Nina Agdal, Jessica Gomes, Chanel Iman, and Robyn Lawley

Lovely ladies, at Sports Illustrated, "Nina Agdal, Robyn Lawley, Jessica Gomes and Chanel Iman star in one of the HOTTEST videos SI Swimsuit has ever made."

ABC News, 'This Week with George Stephanopoulos': Fallout Over Donald Trump Megyn Kelly Comments (VIDEO)

Well, Monday's the start of a fresh news week, so hopefully the political cycle will unearth something new. Meanwhile, here's the rehash on Trump's allegedly "misogynist" comments, at "This Week":

Democrats Stoking Black Anger (Which May Mean Riots) to Keep White House in 2016

No doubt.

From Steve Sailer, at VDare.

Jeremy Corbyn to 'Bring Back Clause IV' of Labour Party Constitution, Which Would Take Public Ownship of British Industry

Corbyn's a communist.

At the Independent UK, "Jeremy Corbyn to 'bring back Clause IV': Contender pledges to bury New Labour with commitment to public ownership of industry":

Jeremy Corbyn has risked provoking a damaging row at the heart of the Labour Party by pledging to restore Clause Four if he is elected leader next month.

In an interview with The Independent on Sunday, the man who has set alight the leadership race says the party needs to reinstate a clear commitment to public ownership of industry in a move which would reverse one of the defining moments in Labour’s history.

Mr Corbyn’s pledge will enrage many MPs and party members who see Tony Blair’s abolition of the old Clause Four two decades ago as a symbolic and essential move which recognised the importance of markets and made Labour electable.

However, the MP for Islington North, who believes he has captured a changing public mood, said voters, including the thousands who are signing up to Labour to vote for him, wanted to see a better return on public investment in railways and other infrastructure.

Asked if he wanted to restore the clause to the party’s constitution, Mr Corbyn said: “I think we should talk about what the objectives of the party are, whether that’s restoring Clause Four as it was originally written or it’s a different one. But we shouldn’t shy away from public participation, public investment in industry and public control of the railways.”

But his leadership rival Liz Kendall told the IoS: “This shows there is nothing new about Corbyn’s politics. It is just a throwback to the past, not the change we need for our party or our country. We are a party of the future not a preservation society.”

Keep reading.

RELATED: "Socialist Corbyn supporters are living in an anti-capitalist fantasy world." Yeah, well, we've been living in an anti-capitalist fantasy world for sometime now, right here in the states.

Printer Deals for Back to School

At Amazon, Back to School - Printer Deals.

Plus, due out September 1st, from by Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney, Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America.

Bernie Sanders Shut Down by #BlackLivesMatter Protesters (VIDEO)

At the Hill.

And video from KIRO News 7 Seattle, "VIDEO: Rally featuring Sen. Bernie Sanders cut short due to activists."



And from the Sanders Campaign, "Sanders Statement on Seattle Protesters":

SEATTLE – Sen. Bernie Sanders issued the following statement today after two demonstrators blocked him from addressing an event hosted by an organization supporting Social Security and Medicare:

“I am disappointed that two people disrupted a rally attended by thousands at which I was invited to speak about fighting to protect Social Security and Medicare. I was especially disappointed because on criminal justice reform and the need to fight racism there is no other candidate for president who will fight harder than me.”

Still more, in an ironically titled piece, at WaPo, "Protesters drove Bernie Sanders from one Seattle stage. At his next stop, 15,000 people showed."

Also at BuzzFeed, "Bernie Sanders’ Campaign Adds Young Black Woman as New Public Face."

Donald Trump Is Different

From Stephen Hayes, at the Weekly Standard, "The Trump Goes On" (via Memeorandum):

It’s not over. And it’s likely to end badly.

In an interview on CNN last night, Donald Trump suggested that Megyn Kelly’s tough questioning was inspired by her menstrual cycle. “You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes,” Trump told CNN's Don Lemon on Friday night. “Blood coming out of her—wherever.”

He refused to apologize, of course, but after widespread condemnation, Trump, who is running on candor and straight talk, sought to explain his comments in a Tweet. “Re Megyn Kelly quote: ‘you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever’ (NOSE). Just got on w/thought.’”

It’s a comment that might end any other presidential campaign. Trump is different, in part because this isn’t a campaign. It’s an extended media-driven ego ride.

