She's been on a crusade to bring charges against the Guardian UK for its treasonous publication of the NSA files, including the identities of UK intelligence personnel.
The Guardian backtracking frantically, trying to avoid Terrorism Act 2000 prosecution over GCHQ ... http://t.co/wgOCj5KMzC
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
My questions about Guardian trafficking GCHQ names panicking paper - they only deny SPIES names ... http://t.co/0inH1wfaNF
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
You will note the @Guardian does not deny trafficking names of GCHQ staff - a clear crime under the Terrorism Act http://t.co/cNu0KEDVEG
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
Did it FedEx names of GCHQ personnel to ProPublica? Did you, @Guardian? #Snowden #TerrorismAct http://t.co/cNu0KEDVEG
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
There is no public interest defence to the crime of disclosing identity of anyone who works in the intelligence services. Guardian panicking
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
And you better believe I have been collating the tweets and quotes of vainglorious Guardianistas who now realize trafficking data a crime
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
There is a difference in law between receiving files and reporting on them, and then copying, trafficking and distributing them #Snowden
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
The Guardian have copied, duplicated and trafficked the files as @janinegibson and @arusbridger have both boasted online
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
Meanwhile, it seems all is not well with Edward #Snowden. His father was promised he could see him. #Wikileaks now keeping him from his son.
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
#Snowden's father traveled to Russia to see his boy and now is being denied access. What a surprise.
— Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch) October 13, 2013
And see the devastating editorial at London's Daily Mail, "The paper that helps Britain's enemies."
Also at CIF Watch, "The paper which hates Britain? Guardian leaks ‘worst blow to British intel ever’":
The focus of this blog is of course to monitor the Guardian for antisemitism and the assault on Israel’s legitimacy, but it’s vital to understand the broader ideology which inspires the anti-Zionism we are constantly documenting. Glenn Greenwald, as with his fellow political travelers at the Guardian, is not a mere “progressive” commentator (yet alone a “journalist) but, rather, a radical activist inspired by an “anti-imperialist” ideology which holds his own country and its democratic allies in contempt, and advances propaganda which amplifies the message of our enemies.Actually, I disagree there: They hate their country with a white-hot revulsion, as do any hard-leftists in any country, such as the American left supporting traitors such as Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden himself.
The Guardian’s editor Alan Rusbridger, typifying the vitriol directed against the West by many within the leftist intelligentsia, in defending his paper’s right to publish classified documents, referred to George Orwell’s book ’1984′ and argued that US and British intelligence gathering went “beyond Orwell’s imagination”. However, Orwell understood the advantages of even flawed democracies over totalitarian regimes and realized the danger of an intellectual elite which doesn’t understand such stark moral differences.
In 1945, Orwell published “Notes on Nationalism” which argued that within the leftist intelligentsia there is “a derisive and mildly hostile attitude towards Britain [that] is more or less compulsory”, and that that, to such intellectuals, political outrage is inevitably directed not towards truly totalitarian regimes, but “almost entirely against Britain and the United States.”
The Guardian’s role in nurturing indifference towards its own country’s national security – a political orientation John Stuart Mill characterized as a “decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling” – should rightly be seen as a genuine threat to the Western political values to which true liberals remain loyal.
Guardian editors and contributors may not hate Britain, but their activism certainly serves to aid and abet those who do.
0 comments:
Post a Comment