Saturday, December 5, 2009

New York Times Shills for Climate Change Industry

The New York Times puts yet another nail in its coffin, "That Climate Change E-Mail":

The theft of thousands of private e-mail messages and files from computer servers at a leading British climate research center has been a political windfall for skeptics who claim the documents prove that mainstream scientists have conspired to overstate the case for human influence on climate change.

They are using the e-mail to blast the Obama administration’s climate policies. And they clearly hope that the e-mail will undermine negotiations for a new climate change treaty that begin in Copenhagen this week.

No one should be misled by all the noise. The e-mail messages represent years’ worth of exchanges among prominent American and British climatologists. Some are mean-spirited, others intemperate. But they don’t change the underlying scientific facts about climate change.
Right.

Folks should read this long piece at Climate Depot, "
Climategate Professor to Skeptic on Live BBC TV: ‘What an Assh*le’." (Via.)

The fallout for the climate hucksters is so bad that it's doubtful "science" itself can recovery. See Mark Steyn, "
The ‘science’ of global warming: These leaked documents reveal the greatest scientific scandal of our times—and a tragedy."

Image Credit: Voting Female Speaks!, "
Climategate bigger than Watergate; Al Gore’s Credibility is Permanently Destroyed."

Non-Profit Group to Launch 'Gang Tours' in Los Angeles

I suppose it shouldn't be a surprise. When inner-city poverty and unemployment often triple the national averages, you gotta go with your one robust export: gangland violence.

It turns out that a non-profit organization, L.A. Gang Tours, will charge $65 per person for two-hour tours in South Central L.A. See the Los Angeles Times, "
Giving Tourists a Look at Gang Culture":

A group of civic activists, united by faith and a belief that the poor economy in the interior of Los Angeles is a social injustice, is preparing to offer bus tours of some of the grittiest pockets of the city, including decayed public housing, sites of deadly shootouts and streets ravaged by racial unrest.

After a VIP preview last weekend, L.A. Gang Tours expects to open to the public in January, giving tourists a look at the cradle of the nation's gang culture -- the birthplace of many of the city's gangs, including Crips and Bloods, Florencia 13 and 18th Street.

"This is ground zero for a lot of the bad in this city. It could be ground zero for a lot of the good too," said Alfred Lomas, a former Florencia member who has become a leading gang intervention worker in South Los Angeles and is spearheading the tours. "This is true community empowerment."

The nonprofit group plans to offer two-hour tours at an initial cost of $65 per adult, with profits funneled back into the community through jobs, "franchised" tours in new areas and micro-loans to inner-city entrepreneurs. Early routes will focus largely on South L.A., with forays through Watts and Florence-Firestone.

The concept appears to have no equal in L.A. -- for good reason, some might argue. It seems to echo, more than anything, the "slum tours" of such sites as India's Dharavi township and Rio de Janeiro's favelas. Those operations have been lauded as innovative economic tools and mechanisms for humanizing poverty -- and also attacked as exploitative and voyeuristic.

The L.A. tour comes after months of planning, and is offered in a spirit of education and public service. Lomas, who will lead tours at first, plans to talk about important chapters in the development of the city's core, such as how racist housing restrictions shaped ethnic enclaves and the formation of gangs.

Other aspects may raise eyebrows. Selling shirts painted on the spot by a graffiti "tagger" is one thing. But one backer said he also hopes to stage dance-offs between locals; tourists would pick a winner and fork over a cash prize. It wasn't long ago that organizers decided against a plan to have kids shoot tourists with water pistols, followed by the sale of T-shirts that read: "I Got Shot in South-Central."

"It's going to be fascinating -- but really controversial," said Francisco Ortega, a field staffer with the Los Angeles Human Relations Commission and a respected mediator and neighborhood advisor in South L.A. Ortega said there could be great value in "sensitizing people, connecting them to the reality of what's on the ground."

"But the other side is that it could come across like a zoo or something," Ortega said. "You're being carted about: 'Look at that cholo over there!' It could be perceived as demeaning for the people who are living in these conditions. I don't know how they're going to manage those perceptions."
More at the link.

Plus, see the photos "
Promise and Peril in South L.A."

