But here's Frank Rich, in any case, "After the Massachusetts Massacre." It's not the most hysterically screeching rant Rich has ever penned. But he's still spinning in all the wrong directions (and blaming the banks ain't going get the administration off the hook). All danger signs point to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. As I said earlier, "Bye Bye Obama." That's the message, plain and simple. Wait 'till November. It'll be interesting to see what Frank Rich has to say at that time ...
Commentary and analysis on American politics, culture, and national identity, U.S. foreign policy and international relations, and the state of education - from a neoconservative perspective! - Keeping an eye on the communist-left so you don't have to!
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Obama Approval and Disapproval at 47 Percent...
Instead of giving some big analysis of how wrong Frank Rich is at his latest New York Times column, I'm simply going to post the link to Gallup's daily presidential tracking poll, along with Weasel Zippers' entry, "Good News: Gallup Daily Poll Has Obama Approval And Disapproval at 47%....":
But here's Frank Rich, in any case, "After the Massachusetts Massacre." It's not the most hysterically screeching rant Rich has ever penned. But he's still spinning in all the wrong directions (and blaming the banks ain't going get the administration off the hook). All danger signs point to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. As I said earlier, "Bye Bye Obama." That's the message, plain and simple. Wait 'till November. It'll be interesting to see what Frank Rich has to say at that time ...
But here's Frank Rich, in any case, "After the Massachusetts Massacre." It's not the most hysterically screeching rant Rich has ever penned. But he's still spinning in all the wrong directions (and blaming the banks ain't going get the administration off the hook). All danger signs point to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. As I said earlier, "Bye Bye Obama." That's the message, plain and simple. Wait 'till November. It'll be interesting to see what Frank Rich has to say at that time ...
Hooray! "I hope he fails." Rush you are the man.
ReplyDeleteIt strikes me that there are only two groups who matter as to their assessments of the meaning of Coakly's defeat: House Dems, who face reelection in '10, and Sen Dems, especially those who face '10 bids. It's easy for Rich to speculate from the safety of his NYT's perch. It's quite another to be in the line of fire. The question is, when the Obama yells "charge!", who will follow?
ReplyDeleteRich's relationship to reality is roughly Olbermann's relationship to civility or anti-matter's relation to matter---one annihilates the other. Axelrod is a complete mindless brain-dead hack who was refuted by Karl Rove in the Wall Street Journal last week after blaming the Scott Brown victory in MA on GWBush, for God's sake!
ReplyDeleteWhen you are morally retarded and mentally obtuse, Axelrod's and Rahm-bo's and Obama's gigantic lies and calls for class warfare actually make sense.
Luckily, most Americans have escaped liberalism [I suffered as one for two decades] and know that BIG GOVERNMENT, especially by the likes of Obama & his scurvy crew, are much more dangerous than any BIG corporations or BIG banks.