At AoSHQ:
how can you not love Ace's HQ?https://t.co/BsRObYRb1O— SynodeAmazonie Aka Heresy Island (@lamblock) October 11, 2019
Commentary and analysis on American politics, culture, and national identity, U.S. foreign policy and international relations, and the state of education - from a neoconservative perspective! - Keeping an eye on the communist-left so you don't have to!
how can you not love Ace's HQ?https://t.co/BsRObYRb1O— SynodeAmazonie Aka Heresy Island (@lamblock) October 11, 2019
Rehearsals for south of the border music video ❤️ only had one day for rehearsals but my stunt team kicked my butt for 6 hours 😂 pic.twitter.com/Biua09Lw5c— Alexis Ren (@AlexisRenG) October 10, 2019
3 million Californians may go without power.https://t.co/YpIaRUxDRF
— The Federalist (@FDRLST) October 9, 2019
For the last three decades, San Francisco has conducted a real-life experiment in what happens when a society stops enforcing bourgeois norms of behavior—in the name of compassion toward the homeless. The results have been the opposite. https://t.co/QOREy5oiAV via @HMDatMI— City Journal (@CityJournal) October 7, 2019
The stories that the homeless tell about their lives reveal that something far more complex than a housing shortage is at work. The tales veer from one confused and improbable situation to the next, against a backdrop of drug use, petty crime, and chaotic child-rearing. Behind this chaos lies the dissolution of those traditional social structures that once gave individuals across the economic spectrum the ability to withstand setbacks and lead sober, self-disciplined lives: marriage, parents who know how to parent, and conventional life scripts that create purpose and meaning. There are few policy levers to change this crisis of meaning in American culture. What is certain is that the ongoing crusade to normalize drug use, along with the absence of any public encouragement of temperance, will further handicap this unmoored population.RTWT.
Why are capitalists warming to the leftist Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn? “The Tories are promising the most radical and extreme economic intervention probably in 200 years,” says one analyst. “Any of Labour’s policies pale in significance." https://t.co/JSPBQGPrBK— New York Times World (@nytimesworld) October 6, 2019
LONDON — He is the bane of bankers, a bearded, teetotaling socialist often derided in the British press and in Parliament for his efforts to suppress dissent inside the Labour Party and his radical plans to remake the British economy.Keep reading.
But in the unmitigated chaos of Brexit, Jeremy Corbyn, the opposition Labour leader, is trying to remint himself as a safe pair of hands, and an unlikely salve to jittery British markets panicked by Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s plans for an abrupt split with the European Union.
And, surprisingly, it might be working.
“‘What method of execution would you prefer?’ is basically the question,” said David Willetts, a Conservative former minister who was once an aide to Margaret Thatcher. “Corbyn would in normal circumstances look like an off-the-scale risky gamble. However, Brexit is the single biggest change in Britain’s economic and political relations in 40 years, so Brexit itself is an off-the-scale economic gamble.”
With an early election looming, Mr. Johnson’s Conservative Party, once a friend to big business and a refuge for establishment figures of all types, has torched one convention after another, creating dust-ups with Queen Elizabeth II, the Supreme Court and Parliament. The prime minister’s proposed Brexit deal, proffered last week to Brussels, was met with so much dismay that most analysts believe he is fully resigned to Britain leaving the bloc without one.
That has turned Mr. Corbyn — a lifelong rabble-rouser and one of the most left-wing leaders in Labour’s century-long history — into an improbable figure of restraint. He is implacably opposed to a no-deal Brexit and promises a second referendum that could reverse the split altogether...
Celebrate #JamesBondDay with the first poster for #NoTimeToDie #Bond25 pic.twitter.com/EoU4PXhxwX
— James Bond (@007) October 5, 2019
Happy James Bond Day. The World Premiere of the first 007 film DR. NO was on this day in 1962. How will you be celebrating? #JamesBondDay pic.twitter.com/6aPr4vGC5X
— James Bond (@007) October 5, 2019
On October 5th, 1962, Sean Connery was introduced to the world as Ian Fleming’s James Bond. Tonight, be sure to watch the movie that started it all, and celebrate with a martini, shaken, not stirred of course... #JamesBondDay @007 pic.twitter.com/e6AUVdPz0i
— Jack Carr (@JackCarrUSA) October 5, 2019
Keep talking crazy person! Love it. @realDonaldTrump & GOP landslide coming. https://t.co/ktu9dnfwEq— Wayne Allyn Root (@RealWayneRoot) October 5, 2019
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is promoting a new package of left-wing economic policies, including national rent control and expanding welfare to illegal immigrants across the country, as part of a massive new proposal aiming to achieve a “just society.”Yes, let's joke about what a "crazy person" she is, but imagine, if folks don't take this seriously, what will happen if the Democrats win power in 2020.
The freshman lawmaker, who champions the multi-trillion-dollar Green New Deal proposal to combat economic inequality and climate change, has now proposed a package of bills aimed at solving perceived economic injustice.
