Jessica Davies in Sexy Black Lingerie

At Egotastic!, "Jessica Davies Shows Her British Love Mounds."

And ICYMI, "Jessica Davies Bouncing."

'Deltopia' Riot at UC Santa Barbara's Isla Vista Community

The Isla Vista community has the reputation as the biggest, rowdiest party town in the country. The year my wife and I moved down to UCSB, 1992, Halloween fell on a Saturday, and the County Sheriff and UCSB authorities blocked off the streets to prevent an imminent riot. But they can't stop everything, especially when these parties are launched without permits from the county. Often times people are killed when they get too drunk and fall over the cliffs onto the rocky beach below.

At LAT, "Amid party debris, calm returns to student enclave after riot":

ISLA VISTA, Calif. — The scene Monday on Del Playa Drive was a curious, uniquely Isla Vista mix: part laid-back beach vibe, part riot aftermath.

Beach towels fluttered over cliffside balconies as UC Santa Barbara students enjoyed spring weather. Dumpsters overflowed with beer boxes and red cups.

"I was in the riot," one young woman said nonchalantly to her friend as they rode beach cruisers.

"I got hit by a tear gas grenade," a male student told his friends as they carried an inflatable pool over their heads.

They were talking about Deltopia, a social media-fueled street party that spun out of control Saturday night, leaving a sheriff's deputy seriously injured and more than 100 people arrested.

The eruption of violence was nothing new for unincorporated Isla Vista, a densely packed, student-dominated community where the average age is 23 and officials have struggled for decades to curb sporadic bouts of Bacchanalia.

"We've been dealing with this issue one way or another for the last 45 years," Santa Barbara County Sheriff Bill Brown said. "There's been problems and challenges in Isla Vista that don't exist elsewhere in the country."

Last year, authorities received 440 calls during Deltopia, and a visiting student from Cal State Poly San Luis Obispo was found dead in the surf after falling off the cliff.

The estimated 22,000 residents of Isla Vista, 60% of whom are UC Santa Barbara students, often blame incidents on outsiders. But the campus' student president sent an email to students Monday saying that they need to take responsibility.

"Yes, it is true that much of the crime that happens is connected to out-of-towners, but who invites these people into our town?" Jonathan Abboud wrote. "We do. It is perfectly OK to celebrate holidays such as Deltopia, but we must consider that inviting our seven best friends from high school does tend to contribute to the problem."

Like the area's raucous Halloween celebrations, Deltopias are not organized events as much as calls to come and party, now trumpeted on social media.

"We have asked over and over if [backers] want to come forward and take responsibility" for getting permits, County Supervisor Doreen Farr said Monday. "And nobody has been willing to do that...

Also, "Spring break party riot near UC Santa Barbara spurs calls for change."

ADDED: Also at Blackmailers Don't Shoot, "Shocker: Gathering of Drunk, Half-Naked College Students Ends in Disaster."

Constituents Outraged at Irvine Councilman Larry Agran Proposal for 'Friendship City' in Communist Vietnam

Yeah, and this from a Democrat who ran for his party's 1992 presidential nomination.

Heh.

Remember, the O.C. is home to the largest number of Vietnam refugees in the country.

Gotta love that Democrat Party ethnic sensitivity, lol.

At LAT, "As anger builds, Irvine official drops plan to bond city with Vietnam":

John Duong, who lives in Irvine and heads the city’s Finance Commission, said he was “floored” that a veteran politician like Agran would make such a proposal.

“I don’t think he understands our sentiments and emotional scars,” Duong said. “Why bring back painful memories for people who value freedom?”

Well, obviously Democrats don't truly value freedom. Shoot, Communist Vietnam is right up there with Cuba as the cool spot for leftist happy campers!

Shoot, they can't wait for Americans to adopt the Cuban healthcare system! At National Journal, "Sen. Tom Harkin Visits Cuba, Is Pretty Impressed With Its Public Health System." Makes sense: Castro loves ObamaCare!

