In This Country."

The left has been pretty successful in destroying the private insurance market so far. The real solution to this mess is to scrap ObamaCare altogether and develop market-friendly reforms that increase competition and lower costs, and then some kind of national healthcare safety net should be created to protect those unable to afford coverage. The left's alternative, socialized medicine, is bad for America. Indeed, critics who accused the Democrats of pushing for stealth socialized medicine through the ACA now look prescient.

Be Nice to Homosexuals. Or Else.

Be sure to read Mark Steyn's excellent essay on the "tolerant" left's intolerance of mainstream Christian beliefs, and their intolerance of the temerity that anyone might express them.

See, "The Age of Intolerance" (via Memeorandum).

And because he's a bleedin' idiot (and epic asshole), LGM's Scotty Lame-ieux attacks Steyn on free speech grounds (although Steyn's not making a free speech argument).  See, "And David Duke is the New Fred Shuttlesworth!"

And previously, ICYMI, "GLAAD: Demonizing Critics in the Name of 'Equality'."



Canada Slams U.N. Special Rapporteur Richard Falk on Israel 'Holocaust' Allegations

Background at Israel Matzav, "And again: Richard Falk calls Israel 'genocidal' (VIDEO)."

And at the Times of Israel, "Canada wants UN official ousted over ‘Palestinian holocaust’ comment."



Alessandra Ambrosio Holiday Video

Well, I guess she comes up short in the singing department. Easy on the eyes though.



'Blue Is the Warmest Color' Tops Daily Beast's '10 Best Movie Sex Scenes of 2013'

I used to go to a lot of foreign art films when I was in college, and I would have probably seen "Blue Is the Warmest Color."

These Daily Beast dolts are getting an erection out of it, however.


It was the most talked-about sex scene of the year for a reason. Abdellatif Kechiche’s three-hour French drama centers on Adèle (Exarchopoulos), a teenager who falls for blue-haired collegiate art student Emma (Seydoux). After sharing a few kisses in the park, the sexual tension builds to a fever pitch, resulting in a seven-minute paroxysm of sexual desire replete with clawing, slapping, scratching, moaning, and howling. Adèle and Emma contort themselves into a plethora of sexual positions. It’s feral, an explosion of their desire for one another. The scene is a bit problematic, too. It’s composed of medium shots from the perspective of the filmmaker (male gaze), never shifting to the perspective of the women, and it does drag. Oh, and the actresses hated shooting it—over 10 days. Nevertheless, it’s a powerful, important scene that challenges viewers’ heteronormative cinematic perspective. The first time I viewed it was at the Telluride Film Festival in Colorado, seated next to a lil’ old lady slurping a gigantic cup of coke, who “oohed” and “aahed” the entire time. Priceless.

I don't see the sex-scene video, but I'll tell you, this movie's like a how-to manual for postmodern queer feminism.




Student Christina Edwards Claims White Lynching Was to 'Shine Light on an Old but Standing Matter...'

Here's a disgusting but all-too-inevitable twist on the left's racist grievance shakedown artists. It's all just "art" you see.

At Fire Andrea Mitchell, "Christina Edwards Sacramento State black student lynches two white males calls it art."

This lady, Ms. Edwards, is an "African American artist" who wanted to "cross-racial lines" to "create an open opportunity to personalize and empathize with his-story as a people and hopefully initiate compassion and change in terms of social and racial availability and equality."

With that, yet more evidence that regressive leftism makes you stupid. Lynching is not a "standing matter." And I doubt many people need to be forced to empathize with how a lynched black man would feel. All this does is instantiate and legitimize reverse racism as a form of "retribution," which not ironically is what her performance is entitled. Put a woman like this in power and you'll have real examples of "retribution" against whites. (Or, that is, put more women like this in power.) Think about it, such retribution is already real and frightening at campuses across the country.

More at Sac State's Campus Culture, "ARTIST: LYNCHING DISPLAY ON CAMPUS WAS ART MEANT TO BRING AWARENESS TO SOCIAL JUSTICE AND RACIAL INEQUALITY."

And at the New York Daily News, "Lynching art project with live men at Sacramento State University stirs outrage."

"Hitting a little too close to home":



CNN's Brianna Keilar: Lapdog Laughingstock

Keep humping that leg, lol.

At Director Blue, "LAPDOG MEDIA COMIX: CNN's Brianna Keilar, Laughingstock Edition."

Brianna Lapdog photo 131221-brianna-keilar-cnn-laughingstock-comix2-lapdog-media_zps1a58fd92.jpg

U.S. Troops Attacked in South Sudan

At the New York Times, "Attack on U.S. Aircraft Foils Evacuation in South Sudan."

And especially at the Other McCain, who has been on this the last couple of days, "#SouthSudan 3 U.S. Troops Wounded as Rebels Fire on Transport Plane UPDATE: Four U.S. Casualties; Rebels Claim Overthrow of Oil Region Capital."




Expect updates.