RELATED: L.A. Weekly, "War and Peace in Watts: A Gang Treaty Implodes and the Killing Resumes."

Photo Credit: "
Two Young Crips," on Flickr.

Protesters Rally Against 9/11 Terror Trials in New York

I have a deep attachment for our friends in New York, protesting the Obama administration's decision for terror trials in the civilian courts. There's lot of reporting on today's protest. See Fox News, "Hundreds Protest Terror Trials in New York." And the New Jersey Star-Ledger, "Group of 9/11 Families Hold Rally to Protest Manhattan Terror Trial."

But the photos are from the blogs. The first couple of shots are from Gathering of Eagles NY, "
911 Families Rally Against Trials in New York." And below are pics from Urban Infidel, "KSM Trials Protest New York City." See also, Atlas Shrugs, "9/11 Families, Patriots, Americans Rally Against NYC Terror Trials." (Plus, "Speaker List 9/11 Never Forget Coalition Dec 5 Rally, Noon, Rain or Shine," via Memeorandum.)

See also, Debra Burlingame's essay, "We must rise up against the trial: It's time for 9/11 families to fight Holder's dangerous move":

The attorney general has suggested that those who oppose prosecuting these men here in New York City are afraid - that we somehow don't have the courage to face Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in court.

How dare this man, who didn't have the decency to notify victims' families of his decision to bring these monsters here, imply that we lack courage. Courage is carrying on after watching your loved ones die, in real time, knowing that they burned to death, were crushed to death, or jumped from 100 flights high. Courage is carrying on, even as we waited, in some cases years, for something of our loved ones to bury. More than 1,100 families still wait.

How dare the attorney general suggest that the firefighters who oppose this trial need to "man up" and let this avowed enemy of America mock their brother firefighters in the country's most magisterial setting, a federal court.

Let me refresh the attorney general on the meaning of courage. Courage was going into those buildings that day, knowing they might not come out alive. Courage was digging for nine months on hands and knees, breathing in toxic smoke, to find the ravaged remains of brother firefighters, police officers, citizen responders and office workers. This courage was not summoned from false bravado; it sprang from an abiding love of their fellow human beings and a sense of obligation to them, their families and their beloved country.
And Kejda Gjermani, "The True Administration of Justice is the Firmest Pillar of Good Government."

Tea Party America's Christmas Wish List: 'Kiss My Astroturf' - STOP Health-Care Take-Over, and More!!

Following up on my post from last night, I first want to thank those who've linked: The Astute Bloggers, Doug Ross, Nice Deb, Pat in Shreveport, and Voting Female Speaks! (I'll update with additional links as they come in --- ADDED: Reaganite Republican and Lonely Conservative.)

Okay, thinking about it now, it turns out I've saved the best for last. The pics are in chronological order, but some of my favorites below are the "Kiss My Astroturf" sign, and "HELP WANTED: HARD-WORKING AMERICAN CZAR," the "X-MAS WISH-LIST," and "FREE-MARKETS NOT FREE-LOADERS."

Plus, it turns out that TEA PARTY: The Documentary Film premiered in Washington, D.C., December 2nd. My good friend
Robert Stacy McCain attended the event, and published his thoughts at American Spectator, "Can You Hear Us Now?" (and, Be John Galt has the film's trailer, "'Liberty’s March Has A New Generation Of Patriots'.")

Also, I need to post a sincere apology here to Roger Ogden,
Meetup Organizer of the San Diego Tea Party. Roger is NOT a LaRouchie, and I wrongly inferred at my report last night. And that's Roger's street map of the Irvine Hilton and MacArthur Boulevard. That said, I don't take back my comments about Roger's Obama/Nazi signs, but free speech is a good thing, and we can disagree about that. A BIG THANKS to Roger and his work in organizing the San Diego tea parties.

In any case, I'll update later, so folks can drop any links in the comments and I'll add those ...

UPDATE: Linked at AUP 2, "A Tea Partyer's CHRISTMAS Wishlist and MUCH More!"

'Patriots Against Pelosi' -- Hundreds Protest House Speaker at Orange County Tea Party!

Well, good thing I'm not on deadline! But it's worth the wait!

