Rick Santorum Debates Gay Marriage in New Hampshire

This is pretty interesting.

See the report at New York Times, "Students Jeer Santorum on New Hampshire Blitz."

Santorum has previously made some incisive arguments in this debate --- some time last year he argued that gays had "super rights," which I thought was pretty sharp. And while in Europe there's a movement to legitimize multiple homosexual partnerships --- and gay radicals are indeed pushing for "three ways" here --- folks can easily make the case for traditional marriage without attacking the radical gay propensity for multiple partners. Same-sex marriage is simply unnatural and the institution of marriage was never designed for same-sex couples. Not only is gay marriage not a civil right, but the aggressive agitation by the radical gay movement is suppressing real rights of all Americans. Santorum simply needs to say that regular Americans support whatever lifestyles that gays choose to live, but they should not be browbeaten and harassed to redefine an institution whose essential meaning is the biological union of man and woman for the purpose of procreation and regeneration of family and society.

There's additional video at New York Times, "Santorum Has Testy Exchange on Same-Sex Marriage." And the freaks at Think Progress practically ejaculated over the debate, and they write:

To be clear, Santorum’s offensive and circuitous responses are all meant to reject the natural desire of two same-sex individuals to join in a union and enjoy the same rights as heterosexual couples.

Actually, there is no "natural desire" such as this. Homosexuality is a deviant form of sexual relations and has become a "right" only at the whip end of progressive campaigns of recrimination and terror against traditionals. These are the points that Santorum needs to raise. Hold the evidence on the radical gay push for homosexual polygamy for later.