Over the weekend, I asked AFP activists in Illinois to join me in a national day of mourning and protest today along with millions of other Americans whose insurance plans have been canceled thanks to Obamacare’s top-down tyranny. The do-gooders continue to lie, mock, and smear those who are being forced onto the exchanges and who face massive sticker shock despite Pinocchiobama’s promise that they could keep their plans if they liked them and keep their doctors if they liked them.That's Hadley Heath at the photo. Here's her story, at the Washington Examiner, "For some, losing so-called bad apple health insurance plans will mean paying more for less."
Here’s what you can do to raise your voices:
1) Tweet a phot of your cancellation to @WhiteHouse and @MyCancellationMy story: Obama lied, my health plan died.
2) Use #MyHealthPlanDied hashtag for all related tweets; and
3) Contact local media with your story.
In the WSJ today:
Everyone now is clamoring about Affordable Care Act winners and losers. I am one of the losers. My grievance is not political; all my energies are directed to enjoying life and staying alive, and I have no time for politics. For almost seven years I have fought and survived stage-4 gallbladder cancer, with a five-year survival rate of less than 2% after diagnosis. I am a determined fighter and extremely lucky. But this luck may have just run out: My affordable, lifesaving medical insurance policy has been canceled effective Dec. 31.After years of phony Obamacare fables, which the MSM swallowed whole, it’s time the media started reported the true horror stories of progressive wreckage.
My choice is to get coverage through the government health exchange and lose access to my cancer doctors, or pay much more for insurance outside the exchange (the quotes average 40% to 50% more) for the privilege of starting over with an unfamiliar insurance company and impaired benefits. Countless hours searching for non-exchange plans have uncovered nothing that compares well with my existing coverage. But the greatest source of frustration is Covered California, the state’s Affordable Care Act health-insurance exchange and, by some reports, one of the best such exchanges in the country. After four weeks of researching plans on the website, talking directly to government exchange counselors, insurance companies and medical providers, my insurance broker and I are as confused as ever. Time is running out and we still don’t have a clue how to best proceed.
The information surge is just beginning.
Monday, November 4, 2013
Information Surge! — #MyHealthPlanDied
At Michelle Malkin's, "#MyHealthPlanDied – A national social media information surge":
Jay Carney Paper Process Enrollment Meltdown – #MyHealthPlanDied
Jonathan Karl reported today that paper and phone ObamaCare enrollment takes just as long as logging on to Healthcare.gov. "We're all stuck in the same queue." See, "Obamacare Paper, Phone, Web Apps ‘Stuck in the Same Queue,’ Memos Note."
Here's the exchange, "Carney gets animated as reporter pressures him on Obamacare (Video)."
And also from Mandy Nagy, at Legal Insurrection, "Jay Carney nears meltdown over questions about Obamacare application process."
Here's the exchange, "Carney gets animated as reporter pressures him on Obamacare (Video)."
And also from Mandy Nagy, at Legal Insurrection, "Jay Carney nears meltdown over questions about Obamacare application process."
Leftists Smear Stage-4 Cancer Survivor Whose Insurance Plan Was Curb-Stomped Under #ObamaCare
It was inevitable.
Leftists will stop and nothing to destroy grassroots resistance to the ObamaCare monstrosity. Still, even this latest smear is lower than the lowest of the leftist-regressive low.
At Twitchy, "Despicable: WH smears cancer survivor who lost her insurance plan due to Obamacare." Plus, "Dana Perino slams WH with advice to shameful cancer victim-blaming Dan Pfeiffer."
Yep, this goes right to the top. See James Taranto, at WSJ, "How Low Can They Go? The White House Attacks a Cancer Patient":
The lame Volsky piece is pure propaganda. Despicable propaganda at that.
Noel Sheppard offers another takedown at NewsBusters, "Obama Advisor Tweets Far-Left Website's Rebuttal to Cancer Survivor Losing Doctors Due to ObamaCare":
Leftists will stop and nothing to destroy grassroots resistance to the ObamaCare monstrosity. Still, even this latest smear is lower than the lowest of the leftist-regressive low.
At Twitchy, "Despicable: WH smears cancer survivor who lost her insurance plan due to Obamacare." Plus, "Dana Perino slams WH with advice to shameful cancer victim-blaming Dan Pfeiffer."
Yep, this goes right to the top. See James Taranto, at WSJ, "How Low Can They Go? The White House Attacks a Cancer Patient":
It's been just over a month since ObamaCare's disastrous launch, and it's just over three years until the scheduled election of Barack Obama's successor. It's going to be a long three years. The exposure of Obama's signature "achievement" as both incompetent and fraudulent (with its economic inviability yet to be realized) is also showing the administration's true face. It is an ugly one, and we can expect to see a lot more of it while Obama remains in office.There's more at the link.
This morning the White House went on the attack against a cancer patient who is also a victim of ObamaCare. Edie Littlefield Sundby of San Diego explains in today's Wall Street Journal that she's been managing a case of stage 4 gallbladder cancer, an affliction whose five-year survival rate is just 2%. Having survived the diagnosis by seven years so far, she beat very long odds--and she did so with the help of an excellent insurance plan that covered care at three hospitals, two in California and one in Texas.
In touting ObamaCare, Obama asserted at least two dozen times (in slightly varying language) that if you like your health plan, you can keep it. As Sundby explains, she is a victim of Obama's fraudulent sales pitch:
Since March 2007 United Healthcare has paid $1.2 million to help keep me alive, and it has never once questioned any treatment or procedure recommended by my medical team. The company pays a fair price to the doctors and hospitals, on time, and is responsive to the emergency treatment requirements of late-stage cancer. Its caring people in the claims office have been readily available to talk to me and my providers.Covered California is the state ObamaCare exchange, one of those that, unlike the administration-built federal one, has some degree of technical functionality. Thus Sundby was able to log in and check out her options, which--contrary to Obama's "new and improved" sales pitch, that people whose policies are canceled will get better insurance--were unsatisfactory. No plan available to her would cover both her primary-care doctor at the University of California, San Diego, and her oncologist at Stanford. Sundby asks: "What happened to the president's promise, 'You can keep your health plan'? Or to the promise that 'You can keep your doctor'? Thanks to the law, I have been forced to give up a world-class health plan. The exchange would force me to give up a world-class physician." This morning Dan Pfeiffer the fast-talking flack tweeted out a piece from ThinkProgress.org, a leftist propaganda outfit. Titled "The Real Reason That the Cancer Patient Writing in Today's Wall Street Journal Lost Her Insurance," the piece, by one Igor Volsky, claims that "Sundby shouldn't blame reform." Volsky instead blames United Healthcare, which, he writes, "dropped her coverage because they've struggled to compete in California's individual health care market for years and didn't want to pay for sicker patients like Sundby":
But in January, United Healthcare sent me a letter announcing that they were pulling out of the individual California market. The company suggested I look to Covered California starting in October.