As promised, here's my report on today's anti-PelosiCare protest at the Irvine Hilton/Orange County Airport. The background information is at my earlier entry, "
Orange County Tea Party Patriots to Protest Nancy Pelosi at Democrats' 15th Annual Harry S. Truman Awards Dinner!"

Okay, here's the scene along MacArthur Boulevard when I arrived a little after 4:00pm. Just a few tea partiers are lined up along the east side of the street, and I'm facing north. That first sign on the right captures the spirit of the day:

You can see the geography of the tea party at the protest map event organizers sent me. Early in the evening, the main protest is taking place at the little red-lined elbow at left -- at the intersection of MacArthur and Douglas. Later on, some of the more intense demonstrations took place at the driveway entrance to the hotel parking lot, just left of the service entrance marked below. Lots of police units were on hand:

I walked over by the hotel driveway and Planned Parenthood activists were setting up. I'll have more on these folks below. Just hidden behind the folks with the "Health Care Reform Now" sign is Pauline Merry, the former provost of the Pacific Coast Campus at my school, Long Beach City College. Pauline retired in 2007. She asked me, "What are you doing here"? I pointed back over to MacArthur and said, "I'm with the tea partiers." And she looked at me and said, "You're with them? Why?" And I told her: "I'm not happy with the Democrats." She said, well you're in political science, right? That explains it." Actually, President Hussein "Infanticide" Obama and his PelosiCare monstrosity explain it, but I said my farewells, in any case:

That's Pauline here, holding that "Stupak Never!" sign:

Okay, back over at the tea party section. I said hello to these two lovely activists. They were boasting awesome signs, reversible for added impact:

I stopped to say hello to a tea party mom:

Here's the scene walking back over to MacArthur Boulevard. A few more people were setting up:

Some long-time readers might recall this gentleman, who also hoisted a big-flag protest sign at the Adam Schiff town hall in August:

A couple of more lovelies, featuring the AARP sign on the left (the American Association of Repulsive Politics).

Walking back over to the intersection, more lovelies, even more excited to have their picture taken. Notice that sign on the left: "Obama-Care CAIR" -- for the unindicted terrorist co-conspirator, the Council on American-Islamic Relations:

This is my old friend Michael Fell. I saw him again for the first time in years at the Westwood 9-12 Tea Party West in September:

You can see the crowd's filling out by now. I counted 200 people before sundown:

Walking back over to the driveway, I had to post the obligatory SEIU open-borders demonstration picture:

A purple-shirt janitor amigo is here -- JUSTICIA!:


Here's our big-flag patriot speaking with the Planned Parenthood activists. My good friend Megan Barth suggested I get a picture -- too good to pass up, you know? -- of this PREGNANT PRO-ABORTION ACTIVIST protesting the Stupak amendment. Something just doesn't compute there, you think?:

Checking back with the tea partiers, I had to chase this guy down the sidewalk to get a picture. He was cruising up and down with that bullhorn. My bet is this guy's a LaRouchie (the other side of his sign was an Obama-Nazi poster, not my favorite). He didn't seem to be with the grassroots folks I've been highlighting, and there were more extreme-o types on the south side of Douglas street, including some 9/11 truthers. I didn't take any more photos of them:

At the video, provided by W.C. Varones, you can hear the big chanting along the front driveway when protesters started getting really fired up:

Although the protest was in high gear, I was cruising around to see if I could find Nancy Pelosi inside the hotel. I heard mixed reports on her arrival, and never did see her pull up. Here's the scene in the hotel bar/lobby area. Everyone had to check in to receive nametags, so it's not like I could snake into the main hall to take pictures:

I'm borrowing this shot below from the Orange County Register's report, "House speaker Pelosi attracts fans and foes." Be sure to check out the huge photo-slideshow at the article:

Walking out to my car (which was up MacArthur past the next hotel), I saw one more sign:

Home safe and sound, my wife took a picture of yours truly:

I actually have more pictures. Look for a follow-up post sometime tomorrow.

**********

UPDATE: The Astute Blogger links, "PELOSI WELCOMED BY TEA PARTIERS IN CALIFORNIA."

Also, linked at Doug Ross, Nice Deb, and Pat in Shreveport.

ADDED: Also, Reaganite Republican and Lonely Conservative.

