Saturday, November 2, 2013

GOP Gives Health Law Stumbling Room

Republicans need to let this play out for awhile.

The law's not working and Democrat lies are finally getting the sunshine they so richly deserve.

At the Wall Street Journal, "Republicans Give Health Law Room to Stumble: New Tack Is a Departure From More Confrontational Approach Still Favored by Some in Party":
WASHINGTON—Many House Republicans are replacing their push to delay or defund the 2010 federal health law with a new strategy: Hang back and see if problems with the rollout continue or get worse.

It is an abrupt reversal of the activist approach of just weeks ago, when Republicans demanded changes to the law in exchange for funding the government or raising the nation's borrowing limit. Now, they say putting the spotlight on technical flaws of the law's health-insurance exchange may be more effective than a direct attack.

"It's its own worst enemy, and to some degree it is collapsing under its own weight," said Rep. Michael Burgess (R., Texas), who sits on the committee that pressed Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Wednesday to explain what is going wrong.
Give 'em enough rope.

More at the link.



KMET Mighty Met Mighty Weekend on The Sound 100.3 FM

If you're an L.A. native, and a baby-boomer, then this weekend's rollback to the 1970s KMET radio at The Sound L.A. is right up your alley.

I'm listening right now.



The Ballad of John and Yoko - The Beatles 2:36 PM

Lunatic Fringe - Red Rider 2:31 PM

Peace of Mind - Boston 2:26 PM

Take Me To The Pilot - Elton John 2:22 PM

King of Pain - The Police 2:10 PM

Spirit In the Night - Bruce Springsteen 2:05 PM

Lovin', Touchin' Squeezin' - Journey 2:00 PM

Who Are You - WHO 1:54 PM

Dancin' Fool - Frank Zappa 1:50 PM

In the Mood - Robert Plant 1:36 PM

DON'T FEAR THE REAPER - B.O.C. 1:31 PM

Bungle In the Jungle - Jethro Tull 1:27 PM

Unchained -  Van Halen 1:23 PM

Midnight Rambler - The Rolling Stones 1:08 PM

Rhiannon - Fleetwood Mac 1:04 PM

Back In Black - AC/DC 1 PM

Jim Ladd's on tonight at 5:00pm. I used to love that guy!

Obama Lied — White House Aides Debated President's Pledge to Americans: 'You Can Keep Your Plan'

The president lied to the American people. It wasn't a "talking point." It wasn't a "political lie" to get something passed. It wasn't "posturing." Obama made bald-faced lies, multiple times, telling citizens they could keep their healthcare plans if they liked them. And that they could keep their doctors. He lied. Again and again. "Period." You can keep your plan. "Period."

What part of "period" don't leftists understand? Leftists like this far-left Obama-shill Bill Scher at Bloggingheads, via Althouse, "'Bill Scher does not accept that it was a lie to say "if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it'."

The president's a disgusting pig and socialist scumbag liar. The Wall Street Journal documents it, mercilessly, "Aides Debated Obama Health-Care Coverage Promise: Behind the Scenes, White House Officials Worried About Insurance Pledge":

 photo BYAQEZECIAAwF7Ojpg-large_zpse0d068a0.jpeg

As President Barack Obama pushed for a new federal health law in 2009, he made a simple pledge: If you like your insurance plan, you can keep your plan. But behind the scenes, White House officials discussed whether that was a promise they could keep.

When the question arose, Mr. Obama’s advisers decided that the assertion was fair, interviews with more than a dozen people involved in crafting and explaining the president’s health-care plan show.

But at times, there was second-guessing. At one point, aides discussed whether Mr. Obama might use more in-depth discussions, such as media interviews, to explain the nuances of the succinct line in his stump speeches, a former aide said. Officials worried, though, that delving into details such as the small number of people who might lose insurance could be confusing and would clutter the president’s message.

“You try to talk about health care in broad, intelligible points that cut through, and you inevitably lose some accuracy when you do that,” the former official said.

The former official added that in the midst of a hard-fought political debate “if you like your plan, you can probably keep it” isn’t a salable point.

The breadth of Mr. Obama’s statement proved to be a miscalculation. Mr. Obama repeated the claim, with only occasional caveats, through this week, when a flurry of cancellation notices from insurers to customers around the country prompted him to recalibrate. The resulting furor has energized Republican opposition to the plan, which only a few weeks ago had fallen flat as a result of the party’s failed attempt to link it to government spending and debt deadlines.

