Thursday, June 10, 2010

Tina Brown Slams Women GOP Primary Winners as 'Blow to Feminism'

At Newsbusters, "Editor Tina Brown Slams Female GOP Primary Winners: These 'Wingnuts' Are a 'Blow to Feminism'" (via Memeorandum). But Cassy Fiano's on the case, "Fascist feminism strikes again: victorious conservative women are 'a blow to feminism'":

One would think that feminists would rejoice to see women victorious in political elections. But today’s feminism is not after equality; the movement has been hijacked by rabid fascist feminists. These new feminists require that, in order to be a “real” feminist, you have to walk in lock step with them, toe the fascist feminist line, and never disagree with them on a single issue. And their stance on every issue is always, of course, liberal. They want unlimited taxpayer-funded abortions available right up until the moment of birth, universal health care, universal day care, open borders, a weaker military, massive welfare systems, the government taking the place of fathers in families — basically anything you can think of to destroy western civilization.
Word.

More at
the link.

2 comments:

  1. I really love this stuff. The more finely that Leftist, feminists, et al define the requirements to be a "good", you fill in the blank, member in standing the more people they alienate.
    Radicals will always define themselves out of existence as long as others keep them talking long enough to let them do significant damage to themselves and their causes.
    They never represent themselves as they really are so it should not surprise anyone when more and more people cannot meet their definitions. One sees the example every where in comments like: "Your not Black if........" "Your not a woman if .........", et al.
    One of the reasons I love the First Amendment is because it allows these people to destroy themselves or as they say "hoist themselves on their own petard."
    This stuff is just great.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Have you ever noticed that every movement or cause that starts as a positive and/or need is eventually taken over by radicals? So much so that the very people the movement or cause was designed to help cannot meet the ever shrinking definition of what the cause or movement espouses.
    There must be a law that defines this behavior or inevitable conclusion?

    ReplyDelete