**********

UPDATE II: My follow up entry is here, "Tea Party America's Christmas Wish List: 'Kiss My Astroturf' - STOP Health-Care Take-Over, and More!!" And that includes an apology to Robert Ogden, the Meetup Organizer of the San Diego Tea Party.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Orange County Tea Party Patriots to Protest Nancy Pelosi at Democrats' 15th Annual Harry S. Truman Awards Dinner!

Orange County conservatives are planning a big anti-Pelosi protest late this afternoon in Irvine. You can see the Democratic Party's announcement here:

Megan Barth, my very good friend (and conservative activist par excellence), has an announcement on the action at Red County, "Nancy Pelosi, Key Note Speaker for Harry S. Truman Awards Dinner and Fundraiser":
San Fran Nan is the Key Note speaker this evening, in Orange County, for the Harry S. Truman awards dinner and fundraiser. According to OCDemocrats.org, the awards will be honoring the following people ...
Check Megan's post notes the roster of Democratic luminaries, and then this:
Needless to say, RedCounty.com did not sponsor a table or buy a ticket, but if I was a betting woman, which I am, I sense that the Tea Party Patriots may be brewing some tea this evening on MacArthur Blvd. I know I have my boots shined and ready...
I'll be heading down there in a few minutes. Looking forward to joining the local conservative cowboys, and helping them rope in a little ornery excitement!

Tune in here tonight for the report!

Carly 'Golden Parachute' Fiorina Makes Pitch for Campaign Contributions

Just got this finance pitch in my inbox, from Carly Fiorina's campaign:

Not interested, of course. Recall Michelle Malkin's earlier entry, "Carly Fiorina channels Dede Scozzafava, wields race/gender card against conservative rival."

Don't give this woman money, obviously. Not only is she RINO,
she doesn't need the cash:
Fiorina’s personal wealth means that she can fight Boxer dollar for dollar in a state where money (and the television ads it buys) is absolutely critical.
Recall Ms. Fiorina's golden parachute from Hewlett-Packard in 2005, "Carly may get $42 million: Severance of $21.4M excludes another $21M in options, restricted stock and pension."

Fiorina's payout was a troubling issue during John McCain's campaign last year, "
McCain Economic Adviser Carly Fiorina's Golden Parachute" (and for Sarah Palin too, who spoke the McCain party line about reforming Wall Street).

Check out
Chuck Devore's home page instead. This guy's a conservative!

Danish Sex Workers to Comp Copenhagen Delegates!

Maybe THIS is why Al Gore cancelled. Gotta keep up with the Tiger Woods' of the world, dontcha know. From Der Spiegel, "Prostitutes Offer Free Climate Summit Sex":

Copenhagen Mayor Ritt Bjerregaard sent postcards to city hotels warning summit guests not to patronize Danish sex workers during the upcoming conference. Now, the prostitutes have struck back, offering free sex to anyone who produces one of the warnings.

Copenhagen's city council in conjunction with Lord Mayor Ritt Bjerregaard sent postcards out to 160 Copenhagen hotels urging COP15 guests and delegates to 'Be sustainable - don't buy sex'.

"Dear hotel owner, we would like to urge you not to arrange contacts between hotel guests and prostitutes," the approach to hotels says.

Now, Copenhagen prostitutes are up in arms, saying that the council has no business meddling in their affairs. They have now offered free sex to anyone who can produce one of the offending postcards and their COP15 identity card, according to the Web site
avisen.dk.

And courtesy of Watts Up With That, "Seems easy enough to find":

See also, Fox News, "Danish Prostitutes Offer Free Sex to Climate Conference Delegates, " and Discover, "Another 'Climate Trick' Controversy: Copenhagen Prostitutes Giving Freebies."

Photo Credit: Der Spiegel.

Climate Fail

From the Politico, "Have the Greens Failed?":



On May 3, 2007, League of Conservation Voters President Gene Karpinski realized that the plan was working.

That morning, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), then a presidential contender, attached his name to a model piece of climate legislation that sought to bring U.S. carbon emissions down by an ambitious 80 percent by 2050. Not to be outdone, a few hours later, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) hastily announced she’d support the same bill.

