Showing posts with label Exceptionalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Exceptionalism. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Young Albino Amputees from Tanzania

Well, certainly not something you see everyday.

At WSJ, "New Start in New York City for Hunted Albino Children."


Thursday, August 13, 2015

Carly Fiorina Emerges as GOP Weapon Against 'War on Women' Charge

I have to admit, I'm fascinated just listening to her talk.

At the New York Times, "Fiorina Emerges From Pack After Trump Remarks":

This week, Donald J. Trump said that listening to Carly Fiorina, the only woman competing for the Republican presidential nomination, gave him “a massive headache.”

It was music to Mrs. Fiorina’s ears.

For months, the former Hewlett-Packard executive has tried to gain traction by pointedly attacking Hillary Rodham Clinton. But Mrs. Fiorina’s candidacy did not start to sizzle until her performance at last week’s second-tier Republican debate, where viewers realized that as the sole woman in a 17-candidate primary field, she was singularly qualified to stand up to Mr. Trump.

It is not a role Mrs. Fiorina necessarily wants to emphasize. “I don’t spend very much of my campaign time talking or thinking about Donald Trump,” she said in an interview Wednesday. But it is one she has embraced with the same fervor that she has employed against Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic Party front-runner.

It is not a role Mrs. Fiorina necessarily wants to emphasize. “I don’t spend very much of my campaign time talking or thinking about Donald Trump,” she said in an interview Wednesday. But it is one she has embraced with the same fervor that she has employed against Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic Party front-runner.

“Women understood” that Mr. Trump’s attack the day after the debate on the Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, making a reference to bleeding that many people thought was an allusion to menstruation, was sexist, Mrs. Fiorina told a visibly squeamish Jake Tapper of CNN. “I’ve had lots of men imply that I was unfit for decision-making because maybe I was having my period. So I’ll say it, O.K?”

In a crowded Republican field, Mrs. Fiorina has delivered the most forceful and succinct denunciation of Mr. Trump’s comments, which sent a shudder through a party concerned that it would reinforce perceptions that it was increasingly out of touch with female voters.

Now, many Republicans, preparing to potentially confront Mrs. Clinton in a general election, are looking anew at Mrs. Fiorina, who rose from being a secretary to running the giant technology company HP, as the party’s weapon to counter the perception that it is waging a “war on women.”

“People feel Carly has clearly demonstrated she is a very powerful operator, has a lot of strengths of conviction and is willing to take Hillary — and now even Trump — on very directly,” said Katie Packer Gage, a political strategist who focuses on helping Republicans connect with women.

Asked whether she was willing to play the role of telegenic poster girl of the Republican presidential field, Mrs. Fiorina said, “I know Hillary Clinton wants to paint the entire Republican Party with the broad brush of Donald Trump’s comments, but it’s not clear to me that Donald Trump is a Republican.”
Keep reading.

It's been pointed out, on Twitter, if I remember correctly, that Fiorina's soft on Islamic jihad, that she's praised Islam as a great civilization. I vaguely remember something like that from some time ago. Recall, I didn't support her in the California Senate race in 2010. Of late, she's spoken quite forcefully on how we must destroy Islamic State, and she's criticized the administration. I'd like to hear more from her on these topics. She's a fabulous candidate.

Until then, see Tabitha Korol, at Gates of Vienna, "A Mythical, Deceptive Tale by Carly Fiorina."

Sunday, August 9, 2015

Red State Closes Comments on Erick Erickson Post Banning Donald Trump from Conservative Gathering

This is pretty interesting, especially the aggregation of comments from the Erickson post banning Trump.

 At VDare, "REDSTATE Extends Trump Repression: Freezes Comment Thread":Clearly what has happened is that the volume of negative comments had become overwhelming. Some recent posts:
• Bad move….Kelly and her partners were bent upon getting Trump. Priebus ‘n Rove will be orgasmic over it.

• Erick I am on your side usually but this is a big mistake… Megan Kelly came out with with full intent to smear a leading republican candidate, I have never seen such a disrespectful one sided attack from a debate mediator in my lifetime. Trump handled it well,..If we bow to this you can grantee that CNN, ABC, NBC, etc… pansy media will do the same to any and every candidate we put forward.