“With 20/20 hindsight, maybe this should have been parsed more carefully,” said Jim Margolis, a media adviser to Mr. Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012, said of Mr. Obama’s broad promise. But, he added, “The president’s statement seems fair.”

At the time the law was being written, Mr. Obama was trying to make the case for the health-care overhaul in understandable terms, and in an environment in which Republicans were casting it as a “big government” takeover of the health system. Mr. Obama’s aides were focused on telling people that disruption would be minimal and benefits from the law substantial.

Aides said that because insurers could continue offering plans, even those deemed to be substandard, if they were in existence at the time the law passed, Mr. Obama’s statement that “you can keep your plan” was solid.

“We thought we could fulfill the promise with this grandfathering clause,” said Ezekiel Emanuel, vice provost at the University of Pennsylvania and a former White House health-care adviser.

The health law aims to eliminate certain low-premium policies that the administration said provide skimpy coverage and could leave people with high out-of-pocket costs. While it allows insurers to continue covering longtime customers with policies that were in existence as of March 2010, many insurers are canceling such plans because they would die out, anyway, in the absence of new customers.

About 5% of the U.S. population, or about 15.4 million people, are covered under individual health plans, and many of them—as many as 10 million—are expected to have their health plans terminated by their insurers by year-end, industry experts have said. These customers account for many of those now receiving cancellation notices; Mr. Obama says they will be able to buy better coverage on the new federal insurance exchange.

One former senior administration official said that as the law was being crafted by the White House and lawmakers, some White House policy advisers objected to the breadth of Mr. Obama’s “keep your plan” promise. They were overruled by political aides, the former official said. The White House said it was unaware of the objections.

Mr. Obama began offering broad assurances as he campaigned for president in 2008, before the Affordable Care Act was written or many of the details decided. In a presidential debate with Republican nominee John McCain, Mr. Obama said that “if you’ve got health care already…you can keep your plan.”

Before then, Hillary Clinton was making similar promises about her proposed health-care overhaul. As she campaigned for president in 2007, Mrs. Clinton said, “Here’s how my plan works: If you already have private insurance, and you’re happy with it, nothing changes. You keep that insurance.”

Mr. Obama adopted similar language during the campaign and continued to use it in the White House as he pitched Congress and the American people on his health-care legislation.

Jon Favreau, who served as Mr. Obama’s top speech writer, said that as they tried to promote the overhaul plan and explain it to the public, the aim was to make it as simple as possible “while still being true.”

“Simplification and ease of explanation were a premium, and that was true throughout the process,” he said.

Richard Kirsch, the former national campaign manager of Health Care for America Now, which pushed for the 2010 health law, said the words were reassuring—and true—for the vast majority of the people, and so his group never raised concerns about that claim. Adding an asterisk to note that people who had “shoddy insurance” might need to change plans was not practical, he said.

“The actual, accurate statement is if you have good insurance, and you like it, you can keep it,” said Mr. Kirsch, now a senior fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, a liberal policy organization.

The fact that insurers are cancelling policies covering some people has become central to the Republican argument against the Affordable Care Act, adding to the administration’s problems as it struggles to fix a malfunctioning website.

Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, seized upon Mr. Obama’s words, writing in an email Friday to supporters, “Here’s the truth: Barack Obama knowingly and repeatedly lied to Americans.”
Like the idiot Bill Scher at Bloggingheads, leftists just keep piling on lie after lie to further deceive the public about their dishonest healthcare program. Here's top Obama-Democrat Robert Axelrod at the article:
David Axelrod, a senior White House adviser during the health-care fight, said there was no intention to mislead.

“The great misfortune here is that the website debacle occurred at the same time as this issue arising,” he said. “Because, if the website hadn’t gone down, then lots of these people would be going online and figuring out, ‘Hey I’m getting a better insurance policy, and I’ll have to pay less money for it.’ But they can’t, because the website is down.

“It’s a perfect storm that has created an opportunity for those who oppose the plan.”
That's bullshit. People are not finding cheaper policies on the website. They're finding inferior cookie-cutter policies with higher premiums and higher deductibles. This fact is why the new Democrat meme is that Americans were being sold "shoddy plans" on the individual market. But the policies weren't "shoddy." These were healthcare policies that millions of Americans researched, compared, evaluated and then purchased --- because they liked them.