And with that, climate issues seemed — at long last — to have departed the realm of idealism and entered the more fruitful arena of politics, with its results-driven rules of engagement. Environmentalists would no longer have to appeal to politicians’ best instincts by promising they’d be saving future generations and doing the right thing for the globe. Instead, climate activists could draft more-persuasive allies of the electoral variety: fear, ambition and self-preservation.

“It really became a competition. That was the beauty of it,” recalled Karpinski. “This became an issue where they were competing to see who was the best.”

Yet as green activists converge on the 15th United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, their sense of disappointment is palpable, even with the eleventh-hour decision by President Obama to attend the summit on Dec. 9. What was seen in the heady days of 2007 and 2008 as the likeliest venue for a new international agreement on carbon emissions now caps a year of mixed results. While the American political system has, in many ways, seen a total transformation in its capacity and willingness to tackle such a transcendent issue, some of the traditional obstacles remain — primarily the age-old laws of partisan politics and the limits on how much ambitious legislation Congress can absorb at one time.
More at the link.

See also, James Delingpole, "Climategate goes uber-viral, Gore flees leaving evil henchmen to defend crumbling citadel."


Image Credit: The People's Cube, "Obama: Shovel-Ready on Lenin's Birthday / Earth Day."

Home for the Holidays: Obamas Will Spend Christmas, New Year's in Hawaii

Via WyBlog, and from Honolulu's Star-Bulletin, "Obamas will spend holidays in Hawaii":

Hawaii's home-grown president, Barack Obama, is expected back in Honolulu on Dec. 23, according to sources in Washington.

The president and his family are expected to stay until Jan. 2, meaning he will celebrate both Christmas and New Year's in the islands.

In the past, Obama made a point of celebrating Christmas with his grandmother Madelyn Payne Dunham. The woman who raised Obama when his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was working and studying in Indonesia, died last November.
See also, the Honolulu Advertiser, "Obama expected to visit Hawaii for family holiday vacation."

Image Credit:
Blogs for Victory.

Demjanjuk Trial Could Be Germany's Last Major Nazi War Crimes Tribunal

This is worth sharing with readers. From today's Los Angeles Times, "Why is Germany Putting John Demjanjuk on Trial?":

"The Nazi war crimes case is seen as a chance for Germany to right a moral wrong, before the 89-year-old Demjanjuk and other suspects die."

*****

Demjanjuk is accused of helping kill 27,900 Jews at Sobibor from March through September 1943, when he allegedly worked there as a guard.

What some observers described as an absurd piece of courtroom drama -- which was adjourned Wednesday for three weeks -- constitutes what could be the last major Nazi war crimes trial in Germany.

As Haas and five other witnesses whose relatives were killed in Sobibor testified, it was impossible to know whether Demjanjuk, who remained impassive and shut-eyed throughout, was even listening.

Doctors vouch for his mental and physical health, saying that though he is frail -- he suffers from a bone marrow illness and a heart murmur -- he is fit to stand trial. The defense argues that he is very sick, with less than a year to live.

Detractors have accused Ukraine-born Demjanjuk of putting on an act. They point to video of him getting in and out of a car with relative ease and to witnesses who saw him gardening at his home in Cleveland, before his deportation to Stadelheim Prison in Munich after a 30-year effort to bring him to justice.

"Listen, seeing him there in court he belonged to Hollywood, not Sobibor, so great was the act he put on," said Efraim Zuroff, head of the Jerusalem office of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which lists Demjanjuk as its most-wanted war suspect.
Recall the photos from April, just before Demjanjuk was extradited:

"In this two-photo combination, John Demjanjuk is seen on April 6, 2009, getting into a car outside a medical building in Parma, Ohio, top. In lower photo he is taken on a wheelchair from his home in Seven Hills, Ohio, by immigration agents on April 14, 2009. Federal prosecutors submitted videos of Demjanjuk to an appeals court that show the alleged Nazi death camp guard walking and talking animatedly."

The Times' piece continues:

The complexity of trying one of the last suspected World War II criminals has been further underlined by the experience of Israel, which in the 1980s convicted Demjanjuk of crimes against humanity for allegedly being the guard known as Ivan the Terrible at the Treblinka death camp. Israel was forced to release him in 1993 after the Supreme Court overturned his death sentence because of reasonable doubt.