From the beginning, he’s played by different rules because the media have let him. Trump works just blocks from the headquarters of the major broadcast and cable outlets. But as he’s rolled out his Trump for President brand, he has gotten journalists to come to him. He sits for interviews in the gilded atrium of Trump Towers, a nice home field advantage and one that sets him apart from the other politicians sitting in boring studios.

Trump has conducted frequent telephone interviews on cable networks, sometimes several times a day, and last weekend did “phoners” on two Sunday morning political shows. (Has any other candidate this cycle, in either party, been given an opportunity to do a television interview by phone?) If he were asked policy questions, the arrangement would give him an unfair advantage, with the opportunity to answer questions with a cheat sheet in front of him and Google at his fingertips. But substantive questions about the country and its problems are the exceptions in Trump’s conversations with journalists, who prefer to ask him about his latest controversial comment or seek to provoke the next one by asking him about his opponents. (Trump’s comments about Kelly didn’t provoke any follow-up questions from CNN host Don Lemon, whose interview with Trump continued for several more minutes). So the cycle continues: Trump says something outrageous that may or may not have any relevance to serving as president, he’s asked about it in a largely substance-free interview, and ratings climb—along with Trump’s name ID and poll ratings.

Trump is right, sadly, when he boasts that he is partly responsible for the 24 million viewers who tuned into the debate Thursday night. He has convinced himself that people watch because they love him and in a limited sense, he’s probably right about that, too. While I suspect that the Trump hype is driven by curiosity more than admiration, there is no doubt some segment of the population that is properly understood now as “Trump supporters.” That segment is small and will be shrinking in the coming weeks, but it won’t disappear.

The true Trump apologists are way too far in now. They've invested too much to bail on him. So his defenders will become increasingly desperate to convince people that this is all part of the establishment's failure to understand their anger and the media's failure to appreciate Trump’s appeal.

That’s backwards. It's not that the media haven’t failed to give Trump enough credit; we’ve given his supporters too much...

Keep reading.

The problem for Hayes is that he's clearly invested in a Republican victory in 2012. That's okay if you want to practice partisan journalism, and who doesn't nowadays? But from the perspective of the political system and democratic governance, it might not turn out bad at all.

Some folks seem to forget that the reason for the primaries is to foster robust competition between competing ideas. There's no law that says a candidate has to be an establishment politician. The horror for the GOP is that should Trump indeed run an independent presidential campaign, he'll no doubt siphon votes from the Republican ticket.

The ready comparison is to Ross Perot in 1992. The problem with that comparison is that Perot screwed up royally dropping out of the race during the Democrat Party convention, which was in June. Perot said the Dems had taken up all his positions and he was satisfied things like deficit reduction would be tackled within the party system. Big mistake. The astronomical grassroots anger at the beltway establishment was off the charts. The 1991 recession was grinding people down and defense downsizing was creating a nightmare for thousands upon thousands of people losing their jobs. Three-quarters of Americans thought the country was on the wrong track.

Perot ended up taking over 19 percent of the vote in November after he'd reentered the race in September of that year and participated in the presidential debates. Had he not exited in June, thereby alienating untold numbers of supporters, who once jilted weren't going back, Perot could have easily doubled his vote totals and won the presidency with a plurality of the vote. As it is Bill Clinton only won 43 percent. Jigger some of the numbers around, reducing the Democrat and Republican share of the electorate, and boom! Hey, stranger things have happened in American politics.

Sure, it's a long-shot scenario, and the concatenation of circumstances that propelled Perot that year might be completely irrelevant to what's happening today. What's not in doubt is that Trump is tapping into some kind of huge groundswell of discontent, especially on the immigration issue. Normally rock-ribbed conservatives are mounting vociferous defenses of Trump because they feel he's genuinely fighting for the issues they believe in. What's more, this purported incestuous relationship Trump has with the media only helps air those issues conservatives care about, propelling debates about illegal immigration, for example, to substantive levels not seen for years, if not decades. That's a good thing for American politics. Trump is right when he says the media types wouldn't even be talking about securing the border if it wasn't for him.