These are plans like the one purchased by Kathleen Crowley, a woman booted from her health policy due to ObamaCare, covered in James Taranto's column yesterday, "President Obama's #ObamaCare Lie":
My health-care policy was cancelled, and the Obama administration's explanation that policies are being cancelled because they were "substandard" and issued by "bad apple" insurers is absolutely not true. I had a very comprehensive policy, with a large and solid national health insurer, and the reasons my policy was not "ACA compliant" is because I now have to pay for maternity coverage, general pediatric coverage and pediatric dental coverage, as prescribed by ObamaCare. I'm 55 years old, have no children and don't plan to have children. Clearly, I am beyond childbearing age, and without children. Why would I have to purchase pediatric dental insurance? Or general pediatric care?

ObamaCare is forcing people to purchase a product that they don't want and can't ever use. I do not need maternity or pediatric services but have to purchase them. The new policy that would have been "comparable" to my current policy is more expensive with higher deductibles.

The president's comment of "shop around" is so smug. I sat on hold with an insurer while "shopping around" yesterday for over 20 minutes and finally gave up because I had work to do. I'll now have to factor quite a bit of time into my day to "shop around" since this president's dictates have resulted in my loss of health insurance I liked very much, and the market is now flooded with other people "shopping around."
What the insurance debacle reveals is the ultimate failure of progressivism. Leftists pride themselves on superior knowledge and noble intentions. But when that knowledge and those intentions are tested in the real consumer marketplace they come up wanting, badly. It's one big fail after another, and don't forget that the country was warned about this from day one: "It won't work." We were warned, over and over, from congressional Republicans, from free-market think tanks, down to the thousands of tea party patriots protesting throughout 2009.

And things are not going to get better. The administration's not keeping its promises to have the website fully functioning by November 1st. Just this week Secretary Sebelius further soiled herself as a national laughingstock with her claims during congressional testimony that Healthcare.gov "didn't crash." Yet at the very second she uttered those words, House Republicans couldn't logon to the system and the error message was played on the overhead during the hearings, "the system is down at the moment."

Sebelius Testimony photo Sebelius-website-screen-620x461_zpsf54d90b1.jpg

It's all lies.

From Obama to Axelrod to Sebelius to this idiot Bloggingheads ghoul Bill Scher. It's all lies.

The country has been sold a bill of healthcare goods. And our healthcare system is being systematically dismantled and destroyed. This is no accident. It's like the generals in Vietnam who claimed that "we had to destroy the village in order to save it." Democrats had to destroy American healthcare in order to fundamentally transform it. And they knew that they were f-king the average Joe up the ass. So they lied. The president lied. Congressional Democrats lied. Stephanie Cutter lied. Leftist media shills lied. We've been lied to.

It's time to stop with the lies.

Tell Congress and the president to stop lying. Tell them that they're going pay for their lies. They will pay for it with their political hide, and if criminal negligence is found, they'll pay in a court of law and hopefully with time in a penitentiary. These are monumental lies that bring disgrace to representative government. There's going to be a reckoning. The 2014 elections are one year from now. Each national election is billed as the most important in American history. The 2012 presidential election filled the bill, and conservatives lost. They can't make that mistake again if they hope to salvage whatever decency and free will is left in this country. People need to rise up and say this is f-king enough.

President Obama's #ObamaCare Lie

The president's a f-king liar.

Everyone knows it --- or at least now they do, after the health care debacle is no longer a theoretical possibility, but an abomination now really, truly destroying the American marketplace.

James Taranto has the latest on this cluster-k, "When Fraud Is Legal" (at Memeorandum):
Under socialism, there's no such thing as consumer protection.
Obama Liar photo WilshireFederalBuilding027-1_zpsb95548bf.jpg
d

Halloween Skate Jam

The 2013 Burnside skatepark Halloween jam in Portland, Oregon.



Can #ObamaCare Fiasco Save the GOP?