Germany might be forced into a similarly embarrassing back-down. None of the current witnesses can make a positive identification of Demjanjuk. Of the two survivors involved, neither remembers seeing him. The main evidence is some paperwork and an SS identity card, which states that he worked in Sobibor.

So why is Germany putting Demjanjuk on trial? The main reason is that the case is being seen as one of the last chances to right a moral wrong, before Demjanjuk and other suspects die.

Apart from the Nuremberg trials that followed the war, few Nazis have been tried in Germany, despite tens of thousands of investigations. Much of the pressure for Germany to host the trial, despite the fact that Demjanjuk is not a German citizen, was brought to bear by the United States.

The U.S. Office for Special Investigations has sought to persuade the native countries of some of the hundreds of elderly Nazi war crime suspects who sought refuge in the United States to put them on trial.

Those nations, most in Eastern Europe, have largely refused on grounds that the costs are high and the responsibility not theirs, but Germany has accepted it as a moral duty of the country that carried out the Holocaust.

Other suspects whose U.S. citizenship was revoked after court rulings that they had lied about their Nazi pasts will be watching the Demjanjuk proceedings carefully, knowing that its outcome could determine their fate.

Here's Demjanjuk in 1983, "Demjanjuk hearing his death sentence on April 25, 1988 in Jerusalem, Israel":

Crooks and Liars' Disgusting Moral Equivalence

William Jacobson wrote the post I thought of writing (that I should have written), and he does it better in any case, "Comparing Obama To Brezhnev."

It's a response to Crooks and Liars' disgusting moral equivalence on President Obama's Afghan surge, "
And Thirty Years Ago This Month Somebody Else Had A Great Idea About Afghanistan":

Sometimes I just shake my head at this kind of relativism and America-hatred, but it's so routine on the radical left that conservatives have a duty to rebut each and every instance of it. This non-thinking nihilism sinks into young impressionable minds, and sometimes the damage can never really be undone.

But here's
William's analysis:

The Crooks and Liars' blogger asserts that the Soviets thought the invasion was "what the Afghan people wanted." But in fact the Soviet invasion had nothing to do with any real concern for what the Afghan people wanted, just as the invasions of Hungary and Czechoslovakia were not out of concern for what those peoples wanted. A good discussion of the Soviet Afghan invasion is here.

There is no legitimate comparison between the Soviet attempt to prop up the Communist military government it had installed in Afghanistan, and the U.S. response to the 9/11 attacks. By removing the repressive Taliban regime and its al-Qaeda elements, the U.S. responded to a direct attack and the likelihood of future attacks. A restoration of Taliban rule would be a direct threat to the U.S., not to mention a blow to the Afghan people.

There are legitimate criticisms of Obama's strategy and speech to be made. But snide comparisons of Obama's decision on troop levels to Brezhnev's decision to invade also are not legitimate.

But then again, perhaps that blogger would prefer an Afghanistan which served again as a base for worldwide terrorism and attacks on the U.S. at home and abroad. Although it would be harder to write snark about that.
Actually, yes, these bloggers would prefer a U.S. defeat in Afghanistan, because for them, we're no better than the old Soviet Union, which was the "Evil Empire," in President Reagan's unequivocal, immemorial words.

Sarah Palin on Barack Obama's Presidential Eligibility

From Sarah Palin's Facebook statement:

Voters have every right to ask candidates for information if they so choose. I’ve pointed out that it was seemingly fair game during the 2008 election for many on the left to badger my doctor and lawyer for proof that Trig is in fact my child. Conspiracy-minded reporters and voters had a right to ask... which they have repeatedly. But at no point – not during the campaign, and not during recent interviews – have I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States.
Sister Toldjah offers an interpretation, "Why did you have to go there, Sarah?":

Sarah Palin is right in that this is a “legitimate issue” to raise – but because the left crucifies her for every statement she makes and how her statements get magnified to the nth degree by the left’s associates in the mainstream media (as is happening now), a better way for her to have put it is that it is a legitimate issue for others to pursue, but that she’s “not interested in doing so and instead desires to remain focused on the things he’s doing as President that are destroying America’s fundamental ideals.” In fact, she said as much in her follow-up statement to her remarks, but of course follow-up statements look like “clean-up” after the fact, and no one but loyal supporters will care. Handling it in this manner would have put her “above the fray” and given the left less to no ammo, while at the same time, she would still be holding true to her correct standard that the issue is “fair game.”
And that's the thing: The fact is that President Obama's presidential eligibility remains a major constitutional question, mainly because he's never been completely open and forthcoming about the official documentation of his birth.

