Maricopa County Sheriff Deputies Arrest 6-Year-Old Suspected Illegal Immigrant

The progressives think this is just outrageous!

Here's the report from the Arizona Republic, "MCSO arrests girl, 6, suspected of illegal immigration" (via Memeorandum):

Maricopa County Sheriff Office deputies arrested a 6-year-old suspected illegal immigrant Friday, the day President Barack Obama softened the country's deportation policy toward young illegal immigrants.

The girl was with 15 other people believed to be in the country illegally who were traveling to the Midwest and northeast United States, said Chris Hegstrom, spokesman for the Sheriff's Office.

"She's been turned over to ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to try to determine where she's from. She told us she's from El Salvador. That's what she told us," he said.

It goes on like that, but see Bryan Preston at PJ Media, "Six-Year-Old Illegal Alien Gets Arrested. Whose Fault Is It?":

President Obama announced a new immigration policy on Friday that tells the whole world he has no intent of doing his job, which is to faithfully execute the laws of this nation. That announcement probably played no role in this specific case, but it will attract more illegal aliens, and it will create more business for the coyotes who smuggle these people, and drugs and other things, into the United States. It will make it more difficult to secure the border. Sheriff Joe will see more six-year-old illegal aliens making a very dangerous journey in the hands of some unsavory and dangerous characters thanks to President Obama.

We also shouldn’t exonerate the little girl’s family in all this. Six-year-old girls don’t make the decision to cross borders on their own, they don’t hire the smugglers, they don’t make this trek unless some adult has made the decisions for them. These family decisions to abandon one country and break the laws of another, and continue to break those laws every day, don’t start with the six-year-old, and they don’t end with a presidential declaration either. Sheriff Joe still has to do his job. We are either a nation of laws, or we are not.

Word.

Fantasizing About Young Sexy Women is Called 'Normal'

ICYMI, my friend David Swindle kicked off a big debate on fantasizing about young women at PJ Media. Here's David's original post, "Revolting: Kardashian Mom Allows Bikini Photo Shoot of 16 and 14 Year-Old Daughters."

Dave's key point is that men should not be fantasizing about slutty "girls" in the 18-22-year-old range, as they're immature and most likely to bring pain and unhappiness.

The argument's not going over too well, however. Dr. Helen Smith responds, for example, "‘When Do Cute and Sexy Young Girls Stop Looking Cute and Sexy? Death’":

Women are often at their most fertile and attractive at the ages (18-22) that Swindle is describing. Men being attracted to women of this age is called normal. Should you act on it? Maybe not, but that’s not the point that Swindle is making. He doesn’t even seem to think that you should be fantasizing about women who are of age 18-22. Why not? Why should men only be interested in “mature women,” especially for a fantasy?

Dave responds here, but it's the comment section that's especially good.

Exit question: Is Kate Upton a "girl" or a "woman"?

Hamilton Airshow 2012

Blazing Cat Fur reports, "And we're back...", and "Air Show Pics."

The homepage is here.

Islamists Claim Victory in Egypt Election

The New York Times reports, "Egypt’s Military Cements Its Powers as Voting Ends":

CAIRO — The Muslim Brotherhood early Monday projected its candidate, an Islamist, as the winner of Egypt’s first competitive presidential election, hours after the ruling military council issued an interim constitution granting itself broad power over the future government, all but eliminating the president’s authority in an apparent effort to guard against just such a victory.

The military’s new charter is the latest in a series of swift steps that the generals have taken to tighten their grasp on power just at the moment when they had promised to hand over to elected civilians the authority that they assumed on the ouster of Hosni Mubarak last year. Their charter gives them control of all laws and the national budget, immunity from any oversight, and the power to veto a declaration of war.

After dissolving the Brotherhood-led Parliament elected four months ago, and locking out its lawmakers, the generals on Sunday night also seized control of the process of writing a permanent constitution. State news media reported that the generals had picked a 100-member panel to draft it.

“The new constitutional declaration completed Egypt’s official transformation into a military dictatorship,” Hossam Bahgat, director of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, wrote in an online commentary. Under the military’s charter, the president appeared to be reduced to a powerless figurehead.

Though final results were not available, Brotherhood supporters called the apparent victory by their candidate, Mohamed Morsi, a rebuke to the military’s power grab. “Down, down with military rule!” a crowd at Mr. Morsi’s campaign headquarters chanted as he prepared to give a victory speech shortly after 4 a.m. Monday.

Mr. Morsi thanked God, who, he said, “guided Egypt to this straight path, the path of freedom and democracy.” He pledged to represent all Egyptians, including those who had voted against him. And he made a special profession of support for the rights of members of Egypt’s Coptic Christian minority, many of whom had rallied against him out of fear of the Brotherhood.

More at that top link.

And see Barry Rubin, "Egypt: Things to Think About as We Await the Presidential Election Outcome":

While one can certainly sympathize with the idea of letting an elected parliament take office, that’s not necessarily such a clear call in strategic terms. The parliament — which will write the constitution and thus define the powers of the president — is almost 75 percent rabidly anti-American and antisemitic. (I don’t write that last word lightly, but it is quite accurate.) Imagine if this situation had arisen in Iran in 1979 with the Iranian military refusing to turn over power to the forces led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Would it have been wise for Washington to demand that this be done as soon as possible?

Yet, here is Defense Secretary Leon Panetta calling on Egypt’s military in a manner that “highlighted the need to move forward expeditiously with Egypt’s political transition, including conducting new legislative elections as soon as possible.” Senator Patrick J. Leahy has called for withholding U.S. aid to Egypt, saying, “I would not want to see the U.S. government write checks for contracts with Egypt’s military under the present uncertain circumstances.”  What circumstances are more appropriate for sending U.S. arms and money? When the Muslim Brotherhood dominates parliament, the presidency, has written a constitution mandating Sharia law, and follows a policy of death to America and death to Israel? Who are you going to cheer for if Islamists rebel against the regime?

Maybe now is a good moment for the U.S. government to remain quiet.

Read it all.

BONUS: At Telegraph UK, "Egypt presidential election overshadowed by further army power grab and voter fraud claims."

Rodney G. King, 1965-2012

The New York Times has an obituary, "Police Beating Victim Who Asked ‘Can We All Get Along?’":

LOS ANGELES — Rodney G. King, whose 1991 videotaped beating by the Los Angeles police became a symbol of the nation’s continuing racial tensions and subsequently led to a week of deadly race riots after the officers were acquitted, was found dead Sunday in a swimming pool at the home he shared with his fiancée in Rialto, Calif. He was 47.

There was no evidence of foul play, the Rialto police said.

Mr. King, whose life was a roller coaster of drug and alcohol abuse, multiple arrests and unwanted celebrity, pleaded for calm during the 1992 riots. More than 55 people were killed and 600 buildings destroyed in the violence.

In a phrase that became part of American culture, he asked at a news conference, “Can we all get along?”

“People look at me like I should have been like Malcolm X or Martin Luther King or Rosa Parks,” he told The Los Angeles Times in April. “I should have seen life like that and stay out of trouble, and don’t do this and don’t do that. But it’s hard to live up to some people’s expectations.”

Mr. King published a memoir in April detailing his struggles, saying in several interviews that he had not been able to find steady work.