Damned Communists, sheesh!

Obama to Force Government Contractors to Reveal Salary Breakdowns by Sex and Race in Equal Pay Drive

Well, it's not like Dear Leader's diktats are a surprise anymore or anything.

A Blazing Cat Fur.

Strange though, notes Instapundit, "Once you impose the ‘ceteris paribus’ condition, the alleged 23% gender pay gap starts to quickly evaporate."

Well, O' Great One! prolly didn't do so well in economics, although we'll never know with those Columbia academic transcripts nailed down tighter than the gold at New York's Federal Reserve Bank, lol.

Communist Party USA Pledges to Help Obama in November: 'We've Got Your Back...'

Hey, you gotta love it!

At WND, "Communists to Obama: We've got your back."

And at Frugal Café Blog Zone, "Communist Party Loves Obama, Says Will Help Rescue Democrat Party from Crash-and-Burn Elections."

'The idea that America is a rape culture is a particularly vicious big lie, because it brands all men as rapists or rape facilitators..'

Well, yeah, that's exactly what the radical feminists set out to do. Brand all men are "rapists or rape facilitators...'

At the Other McCain, "#RapeCulture as Propaganda."

Roots of Totalitarian Liberalism

Again, it's "leftism," but lots of folks on the right have caved to the left's mangling of the meaning of "liberal."

That said, a nice piece, from Scott Johnson, at Power Line:

With the cashiering of Brendan Eich as Mozilla’s chief executive officer last week, we are struggling to understand what we have just seen. There is an important book that remains to be written about the totalitarian imperative at the heart of liberalism, and the insight into the nature of the larger forces at work is one of the many reasons Eich’s forced departure strikes a nerve. It is a revealing moment. This is where we are headed...

Keep reading.

Silicon Valley's Trust Problem

From Glenn Reynolds, at USA Today, "Silicon Valley Scares Americans":

Silicon Valley has a trust problem, and it's growing. Some of this is the result of National Security Agency spying — and the tech community's cooperation with same — and some of it is based on other things tech leaders are doing. But the worst of it is based on who our tech overlords have become.

The NSA spying has already done harm enough. As Glenn Derene warned in Popular Mechanics when the story first broke, fear of NSA spying is giving a boost to offshore competitors, as companies and users seek hardware and software without back doors and compromised security standards. Some foreign customers feel betrayed by Google, Facebook, and other tech giants.

But even at home, the tech community is hurting. According to a study by Harris Interactive last week, people are actually reducing their Internet usage because of the Edward Snowden revelations and general fears about privacy. The study found that 47% say they have changed their behavior online, and 26% say they're doing less online shopping. Among younger users, aged 18 to 34, the online shopping number was 33%...

More (via Instapundit).

Homophobe Hypocrisy! Sam Yagan, OkCupid Co-Founder and CEO, Funded Anti-Gay Campaign!

At Uncrunched, "THE HYPOCRISY OF SAM YAGAN & OKCUPID." Hat Tip: Instapundit.

This Yagan should be out. He gave to former far-right Utah Congressman Chris Cannon. According to Uncrunched, "Cannon has a special kind of hate for gays."



Left-wing hypocrites. Boy, we should see a firestorm of protest over this guy. Hmmm.

ADDED: From Ironic Surrealism, "BACKLASH! Over 30K (& Counting) Condemn Mozilla on Their Fascist Purge of Brendan Eich on Their Own Website Mozilla.Org [Screenshot] - OKCupid Co-Founder/Match.Com CEO Donated to AntiGay Candidate."

#Democrats Blast Breitbart Nancy Pelosi Posters

C'mon, you think they'd expect anything less from Breitbart?!!

At Politico (via Memeorandum):

Democrats are slamming an ad campaign from Breitbart to promote its new California coverage that features a graphic illustration of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s face on a scantily clad woman’s body in a suggestive position.

“To say the least, the Breitbart News ad is foul, offensive, and disrespectful to all women,” Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said in a statement. “It is a disgusting new low and would be reprehensible against any woman – regardless of party.”

