Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Russell Pearce, SB 1070 Sponsor, Blasts Obama Administration's 'Political Lawsuit'

Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce hammers the administration in this clip from CNN:

Plus, I'm searching for video from last night's press conference with Gov. Brewer. Will post when I see it. Meanwhile, here's a brief clip at ABC News:

See also, "Jan Brewer: We Will Beat All Lawsuits Against Arizona Illegal Immigration Law." And at Gov. Brewer's Secure the Border homepage, "Federal government has filed a lawsuit against the State of Arizona."


Kill the Ground Zero Mosque

At the National Republican Trust:
With your help, and those like you, we will enact an overwhelmingly aggressive campaign to “Kill the Ground Zero Mosque.” We will not rest until the plans for this mosque are burned, smoking, and buried…like the twisted metal of the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers themselves, after the terrorist attack that killed so many of our fellow Americans at Ground Zero.

And this was too hot for CBS News? "Or so the the Republican Trust was told by media honchos."

Hat Tip: Big Peace.

Come On the Risin' Wind, We're Goin' Up Around the Bend...

Listened to some CCR yesterday afternoon, on 100.3 The Sound.

Good ole American music ... enjoy:

BP and the Lockerbie Bomber's Release

From Bret Stephens, "A (Better) Reason to Hate BP: Did the Oil Giant Profit From the Lockerbie Bomber's Release?"

British Petroleum, with a pending $900 million drilling contract with the Libyan regime, did some hard lobbying, in 2007, in London. BP "told the U.K. government ... 'it was concerned that a delay in concluding a prisoner transfer agreement with the Libyan government might hurt' the deal it had just signed."

Of course, Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi is now expected to live 10 years (after being released with "just weeks" to live last year).

As Stephens notes:
BP has now spent the past 11 weeks promising to make things right for everyone affected by the Gulf spill. But for the families of Pan Am Flight 103's 270 victims, things can never be made right. Nor, following Megrahi's release, will justice ever be served. The question that BP could usefully answer—and answer fully—is whether, in that denial of justice, their interests were served. It won't restore the company to honor, but it might do something to restore a measure of trust.
Also at "The Lockerbie Case."

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Rachel Maddow Reports From Kandahar; or, Just When You Thought DOD Got Beat Up on Rolling Stone and McChrystal...

I caught a little coverage earlier of Rachel Maddow's reporting from Afghanistan. Yeah, you read that right: The fever swamp leftist with her own show on MSNBC is actually in Afghanistan to report on the war. I guess the Pentagon didn't get beaten up enough from Rolling Stone's McCrystal coverage? And be sure to sample some of the headlines over at Maddow's blog, for example, "A Bold Gamble to Salvage Afghanistan." Of course, it's no "gamble." Lots of analysis indicates that victory's well within reach of U.S. forces (e.g., "Yes We Can … Win in Afghanistan," and "Defining Success in Afghanistan").

Rachel Maddow is perfectly representative of the leftist identity of ideological infallibility (anti-rationalist). Watching her show is like listening to the incoherent ramblings of a pathological liar on the verge of cocaine overdose. And our brilliant media people at DOD have rewarded her with an embed in Kandahar! Hmm... on second thought about victory in Afghanistan?

And I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that Ms. Maddow's been on a roll lately, for example, with her allegations of "fake" threats from the Afghan region. For experts she refers to Andrew Sullivan and Glenn Greenwald, the latter who writes:
So between Afghanistan and Pakistan combined, there are a few hundred Al Qeada members total. All of this ongoing war and those hundreds of billions of dollars spent and those deaths and the decade of occupation, and those bombings and shootings and drone attacks and lawless prisons and habeas-stripping court precedents: it's all (ostensibly) for a few hundred extremists total hiding in remote tribal areas. A few hundred.
Hey, it only took 19 to bring down the World Trade Center, and just 10 Lashkar terrorists completely demobilized Mumbai, but who's counting? Of course, Greenwald's expertise is constitutional law, not AFPAK, but when your conclusions fit the nihilist media meme you get marquee treatment on MSNBC.

