Tuesday, June 6, 2017

#LondonBridge: Sadiq Khan Should Be Ashamed

From Katie Hopkins, at London's Daily Mail, "No wonder they didn't want us to know who the London Bridge Butchers were. The more we find out, the more ineffectual the people who are supposed to protect us from the killers look":

I commend Piers Morgan. There's something I never thought I would hear myself say.

I watched him interview Sadiq Khan on GMB this morning and he was 100% more professional than I would ever have been.

I can imagine coming round to find Sadiq lying on the floor with camera three lying across his limp body, and me wild-eyed, legging it down the South Bank.

He appears to show no conception of the horror our capital city is facing, keeps repeating London is the safest city in the world, and refuses to connect the glaringly obvious dots between Islamic Extremism and the attacks on our children.

He said he could not comment about the 23,000 individuals identified as 'subjects of interest' still at large because this is an ongoing investigation.

He would not answer why we did not do more to the lock up the attacker - Khuram Butt - who went on to be the Butcher of London Bridge because the police operation was still live.

It's a mantra we keep hearing from any of the people who are supposed to be keeping us safe. The Met Commissioner said it yesterday. Boris Johnson repeated it this morning.

How convenient.

Well I'm calling them on this.

I'd like to believe there are good operational reasons for taking over two days to tell us who the killers were.

But I can't help suspecting that it's more about dodging difficult questions and managing the flow of news that is bound to make people bloody angry.

Waiting until our initial horror and rage at the original attack dissipates before releasing information that will make us furious all over again.

And giving themselves time to get their stories straight before the sh*t hits the fan.

Similarly, whenever I hear a top cop or a politician start an interview with a paean of praise to the courage of the rank-and-file officers who helped stop Saturday's massacre, I can't help feeling they are being treated as human shields.

Nobody admires our ordinary police officers more than me and the courage of those who faced down the three maniacs in Borough Market – armed sometimes with just a baton – leaves me in awe.

This is not about the brave officers on the ground. Uniformed, on duty or off. Changing into riot gear on the sidewalk behind their vans. Dancing with our little girls to bring some reassurance to our fear. They are warriors. They should be rewarded. One and all.

But equally if the people at the top were doing their jobs properly, the brave bobbies on the street wouldn't need to be quite so much in harm's way. Sadiq Khan, the investigating officers, MI5, Theresa May - I've lost confidence in all of them.

As a twitter user - Sam White commented; 'Jihadis are cleverly evading the authorities by appearing in documentaries about jihadis with the word jihadi in the title'.

We now know the London Bridge, Manchester and Westminster attackers were all known to counter-terrorism agencies.

The mostly recently named of the three attackers on London Bridge, Youssef Zaghba - even told the Italian authorities why he was flying to Turkey in 2016. 'I'm going to be terrorist,' he said. Police were called and he was prevented from flying.

Authorities confirm complete dossier on him would have been forwarded to MI5 in April 2016 after he travelled to the UK.

His London accomplice Khuram Shazad Butt, 27, a British citizen of Pakistani descent, was well known to authorities and reported repeatedly by members of the public, now frustrated nothing was done.

Band of Brothers at the Eagle's Nest

I think that's Major Dick Winters fourth from the right.

Either way, phenomenal photo, and some of the greatest Americans.

PREVIOUSLY: "D-Day 73rd Anniversary."

Bella Thorne Finally Reveals All

At Taxi Driver, "Bella Thorne Finally Reveals All in Public."

Mark Steyn, Lights Out

At Amazon, Mark Steyn, Lights Out: Islam, Free Speech and the Twilight of the West.

Shop Books on D-Day

At Amazon.

Also:
* Jonathan Gawne, Spearheading D-Day: American Special Units in Normandy.

* John C. McManus, The Dead and Those About to Die: D-Day: The Big Red One at Omaha Beach.

* Cornelius Ryan, The Longest Day: The Classic Epic of D-Day.
Thanks for your support!

More blogging tonight.

D-Day 73rd Anniversary

At the Department of Defense homepage, "Ceremony Marks 73rd Anniversary of D-Day Landings."

Also, at the Heavy, "D-Day 2017: 73rd Anniversary Photos of Normandy Beach Invasion."

And watch, "President Reagan's Address at the Ceremony Commemorating the 40th Anniversary of the Normandy Invasion, D-Day at Point-du-Hoc - June 6, 1984":



Charles Krauthammer on Immigration Reform: 'Build the Wall'

For Prager University, at great video:



James Holland, The War in the West

At Amazon, James Holland, The War in the West: A New History Volume 2 - The Allies Fight Back 1941-43.

Also from Holland, The Rise of Germany, 1939-1941: The War in the West, Volume One.

The State Department's a 'Hotbed of Resistance' Against President Trump

Um, bureaucratic officials are supposed to be nonpartisan. This is wrong. Extremely wrong.