He said he had once blamed politicians and lawyers “for taking a battered and confused addict and trying to make him into a symbol for civil rights.” But he was unable to escape that role. On Sunday, the Rev. Al Sharpton, said in a statement, “History will record that it was Rodney King’s beating and his actions that made America deal with the excessive misconduct of law enforcement.”

And more recently, Mr. King seemed to embrace the role himself, saying that his beating enabled others to succeed and “made the world a better place.”

“Obama, he wouldn’t have been in office without what happened to me and a lot of black people before me,” he told The Los Angeles Times. “He would never have been in that situation, no doubt in my mind. He would get there eventually, but it would have been a lot longer. So I am glad for what I went through. It opened the doors for a lot of people.”

Though Mr. King wrote in his memoir that he still drank and used drugs occasionally, he insisted that, with his fiancée, Cynthia Kelley, who had been a juror in a civil suit he brought against the City of Los Angeles, he was on the road to reclaiming his life.

“I realize I will always be the poster child for police brutality,” he said, “but I can try to use that as a positive force for healing and restraint.”

Mr. King said he was essentially broke, though he said he received an advance for his book, “The Riot Within: My Journey from Rebellion to Redemption,” published to coincide with the 20th anniversary of the riots.

He still walked with a limp and several of his scars were visible. His best outlets for relaxation, he said, were fishing and swimming.

More at the link.

King is quoted saying that he didn't think Barack Obama would have been elected had he not been beaten in 1992.

Lefty blogger Kathy Kattenburg commented at my earlier post, objecting to me pointing out the truth about the left and Rodney King. See: "Rodney King Dead: Fiancé Finds Him at Bottom of Swimming Pool."

And more at Twitchy, "Left uses Rodney King’s death as an excuse to bash Republicans," and "Twitter debates whether Rodney King was a civil rights hero."

BONUS: From Steve Lopez, at the Los Angeles Times, "Rodney King was tragic figure, unlikely symbol."

Senior White House Adviser David Plouffe Claims Obama's Backdoor Amnesty 'Not Political' (VIDEO)

No, not political at all (eye roll).

The Political Ticker reports: "Immigration change not political, Plouffe asserts." (Via Memeorandum.)

Socialist Party Wins Majority in French Parliament

The New York Times reports, "President’s Socialist Party Wins Clear Majority in France."

And at Telegraph UK, "France election: Francois Hollande and Socialists head for absolute majority":

President François Hollande received a powerful mandate to champion growth in Europe and take on the German-led austerity drive last night as his Socialist Party headed for control of parliament with an absolute majority.

French prime minister Jean-Marc Ayrault welcomed the victory of his Socialist Party in legislative elections, saying:"The goal is to shift Europe towards growth and protect the euro zone from speculation. The task before us is immense".

After gaining control of the Senate and the presidency, the Socialists now wield more national power than ever before and the outcome means that Mr Hollande is unlikely to make major changes to his largely social democratic cabinet.

But the result of the election, marred by record low turnout of 44 per cent, is likely to mark the end of Mr Hollande's honeymoon period as he faces the economic realities of a debt-ridden Europe and domestic unemployment of 10 per cent, a 13-year high.

He clinched the presidential election in May in part by warning that his conservative rival Nicolas Sarkozy had erred towards too much belt-tightening and calling for more state-sponsored stimulus to boost growth.

But with Spanish banks just given a new bail-out and Greece's future in the euro in doubt, some commentators warn France could be next for market turmoil unless it makes deeper structural reforms.

Mr Hollande's first wake-up call could be the release of a public finance audit late June expected to show France must slow spending promises to meet its deficit goals.

His stance has put him on collision course with Germany in recent days, with Chancellor Angela Merkel pointing out that France risked further falling behind economically with his policies.

Well, it's going to be interesting, to say the least.

Check back for continuing coverage.

Conservative New Democracy Party Set to Lead New Government in Athens

There are live updates at the Guardian and Telegraph UK.

And here's Der Spiegel's report, "Pro-Bailout Party in the Lead: New Democracy Looks Set to Win Greek Election":

Official projections on Sunday evening showed the conservative New Democracy as having won the Greek election, whose outcome is seen as crucial to the euro zone's future. The party may be able to form a pro-bailout coalition government with the Socialists, but Greece could still face months of uncertainty.

London's Daily Mail reports that the socialist PASOK party has agreed to form a unity government. See, "Greece chooses austerity over Euro withdrawal, as latest election results show voters back pro-bailout parties." And see the analysis from James Pethokoukis, "Greek election results: What they mean for Greece, the euro, the EU — and beyond" (via Memeorandum).

The Romney Boys Share Their Favorite Memories About Their Dad on Father's Day

From the Romney campaign:

Rodney King Dead: Fiancé Finds Him at Bottom of Swimming Pool

CNN reports (via Memeorandum).

Rodney King was found at the bottom of his swimming pool at his home in Rialto early Sunday, authorities said.

King’s fiancé called 911 about 5:25 a.m. and said she found King at the bottom of his pool, Sgt. Paul Stella told The Times. Officers pulled him from the pool and began CPR until paramedics arrived and took King to Arrowhead Regional Medical Center in Colton.

King was pronounced dead at the hospital at 6:11 a.m., Stella said.

Preliminary information indicated King drowned and there were no immediate signs of foul play, Stella said.

An autopsy will be conducted.

King was drunk and unarmed when he was pulled over in 1991 for speeding by Los Angeles Police Department officers, who responded to his erratic behavior by kicking him and striking him dozens of times with their batons.

The incident was captured on video by a civilian bystander, and the recording became an instant international sensation.

Four of the officers were tried for excessive force. Their acquittal on April 29, 1992, touched off one of the worst urban riots in U.S. history.

Continue reading at the link.

Dennis Prager discussed Rodney King in his book, Still the Best Hope. Prager mentioned King while discussing the left's shopworn "socioeconomic circumstances" theory to explain (and justify) black crime. And Prager cited King in a footnote:

The 1992 riots provide a perfect example. The Left did not blame the arson or the beatings and shooting of innocent non-blacks, especially Korean-Americans, on the blacks who committed these acts. They blamed white America and the allegedly racist police brutality they contended occurred during the arrest of a black man named Rodney King. The liberal news media were very largely responsible for creating the frenzy, indeed the hysteria, in America, and especially in black America, that led to these riots. For weeks, national and local news shows repeatedly televised a tiny segment of a video showing white police officers beating a black man identified only as "a black mortorist." The "black mortorist" was in fact a convicted criminal who was finally caught by police after a long car chase at high speeds through residential neighborhoods. One part of the video never shown on American television showed King refusing police orders to exit his car and to lie down to be frisked. The members of the jury were among the only Americans to see the entire video, which is why they acquitted the police officers. And that acquittal was the ostensible reason for the riots, fires, beatings, and murders.

More at Memeorandum, including this headline at Gawker which substantiates Prager's argument: "Rodney King, Victim of Police Brutality That Spawned L.A. Riots, Dead at 47."

But see TMZ, "RODNEY KING: Drinking, Smoking Weed Before Drowning."

ADDED: At the Los Angeles Times, "Rev. Al Sharpton calls Rodney King a 'symbol of civil rights'."

