Saturday, November 23, 2013

SIGINT Strategy: National Security Agency Outlined More Powerful Role

At NYT, "N.S.A. Report Outlined Goals for More Power":
WASHINGTON — Officials at the National Security Agency, intent on maintaining its dominance in intelligence collection, pledged last year to push to expand its surveillance powers, according to a top-secret strategy document.

In a February 2012 paper laying out the four-year strategy for the N.S.A.’s signals intelligence operations, which include the agency’s eavesdropping and communications data collection around the world, agency officials set an objective to “aggressively pursue legal authorities and a policy framework mapped more fully to the information age.”

Written as an agency mission statement with broad goals, the five-page document said that existing American laws were not adequate to meet the needs of the N.S.A. to conduct broad surveillance in what it cited as “the golden age of Sigint,” or signals intelligence. “The interpretation and guidelines for applying our authorities, and in some cases the authorities themselves, have not kept pace with the complexity of the technology and target environments, or the operational expectations levied on N.S.A.’s mission,” the document concluded.

Using sweeping language, the paper also outlined some of the agency’s other ambitions. They included defeating the cybersecurity practices of adversaries in order to acquire the data the agency needs from “anyone, anytime, anywhere.” The agency also said it would try to decrypt or bypass codes that keep communications secret by influencing “the global commercial encryption market through commercial relationships,” human spies and intelligence partners in other countries. It also talked of the need to “revolutionize” analysis of its vast collections of data to “radically increase operational impact.”

The strategy document, provided by the former N.S.A. contractor Edward J. Snowden, was written at a time when the agency was at the peak of its powers and the scope of its surveillance operations was still secret. Since then, Mr. Snowden’s revelations have changed the political landscape.

Prompted by a public outcry over the N.S.A.’s domestic operations, the agency’s critics in Congress have been pushing to limit, rather than expand, its ability to routinely collect the phone and email records of millions of Americans, while foreign leaders have protested reports of virtually unlimited N.S.A. surveillance overseas, even in allied nations. Several inquiries are underway in Washington; Gen. Keith B. Alexander, the N.S.A.’s longest-serving director, has announced plans to retire; and the White House has offered proposals to disclose more information about the agency’s domestic surveillance activities.

The N.S.A. document, titled “Sigint Strategy 2012-2016,” does not make clear what legal or policy changes the agency might seek. The N.S.A.’s powers are determined variously by Congress, executive orders and the nation’s secret intelligence court, and its operations are governed by layers of regulations. While asserting that the agency’s “culture of compliance” would not be compromised, N.S.A. officials argued that they needed more flexibility, according to the paper.

Senior intelligence officials, responding to questions about the document, said that the N.S.A. believed that legal impediments limited its ability to conduct surveillance of terrorism suspects inside the United States. Despite an overhaul of national security law in 2008, the officials said, if a terrorism suspect who is under surveillance overseas enters the United States, the agency has to stop monitoring him until it obtains a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

“N.S.A.’s Sigint strategy is designed to guide investments in future capabilities and close gaps in current capabilities,” the agency said in a statement. “In an ever-changing technology and telecommunications environment, N.S.A. tries to get in front of issues to better fulfill the foreign-intelligence requirements of the U.S. government.”
There's more at that top link.

Actually, this strategy sounds more like what NSA should be doing, but it's all FUBAR now, thanks to the treasonous f-k Snowden.

Covered California Won't Extend Insurance Deadline

At LAT, "California won't extend health plans":


Spurning President Obama's call to let insurers extend canceled health policies, California won't allow 1 million policyholders to keep their health plan for another year.

The board of the Covered California health exchange voted unanimously to break with the president and keep its requirement that insurers terminate most individual policies Dec. 31 because the policies don't meet all the requirements of the Affordable Care Act.

Officials acknowledged that their decision won't satisfy angry consumers and will mean many of them will pay significantly more for new coverage come January. But they worried that allowing widespread renewals could cripple the rollout of the healthcare law in California just as enrollment is picking up steam.

"We know this transition is difficult and some people will be hurt," Covered California board member Susan Kennedy said. "But delaying the transition won't solve a single problem. I think it will make a bad situation worse if we complicate it further."

The state did offer some modest relief for consumers. The exchange will open a special hotline Monday to address policyholders' questions about cancellations and pushed back the deadline to sign up for January coverage to Dec. 23, about a week later.
Yeah, that'll help.