The conservative news outlet launched its California coverage Monday with an ad campaign featuring a series of image illustrations, including the Pelosi one, which appeared to combine her image with one of pop star Miley Cyrus’s infamous Video Music Awards performance, and a graphic of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg’s head on the torso of a woman with exposed breasts, save for carefully placed Breitbart logos.

The ads made a splash online, with several commentators noting on Twitter that the image of the House Democratic leader especially crossed a line...

Check out the entire graphic at Feministing, "This has got to be a new low, even for the conservative media."

And at LAT, "Conservative California website quickly stirs controversy." Well, duh.

Welcome to the Liberal Leftist Gulag

From Kevin Williamson, at National Review (with strike-through leftist for liberal), at National Review, "The Liberal Leftist Gulag":

The word “liberal” has taken a beating over the last few days: A Mozilla executive was hounded out of his position at the firm he co-founded by left-wing campaigners resolved to punish him for having made a donation to a successful California ballot initiative that defined marriage in traditional terms; Adam Weinstein, whose downwardly mobile credibility has taken him from ABC to Gawker, called for literally imprisoning people with the wrong views about global warming, writing, “Those malcontents must be punished and stopped”; Mr. Weinstein himself was simply forwarding a dumbed-down-enough-for-Gawker version of the arguments of philosophy professor Lawrence Torcello; Katherine Timpf, a reporter for Campus Reform, faced a human barricade to keep her from asking questions of those attending a feminist leadership conference, whose organizers informed her that the group was “inclusive” and therefore she was “not welcome here”; Charles Murray, one of the most important social scientists of his generation, was denounced as a “known white supremacist” by Texas Democrats for holding heterodox views about education policy; national Democrats spent the week arguing for the anti-free-speech side of a landmark First Amendment case and the anti-religious-freedom side of a case involving the Religious Freedom Restoration Act; Lois Lerner, the Left’s best friend at the IRS, faces contempt charges related to her role in the Democrats’ coopting the IRS as a weapon against their political enemies; Harry Reid, a liberal champion of campaign-finance reform, was caught channeling tens of thousands of dollars to his granddaughter while conspicuously omitting her surname, which is also his surname, from official documents, cloaking the transaction, while one of his California colleagues, a liberal champion of gun control, was indicted on charges of running guns to an organized-crime syndicate.

The convocation of clowns on the left screeched with one semi-literate and inchoate voice when my colleague Jonah Goldberg, borrowing the precise words of one of their own, titled a book Liberal Fascism. Most of them didn’t read it, but the ones who did apparently took what was intended as criticism and read it as a blueprint for political action.

Welcome to the Liberal Leftist Gulag...

More

They're not "liberal." They're ideological leftists, and they're driven by hatred and a diabolical lust for power. See, "The Left Isn't Pro-Gay — It's Pro-Power."

Tammy Bruce: Persecution of Brendan Eich 'Not What Civil Rights Movements About...'

Tammy Bruce is lesbian and libertarian. She's done battle with the left for decades and knows whereof she speaks.

At Twitchy, "‘Bastion of intolerance and punishment’: Tammy Bruce shreds Mozilla for caving to ‘gay gestapo’."

Gay civil rights movement began to make sure people weren't punished for who they were. Now look what you've become #gaygestapo @mozilla


— Tammy Bruce (@HeyTammyBruce) April 3, 2014

Afghan Elections Point to Runoff, Waning Karzai Influence (Warmer Relations with U.S.?)

At WSJ, "Candidate Viewed as President's Choice Appears to Trail Far Behind":

Surreal pic. "@AFP: Afghan women queue outside a polling station in Herat to vote in the presidential elections. pic.twitter.com/NIAO5UfZZB”

— Kathleen McKinley (@KatMcKinley) April 5, 2014

KABUL—Former World Bank executive Ashraf Ghani and opposition leader Abdullah Abdullah appeared to be the two front-runners in Afghanistan's presidential election, sidelining a candidate viewed as President Hamid Karzai's favorite, according to partial results tallied by news organizations and one candidate.

