That said, the movie's too long. I don't know? What, like three hours? And then there's the normative (ethical) questions: Does this film unquestioningly glamorize massive hedonistic gluttony and a literally mean-spirited commercial sensibility? (The scene where the broker-trainee is fired from Stratton Oakmont for cleaning a fishbowl on IPO day is brutal and made me feel sorry for the f-ker.) The Los Angeles Times captures the film's controversy over ethics:
Love it or hate it, "The Wolf of Wall Street," more than seemingly any other movie in the Oscar frame, has gotten audiences up in arms and debating it all through the holidays and into the final pre-noms stretch.In any case, about those reviews which I missed. Check A.O. Scott at the New York Times, "When Greed Was Good (and Fun): DiCaprio Stars in Scorsese’s ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’"; Richard Brody at the New Yorker, "The Wild, Brilliant 'Wolf of Wall Street'"; and Betsy Sharkey at the Los Angeles Times, "Review: Scorsese, DiCaprio go hunting in 'Wolf of Wall Street'."
RELATED: At Business Week, "Jordan Belfort, the Real Wolf of Wall Street," and William D. Cohan, at the New York Times, "The Tame Truth About the Wolves of Wall Street."
No comments:
Post a Comment