“A just society provides a living wage, safe working conditions, and healthcare. A just society acknowledges the value of immigrants to our communities. A just society guarantees safe, comfortable, and affordable housing,” the website for the package says. “By strengthening our social and economic foundations, we are preparing ourselves to embark on the journey to save our planet by rebuilding our economy and cultivate a just society.”
That “Just Society” proposals are made up of six different pieces of legislation that deal with issues including housing, welfare, poverty and human rights.
“The Place to Prosper Act” would prevent year-over-year rent increases of more than three percent. Meanwhile, “The Embrace Act” would allow illegal immigrants to claim the same welfare benefits as U.S. citizens and those immigrants here legally,
“Notwithstanding any other provision of law ... an individual who is an alien (without regard to the immigration status of that alien) may not be denied any Federal public benefit solely on the basis of the individual’s immigration status,” the bill reads.
A federal public benefit is defined as: “any grant, contract, loan, professional license, or commercial license provided by an agency of the United States or by appropriated funds of the United States; and...any retirement, welfare, health, disability, public or assisted housing, postsecondary education, food assistance, unemployment benefit, or any other similar benefit for which payments or assistance are provided to an individual, household, or family eligibility unit by an agency of the United States or by appropriated funds of the United States.”
A similar bill “The Mercy in Re-entry Act” uses similar language to stop the granting of public benefits based on whether a person was convicted of a criminal offense...
Week's Most-Read Column--Remember Clinton was so shaken by Trump's upset win she couldn't compose herself to concede election night? The Dem #impeachment effort began that same night https://t.co/BJNhvr6E4N pic.twitter.com/MNA8nKophd— Andrew Malcolm (@AHMalcolm) October 5, 2019
Donald Trump’s unlikely victory was so shocking for Hillary Clinton and her lazy, overconfident campaign team and supporters that she was emotionally unable to compose herself for a concession speech until the next day.More.
Which suggests to many that voters made the correct choice for commander in chief, even if they have real doubts about Trump.
Clinton and her crowd have never recovered. Even before Trump took the oath and could perform an actual high crime or misdemeanor in office, an impeachment campaign was underway.
Now, billionaire Tom Steyer and noisy segments of that Democratic caucus have finally succeeded in forcing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to launch the preliminary impeachment inquiry, which — news flash! — has actually been playing out in the House Judiciary Committee since mid-summer. The Ukraine phone call is the cover story for a foregone impeachment conclusion.
It’s never surprising anymore that politicians alter their tune with each day’s changing climate. Here’s Pelosi last March:
“Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”
Here’s Pelosi last week: “Right now, we have to strike while the iron is hot.”
The president’s high crime she professed to see even before the July Ukraine phone transcript emerged was Trump pressuring Ukraine’s president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden. Ukraine’s president has denied any quid pro quo or feeling any pressure from Trump.
Here’s an amazing irony that somehow hasn’t attracted the same volume of media attention: That same Joe Biden is currently on the presidential campaign trail, boasting that, in fact, as a sitting vice president he did threaten Ukraine with a quid pro quo loss of aid if it didn’t fire the prosecutor investigating an energy company that was paying Biden’s son $50,000 a month for something. Biden succeeded.
This latest assault on Trump was sparked by a whistleblower alleging, albeit secondhand, that the president personally was pressuring Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden, a possible opponent next year. Turns out, the informant is a CIA employee, giving credence to a prescient 2017 warning from Sen. Chuck Schumer when Trump first criticized intelligence agencies.
“Let me tell you,” Schumer said, “You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”
Realistically, neither of these impeachment inquiries will accomplish anything. That is, beyond drowning out any other attempts at newsmaking to impress voters...
Read @LizEconomy on Xi Jinping’s transformative agenda in China—and the Maoist tactics he has used to advance it.https://t.co/mYUHn6Z83M
— Foreign Affairs (@ForeignAffairs) October 5, 2019
Few countries commemorate historical milestones with the zeal of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and 2019 offers a bonanza of celebratory opportunities: 40 years since Deng Xiaoping launched the economic reforms that opened China to the rest of the world; 40 years since China and the United States established diplomatic relations; and, on October 1, 70 years since the founding of the PRC. These events provide the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) opportunities to laud past achievements, legitimize the course it has set for the country, and rally support for challenges yet to come. And as Chinese President Xi Jinping surveys the country’s progress, he can point to any number of extraordinary economic, social, and geopolitical achievements.A nightmare, and this is the country with designs for regional, if not global, hegemony.
Outside observers tend to credit the Deng-era reforms for China’s meteoric rise. But Xi and the rest of the Chinese leadership are more focused on the earliest years of the PRC—when Mao Zedong sat at the helm of the Communist Party. Like Mao, Xi has prioritized strengthening the party, inculcating collective socialist values, and rooting out nonbelievers. Like Mao, who invoked “domestic and foreign reactionaries” to build nationalist sentiment and solidify the party’s legitimacy, Xi has adopted a consistent refrain of unspecified but “ubiquitous” internal and external threats. And like Mao, Xi has encouraged the creation of a cult of personality around himself.