At the New York Times:


Breitbart's Katie Mchugh Fired for Politically Incorrect Tweets

I don't know Katie McHugh. Frankly, I barely recollect her name. But she's been fired from Breitbart, for tweeting that London wouldn't have terrorism if not for Muslims. (Which is an accurate statement, as far as I'm concerned. When was the last time we had an IRA bombing in Britain?)

I did notice that intrepid Twitter scavengers dug up some of the woman's old tweets, and indeed she posts some whack stuff. For example, she tweeted in favor of repealing the 19th Amendment as a method of rolling back welfare programs? I doubt I'd go for stripping women of the suffrage to get a handle of welfare, but it's not a fire-able opinion.

Whatever?

I think I noted yesterday that I'm not really into getting people fired for their views. Kathy Griffin's a special case. I don't feel sad for her, and as Ace noted, sometimes it's necessary to become the left to fight the left. But be careful what you wish for: the revolution always eats its own, and what goes around comes around. This kind of boycott-attack-character assassination and recrimination-style of politics will leave very few survivors. I've been down this road myself (Scott Kaufman and Carl Salonen come to mind).

In any case, via Twitter:

'Wonder Woman'

I love this movie.

The reviews were pretty enthusiastic, but then, you have to see it for yourself. Gal Gadot is lovable, but the movie itself is coherent and refreshing. I hope she stars in a whole bunch of sequels. Now that Wolverine's retired, I'll need something to keep me into the genre.

In any case, some links:


Is it Ethical to Have Children?

Of course it's ethical.

It's only unethical if you're a leftist anti-humanist.

FWIW, at the far-left Foreign Policy, "As Environmental Catastrophe Looms, Is it Ethical to Have Children?"

Monday, June 5, 2017

President Trump Speaking at the Ford Theater in Washington, D.C.: 'This Bloodshed Must End...' (VIDEO)

Via Associated Press:



Marissa Miller 'iPod Bikini' in Jamaica (VIDEO)

Here's a lovely Sports Illustrated Swimsuit flashback:



Evelyn Taft's Clouds and Fog Forecast

Pretty much expected June weather. Cool and cloudy, but quite pleasant, actually.

And here the pleasant and lovely Ms. Evelyn, for CBS News 2 Los Angeles:



Thomas E. Ricks, Churchill and Orwell

*BUMPED.*

Well, this is certainly timely.

At Amazon, Thomas E. Ricks, Churchill and Orwell: The Fight for Freedom.

Ontario Canada's 'Bill 89' Authorizes Government Removal of 'Trans' Children from Christian Homes

This is bad. Extremely bad.

But then, this is exactly what leftists have been pushing for --- total power over the family unit, the demonization and destruction of God-fearing traditional parents.

At LifeSite, "Petition calls for repeal of ‘totalitarian’ bill allowing children to be taken from Christian homes":

TORONTO, June 5, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — LifeSiteNews has launched a petition for the repeal of the Kathleen Wynne Liberals’ Bill 89, which passed last week by a vote of 63 to 23.

Pro-family advocates warn the bill gives the state power to seize children from families that oppose the LGBTQI and gender ideology agenda, and allows government agencies to effectively ban couples who disagree with that agenda from fostering or adopting children.

“Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption,” says Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition.

“This is a direct hit against parental authority,” echoed Tanya Granic Allen, executive director of Parents As First Educators (PAFE), which along with the Association for Reformed Political Action (ARPA) has been at the forefront of lobbying against the bill.

Bill 89, or the Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017, repeals and replaces the former Child and Family Services Act that governs child protection services, and adoption and foster care services.

It adds “gender identity” and “gender expression” as factors to be considered “in the best interests of the child.”

At the same time, it deletes the religious faith in which the parents are raising the child as a factor to be considered, and mandates child protection services consider only the child’s own “creed” or “religion” when assessing the best interests of the child.

Pro-family advocates point to public comments by Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau as evidence the Liberals will use Bill 89 to enforce a pro-LGBTQI, gender ideology agenda in the home.

Coteau told QP Briefing shortly after he introduced the bill that he sees questioning teenagers’ self-identification as LGBTQI or telling them to change as abuse.

“I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” Coteau said.

“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”

Coteau reiterated this to QP Briefing after Bill 89 passed Thursday...
Keep reading.

Also, at Heat Street:



Get Furious and Fight Back

Keeping calm and carrying on doesn't seem to be doing much good, so it's time to get bloody pissed off.

Here's Katie Hopkins:


Battle of Midway's 75th Anniversary in San Diego (VIDEO)

These veterans' commemorative events make my heart happy. The WWII generation is quickly passing from the scene. Few from the generation who fought the war are here today to make these anniversary events. I'm glad we still have a chance to thank them. It reaffirms our values in a most fundamental way, and hopefully passes on knowledge of past sacrifice to future generations.

At ABC News 10 San Diego:


Kendall Jenner in Sheer Topped Dress

At Taxi Driver, "Kendall Jenner Nipple Show in Sheer Topped Dress."