Nice Deb has a little roundup. It's not just extremist birthers who're asking questions. See, "
Sarah Palin On Rusty Humphries Show: “Birth Certificate Fair Game”."

As always, the question is Barack Obama's deceit. See, Andrew McCarthy, "
Suborned in the U.S.A.: The birth-certificate controversy is about Obama’s honesty, not where he was born."

UPDATE: Chris Wysocki links, "How to dispel the birthers once and for all."

White House Stonewalls Gatecrasher Probe (VIDEO)

From the Politico, "White House to Desiree Rogers Critics: Back Off":

If White House social secretary Desiree Rogers survives this week's withering attacks over her role in last week's state dinner security breach, she'll have gotten by with a lot of help from her friends in the West Wing.

As a House committee opened hearings Thursday on how two uninvited partygoers were able to enter the White House grounds and shake hands with President Barack Obama, top presidential aides delivered a clear message to critics of this favored staffer: Back off.

In a White House not known for its tolerance of staffing errors, Rogers has been the beneficiary of an unprecedented show of support from senior administration officials. A former corporate executive from Chicago, Rogers has known the Obamas for more than a decade and seems blessed with a status that may shield her from the fate of departing White House counsel Greg Craig or Louis Caldera, the Military Office head who was canned for a botched Air Force One photo op.

Rogers's office started taking heat last week after it was reported that the White House did not station staff members at the security checkpoint to help the Secret Service screen guests at the state dinner for Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, as has been customary in previous administrations. When the House Homeland Security Committee invited Rogers to testify about how Tareq and Michaele Salahi managed to reach Obama unimpeded, the White House declined to make Rogers available and said its internal report on the incident would suffice.

"We think we've answered the questions fully," senior adviser Valerie Jarrett, a close friend of Rogers from Chicago, said on ABC News on Thursday. "We think it's important to have a balance and have the White House staff able to have confidential conversations with the president and his team without appearing before Congress."

For the second day in a row, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters that the administration had no intention of making Rogers available for lawmakers' questions, brushing off the charge by Rep Peter King (R-N.Y.), the Homeland Security committee’s ranking member, that the administration was "stonewalling" the congressional probe.

"There's, I think, a pretty long history of ensuring that White House staff can provide advice to the president and do so confidentially," Gibbs said.

Acknowledging that White House staff members have testified at congressional hearings before, Gibbs said the current probe should not require a level of cooperation reminiscent of investigations into the Watergate and Whitewater scandals or the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

"I don't think even Peter King would have the audacity to, in some way, put the Salahis in the trifecta of Watergate, 9/11 or some of the financial dealings," Gibbs said. "If that's the case, then maybe I have been here and just haven't quite seen it all."
Listen to Rep. King on GMA this morning above. He's especially pissed with Robert Gibbs' righteous insouciance.

See also, Memeorandum.

Plus, Jennifer Rubin, "Privileged, Indeed":

This is all quite at odds with the Democrats’ past eight years of foot-stomping and insistence that the Bush White House had to provide advisers (real ones, who advised on more than menus and guest lists) for testimony. (”Speaker Pelosi and Chairman Conyers must feel particularly double-crossed because they were the principal sponsors of a lawsuit filed in an effort to compel testimony and documents from Ms. Miers, Mr. Rove, and others concerning the U.S. attorney controversy.”)

Congress may be inclined to let this slide. But they do so at their institutional peril. The Obami are apparently serious, and Congress, unless it wants to set some new precedent, should be wary about letting the White House get away with a stunt like this. “We don’t want to embarrass our Chicago friend” simply isn’t a good enough reason to stiff Congress.
Also, Big Dog, "Obama Invokes Executive Privilege; Where Is The Outraged Left?"

RELATED: Hot Air, "White House invokes separation of powers to block testimony of … social secretary."