"The company's plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest," UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October. "UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have 'a pent-up appetite' for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that."All this may be true, but it begs the question. The addition of a phrase to that last sentence shows why: Sundby is losing her coverage and her doctors because of a business decision her insurer made within the competitive dynamics of California's health care market under the regulatory structure established by Obama's comprehensive "reform." Obama did not qualify his pitch by stating that if you like your health plan, you can keep it unless your insurer makes a business decision to the contrary within the competitive dynamics of your state's health care market. To the contrary, he represented ObamaCare as protecting consumers from precisely that sort of cruel business decision, and he has not backed away from that fraudulent promise: At a speech last Wednesday, he asserted that the only policies being canceled were "substandard" ones offered by former "bad-apple insurers" whose practices ObamaCare reformed.
Get that? The company packed its bags and dumped its beneficiaries because it wants its competitors to swallow the first wave of sicker enrollees only to re-enter the market later and profit from the healthy people who still haven't signed up for coverage.
Sundby is losing her coverage and her doctors because of a business decision her insurer made within the competitive dynamics of California's health care market.
The lame Volsky piece is pure propaganda. Despicable propaganda at that.
Noel Sheppard offers another takedown at NewsBusters, "Obama Advisor Tweets Far-Left Website's Rebuttal to Cancer Survivor Losing Doctors Due to ObamaCare":
... that a senior White House advisor would disseminate such detritus to rebut the claim of a cancer survivor is deplorable.Staggering Democrat douchebaggery.
Sadly, there is no floor to the depths this administration will sink to defend itself or advance its agenda.
#LAX Shooting: It's Jared Loughner and Zeitgeist All Over Again
As is to be expected, when news broke of the shooting at Los Angeles International Airport, the usual suspects were out in force attempting to smear conservatives and gun rights supporters as complicit in the mayhem.
What I noticed was the Southern Poverty Law Center pushing hard on the anti-government, right-wing militia meme.
Despicable people. Especially so since there's little evidence that the suspect, Paul Ciancia, had any coherent ideological program. See Robert Stacy McCain on that, "LAX Shooter: Some Kind of Kook":
Still, the leftist press is all over the Mark Potok "hate-watch" theory of the right-wing "patriot" anti-goverment types. At yesterday's Los Angeles Times, for example, "LAX shooting comes amid mounting aversion to the TSA":
NYT coverage of LAX shooting is typical: zero ref to the shooter's "Patriot," anti-government rants; http://t.co/SbBr9iPeFB
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) November 3, 2013
What I noticed was the Southern Poverty Law Center pushing hard on the anti-government, right-wing militia meme.
.@RSMcCain Here we go: Mark Potok, "Hatewatch: Alleged #LAX Shooter Referenced 'Patriot' Conspiracy Theories." http://t.co/5RYIBEbSSX
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) November 2, 2013
.@SPLCenter You people have no shame. Disgusting exploitation of the #LAX tragedy. @RSMcCain
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) November 2, 2013
Despicable people. Especially so since there's little evidence that the suspect, Paul Ciancia, had any coherent ideological program. See Robert Stacy McCain on that, "LAX Shooter: Some Kind of Kook":
There’s this weird little game going on between the Justice Department and the media where bits and pieces of LAX gunman Paul Ciancia’s one-page manifesto keep getting leaked out, and yet it seems no one has the entire note. So the shooter supposedly ranted about the “New World Order” and “fiat currency,” which is being interpreted by some as evidence of a right-wing motive — except, no it’s not: It’s Jared Loughner and Zeitgeist all over again.Clear enough. And RTWT.
Perhaps you’ve forgotten how Loughner, the 2011 Tucson shooter, was a big fan of the pseudo-”documentary” Zeitgeist, which wraps up 9/11 Truther stuff in a lot of conspiracy theory crap about bankers, “fiat currency,” and other such paranoid kook stuff.
Still, the leftist press is all over the Mark Potok "hate-watch" theory of the right-wing "patriot" anti-goverment types. At yesterday's Los Angeles Times, for example, "LAX shooting comes amid mounting aversion to the TSA":
WASHINGTON — The killing of a TSA screener in Los Angeles is symptomatic of a growing antipathy toward government workers and TSA personnel in particular, experts said Saturday.Despicable smears. "Tea party" pops into people's minds when they see these "anti-government" memes. And Mark Potok is the f-king last person to trust commenting on this. You might say (cough, cough), he has an agenda.
Specialists on hate crimes and union officials decried what they said was a general atmosphere of mockery and derision toward TSA agents that they said is amplified by late-night talk show hosts, politicians and news media.
"When people or institutions are vilified on national television and in the public square, you often see people latch on to them as enemies to be destroyed," Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, said in an interview.
Potok has tracked radical groups for more than two decades. He said alleged shooter Paul Anthony Ciancia appeared to have subscribed to anti-government theories about a conspiracy to take away American freedoms and create a single global government.
The violent outburst Friday has put airport screeners around the country on edge, just weeks before terminals will see a rush of passengers during the stressful holiday season.
As Ciancia allegedly blasted his way through the checkpoint, the 23-year-old was looking for transportation security officers to shoot, officials said, and cursing the Transportation Security Administration.
A note found with Ciancia contained a rant against the government and the words "kill TSA," said a federal law enforcement official briefed on the investigation. "I would love to see people stop making villains out of government workers — they are good people" said J. David Cox, the president of the American Federation of Government Employees, the union that represents 45,000 TSA employees. TSA officers are verbally abused by passengers every day, Cox said.