It's not all bad, of course. DefSec Robert Gates recently sent out a memorandum outlining a crackdown on Pentagon press relations. No doubt that will get things under control --- well, hopefully before Rachel Maddow "discovers" the next My Lai in the meantime.

More Queers Against Israeli Apartheid — Special Free Speech Edition

Blazing Cat Fur has all your coverage, but I had to post this clip for a reminder of manifest tolerance of the peace and justice crowd:

Reminds me of some of my "colleagues" in the Business and Social Science Division.

RELATED: "
Queers Against Israeli Apartheid: A group founded on the principle of censorship."

Lindsay Lohan Sentenced to 90 Days Behind Bars

Drug rehab's included in sentencing.

At LAT, "
Judge Sentences Lindsay Lohan to Jail":

A Beverly Hills judge ruled Tuesday that Lindsay Lohan violated the terms of her probation in a drunk driving case when she failed to attend alcohol education classes and sentenced her to 90 days in jail.

Judge Marsha N. Revel stated several instances over the last few years in which the actress lied about taking drugs and drinking.

"It's like someone who cheats but doesn't think it's cheating if they don't get caught," Revel said ....

Before sentencing, a tearful Lohan addressed the court, saying "as far as I knew I was in compliance with my programs.”

“I wasn’t trying to get special treatment," the actress said. "I have to provide for myself. I have to work. Having said that, I did everything to balance my jobs and showing up. I’m not taking this as a joke. It’s my life. It’s my career...I take responsibility for my actions. I’ve tried to do the best I can. It’s been such a long haul, I don’t want you to think that I don’t respect you.”
Plus, TMZ has the videos if this YouTube comes down. And all the celebrity gossip's at WeSmirch.

Mercy Mercy Me: Obama Decried, Then Adopted, Bush Administration Drilling Policies

Yeah, well, thing's ain't what they used to be.

Marvin Gaye's 1971 hit "
became one of his most poignant anthems of sorrow at the world dealing with the environment." And I imagine to the eco-extremist left, the Obama administration's blatant hypocrisy on offshore drilling is bit of a sorrow as well.

From WSJ:

Less than four months after President Barack Obama took office, his new administration received a forceful warning about the dangers of offshore oil drilling.

The alarm was rung by a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., which found that the government was unprepared for a major spill at sea, relying on an "irrational" environmental analysis of the risks of offshore drilling.

The April 2009 ruling stunned both the administration and the oil industry, and threatened to delay or cancel dozens of offshore projects in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.

Despite its pro-environment pledges, the Obama administration urged the court to revisit the decision. Politically, it needed to push ahead with conventional oil production while it expanded support for renewable energy.

Another reason: money. In its arguments to the court, the government said that the loss of royalties on the oil, estimated at almost $10 billion, "may have significant financial consequences for the federal government."

The U.S. Court of Appeals reversed its decision and allowed drilling in the Gulf to proceed—including on BP PLC's now-infamous Macondo well, 50 miles off the Louisiana coast.

The Obama administration's actions in the court case exemplify the dilemma the White House faced in developing its energy policy. In his presidential campaign, President Obama criticized the Bush administration for being too soft on the oil industry and vowed to support greener energy forms.

But, once in office, President Obama ended up backing offshore drilling, bowing to political and fiscal realties, even as his administration's own scientists and Democratic lawmakers warned about its risks.
Hey Dems... how's that hope-and-change thingy workin' out for you?

RTWT at the link.

Obama Sues to Strike Down Arizona's SB 1070

William Jacobson's posted a copy of the complaint. The administration claims Arizona's law preempts federal authority and violates the "Supremacy Clause" of Article VI of the Constitution.

And here's this, from ABC News, "
Department of Justice Files Lawsuit Challenging Arizona Immigration Law: Suit Says Arizona Law Treads on Federal Authority":
The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit today challenging Arizona's new immigration law, which takes effect July 29.