Hopefully you'll get someone on the line who's not on probation or parole.

Crystal Mangum, Duke Lacrosse Accuser, Found Guilty of Second-Degree Murder

At Instapundit, "THE GROUP OF 88 WERE UNAVAILABLE FOR COMMENT: Duke lacrosse false rape accuser found guilty of second-degree murder."

Race-Baiter Hypocrite Oprah Winfrey

ZoNation, via Theo Spark.


'They must have thought themselves members in good standing of the Beltway Nomenklatura and immune to the inconvenience of having to live by rules they crafted for the benefit of the peasantry beyond the Potomac...'

Heh.

At the Weekly Standard, "Winners and Losers":
We learn more about the vagaries of Obamacare every day. People who thought they were somehow okay are discovering that they are getting it in the neck and wondering how this could be. One tends to feel sympathy. But in some cases, not so much. As for instance, the situation described by Jonathan Allen & Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico:
Veteran House Democratic aides are sick over the insurance prices they’ll pay under Obamacare, and they’re scrambling to find a cure.

“In a shock to the system, the older staff in my office (folks over 59) have now found out their personal health insurance costs (even with the government contribution) have gone up 3-4 times what they were paying before,” Minh Ta, chief of staff to Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.), wrote to fellow Democratic chiefs of staff in an email …
More at the link.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Media Coverage of JFK Assassination

I don't see it now, but folks earlier on Twitter were praising the '60s-era media coverage of the Kennedy assassination. I think Walter Cronkite was the greatest.

But also, it's amazing how the Dallas Morning News identified Lee Harvey Oswald as a "Pro-Comminist" leftist at the time. It's highly doubtful we'd have that kind of honesty on the front-pages of today's big media newspapers. Wouldn't want to alienate progressives and Democrats, who are the ideological children of the same movement that marinated Oswald.

Kennedy Coverage photo photo-39_zpsc86ff0e3.jpg

More at London's Daily Mail, "How the JFK assassination transformed media coverage: The idea of broadcasting live breaking news was born."

Democrats Were for the Filibuster Before They Were Against It!

Via Moira Fitzgerald, "SENATE FILIBUSTER NUCLEAR OPTION 2013 REMIX."



Plus, an awesome editorial at the Wall Street Journal, "Senate Rules for Radicals":
Today's Democrats have grown up in the Saul Alinsky tradition, and on Thursday they proved it with a partisan vote to break the Senate filibuster rule for confirming judges and executive-branch nominees. The new rules will empower the party's liberals for as long as they control the White House and Senate, but they will also set a precedent for conservatives to exploit in the future.

Majority Leader Harry Reid broke a GOP filibuster of a judicial nominee on a 52-48 vote. He was prodded by the Democratic Senate classes of 2006-2012, younger liberals in a hurry like Al Franken (Minnesota), Jeff Merkley (Oregon) and Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire). These are the same liberals who enjoyed a rare 60-vote supermajority in 2009-2010 when they rammed through ObamaCare without a single Republican vote. They view the minority as an inconvenience to be rolled.

It's true that Senators of both parties have misused the advice and consent power to make it harder for the executive branch to govern. But the great irony is that Democrats voted to end the practice of judicial filibusters that they pioneered when George W. Bush was President. As the minority from 2003-2005, Democrats demanded 60 votes to confirm executive-branch nominees like John Bolton for U.N. Ambassador.
RTWT.

Also from Roger Pilon, at National Review, "Harry Reid’s Nuclear Hypocrisy."

Nevada Sex Workers Love #ObamaCare!

Hookers for Obama.

At Free Beacon, "Bunny Ranch Hookers Love Obamacare."


Charles Manson in Rolling Stone: Final Confessions of a Psychopath

Actually, I'm not linking the Rolling Stone piece. I've had enough of these idiots and their worship of murderers.

The story's unreal, nevertheless. At LAT, "Charles Manson is commitment-phobic? Won't marry prison girlfriend."

Plus, a great write-up at Canada's National Post, "‘She’s not a woman. She’s a star’: Serial killer Charles Manson planning to marry 25-year-old groupie."