"They may go through your luggage, they may question your name on your ticket, but all that is for your protection. It is not to harass you," he said.
Labels:
Guns,
Los Angeles,
Moral Bankruptcy,
News,
Radical Left
Nearly 290,000 to Be Dropped from Insurance Plans in Washington State
And remember, this is by design.
At the Seattle Times, "Canceled health insurance plans add to angst of change" (via Weasel Zippers):
But you just gotta love how this dude Fulner now calls himself "a foot soldier for the Republican Party."
That reminds me of my earlier post, "Dem Party is F****d'." They may well be. They just very well may be.
At the Seattle Times, "Canceled health insurance plans add to angst of change" (via Weasel Zippers):
Bill Fullner has reached his breaking point.Some folks will qualify for subsidies or they'll be sent to Medicaid, a failing Great Society-era program.
It started with the letter from his health-insurance company informing him it was canceling his plan and offering him a new one that’s nearly twice as expensive. Then the 60-year-old retiree from Mount Vernon heard about more people like himself with canceled plans and soaring premiums. Finally, he spent hours on the phone and computer trying — and failing — to find a new option that he likes.
“This whole experience has converted a lifelong Democrat into a foot soldier for the Republican Party,” Fullner said.
He’s not alone in his frustration.
In Washington, most of the 290,000 people covered by insurance plans they purchased on the individual market received letters this fall telling them that their plans are going away.
That’s because under the Affordable Care Act, insurance plans must meet new requirements, including limits on how much money patients spend in out-of-pocket medical expenses, and they must cover 10 so-called essential benefits such as preventive care, prescription drugs and maternity care.
So all 90,181 people with insurance coverage from Regence BlueShield have learned their plans will be canceled, as did all 60,000 people covered by Group Health Cooperative. Some 77,000 people with LifeWise Health Plan, a subsidiary of Premera Blue Cross, also learned their plans were being scrapped.
An additional 24,000 people with LifeWise are covered under “grandfathered” plans that predate the act and will not be canceled, though members will be getting letters in November informing them they can move to another plan if they would like to.
But you just gotta love how this dude Fulner now calls himself "a foot soldier for the Republican Party."
That reminds me of my earlier post, "Dem Party is F****d'." They may well be. They just very well may be.
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Sunday Cartoons
At Flopping Aces, "Sunday Funnies."
Also at Randy's Roundtable, "Friday Nite Funnies," and Reaganite Republican, "Reaganite's SUNDAY FUNNIES."
More at Legal Insurrection, "Branco Cartoon – Healthscare.gov."
CARTOON CREDIT: William Warren.
Also at Randy's Roundtable, "Friday Nite Funnies," and Reaganite Republican, "Reaganite's SUNDAY FUNNIES."
More at Legal Insurrection, "Branco Cartoon – Healthscare.gov."
CARTOON CREDIT: William Warren.
Labels:
Cartoons,
Comedy,
Health Care,
Humor,
Politics
'Dem Party is F****d'
From Ron Fournier, at National Journal, "Obama Takes Friendly Fire" (via Clarice Feldman, "The Silence of the Left").
'Pretty Woman'
I love this song, but this video is a trip. Halfway through it zooms on some woman apparently in the audience and she makes not a move. Indeed, her eyes are cold as ice, almost as if death rays are about to spout forth, lol.
It's all good, in any case. No one could sing Pretty Woman like Roy Orbison.
It's all good, in any case. No one could sing Pretty Woman like Roy Orbison.
Labels:
Music,
Rock and Roll
Lovely Sunday #Rule5
Well, it's been a couple of weeks since my last roundup.
So let's get rockin'!
At the Other McCain, "Rule 5 Sunday: Maximum Acceleration."
And from Soylent Refuge, "Morning Coffee Creamer," and "Marianne."
More at Pirate's Cove, "Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup," and "If All You See……is an evil rising ocean that can only be stopped by the paternal hand of Government, you might just be a Warmist."
And from Bob Belvedere, "Rule 5 Saturday: Sophie Mei."
Also Daley Gator, "DaleyGator DaleyBabes Saturday Beauty."
More at Knuckledraggin', "Your Good Morning Girl," and "And who doesn’t miss the micro mini skirt?"
And In a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World has the "Friday Pinups."
At EBL, "Shocking Study: People tend to focus on a woman's breasts..."
Now from Wine, Women, and Politics as well, "Weekend Sweeties."
At Animal Magnetism, "Solo Ginger Saturday."
From Blackmailers Don't Shoot, "Pretty Girls on a Thursday, Halloween Hotties Edition."
Proof Positive, "Bye Week for San Francisco 49er's," and "The Best of the Web* Linkaround."
See also, the Hostages, "Big Boob Friday."
Plus, from Drunken Stepfather, "Steplinks of the Day."
And at a View From the Beach, "Rule 5 Saturday - Covert Coyote - Piper Perabo."
Good Stuff's has "Amanda Kerr."
First Street Journal has, "Rule 5 Blogging: Wooden Shoes Edition."
At Odie's, "Coffee ? ~OR~ Rule 5 Woodsterman Style."
And at Randy’s Roundtable, "Thursday Nite Tart - Kathy Eusse."
Postal Dogs, "Bree Olson."
And at Egotastic!, "Happy 18th Birthday Kendall Jenner (You Have Arrived)," and "Adriana Lima’s Sexy Lingerie and Other Fine Things to Ogle."
Still more at Subject to Change, "Humpday."
Plus, at 90 Miles From Tyranny, "Girls With Guns," and "Morning Mistress."
Drop your links in the comments of I've missed your Rule 5.
Until then...
So let's get rockin'!
At the Other McCain, "Rule 5 Sunday: Maximum Acceleration."
And from Soylent Refuge, "Morning Coffee Creamer," and "Marianne."
More at Pirate's Cove, "Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup," and "If All You See……is an evil rising ocean that can only be stopped by the paternal hand of Government, you might just be a Warmist."
And from Bob Belvedere, "Rule 5 Saturday: Sophie Mei."
Also Daley Gator, "DaleyGator DaleyBabes Saturday Beauty."
More at Knuckledraggin', "Your Good Morning Girl," and "And who doesn’t miss the micro mini skirt?"