• I have lost all respect for you Erick. You are another sellout. You have also fallen into the politically correct trap. • What in the hell were you thinking, Erick? Did the establishment get to you as well? What did they pay you to turn on conservatism and “get in line”? you took a step away from we the people today and a giant leap toward being a part of the ruling class…maybe you want a seat at the table when the Washington Cartel meets next. But one thing is for sure. You made a HUGE miscalculation here.

• I’m sorry, but dis inviting Trump was a mistake. The current GOP line up are RINOs, finger to the wind types, and general compromisers. Trump is the one candidate capable of thwarting Jebs money machine and Roves manipulations without having to make a deal.

• What a sophomoric more, Eric. I’m really stunned at you. Here you have a great forum and could have ask pretty much any question -live- you might have wanted of Trump, but, no. You now fall completely in line with the GOPe and begin to demonstrate where you really stand.
Keep reading.

Carly Fiorina on 'Meet the Press'

Between the debate last Thursday, and rounds on the Sunday talk shows, Ms. Fiorina's definitely getting the kind of major media exposure that lifts a campaign. And because she's so articulate, it's no doubt she'll be getting a boost in her public approval ratings and support. The question now is how big a boost. Wouldn't that be amazing if she switched places with Donald Trump in the polls?

Watch, at CBS News, "Full interview: Carly Fiorina, August 9."

ABC News, 'This Week with George Stephanopoulos': Fallout Over Donald Trump Megyn Kelly Comments (VIDEO)

Well, Monday's the start of a fresh news week, so hopefully the political cycle will unearth something new. Meanwhile, here's the rehash on Trump's allegedly "misogynist" comments, at "This Week":



Printer Deals for Back to School

At Amazon, Back to School - Printer Deals.

Plus, due out September 1st, from by Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney, Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America.

Saturday, August 8, 2015

Donald Trump Is Different

From Stephen Hayes, at the Weekly Standard, "The Trump Goes On" (via Memeorandum):
It’s not over. And it’s likely to end badly.

In an interview on CNN last night, Donald Trump suggested that Megyn Kelly’s tough questioning was inspired by her menstrual cycle. “You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes,” Trump told CNN's Don Lemon on Friday night. “Blood coming out of her—wherever.”

He refused to apologize, of course, but after widespread condemnation, Trump, who is running on candor and straight talk, sought to explain his comments in a Tweet. “Re Megyn Kelly quote: ‘you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever’ (NOSE). Just got on w/thought.’”

It’s a comment that might end any other presidential campaign. Trump is different, in part because this isn’t a campaign. It’s an extended media-driven ego ride.

From the beginning, he’s played by different rules because the media have let him. Trump works just blocks from the headquarters of the major broadcast and cable outlets. But as he’s rolled out his Trump for President brand, he has gotten journalists to come to him. He sits for interviews in the gilded atrium of Trump Towers, a nice home field advantage and one that sets him apart from the other politicians sitting in boring studios.

Trump has conducted frequent telephone interviews on cable networks, sometimes several times a day, and last weekend did “phoners” on two Sunday morning political shows. (Has any other candidate this cycle, in either party, been given an opportunity to do a television interview by phone?) If he were asked policy questions, the arrangement would give him an unfair advantage, with the opportunity to answer questions with a cheat sheet in front of him and Google at his fingertips. But substantive questions about the country and its problems are the exceptions in Trump’s conversations with journalists, who prefer to ask him about his latest controversial comment or seek to provoke the next one by asking him about his opponents. (Trump’s comments about Kelly didn’t provoke any follow-up questions from CNN host Don Lemon, whose interview with Trump continued for several more minutes). So the cycle continues: Trump says something outrageous that may or may not have any relevance to serving as president, he’s asked about it in a largely substance-free interview, and ratings climb—along with Trump’s name ID and poll ratings.

Trump is right, sadly, when he boasts that he is partly responsible for the 24 million viewers who tuned into the debate Thursday night. He has convinced himself that people watch because they love him and in a limited sense, he’s probably right about that, too. While I suspect that the Trump hype is driven by curiosity more than admiration, there is no doubt some segment of the population that is properly understood now as “Trump supporters.” That segment is small and will be shrinking in the coming weeks, but it won’t disappear.

The true Trump apologists are way too far in now. They've invested too much to bail on him. So his defenders will become increasingly desperate to convince people that this is all part of the establishment's failure to understand their anger and the media's failure to appreciate Trump’s appeal.