From Jonathan Tobin, at Commentary:
With each passing day since the president’s signature health care legislation was launched it’s now obvious that the administration has lost control of the story. At first it was just a matter of a dysfunctional website. Then it became one in which the incompetence of the Department of Heath and Human Services was compounded by the arrogance of Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the denials of the White House. But once it became apparent that President Obama had been lying for the last three years when he repeatedly promised that Americans would be able to keep their insurance if they liked it rather than being forced onto the ObamaCare exchanges, a tipping point was reached. That more details are leaking out every day that reinforces the negative impression of ObamaCare is adding to the administration’s problems.

So it’s little surprise that the New York Times led its front page with a story about how Democrats are “feeling anxious” about the future tied to the ObamaCare boondoggle. While some in the party are claiming, as Senator Chuck Schumer did, that the anger at the Tea Party over the shutdown will be more of a “long-term” liability for the GOP, most Democrats know better. The ObamaCare disaster not only changed the political narrative that worked so well for them. It goes straight to the heart of an underlying liberal weakness: the belief that big government is not only incompetent but also a threat to the wellbeing and the pocketbooks of ordinary Americans.
Well, the rollout debacle's not going to "save" the GOP. It's debatable whether Republicans needing saving. ObamaCare's just the tip of the iceberg of Democrat policy failures. It's just this time Democrats and the Democrat-enabling media can't fool the public with their Orwellian totalitarianism. Republicans need to play their cards right. I expect they'll hold the house next November, but they can't get cocky and they need to offer a popular alternative to the law. Still, it's been a staggering turnaround of fortunes this last few weeks, and it's got the leftists tied up in knots as reality bites down hard.

More at that top link.

'Websites for Dummies'

Boy, that would've been delectable.

At the Blaze, "Tennessee State Senator Presents Kathleen Sebelius With Really Embarrassing 'Gift' – and She Doesn't Look Very Happy About It..."

And at Twitchy, "Ouch! Tenn. state senator presents Kathleen Sebelius with book that might come in handy [pic]."

Sebelius photo BYBJE9rIcAAdxEkjpg-large_zpsdc1c4b4d.jpeg

Senate Democrats Supported #ObamaCare Regs That Destroyed Individual Insurance Market

Oh boy.

And this was on CNN no less.

At Legal Insurrection, "Senate Dems killed (Obamacare) grandfather (fix)":
They own all of our Obamacare problems, completely.

CNN reports, Senate Democrats supported rule that led to insurance cancellations:
Senate Democrats voted unanimously three years ago to support the Obamacare rule that is largely responsible for some of the health insurance cancellation letters that are going out.

In September 2010, Senate Republicans brought a resolution to the floor to block implementation of the grandfather rule, warning that it would result in canceled policies and violate President Barack Obama’s promise that people could keep their insurance if they liked it.

“The District of Columbia is an island surrounded by reality. Only in the District of Columbia could you get away with telling the people if you like what you have you can keep it, and then pass regulations six months later that do just the opposite and figure that people are going to ignore it. But common sense is eventually going to prevail in this town and common sense is going to have to prevail on this piece of legislation as well,” Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley said at the time.

“The administration’s own regulations prove this is not the case. Under the grandfathering regulation, according to the White House’s own economic impact analysis, as many as 69 percent of businesses will lose their grandfathered status by 2013 and be forced to buy government-approved plans,” the Iowa Republican said.

On a party line vote, Democrats killed the resolution, which could come back to haunt vulnerable Democrats up for re-election this year.

Bwahaha!! Hilarious New Yorker Covers Slams #ObamaCare Rollout Debacle

Love the Motorola DynaTAC cell phone (Zack Morris).

At Twitchy, "‘Obama sporting Zack Morris’ cellphone’: New Yorker ‘reboot’ cover nails O-care launch [pic]." And a NewsBusters, "New Yorker Mag Cover Slams Obama and Sebelius."

Also, from Reliapundit, "IF YOU'VE LOST THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, THEN..."

 photo 58da87a7-3136-44c8-8cd2-a91e5042360c_zps9e04b730.jpg

Friday, November 1, 2013

Deadly Rampage Creates Chaos at #LAX

At LAT, "Chaos follows LAX shooting."



More at NYT, "Security Agent Is Killed at Los Angeles Airport."