A victory for Mr. Abdullah or Mr. Ghani could significantly reduce the influence of Mr. Karzai, who has ruled Afghanistan since the 2001 U.S. invasion. Both candidates say they will sign the bilateral security agreement, which is needed to maintain American aid and a limited U.S. military presence in Afghanistan once the international coalition's current mandate expires in December. Mr. Karzai has infuriated Washington by refusing to complete the deal.

The Wall Street Journal tallied partial election results from visits to roughly 100 polling stations, out of more than 20,000 nationwide, in the capital Kabul and the cities of Mazar-e-Sharif in the north, Kandahar in the south, and Gardez and Jalalabad in the east. At nearly all these stations, Messrs. Ghani and Abdullah were the clear leaders, according to counts posted by local poll supervisors. Mr. Karzai's former foreign minister, Zalmai Rassoul, trailed far behind.

It wasn't immediately clear whether Mr. Ghani or Mr. Abdullah managed to garner the absolute majority needed to avoid a runoff between the top two finishers. Diplomats, campaign insiders and election observers predicted a runoff sometime in late May or early June.

Afghanistan's Pajhwok news agency, which collated its information from Kabul and several other provinces, projected 42.1% for Mr. Ghani and 40.7% for Mr. Abdullah. Their sample was heavily weighted in Kabul. A separate tally compiled by Mr. Ghani's observers and posted on his campaign website predicted 53% for him and 35% for Mr. Abdullah, based on 10% of results.

Official final results aren't expected for weeks to allow time for fraud complaints to be resolved. While reports of ballot-stuffing came in from all over the country, the election appeared cleaner than the 2009 presidential election, when more than one million votes had to be disqualified, domestic and foreign observers said...

More. And again, I'm amazed at the gendered vote. Women really exercised their rights.

When Tara Dublin Got Off Work Yesterday...

I was wondering how she'd respond to the McCain treatment, and she didn't let us down!

.@rsmccain Wait until this lady gets off work and checks her mentions, lol! She's going implode, heh.

— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) April 6, 2014

I'm just getting out of work & apparently some obtuse anti-#LGBT chode decided to write a hate blog about me. Righteous. #wtf

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 7, 2014

Here's the entry at Urban Dictionary for "chode":

1. Chode:
A penis wider than it is long
My boyfriend wanted a hand-job but i couldn't get a good grip because he had a chode.

Whoa! A vile skanky bitch!

. @suzy_rice @AmPowerBlog Hey, you two get a room, have a great hate fuck, leave me out of your narrow views of the world. #BLOCKED

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

"Chodes" and "hate fuck." Man, she's a scuzzy, foul-mouthed lefty whack job, lol!

The Left Isn't Pro-Gay — It's Pro-Power

From Daniel Greenfield, at Frontpage Magazine:

Libertarians and liberal Republicans have been proposing a truce on social issues in order to be able to concentrate on fiscal issues, but there is no such thing as a truce on any issue with the left.

Brendan Eich offered the left a truce on gay marriage. He talked about tolerance and diversity and he got his head handed to him. His forced departure from the Mozilla Foundation, which is behind the Firefox browser, should be a wake up call to anyone on the right who still thinks that social issues can be taken off the table and that we can all agree to disagree.

Those on the right who insist that conservatism should be reduced to fiscal issues imagine that the culture war is a fight that the right picked with the left. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The left does not care about gay marriage. In most left-wing regimes, homosexuality was persecuted. It was illegal in the USSR. Gay men were locked up in Cuba and are still targeted in China. Nicolas Maduro, the current hero of the left, openly uses homophobic language without any criticism from his Western admirers. It goes without saying that homosexuality is criminalized throughout the Muslim world.

Engels viewed homosexuality as a perversion born out of the bourgeois way of life that would be eliminated under socialism. The Revolutionary Communist Party of the United States stated that homosexuality “is a product of the decay of capitalism” and vowed that once the revolution took place, a “struggle will be waged to eliminate it and reform homosexuals.”