So what's really likely to happen? Well, for one thing we're going to have an extremely interesting campaign. And it's going to be a much more substantive campaign with Trump's presence, despite the attacks on the casino mogul as ill-informed and out only for himself. If the public starts getting bored with him we'll know soon enough. Lord knows there's no shortage of public opinion polls. And that's also good. We'll see Trump's popularly fade and other candidates will rise to the top. But those candidates will ignore the issues Trump's championed at their peril. I seriously doubt a pro-amnesty candidate will have much of a chance by the time Iowa and New Hampshire come around. And of course more and more voters will start to coalesce around a candidate that looks to combine conservative bona fides with the best chance of defeating Hillary Clinton. But it's going to be a sad day in conservative America if primary voters cluster around the mean of some Mitt Romney-esque candidate, because we've been down the "electabilty" road before. What we need is a movement candidate. We need another Reagan. We need to get someone who fosters the passions of the people and exudes America's exceptionalism. People will to rally to someone who looks most likely to restore America's promise, and America's standing in the world.

Who will it be? Scott Walker and Ted Cruz come to mind, but we'll see. Maybe Marco Rubio. He's learned his lesson on the Gang of Eight. Maybe Mike Huckabee. Maybe John Kasich. Maybe Carly Fiorina will somehow continue her phenomenal rise and do well in the 2016 primaries.

Either way, the system will work its will, and Donald Trump will either generate enough popular support to have a shot at the presidency, or he'll fall by the wayside. All the gnashing and thrashing we're seeing now demonstrates just how important Trump's moment is to American politics. Yes, Trump's different. He's also extremely consequential. Let's see how it plays out. It should be up to the voters to decide if he's not up to speed.

Donald Trump Issues Press Release After Red State Gathering's Disinvitation

Pretty interesting, at Twitchy, "Trump campaign’s press release about #RSG15 disinvite gives Jonah Goldberg second thoughts."

And ICYMI, "Hand-Wringing in GOP After Donald Trump's Remarks on Megyn Kelly."

ADDED: At London's Daily Mail, "Banned Trump says: I was talking about Megyn Kelly's NOSE! Tycoon declares war on 'politically correct fools' who kicked him out of GOP conference for his 'blood' outburst at Fox host."

Hand-Wringing in GOP After Donald Trump's Remarks on Megyn Kelly

Okay, following-up from earlier, "Donald Trump Attacks Megyn Kelly: 'There Was Blood Coming Out of Her Wherever...'"

I don't like Trump's comments, obviously. But I'm not ready to kick him to the curb either. For one thing, I can't stand Erick Erickson. He's exactly what's wrong with so-called movement conservatives: they're afraid of their own shadows with stultifying political correctness. So this particular round of right-wing infighting reminded me that we do this every four years, most notably over conservative reactions to Mitt Romney in both 2008 and 2012. So I tweeted:

Ah, I remember. We're entering the stage of the four-year political cycle where the right 'sphere blows its collective brains out.

— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) August 8, 2015

And now here's the New York Times to trumpet the news, "Donald Trump Disinvited From Conservative Event Over Remark on Megyn Kelly" (via Memeorandum):

Donald J. Trump’s suggestion that a Fox News journalist had forcefully questioned him at the Republican presidential debate because she was menstruating cost him a speaking slot Saturday night at an influential gathering of conservatives in Atlanta. It also raised new questions about how much longer Republican Party leaders would have to contend with Mr. Trump’s disruptive presence in the primary field.

With Mr. Trump at center stage, the event Thursday shattered television viewership records for primary debates: Nearly 24 million people watched. But any hopes that he would try to reinvent himself inside the Cleveland arena as a sober-minded statesman, or that he would collapse under scrutiny and tough questions, vaporized in the opening minutes.

By the weekend, as Mr. Trump’s latest eruption rippled through Republican circles, the conversation had turned to whether the party, and his rival presidential contenders, should continue to accommodate his candidacy, quietly hoping that this would be the moment he burned out — or should try to run him out on a rail...

It shouldn't be up to party elites, obviously. It should be up to the rank-and-file, and for the life of me I have no idea how Trump will fare in this next batch of polls. If they're anything like the Drudge poll, Trump should be flying high. But if those focus groups turn out to be a harbinger, then Trump's going to be dropping like a rock. Meanwhile, as Rick Perry's not catching fire, with a mediocre debate performance making things worse, I'm pretty much firmly in the Carly Fiorina camp now. Just imagining her as the first woman president is so fantastic I can hardly see straight. She's so smart and articulate it's ridiculous. I'm really exited for her.

