Showing posts with label Rand Paul. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rand Paul. Show all posts

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Senators Graham and McCain Are the Real Threat

At RCP, "Ingraham Slams McCain, Graham: Chavez Would Have Supported Drones."


"It’s you and Senator McCain. That’s the threat we face. We keep having these squishy, moderate Republicans telling us what we need to do, and meaning ‘Stand down: don’t defend that Constitution,'" nationally syndicated radio show host Laura Ingraham said today.

“Hugo Chavez would have been for the drone program.” Ingraham said, “He took out people, he took out lots of people… [N]ow we want to give that authority to the President of the United States on our soil? I don’t think so!”
PREVIOUSLY: "Rand Paul's Political Genius."

Rand Paul's Political Genius

Here's Charles Krauthammer's comments from the Fox News All Star panel:


Also, from Ross Kaminsky, at the American Spectator, "A Political Earthquake":
Senator Paul’s filibuster was dramatic and historic. Indeed, while CSPAN2 is normally less interesting than a 3 AM half-hour long infomercial for Facelift in a Flash, not once from the time I started hearing Senator Paul, before 10 AM here in the Rocky Mountains, through at least 10 hours later as I write this note, did I consider changing the channel.

To give you a sense of Paul’s intensity and seriousness, he gave every one of the following remarks within a five-minute span just after 7:35 PM Eastern Time:
* Can the president have the power to decide when the Bill of Rights applies?
Someone in the media should ask the president…“Do you plan on killing Americans who are not in combat…people he might be accusing of some kind of crime but who are not actually engaged in combat?” It should be an easy question.
* We’ll take a telegram. We’ll even take a tweet…if they let us know that they acknowledge that their power is not unlimited.
* If you have a war that has no end, if you have a war that has no geographic limit, and then if you have strikes that have no constitutional bounds, basically what you have is an unlimited imperial presidency.
* But even under George Bush, nobody ever maintained they could kill Americans at home. I can’t imagine that the president, when he comes forward and says that he hasn’t killed Americans yet and he doesn’t intend to do it, but he might, that somehow we’re supposed to be placated by that.
* The president who ran for office and said we’re not going to tap phones without a warrant, the president who ran for office and said we’re not going to torture people now says we’re going to kill people with no due process. I find that incredibly hypocritical and incredibly ironic.
I repeat: that was in one five-minute span.
Continue reading.

Yesterday was a big day for Senate Republicans, and I mean the New Guard Senate Republicans. The Old Guard? Not so much.

More coming up shortly.

And also at Memeorandum.


Sunday, February 17, 2013

Friday, February 15, 2013

Rand Paul Is the Republican to Watch in 2013

I've been thinking as much this last week. I like Rand, and if his recent turn on foreign policy is a longer-term indication, this is someone I could support in 2016.

From Josh Kraushaar, at National Journal:

One of the most intriguing sideplots from Senate Republicans’ successful filibuster blocking Chuck Hagel from becoming Defense Secretary was that one of the GOP ringleaders was recently tagged by critics as someone who shared his more-isolationist worldview.

But freshman Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who openly talks about his presidential ambitions for 2016, is playing the long game – and his politically savvy positioning suggests he’ll be a major national player. Unlike his father, he’s not interested in pursuing ideologically charged issues just for the sake of making a point, he’s learning how to make an impact in Washington.

One senior Republican leadership aide gushed with admiration over the freshman senator, emphasizing that he’s been able to tailor his libertarian ideology toward legislation that holds broader appeal. The adviser touted his involvement on right-to-work legislation, his call to audit the Federal Reserve, and even his leadership on legalizing industrial hemp – legislation first pushed by his father, which has now won support from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

“Rand is somebody who has the generational know-how to turn it into 21st century machine. He gets branding. He understands there’s a need for credibility,” said the adviser. “He understands he doesn’t have the answers to everything. He’s not afraid of input, but is totally confident in listening to input to help achieve his goals.”

One of the areas where he’s taken a lot of feedback is on foreign policy, which critics have tagged as being synonymous with his father’s controversial views. But in a sign that he’s looking beyond just his next re-election, Paul made a high-profile trip to Israel, gave a foreign policy speech to the Heritage Foundation designed to smooth over the rough edges of his foreign policy worldview, and joined most of his Republican colleagues in blocking Hagel. He reached out to Israel supporters, framing his distaste for overseas interventions as one that would prevent the U.S. from putting undue pressure on Israel, getting a jibe at President Obama in the process.
More at that top link. Rand made that Heritage speech the day before I flew out to North Carolina and I've been meaning to watch on video. I might do that today some time and update with my thoughts. His emerging support for Israel is the clincher for me. His tea party background is already phenomenally appealing. More later.

Meanwhile, see Robert Stacy McCain for more, "Ron Paul Supporters Slam Rand After Republicans Block Hagel Nomination."