Mary Landrieu Mussolini

At the Hayride, "Mary Voted to Kill the Filibuster Today…"

Mary Landieu photo mussolandrieu_zps1733993f.jpg

Via Memeorandum, "Bill Cassidy staffer tweets Mary Landrieu-Mussolini picture."

And at TPM, "Rep. Cassidy's Campaign Manager Tweets Photo Of 'MussoLandrieu'":
The campaign manager for Rep. Bill Cassidy's (R-LA) Senate campaign tweeted out a link to a photo of Sen. Mary Landrieu's (D-LA) face superimposed on the body of Italian dictator Benito Mussolini an hour after a conservative Louisiana blog posted the image.
Screw 'em. As if I'm supposed to be upset by a Photoshop.

Rachel Williams: Zoo's Great British Babe Search Winner 2013

Whoa!

This lady is freakin' worthy!

At Zoo Today, "Meet Rachel Williams, your winner of our Great British Babe search 2013!"



Leftist Democrat Martha Robertson Running Away from #ObamaCare in #NY23

We'll be seeing stories like this for the next 11 months.

At Legal Insurrection, "Dem House candidate runs from past single-payer support after Obamacare debacle."



Also at the NRCC, "Martha Robertson and the Democratic Socialists of America Sing for Single Payer!"

Yep. She's a "Democrat-Socialist."

But I thought that was a right-wing conspiracy, or something. Fail.

Hot Beth Williams!

What a lady.

Via Twitter.

Beth Williams Hot! photo BZNpzf5CEAAh994_zps4a61d646.jpg

The Man Who Used to Walk on Water

Brutal.

At the Economist, "How Barack Obama can get at least some of his credibility back."
AN AMERICAN president’s most important power is not the veto pen or the ability to launch missiles. It is the bully pulpit. When a president speaks, the world listens. That is why Barack Obama’s credibility matters. If people do not believe what he says, his power to shape events withers. And recent events have seriously shaken people’s belief in Mr Obama. At home, the chaos of his health reform has made it harder for him to get anything else done. Abroad, he is seen as weak and disengaged, to the frustration of America’s allies.
Continue reading.

Used to Walk on Water photo 20131123_cna400_zps06f5cd74.jpg

Via Instapundit, "... not the Economist cover Obama wants to see."

JFK Single-Bullet Theory Probed Using Latest Forensics Technology

A CBS News story, at Guns.com, "Father-son duo use latest forensic tech to prove JFK single-bullet theory (VIDEO)."

The entire PBS Nova video is here, "Cold Case JFK."



It's very compelling, but see JFK Facts, "The single bullet theory and the perils of JFK denialism."

I'm a "denialist," I guess.

PREVIOUSLY: "Kennedy Assassination Trutherism."

Kennedy Assassination Trutherism

Fifty years ago today. And we're still dealing with Kennedy truthers.

At the Los Angeles Times, "Seeking the truth behind the tragedy of Kennedy's assassination":
Barb Junkkarinen emerges from the bedroom with the gift her husband and son gave her one Christmas.

It's a 1940 Italian-made rifle, like the one Lee Harvey Oswald fired from a sixth-floor window at the Texas School Book Depository, killing President Kennedy on an autumn afternoon in Dallas. He'd spirited the weapon into the building by disguising it as a curtain rod.

"This is how Oswald carried his package," she says, holding the butt of the rifle low, the way witnesses described. "He had it cupped in his hand, like this."

Junkkarinen's husband, Juha, and son, Jason, nod at the demonstration they've seen again and again. They help adjust the unloaded weapon just so. They point out there's also a scope and ammunition.

Over more than half her lifetime, Barb Junkkarinen has made a hobby of delving into rumors, theories and contradictory facts that swirl around a killing that continues to titillate — and divide — Americans on the 50th anniversary of the events of Nov. 22, 1963.

In the world of online Kennedy discussion groups, she learned "lurkers" tune in but never post; "fringies" attribute a political motive to every turn; false witnesses claim to have been places they haven't. Those who believe Oswald acted alone are "lone-nutters."

And people like Junkkarinen are CTs, for conspiracy theorists.

She has amassed a trove of artifacts: autopsy reports, investigation documents, shelves of books and photos, and a model of the Lincoln Continental limousine Kennedy rode in when he was shot in Dealey Plaza. There's also a life-sized plastic model of a human skull she uses to make detailed arguments about bullet entry and exit.