Lots more at Memeorandum.

Why I'm Running for President and How I'll Re-Establish American Leadership in the World

From Carly Fiorina, at Independent Journal Review:

How has our extraordinary nation come to this crossroads? The theme of this administration has been eight years of a false choice: President Obama’s failed foreign policy or war. President Obama has sometimes gotten away with his failed foreign policy by lulling the American people into believing that he has saved us from war.

Here is the truth: there are many specific things we could be doing now to reestablish American leadership around the world that do not involve going to war.

We must have the strongest military in the world and everyone must know it. We must show Putin we are serious by rebuilding our Sixth Fleet, rebuilding our missile defense systems in Poland, and conducting military exercises in the Baltic States.

As Commander-in-Chief, I will provide our Arab allies with the support they need to defeat ISIS in the Middle East. They know this is their fight – but they need help. I would arm the Kurds, share intelligence with the Egyptians, and provide the bombs and materiel that Jordan has requested.

None of these specific actions require a declaration of war. All would send an important signal to our friends and our enemies: America is back in the leadership business...

She comes across so presidential. It's no wonder the Democrats are sharpening the knives.

Still more at that top link.

Donald Trump Attacks Megyn Kelly: 'There Was Blood Coming Out of Her Wherever...'

Well, speaking about those Donald Trump unfavorables, this really might be the beginning of the end.

I'm as anti-PC as they come, but c'mon, Megyn Kelly was "on the rag"?

At Twitchy, "Video: Watch Donald Trump say Megyn Kelly had 'blood coming out of her ... wherever'."

Also, "Game on: Carly Fiorina goes after Donald Trump over his Megyn Kelly comment," and "Donald Trump disinvited from RedState Gathering after comments about Megyn Kelly; Update: Trump camp responds."

Watch: "Donald Trump on Megyn Kelly: 'There Was Blood Coming Out of Her Wherever'."

Like I said on Thursday, we won't know for sure until the next batch of polls comes out. But I'll be surprised if Trump doesn't doesn't take a deep dive in the standings, and not just from the "blood" comments. Those focus groups haven't been kind. But we'll see. We'll see.

Donald Trump's Got Super High Unfavorables

I missed this poll from earlier this week, from before the GOP debate, at the Wall Street Journal, "Unhappy Voters Shake Up Presidential Race." This is interesting:

An unhappy and unsettled electorate is giving a lift to antiestablishment candidates and changing the dynamics of the 2016 presidential contest for both parties, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll finds.

Amid a rise in Americans saying the country is on the wrong track, Donald Trump has moved to the top of the Republican field while liberal long-shot Bernie Sanders has gained ground among Democrats.

But Americans are taking an unusually sour view of the leading candidates of both parties. Jeb Bush is losing ground among the most conservative Republican voters; Hillary Clinton is viewed more negatively now than at almost any time in her political career. While Mr. Trump leads the pack of GOP contenders, he inspires more negative feelings than any other major candidate...

Trump's negative feelings are at -30 percent, which is pretty astounding, the highest unfavorables going back fifteen years (scroll down and check the graphics).

Hillary's unfavorables are also substantial at -10 percent, which could be the more important statistic, since it's hard to discount that she'll be the eventual nominee. Donald Trump, not so much.

Illegal Alien Charged with Murder in Brutal Attack on 64-Year-Old Marilyn Pharis of Santa Maria (VIDEO)

In fact, two suspects have been charged with murder. One of them, Victor Martinez Ramirez, is an illegal immigrant on probation, who has been arrested four times on drug charges in the past two years.

Horrible!

At the Santa Maria Times, "Suspect of alleged sexual assault in country illegally, police say,"and "Men accused of attacking Santa Maria woman charged with murder: POLICE CHIEF LAYS BLAME ON FEDERAL AND STATE OFFICIALS."