Obama's Presidency and the Pathologies of Progressivism

From Bruce Thornton, at FrontPage Magazine:

Obama’s presidency has failed miserably, but it has accomplished one thing: it has revealed for all to see the lethal pathologies of progressive ideology. This doesn’t mean progressivism will go away. We thought the New Democrat Bill Clinton had put progressive ideas to rest when he said that the era of big government was over, and then reformed welfare and cut government spending from 23.5% of GDP to 19.5%. Yet despite the success that followed his rejection of failed liberal policies, here we are in the fourth year of Obama’s term, saddled with $5 trillion in new debt, a stalled economy, a National Labor Relations Board carrying water for the unions, a blatantly politicized Department of Justice, and rapidly metastasizing entitlement programs. Meanwhile the president indulges in class-warfare rhetoric young a century ago, and calls for even more redistributionist deficit spending to benefit his political cronies and clients.

The worst economic recovery since World War II that Obama and the Democrats midwifed has exposed the failure of the notion that the government can create economic growth and wealth rather than merely expropriating it from the creative and productive, and that centralized planning and regulating by “experts” can more efficiently allocate resources than the free market does. But more important is the underlying idea of progressivism that Obama’s policies is predicated on: Perfect justice, prosperity, and equality are possible if enlightened elites are given the power to organize and run society according to “scientific” knowledge about human nature and behavior. For two centuries this hubristic idea has led to failure, misery, and murder on a vast scale, yet progressives continue to increase government power in order to create this impossible utopia. Obamacare is just the latest iteration of this frequently demonstrated fallacy that complex human behavior, which reflects the unpredictable free will of millions of unique individuals, can be organized, controlled and regimented in order to achieve some dream-world utopia. That progressives still cling to this exploded idea despite the evidence of history and a disintegrating E.U. shows just how reactionary and blinkered they are.

But the list of progressive fallacies exposed by Obama is much longer. He has laid bare the hypocrisies and failures of the race-based identity politics that lie behind affirmative action and other racialist policies. Only by dint of the Jim Crow one-drop rule can someone who is half-black, who was raised in one of the least black states in the union by white grandparents, who had no exposure to black American culture and mores in his formative years, and who graduated from exclusive, elitist, predominantly white universities be considered authentically black. Moreover, his manifest ignorance about everything from pronunciation of common words to the basics of history and economics has exposed the gross inflation of his abilities by whites, one based not on performance but on assertion. Remember the presidential historian who claimed, with no evidence from transcripts or test scores, that Obama was probably the smartest president ever? Obama illustrates the truth that progressive racial policies are based on the illiberal idea that predicates minority identity on simplistic group stereotypes and the presumption of victimhood based on nothing other than melanin quotient and hair texture.

Continue reading.

I mentioned earlier that the failed Wisconsin recall signaled the end of a viable progressive ideological program. Leftists won't quit, as Thornton also notes, but their ideology has been totally discredited.

How our Fear of Talking Honestly About Race Hurts Us All

I'm reading Harry Stein's new book, No Matter What...They'll Call This Book Racist: How our Fear of Talking Honestly About Race Hurts Us All.

It's great!

The Southern California Chevelle Camino Club 15th Annual Car Show

Here's the link to SCCCC website.

I was out in Los Alamitos this morning.

My buddy Greg Joseph invited me. Here's his 1971 Dodge Charger:

Nice interior. I like that little cassette player below the dash.

The car's completely original, with a new paint job back in 1986. I'm told it's probably worth $125,000.

I'll come back to this one. My memory escapes me:

This one's a 1941 Ford Woody, hard to forget:

Here's a Chevrolet Bel Air, 1956 or so:

I should have brought a notepad or something. I took a shot of the identification card on this one, knowing I wasn't going to remember the details:

It's an incredible 1950 Chevrolet Fleetline:

The interior:

The trunk:

Here's the Transformers Ironhide from Trinity Worldwide Reprographics. It's the original truck from the movies Transformers 1 and 2.

Trinity set a up an information table. Here's the Mission Statement.

This is one of my favorites, a 1964 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu Convertible:

A really clean car:

The event was held at the Cottonwood Church. Here's the lineup of Chevelle's on the grass out front:

Here's clean Dodge Coronet, I think 1965:

And here's a 1929 Ford Model T:

That's it.

Good clean fun.

Swastikas Spray-Painted in Brooklyn's Borough Park Neighborhood

At the New York Post, "Swastikas, hate graffiti found on B'klyn synagogue, stores."

There's also an interview with New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind, here.

And Pamela adds, "In Obama's America, Jew-hatred is becoming more and more widespread." (Via Memeorandum.)

Progressive Heads Explode After Rigorous Scientific Research Reports Better Outcomes for Kids in Traditional Biological Family Structures

You gotta love it, at Heritage, "Why the Liberal Intolerance for New Family Structures Study?" (Via Memeorandum.)

And check the research summary here, "New Family Structures Research and the “No Differences” Claim."

Progressives are working overtime to destroy and discredit the author of the new research, Mark Regnerus. See Molly Redden at TNR, for example, "It's Time for Mark Regnerus to Get Collectively Dumped."

The left wants to "Spitzerize" Regnerus. Recall the report from a couple of weeks ago at the New York Times, "Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, Noted Psychiatrist, Apologizes For Study On Gay 'Cure'." His research was met with "tremendous anger" by the radical gay community, and Spitzer reportedly spent many nights sleepless at the backlash.

Well, that's what you get for going against the left's orthodoxy, I guess.

BONUS: Linkmaster Smith comments:

I’m all for creativity (as this blog may in fact bear out, for regular readers). Invariants like the building blocks of society, e.g. families, may not be the best place to get all wildly experimental.

Careful there, Linkmaster. You may have to recant if you announce those views too energetically.

Mitch McConnell: The Political Left Seeks to Undermine Free Speech

This is an amazing speech.

Breitbart interviewed Sen. McConnell on Friday, "EXCLUSIVE: McConnell: 'Radical, Dangerous' Obama Admin Seeks to 'Shut Up' Opponents." (At Memeorandum.)

More here. And the full speech is at the link.

And see Patterico, "Mitch McConnell: “There’s somebody I’ve heard about named Brett Kimberlin”."

More from Alana Goodman, "McConnell Vows to Defend Citizens United." And at the American Enterprise blog, "Growing threats to our First Amendment rights: An address by Mitch McConnell":

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell delivered a harrowing address on Friday at AEI, detailing both the singular importance of free speech and the forces that seek to stymie it.

Chiefly among Senator McConnell’s concerns are moves proposed by the Obama administration that bully dissidents and effectively stifle their political rights. With legislation such as the DISCLOSE Act, McConnell asserted, the Obama administration and its allies in Congress impinge upon the rights of American citizens.

America was built on the sanctity of political freedom and in the words of Senator McConnell, “The bulwark of this freedom is, of course, the First Amendment.”

This is exactly what I've been talking about.

Gisele Bündchen is Highest Paid Model in the World

At Forbes, "The World's Highest Paid Models."

And at London's Daily Mail, "Kate Moss, Miranda Kerr and Lara Stone rank among world's best-paid models... but Gisele outstrips them all with $45m fortune."

