Monday, June 5, 2017

Ontario Canada's 'Bill 89' Authorizes Government Removal of 'Trans' Children from Christian Homes

This is bad. Extremely bad.

But then, this is exactly what leftists have been pushing for --- total power over the family unit, the demonization and destruction of God-fearing traditional parents.

At LifeSite, "Petition calls for repeal of ‘totalitarian’ bill allowing children to be taken from Christian homes":

TORONTO, June 5, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — LifeSiteNews has launched a petition for the repeal of the Kathleen Wynne Liberals’ Bill 89, which passed last week by a vote of 63 to 23.

Pro-family advocates warn the bill gives the state power to seize children from families that oppose the LGBTQI and gender ideology agenda, and allows government agencies to effectively ban couples who disagree with that agenda from fostering or adopting children.

“Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption,” says Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition.

“This is a direct hit against parental authority,” echoed Tanya Granic Allen, executive director of Parents As First Educators (PAFE), which along with the Association for Reformed Political Action (ARPA) has been at the forefront of lobbying against the bill.

Bill 89, or the Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017, repeals and replaces the former Child and Family Services Act that governs child protection services, and adoption and foster care services.

It adds “gender identity” and “gender expression” as factors to be considered “in the best interests of the child.”

At the same time, it deletes the religious faith in which the parents are raising the child as a factor to be considered, and mandates child protection services consider only the child’s own “creed” or “religion” when assessing the best interests of the child.

Pro-family advocates point to public comments by Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau as evidence the Liberals will use Bill 89 to enforce a pro-LGBTQI, gender ideology agenda in the home.

Coteau told QP Briefing shortly after he introduced the bill that he sees questioning teenagers’ self-identification as LGBTQI or telling them to change as abuse.

“I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” Coteau said.

“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”

Coteau reiterated this to QP Briefing after Bill 89 passed Thursday...
Keep reading.

Also, at Heat Street:



Get Furious and Fight Back

Keeping calm and carrying on doesn't seem to be doing much good, so it's time to get bloody pissed off.

Here's Katie Hopkins:


Battle of Midway's 75th Anniversary in San Diego (VIDEO)

These veterans' commemorative events make my heart happy. The WWII generation is quickly passing from the scene. Few from the generation who fought the war are here today to make these anniversary events. I'm glad we still have a chance to thank them. It reaffirms our values in a most fundamental way, and hopefully passes on knowledge of past sacrifice to future generations.

At ABC News 10 San Diego:


Kendall Jenner in Sheer Topped Dress

At Taxi Driver, "Kendall Jenner Nipple Show in Sheer Topped Dress."

Stefan Molyneux on the London Jihad (VIDEO)

Take a listen:



Shop Deals

Thanks for your support. I'm building an awesome book collection with the help of my readers. I don't blog for money, but I do enjoy shopping for books.

Thanks again!

At Amazon, Today's Deals.

BONUS: Nabeel Qureshi, Answering Jihad: A Better Way Forward.


After Britain Attack, Trump Feuds With London Mayor

I love Trump's tweets. I just love 'em.

I don't care what the MSM fags think.

That's the headline, cut-and-pasted above, from Memeorandum.

Plus, from idiot prog reporter Philip Rucker, at Wapo, via Memeorandum, "Trump reacts to London terror by stoking fear and renewing feud with mayor."

The leftist media is objectively pro-jihad.


London Bridge Terrorist Was Carrying Irish identity Card

Here's the latest, at the Telegraph U.K., "Live - London Bridge attack latest: Terrorist was carrying Irish identity card, security sources reveal."


Frances Townsend Discusses London Jihad Attack (VIDEO)

On CBS This Morning:


Brian Downing, The Military Revolution and Political Change

At Amazon, Brian Downing, The Military Revolution and Political Change: Origins of Democracy and Autocracy in Early Modern Europe.

Seal Beach Paddleboarder's Close Call with Great White Shark?

Dang, I could do without that, lol.