And at KEYT News 3 Santa Barbara, "Second Suspect Arrested in Connection to Sexual Assault and Attempted Murder of 64 Year-Old Santa Maria Woman," and "2 Now Face Murder Charges in Brutal Santa Maria Attack — Police Chief: "Blood Trail From Washington, D.C. and Sacramento":

SANTA MARIA, Calif. - A visibly frustrated Santa Maria police chief blamed a lack of federal and state policies for undocumented immigrants for a series of events that ended with a brutal attack on a local woman who died eight days later.Marilyn Pharis, 64, was asleep in her home on Santa Maria's northwest side when two men allegedly broke in with the intention of burglary, according to police chief Ralph Martin.

Police said the men used a hammer to attack Pharis, who suffered a broken neck and shattered eye sockets.  Her family members told reporter Nia Wong Pharis died from a fatal coronary embolism eight days after she was admitted to the hospital.

Victor Martinez Ramirez and Jose Villagomez were both originally charged with attempted murder and burglary.  After Pharis' death, the charges were increased to first degree murder for both men.  Martinez was also charged with enhanced charges alleging torture and mayhem.  Both men were charged with sexual assault.

Martinez is in the country illegally, and had been arrested by local police a total of six previous times, according to Chief Martin.   The undocumented immigrant pleaded no contest to felony possession of a concealed dirk or dagger on July 20, and was sentenced to a 30-day county jail term beginning at the end of October.

In a news conference broadcast live on KCOY 12 Friday afternoon, Chief Martin said a factor in Pharis' death was a lack of federal and state policies for local agencies dealing with undocumented immigrants who commit serious crimes. He was also critical of reduced penalties for some crimes in California under Proposition 47, and prison realignment under AB 109.

"There is a blood trail from Washington D.C. and Sacramento to the bedroom of Marilyn Pharis," Martin said...

More at Big Government, "Illegal Alien on Probation Allegedly Rapes, Beats Woman with Hammer During Home Invasion."

U.S. Coast Guard Seizes Homemade Submersible Vessel Carrying Eight Tons of Cocaine (VIDEO)

Whoa.

That's hella lot of cocaine.

At the Los Angeles Times, "Northern California Coast Guard crew seizes $181 million in cocaine."

And at BuzzFeed, "Here’s Video of a Submarine Caught Carrying 8 Tons of Cocaine."

Before the Coast Guard could unload all the bales, the vessel sank, taking two more tons of cocaine down with it.

That is wild.

Here's the video: "U.S. Agencies Stop Semi-Submersible, Seize 12,000 Pounds of Cocaine."

Donald Trump Still Dominant After GOP's Raucous Presidential Debate

One of the better reports I read last night, from Karen Tumulty and Philip Rucker, at the Washington Post, "Trump roils first debate among GOP contenders":

CLEVELAND — Donald Trump landed on the Republican debate stage like a hand grenade here on Thursday night — serving notice that he may run as an independent if he does not get the party’s nomination, dismissing criticism of his insulting comments about women as “political correctness” and flatly calling the nation’s leaders “stupid.”

The current leader of the GOP pack drew boos and cheers from the audience and set the tone for a raucous two-hour debate. And other candidates acknowledged that Trump, a celebrity billionaire known for his showman’s flair, has tapped into a genuine current of public outrage and exasperation.

“Donald Trump’s hitting a nerve in this country. He is. He’s hitting a nerve,” Ohio Gov. John Kasich said. “People are frustrated, they’re fed up, they don’t think the government’s working for them. People who want to tune him out are making a mistake.”

Only 10 of the 17 declared contenders for the 2016 GOP nomination appeared in the first official debate of the 2016 campaign season. They were chosen by debate sponsor Fox News Channel because they ranked highest in the polls, though some of them are barely registering.

Trump’s entry into the race — and his continuing rise despite a series of incendiary comments — has thrown into chaos a party that is normally known for a coronation-like orderliness in its nominating process.

A first-time candidate, Trump is overshadowing the bids of a host of current and former governors and senators. And he is undercutting party leaders’ hopes of upgrading the GOP’s image by presenting a field of candidates distinguished by their experience, policy expertise and gravitas.

The internecine battle also is shifting focus from making their larger case against the Democratic front-runner, former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, at a time when her poll numbers are sinking.

“Let’s be clear, we should be talking about Hillary Clinton . . . because everywhere in the world that Hillary Clinton touched is more messed up today than before,” Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said.

The moderators’ questioning of Trump was particularly aggressive.