Sarah Palin at Right Online - #RO12

The Right Scoop has the full clip: "Full Speech: Sarah Palin at Right Online 2012."

And see the Los Angeles Times, "Sarah Palin gives a pep talk to conservative bloggers at the Right Online conference":

LAS VEGAS -- It was a rousing pep talk for a ballroom full of conservative bloggers, and a tribute to a fallen compadre Friday evening, as Sarah Palin honored the memory of the late Internet entrepreneur Andrew Breitbart and told an annual gathering of conservative new media that they fill a vital role in the nation’s political discourse.

In some ways, Palin’s 35-minute speech was also a vintage performance, her sing-song voice rising and falling as she also castigated and mocked the “lamestream media,” accusing it of failing to vet then-candidate Barack Obama in 2008 and of promulgating rumors about her personal life, which still seem to get under her skin.

“You do what the old media can’t or won’t do, and that’s tell the truth,” said Palin, who remains a hero of the tea-party right despite her withdrawal from the arena of electoral office. “I have learned in the last four years or so, it doesn’t do any good to personally complain about the untruths told by the old media. I might as well save my breath…. Shoot, by now I should have been divorced how many times?  Under FBI investigation. Living in the Hamptons. It still is a great mystery who really is Trig Paxon Van Palin’s real mother.”

RTWT.

And follow all the action on Twitter.

Nik Wallenda Walks Over Niagara Falls

At the Los Angeles Times, "Nik Wallenda completes historic tightrope walk over Niagara Falls."

There's also a home taping here, and ABC's Nightline has a segment here.

Five-Year-Old Aelita Andre Holds Art Exhibit in New York

She's a prodigy.

See Telegraph UK, "Five-year-old girl unveils new art exhibition in New York."

New York 5th Grader Kameron Slade Now Allowed to Give Speech on Homosexual Marriage

Here's the report from last night, "NY1 Exclusive: School Prohibits Fifth-Grader From Giving Speech On Same-Sex Marriage."

And here's the update at DNAinfo, "Fifth Grader Allowed to Give Same-Sex Marriage Speech, Walcott says." Also at New York Post, "Walcott: student has right to read gay nups essay but not everyone has to hear it."

Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott said a Queens fifth-grader barred from reading his essay on gay marriage in front of the entire school “has the right” to present it — but not everyone has to hear it.

Walcott refused to say whether he supports PS 195 principal Berryl Bailey’s controversial decision to bar 10-year-old Kameron Slade from giving a speech on the issue yesterday.

Only after media inquiries did the Department of Education say that Slade could read his essay in a makeshift assembly scheduled for Monday — but that parents could opt their kids out.

“It’s something that the principal felt that she needed to do more due diligence with her parent community because of the topic of the speech itself,” said Walcott. “This extra day will give her the ability to reach out to those parents to make them aware of the content of the speech — because we’re talking about an elementary school.”

And if you ever doubted that progressives couldn't give a shit about the welfare of children or the rights of parents to raise their kids as they see fit, check the commentary at The New Civil Rights Movement:

Public schools, like all institutions of learning, are supposed to teach facts and relevant topics. Same-sex marriage is not pornography. Same-sex marriage has been in the news in New York for the past few years, especially leading up to its legalization one year ago. Parents should take an interest in their children’s learning, and support the schools’ efforts to teach. Schools need to recognize that for students to learn about equality, they have to start teaching it.

Since when do parents get to decide what public school curriculums teach? If a majority of parents decide they want creationism to be taught instead of evolution, will that become part of a school’s curriculum? What about climate change? Or, the latest David Barton lies? Where does it end?

Public schools are funded by the "parents," so obviously the "parents" have a right to help decide what will be taught in those schools. And obviously, teaching about homosexuality --- or homosexual marriage --- isn't a question of "equality." Current laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and same-sex marriage is not a civil right. But the radical homosexual lobby is all about demonizing people who hold traditional values, so they'll viciously attack folks who might just be a little bit concerned that their 11 year-old kids might not be ready for such a sophisticated, confusing, and political-charged topic as this. But again, the radical gay from couldn't give a flying f-k. They just don't.

See more commentary at Memeorandum.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer Slams Obama's Backdoor Amnesty as 'Blatant Political Pandering'

At Newsmax, "Brewer Blasts Obama's Surprise 'Backdoor Amnesty' Move."

PREVIOUSLY:

* "Rep. Allen West Slams Obama's 'Rule of Edict or Executive Order'."
* "Progressives Go Batsh*t Crazy Over Neil Munro's Interruption: 'Destroying the Basic Decency of Our Democracy...'"
* "Angry Obama Lashes Out at Press Conference: 'I Didn't Ask for An Argument'."
* "Reporter Neil Munro Interrupts Obama During Immigration Speech (VIDEO)."
* "The Left's Democrat-Media-Complex Breaks Out With Huge Open Borders Push."

Rep. Allen West Slams Obama's 'Rule of Edict or Executive Order'

Once again, Congressman West hits a home run:

I think right now, this shows that we are getting away from a government that’s based upon consent of the American people, and we’re starting to live under a rule by edict or executive order...

REACTIONS at Memeorandum.

PREVIOUSLY:

* "Progressives Go Batsh*t Crazy Over Neil Munro's Interruption: 'Destroying the Basic Decency of Our Democracy...'"
* "Angry Obama Lashes Out at Press Conference: 'I Didn't Ask for An Argument'."
* "Reporter Neil Munro Interrupts Obama During Immigration Speech (VIDEO)."
* "The Left's Democrat-Media-Complex Breaks Out With Huge Open Borders Push."

Progressives Go Batsh*t Crazy Over Neil Munro's Interruption: 'Destroying the Basic Decency of Our Democracy...'

The Daily Caller released a statement defending reporter Neil Munro.

And here's progressive commentator Sally Kohn's response on Twitter:

So his job is destroying the basic decency of our democracy?RT @DailyCaller: We are very proud of, @NeilMunroDC for doing his job
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) June 15, 2012

It's going to be a long night.

Here's shrieking left-wing harpy Joan Walsh at Salon, "Frat-boy conservatism in the Rose Garden."

And just one of many race cards being played, but Touré (remember him?), at Newsbusters, "MSNBC’s Touré: Obama Being Interrupted 'Cannot Be Disconnected From the Fact That He’s Black'."

I'll post that one later when it's up on YouTube, plus whatever else I find. What a day!

PREVIOUSLY:

* "Angry Obama Lashes Out at Press Conference: 'I Didn't Ask for An Argument'."
* "Reporter Neil Munro Interrupts Obama During Immigration Speech (VIDEO)."
* "The Left's Democrat-Media-Complex Breaks Out With Huge Open Borders Push."

Angry Obama Lashes Out at Press Conference: 'I Didn't Ask for An Argument'

This is a huge story now at Memeorandum.

Glenn Reynolds rounds it up: "THE SUDDENLY-LESS-DEFERENTIAL PRESS: Daily Caller’s Neil Munro interrupts President Obama..."

And see Ed Driscoll: "ZOMG! Reporter Asks Dear Leader a Question!"

This last part of the talk with O lashing out at Neil Munro is something else:

More at Twitchy, "POTUS Interruptus: Pearl-clutching over reporter who interrupted Obama, MSNBC calls it racist."