The left’s shift on this issue, as on many issues, was purely tactical. The left’s leading lights were racists who jumped into civil rights. They were sexists who became feminists. They were advocates for the working class who despised the idea of working for a living.

The culture war does not emerge from the left’s deeply held beliefs. Its leaders could care less about the things that they pretend to care about. It emerges instead from the need to maintain a constant state of domestic conflict.

You can’t have a truce when the other side wants a war.

Did the activists who claimed Eich’s scalp care about him or his $1,000 donation to defend marriage? They’re already forgetting his name and moving on to the next target. Eich just happened to make a good target. The Mozilla Foundation is shaky, its board was insecure, and once an online dating company cynically came out with a publicity stunt to keep the news cycle churning, the scalp of the man behind Javascript was claimed. If he had hung on for another few days, the whole thing would have gone away.

Next week it will be someone else. And then the week after that.

Opting out of the conflict means standing by while men like Eich are torn down, not because they did anything wrong, but because destroying them allows the left to feel the thrill of its power over people.

Every gang needs to hurt and terrorize people in order to feel its power. Unlike a Chicago street gang which goes in for an honest mugging or beating, the online activists of the left do their dirty work in this way. Afterward there is no blood and there are no bruises, but lives are destroyed and its social justice activists chortle to themselves coming off an adrenaline high before going after someone else.

The purpose of these purges is not to make the country more tolerant, but to make it more afraid. The message of the Eich purge is not, “accept gay marriage,” it’s “don’t question us.” As many have pointed out, Eich had the same view of gay marriage at the time he made that donation as Obama and Hillary.

But Eich wasn’t “us.” He wasn’t a member of the club...

More.

As I always say, the left is all about power, and they'll literally destroy anyone who stands in their way. I know this first hand because I've been standing tall against these demons for years. The culture war never ends because the left relies on long worn-out cultural tropes like "white racism" to bash dissenters and force them in line. And to do this they rely almost exclusively on lies. Hatred and lies --- and violence when they have the chance to inflict it. I had so many people after 2008 tell me about how they supported homosexual issues, that they were all libertarian and some such bull, that after awhile I just blew these people off. Now a lot of them are coming back on the scene and saying, "My god, wtf just happened?!!" Welcome to the left's relentless wars of fake equality. All they want is mass conformity to grease their slide to tyranny. The backlash against Mozilla's hate is building. Bummer for 'em. Leftists are going to get it this week even better than they give.

Blacklisted at Mozilla

The Wall Street Journal editorial board weighs in, "Brendan Eich's case is another reason to rethink campaign disclosure laws" (via Google):

The resignation under pressure late last week by Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich for opposing gay marriage is a disturbing episode for corporate governance as well as for the traditional tolerance of other points of view in American life. Some of our liberal friends have been dismissing our warnings about the politics of personal vilification emerging on the left, but here is a case study.

Mr. Eich is a well known technologist who invented JavaScript and in 1998 helped to start Mozilla, which makes the popular Firefox Web browser. The 52-year-old became CEO two weeks ago, whereupon it emerged thanks to California's campaign-finance disclosure laws that he had donated $1,000 to support Proposition 8. That was the 2008 ballot initiative that defined marriage as between a man and a woman. Voters approved it but the judiciary struck it down.

Nothing we've read suggests that Mr. Eich has exhibited any personal bias in the workplace. And he affirmed that he would not change Mozilla's policy of providing the same health benefits to same-sex couples as married heterosexuals. He apologized to anyone who was hurt by his personal beliefs, but he declined to renounce them.

The Mozilla board denies that it pressured him to leave, but Mitchell Baker, executive chairwoman of the Mozilla Foundation, said in a statement that "Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech. And you need free speech to fight for equality. Figuring out how to stand for both at the same time can be hard." Translation: If you work for Mozilla, Ms. Baker does not have your back.