And In a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World has the "Friday Pinups."
At EBL, "Shocking Study: People tend to focus on a woman's breasts..."
Now from Wine, Women, and Politics as well, "Weekend Sweeties."
At Animal Magnetism, "Solo Ginger Saturday."
From Blackmailers Don't Shoot, "Pretty Girls on a Thursday, Halloween Hotties Edition."
Proof Positive, "Bye Week for San Francisco 49er's," and "The Best of the Web* Linkaround."
See also, the Hostages, "Big Boob Friday."
Plus, from Drunken Stepfather, "Steplinks of the Day."
And at a View From the Beach, "Rule 5 Saturday - Covert Coyote - Piper Perabo."
Good Stuff's has "Amanda Kerr."
First Street Journal has, "Rule 5 Blogging: Wooden Shoes Edition."
At Odie's, "Coffee ? ~OR~ Rule 5 Woodsterman Style."
And at Randy’s Roundtable, "Thursday Nite Tart - Kathy Eusse."
Postal Dogs, "Bree Olson."
And at Egotastic!, "Happy 18th Birthday Kendall Jenner (You Have Arrived)," and "Adriana Lima’s Sexy Lingerie and Other Fine Things to Ogle."
Still more at Subject to Change, "Humpday."
Plus, at 90 Miles From Tyranny, "Girls With Guns," and "Morning Mistress."
Drop your links in the comments of I've missed your Rule 5.
Until then...
Labels:
Babe Blogging,
Blogging,
Full Metal Weekend,
Women
Maybe Ted Cruz Won That Shutdown Fight After All
He totally won the shutdown fight.
And House Republicans did themselves right by standing firm as long as they could. Remember, Republicans fully funded the budget except for ObamaCare. The White House knew the system was screwed all along. It should have taken the deal and punted healthcare past the 2014 elections. Now everything's FUBAR with no rescue in sight.
Lonely Con has it, with a pithy response on Twitter:
And House Republicans did themselves right by standing firm as long as they could. Remember, Republicans fully funded the budget except for ObamaCare. The White House knew the system was screwed all along. It should have taken the deal and punted healthcare past the 2014 elections. Now everything's FUBAR with no rescue in sight.
Lonely Con has it, with a pithy response on Twitter:
@lonelycon @instapundit The #shutdown gave @BarackObama a chance to put some distance between himself and #Obamacare. He didn't take it.
— Lem (@Lemang01) November 3, 2013
Whoa — Associated Press Gets Real on #ObamaCare!
Man, how times change!
What's amazing to me with the ObamaCare debacle is how the normally boot-licking Democrat press has been consistently tearing into the administration. Associated Press was savaged during the Bush years as a hopeless shill for the anti-American left. But these days you'd think AP was an in-house organ at Fox News.
See, "Health policy cancellations are new blow for administration" (via Laura Ingraham).
And at the AP homepage, "STICKER SHOCK OFTEN FOLLOWS INSURANCE CANCELLATION" (via Lonely Con), and "OBAMA'S HEALTH LAW FINALLY GETS REAL FOR AMERICA":
What's amazing to me with the ObamaCare debacle is how the normally boot-licking Democrat press has been consistently tearing into the administration. Associated Press was savaged during the Bush years as a hopeless shill for the anti-American left. But these days you'd think AP was an in-house organ at Fox News.
See, "Health policy cancellations are new blow for administration" (via Laura Ingraham).
The AP on Obamacare: Ins. cancellations are new blow for administration: http://t.co/pRQ2RuczDa #changehascometoAmerica
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) October 30, 2013
And at the AP homepage, "STICKER SHOCK OFTEN FOLLOWS INSURANCE CANCELLATION" (via Lonely Con), and "OBAMA'S HEALTH LAW FINALLY GETS REAL FOR AMERICA":
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Now is when Americans start figuring out that President Barack Obama's health care law goes beyond political talk, and really does affect them and people they know.The piece notes that some people have seen improved coverage under the law, but attitudes are overall negative and more change --- adverse change --- is coming down the pipeline, especially once the employer mandate kicks in after 2015:
With a cranky federal website complicating access to new coverage and some consumers being notified their existing plans are going away, the potential for winners and losers is creating anxiety and confusion....
The Obama administration insists nobody will lose coverage as a result of cancellation notices going out to millions of people. At least 3.5 million Americans have been issued cancellations, but the exact number is unclear. Associated Press checks find that data is unavailable in a half the states.
Mainly they are people who buy directly from an insurer, instead of having workplace coverage. Officials say these consumers aren't getting "canceled" but "transitioned" or "migrated" to better plans because their current coverage doesn't meet minimum standards. They won't have to go uninsured, and some could save a lot if they qualify for the law's tax credits.
Speaking in Boston's historic Faneuil Hall this past week, Obama said the problem is limited to fewer than 5 percent of Americans "who've got cut-rate plans that don't offer real financial protection in the event of a serious illness or an accident."
But in a nation of more than 300 million, 5 percent is a big number - about 15 million people. Among them are Ian and Sara Hodge of Lancaster, Pa., in their early 60s and paying $1,041 a month for a policy.
After insurer Highmark, Inc., sent the Hodges a cancellation notice, the cheapest rate they say they've been able to find is $1,400 for a comparable plan. Ian is worried they may not qualify for tax credits, and doesn't trust that the federal website is secure enough to enter personal financial information in order to find out.
"We feel like we're being punished for doing the right thing," he said.
Their policy may not have met the government's standards, "but it certainly met our minimum standards," Hodge added.
"The main thing that upsets us is the president ... said over and over and over again: If you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan, guaranteed."
There's a chance the number of people getting unwanted terminations may grow. In 2015, the law's requirement that larger companies provide health insurance will take effect. It's expected that a small share of firms will drop coverage, deciding that it's cheaper to pay fines imposed under the law.
Up to now, the changes for employer plans have been incremental. They tend to expand benefits, not take things away.
For example, young adults can stay on a parent's coverage until they turn 26. Employers cover women's birth control as a preventive service, free of charge. Screening tests such as colonoscopies are also free.