Over 93 Millions Americans Could Lose Employer-Based Health Coverage as #ObamaCare Non-Compliant

At National Review, "Roy: Experts Knew Obama’s Promise ‘Was a Lie’":


Avik Roy sat down with Megyn Kelly to share his latest piece over at Forbes that found that more than half of employer-based health-care plans will be deemed illegal next year because they will no longer be Obamacare compliant. This signals the latest blow to President Obama’s controversial promise that people could keep their health-care plans, which Roy said experts knew wasn’t true to begin with.

“Everyone in the health-policy community left, right, or center knew this was a lie,” he said on Fox News on Thursday night. Unfortunately, at the time, critics of the law could only offer theoretical arguments, not real-world examples.

“The difference now is that people are getting cancellation notices — journalists can go and interview the people getting the cancellation notices,” he said.

Make the F-kers Eat It: Supreme Court Called #ObamaCare Mandate a Tax; GOP Should Make Democrats Own It

From Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman, at USA Today, "Dems may have to admit Obamacare tax increase" (via Instapundit):
Remember, in 2009, the president emphatically denied to George Stephanopoulos that the Affordable Care Act imposed a tax increase. Yet, after the Supreme Court decision, going into the 2012 election, the White House again seemed to deny that the mandate was a tax, notwithstanding the administration’s argument to the Court.

Now, as the price for delaying the implementation of the court-created tax penalty, Republicans should demand truth in labeling. The Democrats in Congress must now admit they have imposed a tax on young and healthy Americans to get them to take the bad deal that is Obamacare. And any suspension of this tax must be scored by the Congressional Budget Office so the public knows the size of the tax increase that will be imposed on the American people when the delay ends and the tax kicks in. No longer will congressional supporters of the ACA be able to evade political responsibility.

On the other hand, if the Democrats insist that the penalty is not a tax, then they will be admitting that it is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s decision. If Congress contradicts what the administration told the Supreme Court, a new challenge can be brought under the precedent of NFIB v. Sebelius. The president, and those who supported this law, should now be forced to bear the political consequences of their legislative and litigation legerdemain. If Obamacare can only legally live by the tax, then its supporters in Congress must politically die by the tax.
RTWT.

Gunman Kills TSA Officer at Los Angeles International Airport #LAX

At the Wall Street Journal, "TSA Worker Killed in LAX Shooting; Suspect in Custody: FAA Curtails Planes Following Incident."

And at the Los Angeles Times, "LAX shooting: Gunman left anti-government note, targeted TSA."



I'll have more on this.

Meanwhile, follow Dana Loesch Dana Loesch for the latest developments on the Piers Morgan gun control angle.

Morgan Stanley Bearish on Holiday Shopping Season

I don't know.

Seems like things are actually picking up lately. Besides, didn't Morgan Stanley get an Obama bail out after the 2008 crash? Moral hazard and all that. Who's can trust 'em?

Well, as Kathleen Sebelius would say, "whatever."

At LAT, "Holiday-season retail sales look bleak, Morgan Stanley predicts":
Count on coal this Christmas.

That's what researchers at Morgan Stanley are saying in the first major forecast of a decidedly dour holiday season. Retailers hoping for a respite from a year of so-so shopping can instead expect the worst Thanksgiving-to-Christmas sales since 2008, the financial services firm said Thursday.

Five years ago, the industry was free-falling into recession. This year, a new collection of worrisome economic conditions looms as stores gear up for a period that can sometimes account for 40% of annual revenue.

Shopper confidence is low. The recent federal government stalemate and shutdown was a damper. The window for holiday shopping is six days shorter than it was last year.

At the same time, consumer spending, which makes up more than two-thirds of economic activity, is actually getting a boost. Gasoline prices are lower, and net worth is rising because of higher real estate values and a stock market upswing, Morgan Stanley said in a report.

But instead of shoveling extra money into gifts, many Americans are plowing it into big-ticket items such as cars, appliances and home improvement goods.

The report anticipates that during the fourth quarter, retailers will see a scant 1.7% increase in sales at stores open at least a year. Such same-store sales are an important indicator because they eliminate the effect of opening and closing outlets during the previous 12 months.

Strip out struggling J.C. Penney Co., which researchers predict will roll out deep discounts early in the season, and projected sales growth slips to 1.6%.

That's less than half of last year's 3.5% expansion, according to Morgan Stanley...
Nah. It's gonna be fine.

Indeed, the piece continues, "the National Retail Federation said it expected holiday sales to rise 3.9% to $602.1 billion." That's what I'm talking about!