Mr. Eich's views on marriage are no different than those held by President Obama as recently as 2012, or by Hillary Clinton until last year. The new political censors presumably gave those Democrats a pass because they assumed they were hiding their real convictions until it became politically advantageous to express them. But Mr. Eich is being drummed out of Silicon Valley for having the courage to stick to his.

Mr. Eich's treatment is another reason to rethink our views on campaign-finance disclosure laws. Years ago we supported reform that would deregulate campaign donation laws in return for immediate online disclosure.

But Justice Clarence Thomas made us think with his concurring opinion in 2010 in Citizens United that dissented on disclosure...

More.

Well, getting to the end of the editorial I'm reminded of James Taranto's piece on this from a couple of days ago, "Justice Thomas Was Right: Citizens United and the defenestration of Brendan Eich."

Read the whole thing at the link. What struck me when I first read it was Taranto's long quotation from Thomas' concurring opinion, where he dissented from the majority (8-1) on campaign disclosures:

Some opponents of Proposition 8 compiled this information [to attack Proposition 8 supporters] and created Web sites with maps showing the locations of homes or businesses of Proposition 8 supporters. Many supporters (or their customers) suffered property damage, or threats of physical violence or death, as a result. They cited these incidents in a complaint they filed after the 2008 election, seeking to invalidate California's mandatory disclosure laws. Supporters recounted being told: "Consider yourself lucky. If I had a gun I would have gunned you down along with each and every other supporter," or, "we have plans for you and your friends." Proposition 8 opponents also allegedly harassed the measure's supporters by defacing or damaging their property. Two religious organizations supporting Proposition 8 reportedly received through the mail envelopes containing a white powdery substance.

Those accounts are consistent with media reports describing Proposition 8-related retaliation. The director of the nonprofit California Musical Theater gave $1,000 to support the initiative; he was forced to resign after artists complained to his employer. The director of the Los Angeles Film Festival was forced to resign after giving $1,500 because opponents threatened to boycott and picket the next festival. And a woman who had managed her popular, family-owned restaurant for 26 years was forced to resign after she gave $100, because "throngs of [angry] protesters" repeatedly arrived at the restaurant and "shout[ed] 'shame on you' at customers." The police even had to "arriv[e] in riot gear one night to quell the angry mob" at the restaurant. Some supporters of Proposition 8 engaged in similar tactics; one real estate businessman in San Diego who had donated to a group opposing Proposition 8 "received a letter from the Prop. 8 Executive Committee threatening to publish his company's name if he didn't also donate to the 'Yes on 8' campaign."

The success of such intimidation tactics has apparently spawned a cottage industry that uses forcibly disclosed donor information to pre-empt citizens' exercise of their First Amendment rights. Before the 2008 Presidential election, a "newly formed nonprofit group . . . plann[ed] to confront donors to conservative groups, hoping to create a chilling effect that will dry up contributions." Its leader, "who described his effort as 'going for the jugular,' " detailed the group's plan to send a "warning letter . . . alerting donors who might be considering giving to right-wing groups to a variety of potential dangers, including legal trouble, public exposure and watchdog groups digging through their lives."

These instances of retaliation sufficiently demonstrate why this Court should invalidate mandatory disclosure and reporting requirements. But amici [friends of the court] present evidence of yet another reason to do so--the threat of retaliation from elected officials. As amici's submissions make clear, this threat extends far beyond a single ballot proposition in California. For example, a candidate challenging an incumbent state attorney general [in West Virginia] reported that some members of the State's business community feared donating to his campaign because they did not want to cross the incumbent; in his words, " 'I go to so many people and hear the same thing: "I sure hope you beat [the incumbent], but I can't afford to have my name on your records. He might come after me next." ' "

Here's the decision.

