Re: U.S. won’t release bin Laden photos, president says, May 5
It is somewhat disconcerting to hear the ever-changing reports from American officials regarding the death of Osama bin Laden. First, he was killed by Navy Seals following a firefight at his compound. Later it was announced that there were no armed guards at his compound. First, one of his wives was used as a human shield and was killed in the battle. Later it was stated that she wasn’t used as a human shield but was shot in the leg. First reports from American officials were that when the Navy Seals broke into his bedroom, he picked up a gun and was shot in an exchange of fire. Later it was reported that he wasn’t armed.
Although few in the western world will shed any tears over his death or the manner in which he was killed and his body dumped into the sea, it is important that we in the West observe the rule of law. If bin Laden was not armed and was not killed “in the crossfire,” then he should have been captured and put on trial for his crimes against humanity. This practice was properly observed with Saddam Hussein and the world didn’t fall apart.
Saul D. Paton, Toronto
Commentary and analysis on American politics, culture, and national identity, U.S. foreign policy and international relations, and the state of education - from a neoconservative perspective! - Keeping an eye on the communist-left so you don't have to!
Friday, May 6, 2011
Changing Reports on Bin Laden Raid
At Toronto Star:
Wars are not won by putting your enemy on trial in a court of law.
ReplyDeleteWars are won by killing your enemies until they are either no-longer able to carry on the fight, or they up and quit.
The Islamists have been at war with the civilized world for 14 centuries.
Do I need to explain the problem any further?
-Dave