Sunday, May 3, 2009

California's Big Government Laboratory

George Will irks me sometimes, especially on foreign policy, but he nails it today with his essay on California as the laboratory of big-government liberalism, "No More California Dreaming."

Note in particular Will's comments on Proposition 1A, the May 19 ballot measure that proposes $16 billion in new taxes in exchange for the promise of "spending caps" in future budget years:
Proposition 1A would create a complicated - hence probably porous - spending cap and a rainy-day fund. Realists, however, do not trust the Legislature to obey the law, which may be why some public employees unions cynically support 1A ....

If voters pass 1A's hypothetical restraint on government spending, their reward will be two extra years (another $16 billion) of actual income, sales and vehicle tax increases. The increases were supposed to be for just two years. Voters are being warned that if they reject the propositions, there might have to be $14 billion in spending cuts. (Note the $15 billion number four paragraphs above.) Even teachers might be laid off. California teachers - the nation's highest-paid, with salaries about 25 percent above the national average - are emblematic of the grip that government employees unions have on the state, where 57 percent of government workers are unionized (the national average is 37 percent).

Flinching from serious budget cutting and from confronting public employees unions, some Californians focus on process questions. They devise candidate-selection rules designed to diminish the role of parties, thereby supposedly making more likely the election of "moderates" amenable to even more tax increases.

But what actually ails California is centrist evasions. The state's crisis has been caused by "moderation," understood as splitting the difference between extreme liberalism and hyperliberalism, a "reasonableness" that merely moderates the speed at which the ever-expanding public sector suffocates the private sector.

California has become liberalism's laboratory, in which the case for fiscal conservatism is being confirmed. The state is a slow learner and hence will remain a drag on the nation's economy. But it will be a net benefit to the nation if the federal government and other state governments profit from California's negative example, which Californians can make more vividly instructive by voting down the propositions on May 19.

3 comments:

  1. I think he's right here. I'm not voting for these, as I'm skeptical of our propositions in general. The recent solar energy defeat was good news, as it set up unclear goals that would have given LADWP too much power, pardon the pun.

    We have our problems in California, and they are unique to us because no other state, has the issues we have. Maybe it's us who should secede, not Texas!

    One rule, if anyone cheers this, is that you do not get any of our entertainment. Well, you can get it, but you are gonna have to pay double. Or steal it off the internets. But that would be wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Our friends on the left have often said, as California goes, so goes the nation, eventually.

    So, if y'all succeed in the People's republic of California, the rest of us can look forward to the imposition of your socialist reforms. If you fail, maybe the rest of us will learn from it and not make the same mistakes.

    ReplyDelete