The suit challenges the law on the grounds that immigration is under the purview of the federal government and that Arizona has overstepped its bounds. Justice also claims that the law is too broad and could result in racial profiling and discrimination.

The lawsuit names Arizona and state Gov. Janice Brewer as the defendants.

While the legal challenge had been expected, signaled by Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama in statements soon after the statute was enacted, the lawsuit is sure to set off a firestorm of debate pitting the federal government against Arizona.
Michelle's got some links as well.

I doubt the feds can win on the racial profiling charge, although I suspect there's a pretty good case under doctrines of national supremacy (I'll look into the case law precedents). I'm interested to see what Gov. Brewer's attorney's have prepared to defend the law in court. The State of Arizona should prevail, I'd think, since it's clear by the nature of the legislation that all the authorized actions under SB 1070 are the same as those under federal law. I also can't see how challenging the law helps the Dems in November (huge majorities approve the bill), so obviously Obama's looking to beef up the Hispanic vote for 2012. He's certainly going to need it, considering how epic fail his administration's been so far.

And by the way, I'll check, but I'll bet there's going to be some big pro-SB 1070 rallies in AZ soon, and I'd like to head back out there for some additional coverage. I'll

Queen Elizabeth II Address to U.N. General Assembly

I'm simply fascinated by Queen Elizabeth II. It bothers me somewhat that she'd dignify the General Assembly with her presence (it's a bastion of Israel-bashers, socialists, and terrorist-enabling regimes), but I imagine she might be forgiven since she's avoided the institution since 1957.

The full clip's at Mediaite, "
Queen Elizabeth Speaks To United Nations For The First Time In Over 50 Years." Plus, below, a CNN video as well as a background report from ABC NEWS, "Queen Praises U.N. but Says Much Work Remains to be Done: Queen Elizabeth Ends 'Cost-Conscious' Trip to North America With Visit to U.N. and Ground Zero." (CNN is reporting right now, "Awaiting Queen at Ground Zero.")

Monday, July 5, 2010

4th of July Holiday Wrap

I've posted roundups from today's blogging at Right Wing News and Theo Spark's.

At left is a good friend of mine, doing a little '60s-revival partying for the 4th:

Photobucket

Thanks for reading, everybody!

Check back tomorrow for more of American Power's neocon hotness!

BONUS EXTRA : At The Blog Prof, "theblogprof passes 1,000,000 visitors today!"

Tea Parties and the Constitution

As I've now mentioned a couple of times, tea party patriots are arguing --- at an increasing clip --- for activists to get in the business of political conversion. The San Juan Capistrano event on Saturday had just a bit more of an "outreach" feel to it, and recall too that Lt. Col. Allen West really hammered the point home in his Ft. Lauderdale address. Perhaps this is something of a maturation of the movement. While some leftists have been gleefully pronouncing the death of the tea parties, the movement's most likely here to stay in some form (as long as activists aren't co-opted into a third party --- I'm thinking Ross Perot in 1992 and after). The July 4th weekend demonstrated the point pretty well, I'd say. Indeed, there's a couple of articles out today discussing the tea parties, and most pertinent to my thinking is at Washington Post, "Tea party gatherings on the Fourth mix the educational and the patriotic" (via Memeorandum). I noticed earlier that some folks really are invested in their cherished interpretations of the Constitution (see here and here), and so the first couple of passages at WaPo are what interest me:
Tea party" activists across the nation tried to put the "independence" back in Independence Day this weekend with festivals and other gatherings focused on the Constitution -- and how to use it for political gain.

Coupled with an upsurge in organized classes and book clubs, the trend reflects a growing effort among conservatives to teach supporters how to do political battle using an inviolable weapon: the nation's founding documents. It's a change in emphasis for a movement that rose to prominence with spirited and sometimes unruly protests across the nation.
RTWT.