That’s backwards. It's not that the media haven’t failed to give Trump enough credit; we’ve given his supporters too much...
Keep reading.

The problem for Hayes is that he's clearly invested in a Republican victory in 2012. That's okay if you want to practice partisan journalism, and who doesn't nowadays? But from the perspective of the political system and democratic governance, it might not turn out bad at all.

Some folks seem to forget that the reason for the primaries is to foster robust competition between competing ideas. There's no law that says a candidate has to be an establishment politician. The horror for the GOP is that should Trump indeed run an independent presidential campaign, he'll no doubt siphon votes from the Republican ticket.

The ready comparison is to Ross Perot in 1992. The problem with that comparison is that Perot screwed up royally dropping out of the race during the Democrat Party convention, which was in June. Perot said the Dems had taken up all his positions and he was satisfied things like deficit reduction would be tackled within the party system. Big mistake. The astronomical grassroots anger at the beltway establishment was off the charts. The 1991 recession was grinding people down and defense downsizing was creating a nightmare for thousands upon thousands of people losing their jobs. Three-quarters of Americans thought the country was on the wrong track.

Perot ended up taking over 19 percent of the vote in November after he'd reentered the race in September of that year and participated in the presidential debates. Had he not exited in June, thereby alienating untold numbers of supporters, who once jilted weren't going back, Perot could have easily doubled his vote totals and won the presidency with a plurality of the vote. As it is Bill Clinton only won 43 percent. Jigger some of the numbers around, reducing the Democrat and Republican share of the electorate, and boom! Hey, stranger things have happened in American politics.

Sure, it's a long-shot scenario, and the concatenation of circumstances that propelled Perot that year might be completely irrelevant to what's happening today. What's not in doubt is that Trump is tapping into some kind of huge groundswell of discontent, especially on the immigration issue. Normally rock-ribbed conservatives are mounting vociferous defenses of Trump because they feel he's genuinely fighting for the issues they believe in. What's more, this purported incestuous relationship Trump has with the media only helps air those issues conservatives care about, propelling debates about illegal immigration, for example, to substantive levels not seen for years, if not decades. That's a good thing for American politics. Trump is right when he says the media types wouldn't even be talking about securing the border if it wasn't for him.

So what's really likely to happen? Well, for one thing we're going to have an extremely interesting campaign. And it's going to be a much more substantive campaign with Trump's presence, despite the attacks on the casino mogul as ill-informed and out only for himself. If the public starts getting bored with him we'll know soon enough. Lord knows there's no shortage of public opinion polls. And that's also good. We'll see Trump's popularly fade and other candidates will rise to the top. But those candidates will ignore the issues Trump's championed at their peril. I seriously doubt a pro-amnesty candidate will have much of a chance by the time Iowa and New Hampshire come around. And of course more and more voters will start to coalesce around a candidate that looks to combine conservative bona fides with the best chance of defeating Hillary Clinton. But it's going to be a sad day in conservative America if primary voters cluster around the mean of some Mitt Romney-esque candidate, because we've been down the "electabilty" road before. What we need is a movement candidate. We need another Reagan. We need to get someone who fosters the passions of the people and exudes America's exceptionalism. People will to rally to someone who looks most likely to restore America's promise, and America's standing in the world.

Who will it be? Scott Walker and Ted Cruz come to mind, but we'll see. Maybe Marco Rubio. He's learned his lesson on the Gang of Eight. Maybe Mike Huckabee. Maybe John Kasich. Maybe Carly Fiorina will somehow continue her phenomenal rise and do well in the 2016 primaries.

Either way, the system will work its will, and Donald Trump will either generate enough popular support to have a shot at the presidency, or he'll fall by the wayside. All the gnashing and thrashing we're seeing now demonstrates just how important Trump's moment is to American politics. Yes, Trump's different. He's also extremely consequential. Let's see how it plays out. It should be up to the voters to decide if he's not up to speed.

Wednesday, August 5, 2015

What's the Right Way to Teach Civics?

Just teach it, for crying out loud. But teach it a lot. Make it a central part of universal education, not just something that comes up in the 8th and 11th grades. And teach it well. I've had students change majors to political science after taking my class. It doesn't happen a lot, but if you connect and make history and politics come alive, it will happen.

