Wednesday, September 8, 2010

The Debate Over Religious 'Intolerance'

I've placed "intolerance" in quotation marks. And that's because poll after poll has found that Americans are not intolerant toward Muslims. The Koran burnings are sponsored by the Westboro Baptists, the same folks who protest military funerals. They don't speak for me, and I can't think of any mainstream conservative that aligns with them. What's happening, as always, it the controversial actions of the few become fodder for attacks on the legitimate opposition of the many. This is SOP with the radical left and their allied MFM contingents. It's messed up, but that's the kind of information stream we're dealing with these days. The New York Times is on the case, by the way. See, "Concern Is Voiced Over Religious Intolerance." And as usual, as Tom Maguire points out, the reporters buried the lede:
They did not take a stand on whether to support the proposed mosque and community center near ground zero in Manhattan, saying, “Persons of conscience have taken different positions on the wisdom of the location of this project, even if the legal right to build on the site appears to be unassailable.”

1 comment:

  1. Religious intolerance? Now I wonder which religion has a marked tendency to display intolerance? French Muslims are irritated by the recent series of anti-Islamisation demonstrations organised by Christine Tasin and have therefore issued a Facebook fatwa calling for her to be subject to the Islamic punishment for blasphemy (i.e. beheading). She's received two death threats in 24 hours. 'Religion of peace'? Pah! http://durotrigan.blogspot.com/2010/09/christine-tasin-receives-facebook-fatwa.html

    ReplyDelete