One of the points in the article --- that tea partiers are just now stressing constitutional principles --- doesn't square with my experience. I recall sometime after last summer's town halls finished up, the next batch of tea party events became even larger revivals for constitutionalism. And pretty much all this year, my local group has been hammering the nation's founding principles at events. In any case,
Gallup's got some new findings that confirm it's mostly limited government principles of concern to tea partiers, and while yes, the Founders wanted to correct the deficiencies of the weak confederation of states during the Revolutionary War, it's probably not accurate to overstate the case that they unequivocally backed strong centralized government. I can't vouch for all of these quotes below, but not even Alexander Hamilton --- among the strongest proponents of federal power in 1787 --- could accurately be portrayed as completely favoring centralization over ultimate guarantees for the liberties of the people.

Photobucket


Man Blows Off Arm While Launching Illegal Fireworks

I was just thinking about this the other day, since I saw some fireworks stands popping up in Southern California. The New York man, Eric Smith, was apparently setting off heavy-duty fireworks, mortor rockets, but still, even smaller ones can be dangerous.

Via
WyBlog and Sky News, "Man Blows His Arm Off With July 4 Fireworks":

Eric Smith, 36, had been using a three-foot-long metal tube as a launcher to shoot mortars from the street near his Long Island home.

Police believe he leaned over the device while trying to ignite a firework and it rocketed into his shoulder.

Friends and relatives attending a barbecue in Mr Smith's back yard heard a boom and rushed around to the front to find him injured.

Mr Smith's wife, Tania, saw the accident from her kitchen window. "I ran out to see if he was alive," she said.

One witness said the father-of-two "kept groaning: 'Oh, man, I messed up. I really messed up'."

Mr Smith has now been told his severed left limb cannot be reattached, according to the New York Post.

Yep.

The Post article is here: "
Fireworks father's arm can't be saved."

Matthew Rothschild at The Progressive — 'I Don't Believe in Patriotism'

I really spoke too soon!

I knew there was something like this out there this weekend. I just missed it earlier. See, "
Why I Don’t Celebrate July 4." And I have no response other than I doubt Rothschild even likes apple pie:
You can call me unpatriotic if you’d like, but really I’m anti-patriotic.

I’ve been studying fascism lately, and there is one inescapable fact about it:

Nationalism is the egg that hatches fascism.

And patriotism is but the father of nationalism.

Patriotism is not something to play with. It’s highly toxic. When ingested, it corrodes the rational faculties.

It gulls people into believing their leaders.

It masks those who benefit most from state policy.

And it destroys the ability of people to get together, within the United States and across boundaries, to take on those with the most power: the multinational corporation.

Plus, it’s a war toy, wheeled out whenever a leader needs to improve his ratings by attacking some other country—often after invoking God’s name, too.

It’s been so since the Spanish-American War and World War I and right up through the Iraq War and the Afghanistan War.

American patriotism has also gotten in the way of solving global warming. Many in the United States, which consumes 25 percent of the world’s resources but has just 4 percent of the world’s population, believe we have the God-given right to use up all the resources we can. And there is an all-too-common attitude that we don’t need to listen to any other countries, or the U.N., or obey any international agreements because we’re Americans, and we’re better than everybody else.

We’ve got to get over patriotism, and we’ve got to cure the American superiority complex.

So celebrate the 4th if you like.

But as for me, between God, country, and apple pie, I’ll take the apple pie.
Come to think of it, I will add this Moonbattery quote: "If his previous articles are any guide, Matthew Rothschild is a one-man parade of progressive left douchebaggery."

Queers Against Israeli Canadian Apartheid

It's basic to anti-Western hatred. It all blends together after a while.

From Jonathan Kay, "
'Queers Against Israeli Apartheid' Declare Canada to Be An Apartheid state, Too."

And
Blazing Cat Fur has some viddy, and pics at Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy:

Also, at Five Feet of Fury, "Do 'openly Christian' cops get to stick crusader flags in their helmets?"

RELATED: "Old Rebel Does Toronto!"

Old Rebel Does Toronto!

He's a master of disguise, you see:

On Twitter too! (Snark alert.)

The Democratic-Left: United in Hate With America's Foes

A reminder this holiday week on the Democratic Party's alliance with evil: "United in Hate With America's Foes."