And from Nice Deb, "Video: Obama Runs Back Into White House After Refusing to Take Questions After Amnesty Speech."

And back over at Memeorandum, it's immigration all the way down.

PREVIOUSLY: "Reporter Neil Munro Interrupts Obama During Immigration Speech (VIDEO)."

Reporter Neil Munro Interrupts Obama During Immigration Speech (VIDEO)

Here's the video:

The Guardian lived blogged: "Obama to end deportation for young undocumented migrants – politics live."

And at Twitchy, "Daily Caller’s Neil Munro interrupts President Obama; ‘is this right thing to do for American workers’."

The Left's Democrat-Media-Complex Breaks Out With Huge Open Borders Push

At CNN a little while ago, Fredricka Whitfield spoke with illegal immigrant and open borders activist Jose Antonio Vargas (video here). It turns out Vargas' story is the center-piece of this week's cover story at Time Magazine, "We Are Americans - Not Legal Not Leaving." Good timing, eh?

UPDATE: Shortly after Jose Antonio Vargas' story on the issue of the undocumented was published in TIME, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced that it would no longer deport young undocumented residents who qualify for the DREAM act. Those eligible will receive work permits.

And Vargas has an introductory piece, "Inside the World of the ‘Illegal’ Immigrant":

A year ago this month, I wrote an essay for the New York Times “coming out” about my status as an undocumented immigrant — what many people call an “illegal.” I told of my journey of being sent from the Philippines to the U.S. at age 12 without knowing I didn’t have the right papers; graduating from college and working as a successful journalist; and relying on a support network of American citizens (my high school principal and superintendent among them) to get me through. But mine is just one story. So with the help of friends and supporters, I founded a campaign called Define American, to document the lives of the undocumented and harness the support of our allies around this very controversial and misunderstood issue.

There are an estimated 11.5 million people like me in this country, human beings with stories as varied as that of the U.S. itself yet who lack a legal claim to exist here. It’s an issue that touches people of all ethnicities and backgrounds: Latinos and Asians, blacks and whites. (And yes, undocumented immigrants come from all sorts of countries, like Israel, Nigeria and Germany.) It’s an issue that goes beyond election-year politics and transcends the limitations of our broken immigration system and the policies being written to address them.

Check the link for the rest of the article, and the links to Vargas' NYT commentary and his website.

The immigration system isn't "broken." The left refuses to enforce it. And now with the White House's announcement, the Obama administration is turning election 2010 into a referendum on the president's open borders policy --- and a bid to mobilize the Democrat Party's Latino voting demographic.

More throughout the day on this.

Michelle Malkin has a big report on developments: "Occupy Open Borders: Obama delivers 800,000 more illegal alien deportation waivers."

Graphic Abortion Photos Stir Outrage in China

Steven Ertelt has the report, "China Apologizes, Suspends Officials Over Forced Late-Term Abortion."

And from Independent UK, "Graphic abortion photos prompt outrage at China's one-child law: Shocking images highlight case of woman forced into termination at seven months":

China insists the family planning policy is necessary because the country does not have the resources to deal with a population growing out of control. China is the world's most populous country, with a population of 1.3 billion. The government estimates that more than 400 million births have been prevented by the policy.

The policy is widely despised, and there is pressure to reverse it as China's population is ageing swiftly, prompting fears that there may not be enough young workers to sustain economic growth at current levels for much longer.

The penalty for breaking the rules on planned birth is the imposition of a fine and a loss of benefits such as free education and healthcare, but for many wealthy couples in China this is a price worth paying.

"This was very common in my hometown, even when the baby was close to term, women were forced to abort. Population control is fine, but what about those rich people who are allowed to have eight children," wrote one web commentator from Nanning, referring to a case in December last year when a wealthy couple in Guangdong had eight babies, including several born illegally to surrogates. "In 100 years, or even in 50 years, you will see how ridiculous population control is," a commentator from Ningbo said.

And be sure to read the comment thread from the report at Raw Story, where enlightened progressives are all over the place in denial of the horror and defense of the policy, for example:

You do know that a fetus and newborn baby have no sensations of suffering or satisfaction. Can you imagine the pollution levels in China or the price of oil if there were another 500 million Chinese?

New Mitt Romney Ad: 'Looks like a One-Term Proposition'

Via Instapundit, who has a roundup of reactions to Obama's speech yesterday:

President Barack Obama Has Disappointed in His First Term

From Der Spiegel, "The President of Disappointments: How Obama Has Failed to Deliver":

Barack Obama entered the White House as a savior. But he hasn't delivered. The ideological chasms in the US are as deep as they have ever been, with Republicans blocking the president at every turn. Who is responsible for his failure?

The United States of America, where yet another mammoth presidential campaign is taking shape, makes up less than 5 percent of the world's population. Yet it consumes about 25 percent of the world's oil. It has close to $16 trillion (€12.8 trillion) in debt, its expenditures will exceed its revenues by $1.3 trillion in this fiscal year alone, and the war in Afghanistan is costing it $2 billion. Each week. Many in this country are demanding peace in Syria, even as Washington quietly fights a dirty drone war in Pakistan. Some 169 prisoners are still stewing in Guantanamo. In Washington, D.C., the divide between the two political camps is so deep that it resembles an abyss. Is the current president of the United States really named Barack Obama? Is the era of George W. Bush really over?

Obama's first term in office will end in just a few months time. The giant, many-faceted country, 27 times the size of Germany, needs a new plan -- a new project for the staggering global superpower. A president will be elected in November for 314 million citizens. A new president? Perhaps. It is conceivable that the first black president, Barack Obama, hailed as a savior when he came into office, will be replaced by the pale Mormon Mitt Romney, a Republican with somewhat dubious conservative credentials.

The office both men are vying for is the most difficult in the world. The US president's agenda is constantly jam packed with the weightiest and the most trivial of matters alike, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Sometimes major national projects and monumental global tasks are relegated to the periphery of that agenda, because domestic sports scandals or sexual improprieties capture the headlines, because lunatic pastors decide to burn Korans, or because new statistics are released showing that three-fourths of all Americans are overweight, more than 46 million live in poverty and gunshots kill more than 30,000 people a year, suicides included.

The fact that Kim Kardashian's marriage lasted only 72 days can have a longer-lasting impact on the news in America than any environmental policy initiative. High gasoline prices (in the US "high" means that a liter of gasoline costs the equivalent of €0.77, or less than half the price of gasoline in Germany) are so important to so many people that they could decide the election. The fact that 52 percent of Republicans in Mississippi believe that Obama is a Muslim, or that 46 percent of Americans believe that man was created precisely as is written in the Bible can make political debates extraordinarily tedious.

RTWT.

Obama has failed to unify the country, which is want the Der Speigel piece is hitting on. But the author is bemoaning the puported "excessive partisanship" of recent years, and while it's the GOP that's usually blamed, actually the truth shows otherwise. See Althouse: "'Barack Obama is the most partisan politician since Richard Nixon'."

ALSO AT Althouse: "About Cory Booker: 'He’s dead to us'."

IMAGE CREDIT: The People's Cube, "Getting One’s Mind Right With Mayor Cory Booker."