Ethnic Studies Programs Crash and Burn at Cal State University

Hey, it was good while it lasted, right?

At LAT, "Cal State's ethnic studies programs falter in changing times":
In the 1960s, California college campuses were hotbeds of civil rights and free speech activity, where student protests resulted in the nation's first ethnic studies programs at San Francisco State and UC Berkeley, among others.

Ethnic studies became a sought-after major and a safe setting in which to examine the influence of the state's diverse population of Latinos, African Americans, whites and Asians, among others.

In recent years, however, some of those programs have been cut back, particularly in the California State University system. Today, students — and faculty — are once again protesting: this time to save ethnic studies majors.

At such campuses as San Jose, Stanislaus, Bakersfield, Long Beach and elsewhere, professors aren't being replaced, classes are being reduced and majors could be eliminated or subsumed into other liberal arts programs. The moves have reignited old debates — and wounds —- about Cal State's commitment to social and cultural diversity.

Educators and others say that as campuses look to trim costs, ethnic studies programs are bearing the brunt and could be seen as irrelevant.

Administrators counter that many programs are not attracting enough students to fill classes.

The programs also face stiff competition as students of all ethnicities focus more on obtaining degrees with immediate job prospects.

"A discipline like ethnic studies lays itself wide open to the critiques of what the hell do you do with this, can you run a corporation or fly a plane with this?," said Ron Scapp, president of the National Assn. for Ethnic Studies, which is conducting a national survey on the status of such programs.

But Scapp and others said that debates over immigration, the election of the country's first black president and the aftermath of the shooting death of black teenager Trayvon Martin by a white man show the nation is still grappling with issues of race and cultural diversity. Ethnic studies programs, he said, offer a forum to tackle these topics.

The initial intent of the programs was to increase the numbers of students and professors of color and expand historical perspectives, including those of Native Americans, women, gays and lesbians.

But it was also divisive, with some critics arguing that the disciplines lacked academic rigor. In 2010, Arizona banned school districts from offering ethnic studies programs determined to be radical or fostering racial resentment.

A recent move to reduce the status of the Africana Studies Department at Cal State Long Beach led the state Assembly to adopt a resolution urging that it and other such programs be maintained. Cal State Chancellor Timothy White put the changes on hold until the campus finds a permanent replacement for former President F. King Alexander...
Oh the humanities!

Hey, speaking of the humanities, it's hard times all around. At the New York Times, "As Interest Fades in the Humanities, Colleges Worry."

Suddenly, Obama Loves Mitt Romney as He Walks Back His Keep-Your-Health-Plan Promise

A smashing editorial at the Wall Street Journal, "A President Manqué":
Voters may recall Mr. Romney as the Republican candidate the Obama campaign said was responsible for the death of a Missouri steelworker's wife, among many other White House inventions. But on Wednesday Mr. Obama cited Mr. Romney as a political model who did "the right thing on health care" and built "this template of proven, bipartisan success."

Mr. Romney responded more rapidly than his Presidential campaign usually did and issued a statement saying that "a plan crafted to fit the unique circumstances of a single state should not be grafted onto the entire country" and disavowing the "frustrating embarrassment" of ObamaCare.

The Boston trip is classic example of the Obama political method and why his Presidency is floundering only a year into his second term. Amid a crisis of government execution and policy design, Mr. Obama doesn't address the flaws or take responsibility.

Instead he hits the campaign trail to blame Republicans once again for a failure they had nothing to do with—and to spin new political fables to replace the old ones that even he can no longer utter with a straight face. On his current behavior, the only time Mr. Obama is going to act as if he's President is when he no longer is.
RTWT.

#ObamaCare’s Ugly Authoritarian Problem

From David Harsanyi, at the Federalist, "Obamacare’s Ugly Authoritarian Problem":
It’s almost as if some people believe lying is acceptable – even preferable — if the political outcomes are morally pleasing to them [progressives]. Many Obamacare supporters, in fact, are beginning to sound like they couldn’t care less about process, the law, order, competence, or anything that undermines the goal of putting your health-care choices into more capable hands.
Yeah.

Almost acceptable. Hilarious, isn't it? Hardy-har-har.

Continue reading.

U.S. Military Wants 'Iron Man' Suit

At LAT, "U.S. military wants to create 'Iron Man suit'."