In any case, see Vauhini Vara, at the New Yorker.

Thursday, July 9, 2015

Praying That America Stays Different

Here's Aussie Nick Adams, for Prager University.



Saturday, July 4, 2015

Don't Remove History's Lessons

From Selena Zito, at the Pittsburgh Tribune:


It's not hard to imagine how life was conducted in 1776 as you stand where 56 men signed a document severing them from Great Britain.

River rock remains the bumpy surface for the grid of streets between old buildings that grandly stand more than 200 years after serving as the seat of defiance, rebellion and, yes, treason.

Today, kids on field trips bounce between tourists eager to connect with and understand the past. They all walk through the interconnecting yards of structures where history was made — the Declaration of Independence was signed here, the cracked Liberty Bell lay in state there, the old City Tavern still serves mugs of stout and Ben Franklin lies in his final resting place.

When we look back from the distance of time, it all seems so regal, so uncluttered from today's political battles raging on social media or among panels of partisans on cable news.

Nothing could be further from the truth; so much divisional politics existed in 1776 that it makes us look like amateurs.

All the past divisions we forget should serve as a warning to never look at history through the ego of the moment you live in; it distorts history's realities.

Historians often caution that to declare you live in the worst of times is to not know history at all.

We run a dangerous risk when we hide parts of the fabric of who we were just because it makes us uncomfortable. We can't learn from our mistakes if we take objects off the shelf that offend us in a Gettysburg gift shop, at Wal-Mart or online at Amazon.

Doing so does our Republic damage, with its hasty perception of political correctness. History is not politically correct — not in 1861, not in 1961, not today; it is messy and it is hateful but it is the chronicle of our progression.

Understanding history means understanding mistakes, even atrocities, and shows us why we shouldn't repeat them...
Still more.

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Heavily Armed New Yorkers Hunker Down as Manhunt for Escaped Killers Nears Second Week — #2A

Heh, leftists just can't stand when regular citizens empower themselves against unpredictable criminal eventualities.

I mean, what's idiot Shannon Watts got to say about this mild-mannered guy, Ken Snyder, with a loaded rifle in the laundry room, lol?

At the Wall Street Journal, "As Manhunt for Escaped Killers Nears Second Week, Upstate N.Y. Residents Adjust to Siege Mentality":

CADYVILLE, N.Y.— Ken Snyder refused to waste a perfect sunny afternoon and spent it reseeding his lawn, despite a manhunt under way behind his home in this rural corner of upstate New York.

It wasn’t a typical day of yardwork for the 70-year-old retiree.

On Thursday, as helicopters buzzed overhead and a small army of heavily armed police lined a nearby country road, Mr. Snyder was ready if the two convicted murderers who escaped from a state prison emerged from the woods backing up to his property.

Inside his garage were two phones should he need to call for help. In his laundry room, on the washer and dryer, was a loaded rifle with extra ammunition. Upstairs in the bedroom: another rifle.

Mr. Snyder, who reckons the escapees are likely far from the prison by now, said he is less anxious than his wife, who suggested using chairs to barricade the doors they never used to lock.

“People just want to be back to normal,” he said.

As an intensive search for Richard Matt, 48 years old, and David Sweat, 34, nears its second week, some residents in the area surrounding the Clinton Correctional Facility expressed increasing weariness with what has seemed at times to be a siege mentality in the bucolic countryside surrounding the prison in Dannemora, N.Y.

“People are on such a heightened alert that if there’s just the simplest thing out of the norm, especially in that area right now, they’re calling it in and we’re following up,” Andrew Wylie, the Clinton County district attorney, said in an interview Friday.

Residents and business owners in Pennsylvania’s Monroe County, in the Poconos resort area, know how it feels to live in the middle of a manhunt.

The rural county was the epicenter of a seven-week search for Eric Frein , a local resident accused of shooting two state troopers—one fatally—before fleeing into the woods last September.

“It was abnormal, but we went along with our day-to-day,” said Barrett Township Supervisor John Seese. “If they had an area that was closed off, you just didn’t go there that day.”

Ray Cawolsky, who owns a deli in nearby Mountainhead, said he best remembers two contrasting sounds from that manhunt: the quiet of a stifled tourist season and the roar of search helicopters.