Greece Still Wants Free Lunch

At the Wall Street Journal, "Greece Votes Again" (via Google):

Nobody said the second time would be the charm. Greece's political parties failed to form a government after last month's parliamentary elections, and neither Greek citizens nor their creditors have any appetite for another inconclusive result after Sunday's runoff vote. But no number of polls will spell political stability for Greece unless Athens can show the credible commitment to reform that the Greek establishment has dodged for decades.

Not that too much in the way of reform is on offer at ballot boxes this weekend. The question after Sunday will be whether either of the two main parties can deliver Greece from the clientelism and corruption that bloat its government and leave its private economy moribund—even if they manage to form a government that can serve out the year.

Ahead of the election, the center-right New Democracy party looks to be leading the Coalition of the Radical Left—Syriza in the Greek abbreviation. But once again no party is likely to claim an absolute majority. Syriza was the sleeper story of last month's elections, winning second place with 16.8% of the vote; the party took less than 5% three years ago.

Syriza's ascent has given officials in Brussels and Berlin more than a few sleepless nights. Alexis Tsipras, the party's fiery 37-year-old leader, vows that he'll tear up the EU-IMF bailout agreement but keep Greece within the euro zone. If he becomes Prime Minister, has said he'd nationalize Greek banks, halt privatizations, reverse pension and wage cuts, and scrap the current pledge to fire 150,000 government workers.

But equally worrisome is the centrist parties' collapse into irrelevance. New Democracy chief Antonis Samaras has made the right noises about tax freezes and structural reforms, but if his party wins first place on Sunday it would likely have to form a coalition with Pasok, the socialist party that won third place in May. A joint government with Pasok and one of the smaller parties would be encumbered by coalition politics and peopled by many of the same officials who swelled Greece's public debt and turned "Greek accounting" into an international punchline.

Any government that is formed after Sunday will have to move carefully or face swift collapse. Mr. Tsipras thinks Angela Merkel is bluffing when she says she'll cancel Greece's funding if Athens cancels the bailout terms. He says the German Chancellor and other EU leaders are too committed to keeping Greece in the euro zone not to make concessions....

We hope the Greeks sort it all out, and that the Acropolis doesn't get destroyed in the process. But at one level the politics is a sideshow to the central lesson of Greece's crisis. For decades, and especially once they joined the euro zone, Greeks borrowed to consume beyond their means, and in 2009 the bill came due.

On Sunday Greeks try again to decide on the means of repayment: Mr. Samaras is offering to swallow the austerity medicine but seems fated to under-deliver on the restructuring that needs to accompany it. Mr. Tsipras is promising a free lunch. A Syriza victory Sunday would suggest that millions of Greeks still believe in no-cost dining.

That this is where Greece has come should give EU policy makers pause. Spanish banks are being bailed out and a deeper transfer union looms, but Greece shows that there are limits to what rescue money can achieve when it is poured into a broken political system.

The larger question raised by the current state of Greek politics is whether more transfers and more fiscal union can make Greece and the rest of Europe more like Germany. Or will they make European politics more like Greece's?

RELATED: At the Australian, "Greek leftist Alexis Tsipras slams 'Merkel's Europe' as election looms."

And at the Los Angeles Times, "Greece voters face tough choices at polls: The upcoming vote is seen as a referendum on Greece's Eurozone membership." And the New York Times, "Europe Braces for Greek Vote — and Maybe More."

Burma's Opposition Leader Aung San Suu Kyi Exhausted, Becomes Ill During Switzerland Press Conference

At the Australian, "Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi falls ill from exhaustion on Europe tour."

RELATED: At the Los Angeles Times, "Myanmar forces struggle to contain ethnic and religious violence," and the Wall Street Journal, "Myanmar Clashes Spur Web Use, Crackdown: Openness Poses Challenges for Military-Backed Government."

Oregon State Professor Nicholas Drapela Fired From Position as 'Senior Instructor' in the Department of Chemistry

My good friend Norman Gersman sent this along.

See Watts Up With That, "Climate skeptic instructor fired from Oregon State University."

And commentary at Hall of Record, "Oregon State University Fires Scientist For Being An Unbeliever."

RELATED: From a few days ago, at Volokh, "Peter Gleick’s Possible Involvement in Drafting Fake Heartland Document: Either Not Investigated or the Relevant Results Not Released."

See Steven Hayward earlier, at the Weekly Standard, "Why the Climate Skeptics Are Winning."

Remember, don't get cocky.

Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne Mansion House Speech

I'm fascinated by the extremely dire language out of Britain.

Telegraph UK has the full text of Osborne's speech: "George Osborne's Mansion House speech: in full."

Germany's Response to the Euro Crisis

From Charlemagne, at the Economist, "Between two nightmares: Angela Merkel is drawing the wrong lessons from the chaos of German history":

A STAMP collection in Berlin’s German Historical Museum sums up what, to many Germans, is the price of economic recklessness. A Weimar-era postage stamp worth five pfennigs in 1920 doubled in price the following year, then jumped to ten marks in 1922. It cost 30 marks in January 1923, 1,000 marks in May and 800,000 marks in October. By the end of 1923, sending a letter took ten billion marks. Next to this “document of an insane era”, the museum shows how worthless banknotes were defaced by Nazis with caricatures of Jewish speculators. It was at the height of hyperinflation, explains the display, that Hitler staged his failed Munich beer-hall putsch.

The moral is clear: profligacy leads to economic chaos, political extremism and ultimately to catastrophe for all of Europe. For today’s Germans, prosperity and democratic order must be based on sound money. The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, is in tune with this domestic mood when she insists that the euro zone must embrace a culture of financial stability if it is to overcome its debt crisis.

But is she drawing the wrong lessons from history? It was not hyperinflation in the 1920s but depression and mass unemployment in the 1930s that propelled Hitler to power. Like the hapless Weimar chancellor, Heinrich Brüning, Mrs Merkel is accused by critics of hastening disaster by pushing austerity during a deep recession. But whereas the 1930s is seared in American memory, it is less clearly remembered in Germany. The reason, says Professor Carl-Ludwig Holtfrerich of the Free University of Berlin, is that Germany returned to full employment more quickly, thanks partly to Hitler’s own form of Keynesian stimulus: notably autobahn-building and rearmament.

The prospect of a 1930s-like breakdown now is perhaps most palpable in Greece. In the fifth year of recession, Greeks chose in May to vote in large numbers for the extreme left and right, punishing mainstream parties that supported the austerity and reforms which came as conditions of the country’s bail-out. Even in the best scenario, in which centrists return to power in this weekend’s second election, a “Grexit” might only be delayed. And once the idea takes hold that a euro member can be pushed out, nobody knows where it will stop.

Contagion from Greece has clearly spread to Spain, which this week was promised up to €100 billion ($125 billion) in euro-zone loans to prop up its crippled banks. If Spain is touched, Italy is sure to follow and France may not be so far behind. As one observer in Berlin puts it, Germany’s real fear is not that the euro zone unravels to the Alps, but that it collapses all the way up to the Rhine. That is an existential threat for Germany, not just economically but also politically; its post-war rehabilitation and prosperity is built on reconciliation with France and deeper European integration.

Continue reading.