“The questions to me were not nice. They were inappropriate,” Trump told reporters after the debate. “But you know what? The answers were good, obviously, because everyone thinks I won.”

Trump was asked to explain the bankruptcies of his companies (he responded that he simply used bankruptcy laws to maximum advantage); to detail his evidence that the Mexican government was sending criminals over the border (he said U.S. Border Patrol agents had told him so); why he once supported a single-payer health-care system (he said it worked well in Canada and Scotland); what favors he received for his campaign donations to Hillary Rodham Clinton (he said she showed up at his wedding on demand); and when he became a Republican (he did not say).

In one particularly vivid exchange, Fox News’s Megyn Kelly noted that Trump had referred to women with whom he had disagreed as “fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals.”

After interrupting with “Only Rosie O’Donnell,” referring to a celebrity with who he has feuded, Trump replied more fully: “I’ve been challenged by so many people, and I don’t frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn’t have time either.”

He also minimized his comments as “fun, it’s kidding. We have a good time. What I say is what I say. And honestly, Megyn, if you don’t like it, I’m sorry. I’ve been very nice to you, although I could probably maybe not be, based on the way you have treated me.”

It was pointed out that, if he follows through on his threat to run as an independent, Trump could doom the Republican Party’s chances of victory in 2016. Trump noted that gives him “a lot of leverage.”

Still more.

Fox News GOP Debate Had Record 24 million Viewers

From CNN's Brian Stelter, "Overnight #'s: #GOPDebate had a 16.0 household rating. The biggest GOP debates in 2011/12 had 5.3 ratings."

Also, from Jeff B@AoSHQDD "Holy shit. 16.0 means 16% of all households watched. That's unheard of in modern mega-channel era for a debate."

ADDED: At Twitchy, "LOL: Compare and contrast ratings for the GOP debate and Jon Stewart's final show."

Still more: To give you some perspective, from Dan Savino.

9-Year-Old Boy Struck and Killed Crossing the Street in Orange

This was a hit and run, but the suspect crashed their car after speeding away from the scene.

I used to live not far from there, graduating from Orange High School back in 1979.

At the Los Angeles Times, "Boy, 9, struck and killed by vehicles while walking with sister in Orange," and the Orange County Register, "9-year-old boy killed crossing street in Orange; 2 men arrested on suspicion of vehicular manslaughter."

Also at CBS News 2 Los Angeles, "9-Year-Old Boy Fatally Struck by Pickup Truck In Orange; Driver Arrested."

Ted Cruz Reacts to Fox News GOP Debate on 'Hannity' (VIDEO)

Watch: "Cruz: 2016 Election Could Be Like the 'Reagan Revolution' of 1980":

Ted Cruz appeared on "Hannity" tonight to react to the Fox News Republican debate.

Cruz said that he believes Republican primary voters are looking for consistent conservatives, those that are willing to stand against Democrats and their own party.

He asserted that the 2016 election will be like 1980, when the "Reagan Revolution" came from millions of grassroots Americans, not Washington.

He said that when he talks about the "Washington cartel," he's criticizing career politicians from both parties who are beholden to lobbyists and special interests, and he offers voters a different option.

BONUS: At Politico, "The Freshest Takes On The GOP Debate."

'BTW: When FOX releases a similar photo of Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly can lecture Trump about objectifying women...'

He's got a point, heh.

See Patrick Henry's Ghost, on Twitter.

BONUS: "When Megyn Kelly is finished accusing Trump of objectifying women, ask her to pose for a picture of her LSAT scores."



I have to admit, though, Ms. Kelly looked spectacular last night, heh.

Who Cares About Meek Mill? Just Gimme That Hot Samantha Hoopes!

So who is this Meek Mill guy? I guess he's some hip-hopper in the middle of a celebrity flame war with rapper Drake.

See, "Meek Mill decides 'wedgie' is the best threat for Drake," and "Meek Mill drags Caitlyn Jenner into his latest Drake diss."

Meh. I don't really care so much.

I do care about Samantha Hoopes, though. Remember, she's the American Thick Burger lady.

At Sports Illustrated Swimsuit, "Samantha Hoopes takes sides with Meek Mill, loves skinny dipping":

Samantha Hoopes answers rapid fire questions including one about swimming naked!