“It was a lot of helicopters flying over 24 hours a day, armored vehicles running up and down the road,” Mr. Cawolsky said. “We had state police for customers, but we lost all our tourists. Everyone was afraid to come here.”

Fall is a busy season for Poconos business owners, who cater to tourists visiting to hike, leaf peep or hunt. But outdoor activity was severely restricted during the search, and the hunting season was canceled altogether.

In upstate New York, it remains unclear how the efforts to find Mr. Matt and Mr. Sweat will pan out. It may mean a short-term boon for area hotels and restaurants and may boost overtime pay for law-enforcement officers involved, but it also could strain government budgets.

For now, many locals said they are adapting to the immediate threat. They are locking their doors and windows while some, like Mr. Snyder, have been getting their guns ready...
Yep, regular Americans "getting their guns ready." There's nothing the left hates more than proud, independent, self-sufficient citizens looking out for their own.

Keep reading.

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Dick Cheney Ramping Up New Policy Push

I mentioned the new book coming out previously, Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America.

I'm looking forward to it.

Meanwhile, at the Wall Street Journal, "Former vice president to release book and mount lobbying campaign that is likely to play into 2016 presidential election":
CASPER, Wyo.—Few people noticed the 74-year-old in the tan Stetson at a high-school rodeo here. Dick Cheney was happy to blend in.

That is about to change. The former vice president is looking to make a splash on the national stage with a new book to be published in September and a group he and his daughter Liz launched to advance their views.

The effort is sure to play directly into the 2016 presidential debate, in which national-security policy is already a point of difference between the Republican candidates, many of whom are looking to turn the page on George W. Bush’s administration.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal at the Central Wyoming Fairgrounds, Mr. Cheney previewed some of his likely positions:

• He characterized one leading GOP contender, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, as an isolationist. “He knows I think of him as an isolationist, and it offends him deeply,” Mr. Cheney said. “But it’s true.”

• An early critic of nuclear talks with Iran, he thinks the U.S. should be prepared to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities. He also favors additional arms shipments to U.S. allies in Eastern Europe and further military exercises in Poland to send a signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
• And he scoffed at the debate that tripped up Mr. Bush’s brother, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, over whether or not he would have invaded Iraq with the virtue of hindsight. (Mr. Bush, after some back and forth, eventually said he wouldn’t). Mr. Cheney instead said Republicans should scrutinize the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq under President Barack Obama.

Mr. Cheney’s overarching message, and the theme of the book he is co-authoring with his daughter Liz Cheney, is that the U.S. needs to assert itself more on the world stage. “We thought, looking forward to 2016, it was very important to make sure those issues were front and center in the campaign,” he said.

By weighing in, Mr. Cheney is bound to make himself a flash point in the 2016 debate, stoking further questions about which policies of the George W. Bush administration Republicans embrace and which they reject, from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to the bulk collection of phone records and interrogation policy. That could prove particularly uncomfortable for Jeb Bush, who has struggled to define himself apart from his brother.

Mr. Cheney already exerts quiet influence over his party, making semiregular trips to the Capitol to address House Republicans and advising some GOP White House hopefuls. He wouldn’t discuss those conversations. Two of his top foreign-policy aides have signed on with Jeb Bush. And he is headlining donor events all over the country for the Republican National Committee.

“The party is very fortunate to have an active and engaged Dick Cheney for this upcoming political cycle,” said Reince Priebus, the party’s chairman, noting the number of candidates and elected officials who turn to the former vice president for advice. “He’s a top fundraising draw, in high demand.”

Holly Shulman, a spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee, said “there’s no one happier about Dick Cheney becoming a foreign policy surrogate than we are…If he needs any assistance getting out his message, our team would be happy to help book him for interviews.”
Keep reading.

Thursday, April 9, 2015

Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America

I love the title of Dick and Liz Cheney's forthcoming book, being published by Threshold Editions.

Here's the press release, "THRESHOLD EDITIONS TO PUBLISH NEW BOOK BY FORMER VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY AND LIZ CHENEY."

And at Amazon, Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America.

Heh, the epic title of a neocon manifesto. Leftist heads are going to explode.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

The Science Is Settled: Yes, Leftists Are Less Patriotic

Heh.

From Rich Lowry, at National Review (with the headline above snagged from Instapundit), "Yes, Liberals Are Less Patriotic."

Monday, January 5, 2015