Vile New York Times Israel Nipple Tattoo Front-Page: 'Jews = Cancer'

It really helps to have good Jewish friends. Your friends have an understanding of mainstream moral bankruptcy the subtleties of which generally escape us gentile folk.

At Atlas Shrugs, "THE CANCEROUS NEW YORK TIMES":

Front page. It's really vile -- disgusting. A tattooed (tattoos are a violation of Jewish law) Jewish star above a nipple as the image for the "Jews' genetic predisposition to cancer." Jews = cancer. They must be taking their talking points from Iran.

I would love to see the NY Times dare to run a front page article on cancerous Muslims, illustrated with a half-naked Muslima's nipple on Ramadan. Yeah, right. They like their building too much.

More, "PAMELA GELLER, WND COLUMN: THE CANCEROUS NEW YORK TIMES."



More from William Jacobson, "The New York Times, the nipple, and the Jewish star tattoo":

There’s been a lot of flak about the photo’s inclusion of the nipple—or to be more accurate, the half-aureole. But that’s hardly the only issue. Anyone who knows history knows that the tattoo is reminiscent of two things: the yellow Jewish stars the Jews were required to wear in many Nazi countries, and the more permanent marks—the tattoos—that inmates of many concentration camps were forced to endure.

That’s the limit of most of the buzz in the media about objections to the photo, which has been considerable: the sexual aspects and the Holocaust references.

But in addition to those two obvious controversies there’s a more subtle one. Because the image the woman is wearing is both a Jewish star and a tattoo, it would most likely be doubly offensive to strictly religious Jews who observe the Jewish laws about tattooing...

More at the link.