The pressure's on for Germany to save the Euro, and for practical purposes, that means even greater integration in a banking union, more rescue funds for EU institutions, and continued emergency bailouts for the worst off economies at the periphery. I doubt Germany will be able to hold up the entire European project. But Merkel's Christian Democratic Party has been getting hammered domestically, so she might shift toward even greater intervention. That said, see Telegraph UK, "It’s a poker game, and Angela Merkel will win."

See also London's Daily Mail, "Angela Merkel rejects quick solution to eurozone crisis as Spain's borrowing costs soar past critical 7% 'bailout level' following savage credit rating downgrade."

Europe Borrowing Costs Skyrocket as Financial Crisis Spirals

The Washington Post has a dramatic headline, "Spain and Italy straining under borrowing costs, but Germany balks at key steps to ease crisis":

MILAN — A growing number of European countries are being squeezed by a financial vise just days before a Greek election that could escalate the region’s political and economic turmoil.

The rise of Italian and Spanish borrowing costs to alarming levels Thursday heaped pressure on leaders to prevent Europe’s debt crisis from engulfing its largest countries. No grand solution appears imminent.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel opposes solutions that many experts are pushing that would increase costs for Berlin.

Merkel has found herself isolated from the leaders of Spain, Italy and France, who want the 17 countries in the euro currency union to move quickly to bind their governments’ finances and debt.

Such action could take the form of jointly issued debt or European-wide guarantees on bank deposits. Either step would spread the risks that individual countries bear across the eurozone.

RTWT.

Plus, it looks like Britain is stepping to help the rescue effort. See the Guardian UK, "Debt crisis: emergency action revealed to tackle 'worst crisis since second world war'," and Telegraph UK, "Osborne unveils £140bn scheme to kick-start stagnant economy."

And from Alex Brummer, at London's Daily Mail, "Sir Mervyn's speech sent a shiver down the spine: In 40 years I've never heard such apocalyptic talk."

Scott Brown Hits Back Against Elizabeth Warren's J.P. Morgan Allegations: She's Failed the Test of 'Truthfulness and Credibility and Honesty'

The full video is at Fox News, "Big business blame game heats up Mass. Senate race."

And at National Journal, "Brown, Warren Scrap Over Native American Controversy":

In a fight to keep his Senate seat in Massachusetts, Republican Scott Brown lashed out Thursday at Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren, saying she failed the test of “truthfulness and credibility and honesty” as evidenced by her past claims about her Native American heritage.

On Fox News, Brown responded to a statement Warren made about him being too cozy with Wall Street: “When you're running for elective office … you have to pass a test and the test is about truthfulness and credibility and honesty. And quite frankly she's failed that test as evidenced by her claiming to be a Native American and checking the box and making misrepresentations to not only Harvard but Penn.

He added: “She can rewrite her own history but she can’t rewrite mine.”

Warren has been dogged by claims about her Native American heritage. After initially claiming ignorance on the matter, Warren later admitted identifying herself as Native American while on the faculty at Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania. She said she did not use her Cherokee heritage to help get those jobs, but made the claims after she was hired. Her statements have come under criticism because she has thus far been unable to substantiate them.

Warren defended herself on Thursday, however, saying that by concentrating on the Native American controversy, Brown was trying to distract from the issues.

More at that top link.

And see Legal Insurrection for Elizabeth Brown's comments: "Elizabeth Warren: “I’m not backing off from my family” on Cherokee claim."

Obama, Romney Go Head to Head on Economy

At the New York Times,"Obama Says Election Will Shape the Economy for Years":

CLEVELAND — Framing his re-election bid as a stark choice between government action to lift the middle class and a return to Republican economic policies that he said had caused a deep recession, President Obama on Thursday called the presidential decision facing Americans a clear-cut one that will determine the long-term trajectory of the economy.

“This November is your chance to render a verdict on the debate over how to grow the economy, how to create good jobs, how to pay down our deficit,” Mr. Obama told enthusiastic supporters at Cuyahoga Community College here. “Your vote will finally determine the path that we take as a nation — not just tomorrow, but for years to come.”

The address, by a president who sounded as if he realized he was in a fight for his political life, represented a determined effort to stem two weeks of political and economic sliding that began with a grim jobs report. It came on a day of political gamesmanship in this crucial swing state, as Mitt Romney, the president’s rival, scheduled a speech 250 miles away in Republican-friendly Cincinnati in an effort to overshadow Mr. Obama and pre-emptively attack him for failing to revive the economy.

Speaking shortly before Mr. Obama in remarks that, like the president’s, were carried on cable news programs, Mr. Romney said Mr. Obama’s re-election campaign felt compelled to deliver a major address on the economy “because he hasn’t delivered a recovery for the economy.”

“Now, I know that he will have all sorts of excuses, and he’ll have all sorts of ideas he’ll describe about how he’ll make things better,” Mr. Romney said. “But what he says and what he does are not always the exact same thing. And so if people want to know how his economic policies have worked and how they perform, why they can talk to their neighbor and ask if things are better.”

In his remarks, the president acknowledged that divergent views between him and Mr. Romney on how to revive the economy would define the election.

“There is one place I stand in complete agreement with Mr. Romney,” Mr. Obama said. “This election is about our economic future.”

Also, "Romney Assails Obama for Favoring Words Over Action." (Via Memeorandum.)

Mitt Romney Goes Up With First Attack Ad: 'Doing Fine'

Ed Morrissey reports, "Romney goes on attack with new TV ad, “Doing Fine”."

And see Alana Goodman, "Romney’s Psych Out Ad."

Mitt Romney’s latest attack ad against President Obama (the first negative spot of the campaign, as Jim Geraghty points out) sends two messages. On the surface it’s a cut-and-dry ad criticizing Obama as out of touch on the economy, but there’s another message that seems aimed at psyching out the Obama campaign. See if you can catch it:

More at Memeorandum.

New Mitt Romney Video: 'Raising the Flag'

Celebrating Flag Day, "Our Flag."

Six Senate Republicans Oppose Obama's Iraq Ambassador Nominee Brett McGurk

Members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee have issued a letter to the White House.

At the Christian Science Monitor, "Senate fight brews over Obama's Iraq ambassador pick":

Brett McGurk is drawing the ire of Senate Republicans, who point to an inappropriate relationship with his now-wife when she was a journalist.

PREVIOUSLY: "WSJ's Gina Chon Resigns Over Racy E-Mails: Reporter, Now Married to Iraq Ambassador-Nominee Brett McGurk, Violated Dow Jones Code of Conduct."

Who Is Elizabeth Warren? Sean Hannity Covers Massachusetts Senate Race

Let me recommend folks go over to the full Fox New video here.

Michelle Fields is easier to look at than the screen image of Elizabeth Warren at Fox's upload, ha!

And compare Hannity's segment to competition's: "MSNBC's Chris Matthews Interviews Elizabeth Warren: Completely Ignores 'Fauxcahontas' Scandal, Offers to Help 'Minority' Candidate Instead."

Michelle Malkin Slams GOP Support for ObamaCare's 'Slacker Mandate'

Michelle hammers GOP Senator Roy Blunt at the clip.