Inside her Portland-area home office, she avidly dissects the latest theories of the paranoid and the emotionally unstable.

They include those who believe Kennedy was first hit in the throat with a bullet made of ice; that a man in Dealey Plaza fatally wounded the president with a dart fired from an umbrella; and that J. Edgar Hoover attended a party the night before the assassination celebrating JFK's imminent demise.

Junkkarinen rejects those theories. She blames gangsters and spies.
Well, I'm a "lone-nutter."

Although, since Oswald was a communist, it's natural you'd get Democrats as the leading conspiracists. See, "Secretary of State John Kerry Has 'Doubts' Lee Harvey Oswald Acted Alone in Assassination of President John F. Kennedy."

And don't miss Gerald Posner's book, Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Nuclear Option

At the Los Angeles Times, "Senate Democrats invoke 'nuclear option' on filibusters":


WASHINGTON — Democrats made a historic change to Senate rules Thursday, ending the minority party's ability to use filibusters to block most presidential nominations and, in the process, virtually guaranteeing that the rest of President Obama's term will be dominated by executive actions and court battles rather than legislation.

In changing the long-standing rules with a near party-line vote in the middle of the session, Democrats brushed aside a century of congressional tradition and further embittered relations between the parties on an already deadlocked Capitol Hill.

The Senate Republican minority, which will see its power dramatically curtailed, threatened reprisals and characterized the rule change as a political power grab, comparing it to Obama's push to pass the landmark Affordable Health Care act in 2010 without bipartisan support.

The decision by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to deploy the so-called nuclear option means Senate confirmations of presidential appointments — except for Supreme Court justices — will proceed by a simple majority vote. Previously, a 60-vote threshold had become the norm to avoid a filibuster by the minority party. The change does not affect filibusters on legislation.

Over the years, Democrats and Republican have used filibusters to block nominations, but the practice became much more common in recent years.

"I realize that neither party has been blameless for these tactics," Obama said Thursday in supporting the rule change. "They've developed over years, and it seems as if they've continually escalated. But today's pattern of obstruction — it just isn't normal. A majority of senators believe, as I believe, that enough is enough."

Only three Democrats — Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Carl Levin of Michigan — joined Republicans in the 48-52 vote...
Continue reading. The rest of the piece explains how the rule-chang passed and how the Obama White House expects to govern by executive fiat over the remainder of the term.

More at Memeorandum.

Che-Loving Kshama Sawant Exhorts Workers to Seize Boeing

Fits News has the report, "Seattle Socialist: Boeing Workers Should Rise Up."

Also at WND, "Socialist lawmaker urges workers to 'take over' Boeing."

She's a freakin' murder-loving communist, it turns out. At her election-night party headquarters, Che Guevara posters adorned the walls.

 photo election_2013_sawant_party_poster_allyce_andrew1_zps53ee506a.jpg

Che was a remorseless mass murderer. It's pretty sick he's held up as a icon by a top official in one of America's biggest cities, but it's no surprise. (See my previous Che blogging at the link.)

There's No Substitute for American Power — And Decency

From Walter Lohman, at the National Interest, "What Typhoon Haiyan Taught Us about China":
If the Asia Pacific region ever needed a reminder of the difference between a U.S.-led order and one shaped by the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the respective reactions of the two to Typhoon Haiyan is a stark one. One nation sends its navy and Marines and pledges $20 million in assistance. The other sends $100,000 in government assistance until it folds to the hectoring of the international community and increases its contribution to a still-miserly $1.6 million.

American friends and allies in the region should seriously consider the implication of this comparison. It is not an aberration.

The U.S. has made mistakes over the years. Alliances with undemocratic regimes—whether Marcos in the Philippines or Suharto in Indonesia—were often necessary in winning the Cold War. In some cases, as in Taiwan or South Korea, our embrace was a critical factor in their eventual democratization. But certainly, there were occasions when we embraced autocrats longer and more fully than necessary.

It all seems so clear now. At the time, it was not. And operating in real time, we got the details wrong on occasion. The U.S., however, has always sought to exercise a basic decency in the conduct of its foreign policy. Its electorate demands it. And in the absence of a dominant, overarching strategic context like the Cold War, the judgment calls have only gotten easier...
Continue reading.

24 Grooms Seeing Their Brides for the First Time

This is cool, from BuzzFeed.