But cost control provisions, mainly a tax on expensive insurance plans that starts in 2018, are converging with the long-standing push by employers to tame health costs. Some companies have raised deductibles and copayments for employees, saying they need to scale back to avoid tangling with the coming tax. Others are giving employees a fixed amount of money to shop in private health insurance markets that resemble those created by the law.
Expect cutbacks to be blamed on the law. Sorting out whether that's warranted may be difficult.
"What the Affordable Care Act did was give companies a very convenient excuse to say `Oh, gosh, we really have to get serious about insurance costs,'" said Paul Keckley, an independent health benefits consultant. "I think there's a bit of a bob and weave. The ACA was a convenient excuse for doing what (corporate) human resources departments have been calculating to do for years."
New York Times Propaganda: Obama 'Misspoke' About Keeping Your Plan
This is really a bit much.
The editors at the New York Times richly deserve the mockery now pummeling them.
Here's the editorial, "Insurance Policies Not Worth Keeping":
Ms. Willis says "I did a lot of research before I picked the plan that I had in the first place, and if I had wanted more coverage I would have just gotten another plan. So I really like the plan ... you know, I don't want more. That's why I didn't have more in the first place."
In other words, she bought the insurance policy that was right for her.
But now under ObamaCare she can't have what she researched, purchased, and liked. She's got to have much more coverage, and so far she's been unable to purchase a new plan because the healthcare website she's using in California is kinky, confusing, and difficuly to use.
Democrats can't spin this epic consumer dissatisfaction away. It's despicable for the New York Times to blame Republicans for stoking "consumer fears." Republicans didn't go searching for disgruntled Americans. The mainstream media outlets have been bursting at the seams with story after story of unhappy customers. Nearly a month ago, the San Jose Mercury News published the devastating piece detailing the "winners and losers" in California's shift to ObamaCare. It's been an avalanche of bad news for the left since then. Just last week, the the Los Angeles Times came out with the devastating piece outlining massive frustration with skyrocketing premiums in the state.
So the left, once again, is back to lying. And by now it's gotten so transparent it'd be funny if the stakes weren't so high.
Here's more at Twitchy, "Boot-licking fail: You won’t believe NYT’s excuse for Obama’s ‘you can keep your plan’ lie."
More at Viking Pundit, "The New York Times beclowns itself again." And Patterico, "The New York Times is beyond parody" (via Memeorandum).
Added: The Other McCain has more, "Obama and the New York Times Decide Which Health Plans Are Worth Keeping."
The editors at the New York Times richly deserve the mockery now pummeling them.
Here's the editorial, "Insurance Policies Not Worth Keeping":
Congressional Republicans have stoked consumer fears and confusion with charges that the health care reform law is causing insurers to cancel existing policies and will force many people to pay substantially higher premiums next year for coverage they don’t want. That, they say, violates President Obama’s pledge that if you like the insurance you have, you can keep it.Once again, the editors, as cutout ideological leftists, just don't get it: People liked their plans, or they wouldn't have purchased them. They like the affordability and flexibility, and especially the power to choose their doctors and hospitals. Listen to Natalie Willis, who was featured in the blockbuster CBS report a couple of weeks back, now making appearances on Fox News:
Mr. Obama clearly misspoke when he said that. By law, insurers cannot continue to sell policies that don’t provide the minimum benefits and consumer protections required as of next year. So they’ve sent cancellation notices to hundreds of thousands of people who hold these substandard policies.
Ms. Willis says "I did a lot of research before I picked the plan that I had in the first place, and if I had wanted more coverage I would have just gotten another plan. So I really like the plan ... you know, I don't want more. That's why I didn't have more in the first place."
In other words, she bought the insurance policy that was right for her.
But now under ObamaCare she can't have what she researched, purchased, and liked. She's got to have much more coverage, and so far she's been unable to purchase a new plan because the healthcare website she's using in California is kinky, confusing, and difficuly to use.
Democrats can't spin this epic consumer dissatisfaction away. It's despicable for the New York Times to blame Republicans for stoking "consumer fears." Republicans didn't go searching for disgruntled Americans. The mainstream media outlets have been bursting at the seams with story after story of unhappy customers. Nearly a month ago, the San Jose Mercury News published the devastating piece detailing the "winners and losers" in California's shift to ObamaCare. It's been an avalanche of bad news for the left since then. Just last week, the the Los Angeles Times came out with the devastating piece outlining massive frustration with skyrocketing premiums in the state.
So the left, once again, is back to lying. And by now it's gotten so transparent it'd be funny if the stakes weren't so high.
Here's more at Twitchy, "Boot-licking fail: You won’t believe NYT’s excuse for Obama’s ‘you can keep your plan’ lie."
NYT on broken Obama promises: "Mr. Obama clearly misspoke" Nope; he clearly lied. Deliberately, repeatedly, to the people who voted for him.
— David Gaw (@davidgaw) November 3, 2013
Almost universal mockery of the NYT's apology. This propaganda effort really isn't going well—wherever it's tried.
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) November 3, 2013
The NYT has gone too far claiming Obama "misspoke" re keeping your insurance plans. The NYT LIED, exactly like Obama did. <toilet flush>
— Jane Sherry Gardner (@JaneESGardner) November 3, 2013
just when i was about to re-subscribe, the nyt gives me another reason to save my money.
— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) November 3, 2013
More at Viking Pundit, "The New York Times beclowns itself again." And Patterico, "The New York Times is beyond parody" (via Memeorandum).
Added: The Other McCain has more, "Obama and the New York Times Decide Which Health Plans Are Worth Keeping."
Pissed-Off 'ObamaCare Losers' Could Pack Political Punch
Oh boy, people are gonna be fired up next November.
At Politico, "Obamacare losers could pack political punch":
RELATED: "Obama Lied — White House Aides Debated President's Pledge to Americans: 'You Can Keep Your Plan'."
At Politico, "Obamacare losers could pack political punch":
Meet the new Soccer Mom: Obamacare losers.More at the link. (Via Memeorandum.)
Millions of married, older, white, college-educated, GOP-leaning Americans have quickly seen their political profile rise after their health insurance companies sent them cancellation letters with the launch of the giant new health care law.
It’s not a huge segment of the population — estimates show between 10 million to 19 million people bought health insurance from what Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius dubbed the “Wild West” individual marketplace.