At CBS News 2 Los Angeles:



Hilary Rhoda Gets Oiled Up (VIDEO)

Via Sports Illustrated Swimsuit:



Sunday, June 4, 2017

London Bridge Jihad: 'Gunshots Heard' as Fresh Raids Carried Out in East London

At the Telegraph U.K., "Live - London Bridge attack latest: 'Gunshots heard' as police launch fresh raids in east London after Islamic State claim responsibility."

Norman Podhoretz, World War IV

*BUMPED.*

At Amazon, Norman Podhoretz, World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism.

'Instructing Londoners to run, hide, and tell is a dramatic departure from the can-do, stiff-upper-lip, globe-striding empire of a century ago...'

Following-up from yesterday, "Run. Hide. Tell."

From Jon Gabriel, at Ricochet, "In the Face of Terror, Londoners Told to 'Run, Hide, Tell'."

The People of London Fought Back

At Instapundit, "THE PEOPLE OF LONDON ARE BRAVER THAN THEIR GOVERNMENT."

Sunday Cartoons

At Flopping Aces, "Sunday Funnies."


Also, at Theo's, "Cartoon Roundup..."

Cartoon Credit: Ben Garrison.

Reza Aslan Apologizes

Actually, if the guy wants to call President Trump a POS he should be able to. Me? I just won't (and don't) watch his show. I wouldn't try to get him fired.

But I guess folks have turned up the heat, according to Heat Street, "Reza Aslan’s CNN Show Could Be in Jeopardy After Trump ‘Piece of Sh*t’ Tweet."

I saw some of the outrage on Twitter. And now the idiot's just posted this:


Still Working on It: Richard Slotkin, Regeneration Through Violence

It's an awesome book, but a hefty slog. I've been breaking it up with some other books, but I'm almost through this one, and will be starting out on the next one in Slotkin's trilogy.

This is fine scholarship, to be savored and enjoyed.

See, Richard Slotkin's, Regeneration Through Violence: The Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600–1860.

Also, The Fatal Environment: The Myth of the Frontier in the Age of Industrialization, 1800–1890, and Gunfighter Nation: Myth of the Frontier in Twentieth-Century America.

Richard Slotkin photo 18893124_10213577476934263_8970157736533594901_n_zps0b4yc4mh.jpg

It's Time to Change Our Response to Islamic Extremism

Like I said at my earlier entry, nothing's gonna change.

If jihadists nuked London maybe?

Until then, it'll be more of the same. Political correctness drives policy, and leftists control the establishment, even with Theresa May in power.

In any case, here's the redoubtable Douglas Murray, at the Spectator U.K., "Blind, bovine hope will get us nowhere – it’s time to change our response to Islamic extremism":

Last Sunday, I appeared on the BBC’s Sunday Politics to discuss the aftermath of the Manchester attack. I said what I thought, and various Muslim groups promptly went bananas.

This was not caused by my suggestion that this country should finally crack-down on British officials who spend their retirements working as shills for the House of Saud. Nor by my ridiculing of that modern European tradition whereby someone blows us up and we respond by singing John Lennon songs (and now Oasis too). Rather they objected to my simple two-word suggestion that we could all do with ‘less Islam’.

In a short film preceding the studio discussion, I mentioned that countries like Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic have very little Islam and very little Islamic terror. By contrast, France has a great amount of Islam and a great amount of Islamic terror. To most people it would seem obvious – to co-opt the immortal words of Donatella Versace – that ‘more means more’. Because although many communities are capable of producing extremists, only Islamic communities produce Islamic extremists. Of course some people don’t want to accept this fact. Not least because informed choices might result. For instance, it might help us weigh up the ongoing cultural benefits of large-scale Islamic immigration versus the down-side of dozens of obliterated lives every now and then...
Keep reading.

Note: Murray's whole debate here is post-Manchester. Now we've had the London Bridge jihad, which goes only to prove his point. (And leftists will hate him all the more.)