I blogged all about this at the time. I had a couple of emails from people whose businesses were targeted simply because they supported the initiative. This is the kind of intimidation that was rife during Jim Crow, that if you got "uppity" your home would be burned down and you and your family would be lynched. When I raised these very facts to Tara Dublin, particularly regarding the leftist hate spewed at black people in Los Angeles, she blew her wig. Literally. She started spewing hatred and profanity and bragging about how she was going to block all the "homophobes." Regressive leftists are just not smart. They will bowl you over with emotion, however, the strongest of which is diabolical hatred.

Homosexual Extremist John Aravosis Goes Full Godwin on Fox Sunday's Media Buzz with Howard Kurtz

According to Godwin's Law, when political argument devolves to making Nazi analogies, the proponents of the analogy have lost the debate. I'm actually critical of Godwin's Law to the extent that it removes legitimate comparisons from debate, but when you invoke the Holocaust to attack someone who supported a ballot proposition that passed with nearly 53 percent of the vote, you're seriously a sick nutjob.

At Gateway Pundit, "Outrageous! Gay Activist Compares Brendan Eich & Gay Marriage Opponents to Holocaust Deniers (Video)."

Remember, "'Without question and without exaggeration, the 'gay rights movement' is the angriest, most ruthless, most controlling, most intolerant of all the ideological enterprises in the country. Now, everyone knows it...'"

And they're proving it everyday, "Gay Rights Thought-Enforcer Tara Dublin Can't Handle the Truth."

Newt Gingrich on 'This Week': Mozilla Persecution the 'Most Open, Blatant Example of the New Fascism...'

Here's Gingrich on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos":



And boy, it's been quite a weekend. See, "Gay Rights Thought-Enforcer Tara Dublin Can't Handle the Truth," and "Grocery Owner Chauncy Childs Donates to 'Gay Suicide Prevention Group' in Bid to Appease Homosexual Torquemadas."

And Robert Stacy McCain aggregates some of it, with commentary, "If @TaraDublinRocks Didn’t Exist, Would @AmPowerBlog Have to Invent Her?"

And lots more:

* "Like Most Leftist Groups, the LGBT Crowd Are Wolves in Sheeps' Clothing."

* "Charles Krauthammer: The Left's Attack on Brendan Eich Was Totalitarian — #UninstallFirefox."

* "Celebrate Conformity!"

* "'Without question and without exaggeration, the 'gay rights movement' is the angriest, most ruthless, most controlling, most intolerant of all the ideological enterprises in the country. Now, everyone knows it...'"

* "The Left Legitimizes Despicable Tactics."

* "Why Firefox Is Blocked — #UninstallFirefox."

* "'If this is the gay rights movement today – hounding our opponents with a fanaticism more like the religious right than anyone else – then count me out...'."

Gay Rights Thought-Enforcer Tara Dublin Can't Handle the Truth

Boy, that didn't take long.

I tweeted my Portland grocery store post to this woman Tara Dublin, who features a Human Rights Campaign equality banner at her avatar background, and she proudly announced she wasn't going to take the bait. And then she quickly did otherwise and proved herself an intolerant fascist thought-enforcer. Man, it was beautiful!

@AmPowerBlog If you're trying to bait me, it won't work.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog What does that phrase even mean?

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

, @AmPowerBlog Actually I think "Homosexual Torquemada" would be an awesome drag name.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog Really? She is a BUSINESS OWNER. I don't care what you think, but once you broadcast it to the world, all bets are off.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog The #LGBT community is the last minority where it's "ok" to discriminate them, and NO IT IS NOT OKAY. It is ILLEGAL.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog So, I'm going to use whatever influence I have to make people aware. They can choose to shop there or not. I will not.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog Thought? Sure. Broadcasting of hate on a public website? Maybe not so much if you're a local business owner who wants business.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

. @AmPowerBlog She wasn't just thinking, she PUBLISHED IT ONLINE FOR ALL TO SEE. Can you not make that distinction?

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

, @AmPowerBlog I do not care what people THINK. I care about what they TELL EVERYONE BY USING THE INTERNET.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

.@taradublinrocks That's called freedom of expression. You just said you are going to fight WHAT she was thinking to the end.

— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog Her store isn't open yet. And she won't have to exclude any, since probably none will shop there.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

.@taradublinrocks Again, there's no evidence that I saw that she planned to discriminate against gays. She simply expressed an opinion.

— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog Again, not just thinking. She chose to post her hate for anyone to see. OOPSIE.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog And had she also said it about Jews, blacks, other minorities? It's okay to post that kind of hate too? It's the same.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog YOU answer. Difference between thought and action.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

. @AmPowerBlog Opinions, yes. But if you're going to broadcast them, know there will be consequences.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

. @AmPowerBlog You don't seem to get how a THOUGHT is different from a public action.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@MaroonedInMarin @AmPowerBlog Uh, when you broadcast your discriminatory thoughts publicly, I'm allowed to disagree with them.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

. @AmPowerBlog Do NOT call the #LGBT community violent. No action has been taken. This is a loving community.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

. @AmPowerBlog Of COURSE not. Firebombing is illegal. Like discrimination is illegal. She POSTED. Thought crime? Get over yourself.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog I will peacefully protest, as is my right.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@AmPowerBlog NO, there will not. #LGBT protests are always peaceful, it's the anti-#LGBT protests that get violent.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

.@taradublinrocks Blacks were called "nigger," spit on, and accosted for supporting Prop. 8. Will you stand against the gay hate mobs?

— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) April 6, 2014

.@taradublinrocks No, they are not always peaceful. They are mean, vindictive and violent: http://t.co/YbZ2327TJB

— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) April 6, 2014

.@taradublinrocks FTW!

— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) April 6, 2014

When you're losing the argument, run away RT @taradublinrocks: @MaroonedInMarin @AmPowerBlog BYE to you too!

— Marooned in Marin (@MaroonedInMarin) April 6, 2014

Damn that #LGBT community for wanting to be treated equally everywhere like all other Americans! So nutty of them. #StraightAllyForLIFE

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

BTW anyone who uses the phrase "thought crime" in an argument can just get bent and look elsewhere to peddle their bullshit. #NoTime

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

. @suzy_rice @AmPowerBlog Hey, you two get a room, have a great hate fuck, leave me out of your narrow views of the world. #BLOCKED

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@RightGhost @AmPowerBlog @instapundit All caps are reserved for the more obtuse people who can't possibly ever be wrong! #bye

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

@FilmLadd I'm not attacking anyone. I don't care what anyone thinks. Acting on a hateful belief, that's different. I don't like that.

— Tara Dublin (@taradublinrocks) April 6, 2014

So there you go: A sad little lady with the cognitive capacity of a small child. Frankly, that's the caliber of thinking of the overwhelming majority of regressive leftists. Combine that with leftist hatred and intolerance, in you're in the territory of violence and recrimination from these totalitarians. They're evil people. Funny, too, how little this imbecile Tara even realizes it.

Like Most Leftist Groups, the LGBT Crowd Are Wolves in Sheeps' Clothing

At Astute Bloggers:

THE LGBT CROWD ARE LIKE CASTRO AND MUGABE AND LENIN AND HIS SUCCESSORS - THEY ALWAYS PROMISE THEY'RE BENIGN FOLKS WHO JUST WANT TO LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD, BUT THEY ALWAYS END UP AS TYRANNICAL TOTALITARIANS.

THE OUSTER OF OF EICH PROVES IT ONCE AGAIN.

LEFTISTS ARE WOLVES IN SHEEPS' CLOTHING.

UNDER COLLECTIVIST RULE, EVERYONE IS EQUAL, EXCEPT SOME PEOPLE ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.

Out of hand, no doubt. Even homosexual New York Times columnist Frank Bruni remarks on the "excesses" of today's homosexual left, "The New Gay Orthodoxy" (via Memeorandum). And also Smitty at the Other McCain, "Old Testament Passages Come to Mind."

You're Americans. Act like it! pic.twitter.com/2VNdWDmPI1
— ClassicPics (@History_Pics) April 6, 2014