But the ones who are making the most anti-Obamacare noise are part of this group (think of the self-employed, small business owners, freelance writers, musicians and taxi cab drivers) that share one politically pertinent common denominator. Their complaints — amplified in recent weeks by Republicans and reporters — demonstrate one of the first tangible stumbles of the Affordable Care Act.
“It’s not theoretical anymore,” said Virginia-based health industry consultant Robert Laszewski. “You can spin in the White House press room, but these are people who will be sitting down with their friends and families at Thanksgiving sharing stories about their cancellation letters. That’s going to be the only thing that counts.”
Horror stories already abound of people who can’t get insurance through their employer and are now finding that their old plans don’t measure up to Obamacare’s standards. There may indeed be better policies around the corner, giving people more protections when they actually do get sick and requiring guaranteed coverage for things like prescription drugs, emergency hospital visits, maternity and mental health and not being black listed due to a preexisting condition.
Still, it’s the shock of the change — especially after President Barack Obama repeatedly promised that anyone could keep the plan that they had — that is very real and threatens to resonate through the 2014 midterm campaign...
RELATED: "Obama Lied — White House Aides Debated President's Pledge to Americans: 'You Can Keep Your Plan'."
Saturday, November 2, 2013
GOP Gives Health Law Stumbling Room
Republicans need to let this play out for awhile.
The law's not working and Democrat lies are finally getting the sunshine they so richly deserve.
At the Wall Street Journal, "Republicans Give Health Law Room to Stumble: New Tack Is a Departure From More Confrontational Approach Still Favored by Some in Party":
More at the link.
The law's not working and Democrat lies are finally getting the sunshine they so richly deserve.
At the Wall Street Journal, "Republicans Give Health Law Room to Stumble: New Tack Is a Departure From More Confrontational Approach Still Favored by Some in Party":
WASHINGTON—Many House Republicans are replacing their push to delay or defund the 2010 federal health law with a new strategy: Hang back and see if problems with the rollout continue or get worse.Give 'em enough rope.
It is an abrupt reversal of the activist approach of just weeks ago, when Republicans demanded changes to the law in exchange for funding the government or raising the nation's borrowing limit. Now, they say putting the spotlight on technical flaws of the law's health-insurance exchange may be more effective than a direct attack.
"It's its own worst enemy, and to some degree it is collapsing under its own weight," said Rep. Michael Burgess (R., Texas), who sits on the committee that pressed Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Wednesday to explain what is going wrong.
More at the link.
@USMC_Nightmare LMAO! LEFTISM = Utopian Delusion sold with lies and imposed with force. pic.twitter.com/EwIsf58Ese
— Daniel (@dwb5192723) November 2, 2013
KMET Mighty Met Mighty Weekend on The Sound 100.3 FM
If you're an L.A. native, and a baby-boomer, then this weekend's rollback to the 1970s KMET radio at The Sound L.A. is right up your alley.
I'm listening right now.
Jim Ladd's on tonight at 5:00pm. I used to love that guy!
I'm listening right now.
Only 1 hour away from the start of our #KMET Mighty Met Weekend! Ace and Gonzer start us off at 3PM!
— 100.3 The Sound (@TheSoundLA) November 1, 2013
@ChrstinaForshay Might be some Springsteen in the forecast!
— 100.3 The Sound (@TheSoundLA) November 1, 2013
.@1RickLewis, former #KMET DJ, rocking #LA today at @TheSoundLA. Great stuff.
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) November 2, 2013
The Ballad of John and Yoko - The Beatles 2:36 PM
Lunatic Fringe - Red Rider 2:31 PM
Peace of Mind - Boston 2:26 PM
Take Me To The Pilot - Elton John 2:22 PM
King of Pain - The Police 2:10 PM
Spirit In the Night - Bruce Springsteen 2:05 PM
Lovin', Touchin' Squeezin' - Journey 2:00 PM
Who Are You - WHO 1:54 PM
Dancin' Fool - Frank Zappa 1:50 PM
In the Mood - Robert Plant 1:36 PM
DON'T FEAR THE REAPER - B.O.C. 1:31 PM
Bungle In the Jungle - Jethro Tull 1:27 PM
Unchained - Van Halen 1:23 PM
Midnight Rambler - The Rolling Stones 1:08 PM
Rhiannon - Fleetwood Mac 1:04 PM
Back In Black - AC/DC 1 PM
Jim Ladd's on tonight at 5:00pm. I used to love that guy!
Labels:
Los Angeles,
Rock and Roll
Obama Lied — White House Aides Debated President's Pledge to Americans: 'You Can Keep Your Plan'
The president lied to the American people. It wasn't a "talking point." It wasn't a "political lie" to get something passed. It wasn't "posturing." Obama made bald-faced lies, multiple times, telling citizens they could keep their healthcare plans if they liked them. And that they could keep their doctors. He lied. Again and again. "Period." You can keep your plan. "Period."
What part of "period" don't leftists understand? Leftists like this far-left Obama-shill Bill Scher at Bloggingheads, via Althouse, "'Bill Scher does not accept that it was a lie to say "if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it'."
The president's a disgusting pig and socialist scumbag liar. The Wall Street Journal documents it, mercilessly, "Aides Debated Obama Health-Care Coverage Promise: Behind the Scenes, White House Officials Worried About Insurance Pledge":
These are plans like the one purchased by Kathleen Crowley, a woman booted from her health policy due to ObamaCare, covered in James Taranto's column yesterday, "President Obama's #ObamaCare Lie":
And things are not going to get better. The administration's not keeping its promises to have the website fully functioning by November 1st. Just this week Secretary Sebelius further soiled herself as a national laughingstock with her claims during congressional testimony that Healthcare.gov "didn't crash." Yet at the very second she uttered those words, House Republicans couldn't logon to the system and the error message was played on the overhead during the hearings, "the system is down at the moment."
It's all lies.
From Obama to Axelrod to Sebelius to this idiot Bloggingheads ghoul Bill Scher. It's all lies.
