Barbara O'Brien is the Mob!

Check out this hilarious post from numbskull progressive Barbara O'Brien at Mahablog: "Clowns to the Left of Me, Jokers to the Right …" Barbara is practically hysterical in attempting to distance her own ideological commitments from the freak show communists at International ANSWER. But of course, while ANSWER is no doubt a full-time (leaching) faux-vanguard organization, the revolutionary change they spout is simply mainstream on the progressive left. Barbara can't separate her shit from the left's genocidal anti-Israel agitation, because it's all over the occupy movement. And of course this woman at the clip below, identified as a planner on the ground in New York from day one, represents the Democrat-Socialist, SEIU-ACORN-Working Families Party radical nexus. She's calling for the destruction of capitalism through revolutionary change. That's the exact same change ANSWER calls for, and that's the exact mob-style change that forms the left's historical ideology, as Ann Coulter points out in her new book, Demonic. Most of the occupiers have been too stupid to articulate their revolutionary agenda, and the media's been equally stupid in attempting to compare them to the tea parties. Coulter responds to the comparisons, saying "This Is What a Mob Looks Like":

I am not the first to note the vast differences between the Wall Street protesters and the tea partiers. To name three: The tea partiers have jobs, showers and a point.

No one knows what the Wall Street protesters want — as is typical of mobs. They say they want Obama re-elected, but claim to hate “Wall Street.” You know, the same Wall Street that gave its largest campaign donation in history to Obama, who, in turn, bailed out the banks and made Goldman Sachs the fourth branch of government.

This would be like opposing fattening, processed foods, but cheering Michael Moore — which the protesters also did this week.

But to me, the most striking difference between the tea partiers and the “Occupy Wall Street” crowd — besides the smell of patchouli — is how liberal protesters must claim their every gathering is historic and heroic.

They chant: “The world is watching!” “This is how democracy looks!” “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for!”

At the risk of acknowledging that I am, in fact, “watching,” this is most definitely not how democracy looks...

Back at Barbara O'Brien's post, she calls wistfully for some popular groundswell to pick up the sleazebaggers protesting around the country, to give the occupy movement some non-communist legitimacy: "Big nationwide marches filled with middle-class, working people could actually get the attention of politicians in Washington."

Well, yeah. Like the tea parties. Or as Ann Coulter writes:

The Tea Party name is meant in fun, inspired by an amusing rant from CNBC’s Rick Santelli in February 2009, when he called for another Tea Party in response to Obama’s plan to bail-out irresponsible mortgagers.

The tea partiers didn’t arrogantly claim to be drafting a new Declaration of Independence. They’re perfectly happy with the original.

Tea partiers didn’t block traffic, sleep on sidewalks, wear ski masks, fight with the police or urinate in public. They read the Constitution, made serious policy arguments, and petitioned the government against Obama’s unconstitutional big government policies, especially the stimulus bill and Obamacare.

Then they picked up their own trash and quietly went home. Apparently, a lot of them had to be at work in the morning.

In the two years following the movement’s inception, the Tea Party played a major role in turning Teddy Kennedy’s seat over to a Republican, making the sainted Chris Christie governor of New Jersey, and winning a gargantuan, historic Republican landslide in the 2010 elections. They are probably going to succeed in throwing out a president in next year’s election.

That’s what democracy looks like.

Exactly.

Get a clue, Barbara.