And here's her column from yesterday, "Republican Surrenderists for Obamacare":

During the summer of 2009, conservative activists turned up the heat on Democratic politicians to protest the innovation-destroying, liberty-usurping Obamacare mandate. In the summer of 2012, it’s squishy Republican politicians who deserve the grassroots flames.
In case you hadn’t heard, even if the Supreme Court overturns the progressives’ federal health care juggernaut, prominent GOP leaders vow to preserve its most “popular” provisions. These big-government Republicans show appalling indifference to the dire market disruptions and culture of dependency that Obamacare schemes have wrought.

GOP Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri, vice chair of the Senate GOP Conference, told a St. Louis radio station two weeks ago that he supports keeping at least three Obamacare regulatory pillars: federally imposed coverage of “children” up to age 26 on their parents’ health insurance policies (the infamous, unfunded “slacker mandate”), federally mandated coverage regardless of pre-existing conditions (“guaranteed issue,” which turns the very concept of insurance on its head and leads to an adverse-selection death spiral) and closure of the coverage gap in the massive Bush-backed Medicare drug entitlement (the “donut hole fix” that will obliterate the program’s cost-controls).

Some Republicans are even trying to out-Obama Obamacare. GOP Rep. Steve Stivers of Ohio is pushing a proposal to increase the mandatory coverage age for dependents to age 31. And once a fire-breathing dragon for repeal, GOP Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee hem-hawed when asked by the liberal Talking Points Memo website whether Republicans would be introducing specific bills to preserve the guaranteed issue and slacker mandate provisions.

“Well, I think we need to be prepared,” Alexander told TPM. “And we will be prepared.”

RTWT.

Progressives Blame President Bush for 'Fast and Furious' Scandal

This is a literally unbelievable piece-of-junk report, at the Soros-backed Think Progress, "Five Things to Know About the Republican Witchhunt Against Attorney General Holder":

In 2006, during the presidency of George W. Bush, the Justice Department launched the first of a series of misguided “gunrunning” schemes that eventually led to the death of federal Agent Brian Terry. Rather than look to ways to prevent such a tragedy from happening again, however, House Oversight Chair Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) spent his tenure as a committee chair trying unsuccessfully to embarrass Attorney General Eric Holder.

Hardly. But read the whole thing for the rest of the lies.

Yesterday, Sandra Miller had this, at The Examiner, "The Fast and Furious Scandal":

Eric Holder in his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, has been evasive and has had several memory lapses. He states that he knew nothing of the gunrunning program, that he was not aware that guns were walking into Mexico during Fast Furious, that is until the reports became public in early 2011. Holder claims he knew nothing of the operation until almost three months after a Border Patrol agent, Brian Terry was killed by one of the 2,000 firearms that traveled across the Mexican border into the hands of drug cartels. He continues to insist that Fast and Furious was being handled by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) employees with little to no direction by the Department of Justice.

One of the most compelling parts of Eric Holder's testimony was the inclusion of an exchange with Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) regarding an e-mail written by the Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jason Weinstein to James Trusty, chief of the Department of Justice's Organized Crime and Gang Section. In this testimony and in this e-mail the words “Fast and Furious” were used. Chaffetz says the e-mail says Fast and Furious, Mr. Holder says it does not. Mr. Chaffetz says I have it in black and white. Eric Holder insisted the term was referring to the Bush Administration operations and later said, “I have superior knowledge.”

Eric Holder has tried to implicate the Bush Administration in this scandal all along. This is what Holder said to the committee:

“Although these law enforcement operations, which include Wide Receiver, Medrano, Hernandez, Fast and Furious, and others, were focused on the goal of dismantling illegal gun trafficking networks, they were flawed in both concept and execution. I share your concerns about how these operations were developed and implemented. That's why, just as congressional leaders have called for answers, I have asked the Department's Inspector General to conduct a comprehensive investigation as well”.

However, there are two differences between the Bush and Obama administration and their operations. At least three of four operations conducted under the Bush Administration, Wide Receiver, Medrano and Hernandez, were conducted by co-operating with Mexican law enforcement authorities. There was no effort by the Obama administration to co-ordinate with Mexico on Fast and Furious.

The next difference is the most important. There were no casualties as a result of any Bush administration efforts. As the result of Fast and Furious, one US Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and possibly Jaime Zapata have been killed, along with hundreds of Mexican citizens. Eric Holder seems indifferent to this fact. The Department of Justice is also apparently attempting to stonewall an investigation into the people that are responsible for these operations that have lead to the murder of government officials. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) says the Department of Justice is “out of excuses.” Contempt is the only tool Congress has to enforce the subpoena, says Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA), who is the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

And from late last year, see Andrew McCarthy, at National Review, "Fast & Furious Was . . . Bush’s Fault."

And that's Katie Pavlich at the clip above. She literally wrote the book on Fast and Furious, and she calls out top Justice Department officials as liars.

And see Pavlich's essay from last night, "Issa to Holder: You Said You Want to Talk, Let's Talk." And she's interviewed by the National Rifle Association here.

What Do Libertarians Think About Gay Marriage?

Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie perfectly illustrate why I'm not libertarian on social issues. This is literally a knee-jerk discussion, and I doubt a longer libertarian treatment, perhaps in their new book, would be much better --- I haven't read it though, so this is all I've got. Still, this is pretty familiar terrain, and completely divorced from decency or moral consideration, IMHO:

For a recent argument against gay marriage, see "Conservatives Block Homosexual Marriage Law in Washington State."

This Time, Europe Really Is on the Brink

An essay from Niall Ferguson and Nouriel Roubini, at Der Spiegel, "The Perils of Ignoring History":

The European Union was created to avoid repeating the disasters of the 1930s, but Germany, of all countries, has failed to learn from history. As the euro crisis escalates, Berlin should remember how the banking crisis of 1931 contributed to the breakdown of democracy across Europe. Action is urgently needed to stop history from repeating itself.

Is it one minute to midnight in Europe?

The failure of German public opinion to grasp the dire state of affairs in Europe today is inviting a repeat of precisely the crisis of the mid 20th century that European integration was designed to avoid.
With every increase in the probability of a disorderly Greek exit from the monetary union, the pressure on the Spanish banks increases and with it the danger of a Mediterranean-wide bank run so big that it would overwhelm the European Central Bank. Already there has been a substantial re-nationalization of the European financial system. This centrifugal process could easily continue to the point of complete disintegration.

We find it extraordinary that it should be Germany, of all countries, that is failing to learn from history. Fixated on the non-threat of inflation, today's Germans appear to attach more importance to the year 1923 (the year of hyperinflation) than to the year 1933 (the year democracy died). They would do well to remember how a European banking crisis two years before 1933 contributed directly to the breakdown of democracy not just in their own country but right across the European continent.

Astonishingly few Europeans (including bankers) seem to remember what happened in May 1931 when Creditanstalt, the biggest Austrian bank, had to be bailed out by a government that was itself on the brink of insolvency. The ensuing European bank crisis, which saw the failure of two of Germany's biggest banks, ushered in the second half of the Great Depression. If the first half had been dominated by the American stock market crash, the second was all about European banks going bust.

Continue reading.

Niall Ferguson made the same basic argument at The Daily Beast the other day, and he extended it include fallout for President Obama's reelection chances.

That said, while Ferguson and Roubini are a little over the top, recall the the latter predicted the U.S. housing bust, so I don't discount these arguments too quickly.

Expect updates...