The country has been sold a bill of healthcare goods. And our healthcare system is being systematically dismantled and destroyed. This is no accident. It's like the generals in Vietnam who claimed that "we had to destroy the village in order to save it." Democrats had to destroy American healthcare in order to fundamentally transform it. And they knew that they were f-king the average Joe up the ass. So they lied. The president lied. Congressional Democrats lied. Stephanie Cutter lied. Leftist media shills lied. We've been lied to.
It's time to stop with the lies.
Tell Congress and the president to stop lying. Tell them that they're going pay for their lies. They will pay for it with their political hide, and if criminal negligence is found, they'll pay in a court of law and hopefully with time in a penitentiary. These are monumental lies that bring disgrace to representative government. There's going to be a reckoning. The 2014 elections are one year from now. Each national election is billed as the most important in American history. The 2012 presidential election filled the bill, and conservatives lost. They can't make that mistake again if they hope to salvage whatever decency and free will is left in this country. People need to rise up and say this is f-king enough.
What part of "period" don't leftists understand? Leftists like this far-left Obama-shill Bill Scher at Bloggingheads, via Althouse, "'Bill Scher does not accept that it was a lie to say "if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it'."
The president's a disgusting pig and socialist scumbag liar. The Wall Street Journal documents it, mercilessly, "Aides Debated Obama Health-Care Coverage Promise: Behind the Scenes, White House Officials Worried About Insurance Pledge":
As President Barack Obama pushed for a new federal health law in 2009, he made a simple pledge: If you like your insurance plan, you can keep your plan. But behind the scenes, White House officials discussed whether that was a promise they could keep.Like the idiot Bill Scher at Bloggingheads, leftists just keep piling on lie after lie to further deceive the public about their dishonest healthcare program. Here's top Obama-Democrat Robert Axelrod at the article:
When the question arose, Mr. Obama’s advisers decided that the assertion was fair, interviews with more than a dozen people involved in crafting and explaining the president’s health-care plan show.
But at times, there was second-guessing. At one point, aides discussed whether Mr. Obama might use more in-depth discussions, such as media interviews, to explain the nuances of the succinct line in his stump speeches, a former aide said. Officials worried, though, that delving into details such as the small number of people who might lose insurance could be confusing and would clutter the president’s message.
“You try to talk about health care in broad, intelligible points that cut through, and you inevitably lose some accuracy when you do that,” the former official said.
The former official added that in the midst of a hard-fought political debate “if you like your plan, you can probably keep it” isn’t a salable point.
The breadth of Mr. Obama’s statement proved to be a miscalculation. Mr. Obama repeated the claim, with only occasional caveats, through this week, when a flurry of cancellation notices from insurers to customers around the country prompted him to recalibrate. The resulting furor has energized Republican opposition to the plan, which only a few weeks ago had fallen flat as a result of the party’s failed attempt to link it to government spending and debt deadlines.
“With 20/20 hindsight, maybe this should have been parsed more carefully,” said Jim Margolis, a media adviser to Mr. Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012, said of Mr. Obama’s broad promise. But, he added, “The president’s statement seems fair.”
At the time the law was being written, Mr. Obama was trying to make the case for the health-care overhaul in understandable terms, and in an environment in which Republicans were casting it as a “big government” takeover of the health system. Mr. Obama’s aides were focused on telling people that disruption would be minimal and benefits from the law substantial.
Aides said that because insurers could continue offering plans, even those deemed to be substandard, if they were in existence at the time the law passed, Mr. Obama’s statement that “you can keep your plan” was solid.
“We thought we could fulfill the promise with this grandfathering clause,” said Ezekiel Emanuel, vice provost at the University of Pennsylvania and a former White House health-care adviser.
The health law aims to eliminate certain low-premium policies that the administration said provide skimpy coverage and could leave people with high out-of-pocket costs. While it allows insurers to continue covering longtime customers with policies that were in existence as of March 2010, many insurers are canceling such plans because they would die out, anyway, in the absence of new customers.
About 5% of the U.S. population, or about 15.4 million people, are covered under individual health plans, and many of them—as many as 10 million—are expected to have their health plans terminated by their insurers by year-end, industry experts have said. These customers account for many of those now receiving cancellation notices; Mr. Obama says they will be able to buy better coverage on the new federal insurance exchange.
One former senior administration official said that as the law was being crafted by the White House and lawmakers, some White House policy advisers objected to the breadth of Mr. Obama’s “keep your plan” promise. They were overruled by political aides, the former official said. The White House said it was unaware of the objections.
Mr. Obama began offering broad assurances as he campaigned for president in 2008, before the Affordable Care Act was written or many of the details decided. In a presidential debate with Republican nominee John McCain, Mr. Obama said that “if you’ve got health care already…you can keep your plan.”
Before then, Hillary Clinton was making similar promises about her proposed health-care overhaul. As she campaigned for president in 2007, Mrs. Clinton said, “Here’s how my plan works: If you already have private insurance, and you’re happy with it, nothing changes. You keep that insurance.”
Mr. Obama adopted similar language during the campaign and continued to use it in the White House as he pitched Congress and the American people on his health-care legislation.
Jon Favreau, who served as Mr. Obama’s top speech writer, said that as they tried to promote the overhaul plan and explain it to the public, the aim was to make it as simple as possible “while still being true.”
“Simplification and ease of explanation were a premium, and that was true throughout the process,” he said.
Richard Kirsch, the former national campaign manager of Health Care for America Now, which pushed for the 2010 health law, said the words were reassuring—and true—for the vast majority of the people, and so his group never raised concerns about that claim. Adding an asterisk to note that people who had “shoddy insurance” might need to change plans was not practical, he said.
“The actual, accurate statement is if you have good insurance, and you like it, you can keep it,” said Mr. Kirsch, now a senior fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, a liberal policy organization.
The fact that insurers are cancelling policies covering some people has become central to the Republican argument against the Affordable Care Act, adding to the administration’s problems as it struggles to fix a malfunctioning website.
Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, seized upon Mr. Obama’s words, writing in an email Friday to supporters, “Here’s the truth: Barack Obama knowingly and repeatedly lied to Americans.”
David Axelrod, a senior White House adviser during the health-care fight, said there was no intention to mislead.That's bullshit. People are not finding cheaper policies on the website. They're finding inferior cookie-cutter policies with higher premiums and higher deductibles. This fact is why the new Democrat meme is that Americans were being sold "shoddy plans" on the individual market. But the policies weren't "shoddy." These were healthcare policies that millions of Americans researched, compared, evaluated and then purchased --- because they liked them.