President George W. Bush First Inaugural Address

The first inaugural address from the Non-Apology President.

At about 4:40 minutes into the speech:
America has never been united by blood or birth or soil. We are bound by ideals that move us beyond our backgrounds, lift us above our interests and teach us what it means to be citizens. Every child must be taught these principles. Every citizen must uphold them; and every immigrant, by embracing these ideals, makes our country more, not less, American.

We are a country bound by common political ideals (not grovelling grievances and a refusal to place American exceptionalism in its rightful place of international leadership).

RELATED: Glenn Reynolds has some great 4th of July photos here, here, and here.

'You Got to Make People Understand That There Are Certain Principles and Values Upon Which This Great Country Was Established'

Allen West at a July 3rd tea party in Fort Lauderdale. He reiterates more forcefully the theme I heard at the San Juan Capistrano tea party on Saturday. Patriots have to expand the scope of conflict. We have to move beyond preaching to the choir and get in the business of political conversion. It won't work with implacable America-haters of course. But lots of independents are defecting from the hopey-changey coalition that brought the Obama thugs to power, and we need to speed that process along. Listen to Allen West starting about about 1:50 minutes especially. He says "you gotta take this message out into your workplaces, into your homes, to your friends and you gotta make people understand ..."

VIDEO HAT TIP: Right Wing News.

RELATED: "Lt. Col. Allen West: A True American Hero."

Thoughts on Blogging and Freedom

I'm past the point of writing "tips for bloggers" essays. I did that last year, and the advice is still pretty good over there.

No, I was thinking about a little update on blogging after see John Hawkins' post last week, "
7 Things Every Blogger Should Know How To Do (Besides Write)." John has a comment about making money from blogging, but the more basic thing here is the traffic numbers he cites:
#5) How to make some money doing this: Here's an unpleasant truth. You can have 2,000 or 3,000 people a day reading your blog and make almost nothing off of it. In fact, from what I've seen, until you get big enough to stand out a little bit from the crowd, say at 6,000, 7,000, 8,000 people reading you a day, you will have great difficulty making enough money to do more than pay your bills for your blog. Then, even when you do get big, if you don't know what you're doing and dramatically underprice your ads, you can still make a lot less money than what you should. I've seen people who could DOUBLE their ad rates and probably not lose any ads.
While I'd love to make a little more money than I'm getting now (mostly from Amazon and the ad at the sidebar), I blog mostly to make a contribution to the debate (and we need more regular folks in new media, so hopefully I can hold out for a while). American Power has been doing well. My traffic has doubled since last year, and I'm co-blogging at both Right Wing News and Theo Spark's. (And that's something to think about, for the newer bloggers just getting started. Get going on the networking and seek high-traffic blogs to post essays and increase exposure.) I'm closing in on a solid average of 2000 visitors per day. A good chunk of that is from SEQ, but more and more it's due to the relentless promotion that's integral to serious blogging. As I've said previously, don't be shy about pimping your stuff (although adhere to some limits, naturally). In addition, I suspect one should think pretty carefully about making blogging a career. I'll be honest: If in a few years from now I'm able to find a way to make some serious, long-term money from blogging, I'll be no doubt looking to speed up retirement from my college. After ten years of teaching at LBCC, I've realized I probably don't have the ideological temperament for academe. It's my career, and I'm a professional, but I think I'd like to leave college teaching sooner rather than later. Maybe I can write books, or something. But that's a matter I'll discuss more another day.

There's one more thing: the frequency of recent "babe blogging." I posted a ton of "Rule 5" last week. Linkmaster Smith
has the roundup:
American Power went on a bit of a Rule 5 rampage this week, NTTAWWT:
This is mostly experimentation, especially the frequency of the hotness. I may or may not post Rule 5 in the future, or at least at regular intervals. There's clearly a demand for it. But what's important is that I CAN POST HOTTIES whether I want to or not. IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM. So if you like this kind of thing, enjoy it while it lasts. Meanwhile, maybe we'll see some increased blog frequency over at Swedish Meatballs Confidential!