“The great misfortune here is that the website debacle occurred at the same time as this issue arising,” he said. “Because, if the website hadn’t gone down, then lots of these people would be going online and figuring out, ‘Hey I’m getting a better insurance policy, and I’ll have to pay less money for it.’ But they can’t, because the website is down.
“It’s a perfect storm that has created an opportunity for those who oppose the plan.”
These are plans like the one purchased by Kathleen Crowley, a woman booted from her health policy due to ObamaCare, covered in James Taranto's column yesterday, "President Obama's #ObamaCare Lie":
My health-care policy was cancelled, and the Obama administration's explanation that policies are being cancelled because they were "substandard" and issued by "bad apple" insurers is absolutely not true. I had a very comprehensive policy, with a large and solid national health insurer, and the reasons my policy was not "ACA compliant" is because I now have to pay for maternity coverage, general pediatric coverage and pediatric dental coverage, as prescribed by ObamaCare. I'm 55 years old, have no children and don't plan to have children. Clearly, I am beyond childbearing age, and without children. Why would I have to purchase pediatric dental insurance? Or general pediatric care?What the insurance debacle reveals is the ultimate failure of progressivism. Leftists pride themselves on superior knowledge and noble intentions. But when that knowledge and those intentions are tested in the real consumer marketplace they come up wanting, badly. It's one big fail after another, and don't forget that the country was warned about this from day one: "It won't work." We were warned, over and over, from congressional Republicans, from free-market think tanks, down to the thousands of tea party patriots protesting throughout 2009.
ObamaCare is forcing people to purchase a product that they don't want and can't ever use. I do not need maternity or pediatric services but have to purchase them. The new policy that would have been "comparable" to my current policy is more expensive with higher deductibles.
The president's comment of "shop around" is so smug. I sat on hold with an insurer while "shopping around" yesterday for over 20 minutes and finally gave up because I had work to do. I'll now have to factor quite a bit of time into my day to "shop around" since this president's dictates have resulted in my loss of health insurance I liked very much, and the market is now flooded with other people "shopping around."
And things are not going to get better. The administration's not keeping its promises to have the website fully functioning by November 1st. Just this week Secretary Sebelius further soiled herself as a national laughingstock with her claims during congressional testimony that Healthcare.gov "didn't crash." Yet at the very second she uttered those words, House Republicans couldn't logon to the system and the error message was played on the overhead during the hearings, "the system is down at the moment."
It's all lies.
From Obama to Axelrod to Sebelius to this idiot Bloggingheads ghoul Bill Scher. It's all lies.
The country has been sold a bill of healthcare goods. And our healthcare system is being systematically dismantled and destroyed. This is no accident. It's like the generals in Vietnam who claimed that "we had to destroy the village in order to save it." Democrats had to destroy American healthcare in order to fundamentally transform it. And they knew that they were f-king the average Joe up the ass. So they lied. The president lied. Congressional Democrats lied. Stephanie Cutter lied. Leftist media shills lied. We've been lied to.
It's time to stop with the lies.
Tell Congress and the president to stop lying. Tell them that they're going pay for their lies. They will pay for it with their political hide, and if criminal negligence is found, they'll pay in a court of law and hopefully with time in a penitentiary. These are monumental lies that bring disgrace to representative government. There's going to be a reckoning. The 2014 elections are one year from now. Each national election is billed as the most important in American history. The 2012 presidential election filled the bill, and conservatives lost. They can't make that mistake again if they hope to salvage whatever decency and free will is left in this country. People need to rise up and say this is f-king enough.
President Obama's #ObamaCare Lie
The president's a f-king liar.
Everyone knows it --- or at least now they do, after the health care debacle is no longer a theoretical possibility, but an abomination now really, truly destroying the American marketplace.
James Taranto has the latest on this cluster-k, "When Fraud Is Legal" (at Memeorandum):
d
Everyone knows it --- or at least now they do, after the health care debacle is no longer a theoretical possibility, but an abomination now really, truly destroying the American marketplace.
James Taranto has the latest on this cluster-k, "When Fraud Is Legal" (at Memeorandum):
Under socialism, there's no such thing as consumer protection.
d
Halloween Skate Jam
The 2013 Burnside skatepark Halloween jam in Portland, Oregon.
Labels:
Halloween,
Skateboarding,
Sports
Can #ObamaCare Fiasco Save the GOP?
From Jonathan Tobin, at Commentary:
More at that top link.
With each passing day since the president’s signature health care legislation was launched it’s now obvious that the administration has lost control of the story. At first it was just a matter of a dysfunctional website. Then it became one in which the incompetence of the Department of Heath and Human Services was compounded by the arrogance of Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the denials of the White House. But once it became apparent that President Obama had been lying for the last three years when he repeatedly promised that Americans would be able to keep their insurance if they liked it rather than being forced onto the ObamaCare exchanges, a tipping point was reached. That more details are leaking out every day that reinforces the negative impression of ObamaCare is adding to the administration’s problems.Well, the rollout debacle's not going to "save" the GOP. It's debatable whether Republicans needing saving. ObamaCare's just the tip of the iceberg of Democrat policy failures. It's just this time Democrats and the Democrat-enabling media can't fool the public with their Orwellian totalitarianism. Republicans need to play their cards right. I expect they'll hold the house next November, but they can't get cocky and they need to offer a popular alternative to the law. Still, it's been a staggering turnaround of fortunes this last few weeks, and it's got the leftists tied up in knots as reality bites down hard.
So it’s little surprise that the New York Times led its front page with a story about how Democrats are “feeling anxious” about the future tied to the ObamaCare boondoggle. While some in the party are claiming, as Senator Chuck Schumer did, that the anger at the Tea Party over the shutdown will be more of a “long-term” liability for the GOP, most Democrats know better. The ObamaCare disaster not only changed the political narrative that worked so well for them. It goes straight to the heart of an underlying liberal weakness: the belief that big government is not only incompetent but also a threat to the wellbeing and the pocketbooks of ordinary Americans.
More at that top link.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)