Yet Xi has revived the methods and symbols of Maoism not in service of a return to the past but in order to advance his own transformative agenda, one that seeks to ensure that all political, social, and economic activity within, and increasingly outside of, China serves the interests of the CCP. He is creating a model that reasserts the power of the Communist Party; progressively erases the distinction between public and private in both the political and economic spheres; and seeks to integrate foreign actors, including private businesses, more deeply into a system of CCP values and institutions. Xi also aspires to accomplish what Mao and his successors could not: to render irrelevant the political and physical boundaries separating Taiwan and Hong Kong from the mainland, and to offer China as a legitimate model for other countries disinclined toward liberal democracy.
PARTY LIKE IT’S 1949
Party ideology increasingly pervades everyday life in China, narrowing the space for the expression of alternative views. The government heavily censors the Internet; limits foreign television content; and has called for schools to be “strongholds of Party leadership,” punishing professors for using unapproved texts or “defaming the rule of the Communist Party.” At the same time, Xi’s contribution to CCP theory, known as Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, is pumped relentlessly through the system: more than 100 institutes devoted to Xi Jinping Thought have sprung up over the past few years; a phone app, Study Strong Country, offers mandatory quizzes for party members on Xi’s thoughts and activities; and even college entrance exams now feature political questions tied to the leader’s campaigns and sayings—a practice, journalist Zheping Huang notes, that was popular during Mao’s tenure.
The CCP also seeks to shape the daily choices of its citizens, influencing their behavior to better reflect the interests of the party. One element of this enterprise is the social credit system, an ambitious experiment in social engineering designed to evaluate the trustworthiness of Chinese citizens and condition their behavior through punishments and rewards. Underway in more than 40 pilot programs throughout the country, the social credit system is slated to be rolled out nationally in 2020. As the China scholar Rogier Creemers has observed, this system is about “doing things that are right and incentivizing things that are right. But right is not something that people get to sort out for themselves. It doesn’t call upon individual moral autonomy, rather it calls upon obeisance to, and compliance with, a certain state-defined version of the good.”
In one pilot program in eastern China, for example, people receive points for donating bone marrow or performing other good deeds, but lose points for late payment of bills or traffic tickets. Other programs penalize citizens for participating in protests. While much of this tracking and accounting is done with technology, the CCP has also revived Mao-era tactics: paying elderly residents to report on the behavior of their neighbors, publicly celebrating model citizens while shaming those who fall short. As one government document noted, the objective of the social credit system is to “allow the trustworthy to roam everywhere under heaven while making it hard for the discredited to take a single step.” It is a motto that can be taken literally: in 2017, more than six million Chinese were barred from air travel as a result of social credit misdeeds...
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 4, 2019
💚 happiest I’ve ever been 💚 pic.twitter.com/E4jFdDYnIt
— Devin Brugman (@devinbrugman) July 16, 2019
"The timeline of this orchestrated campaign is another knock to the legitimacy of the so-called impeachment inquiry."
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) October 4, 2019
https://t.co/FdwJ9kgtQh via @WSJ
If the latest impeachment push continues to backfire, Democrats can thank their duplicitous House Intelligence chairman, Adam Schiff.RTWT.
The New York Times reported this week that the “whistleblower” who set off the latest inquisition provided an “early warning” to Mr. Schiff’s committee that he or she was filing a complaint over Donald Trump’s July 25 call to Ukraine’s president. The media is now at pains to stress that whistleblowers do sometimes reach out to Congress, that all “procedures” were followed, and that what really matters is the accusation that Mr. Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden.
Actually, it matters a great deal that Mr. Schiff knew about this early and withheld it deliberately from both the public and his House colleagues. He used his advance information to lay the groundwork steadily for later exploitation of the issue. He went so far as to charge the White House with a coverup—of a complaint he already knew about. The timeline of this orchestrated campaign is another knock to the legitimacy of the so-called impeachment inquiry. If the public can’t trust Mr. Schiff to be honest about the origins of his information, why should they trust his claim that the information itself is serious?
you can’t facetune videos pic.twitter.com/qvyuh95zYB
— Katie Bell🦋 (@katieeeeebell) August 16, 2019
who needs a hug? pic.twitter.com/UjQXPhrctn
— Katie Bell🦋 (@katieeeeebell) August 30, 2019
favorite rick and morty episode? pic.twitter.com/loCCbYlVzh
— Katie Bell🦋 (@katieeeeebell) September 12, 2019
caption this with the last text you sent pic.twitter.com/aQHpMPLjdZ
— Katie Bell🦋 (@katieeeeebell) September 19, 2019
#staceypoole @duljc @buquet1000 @teo_campa @BabeDepository @Firehou94 @WCBeauty_ @LuckyDragon99 @Wildcard095 @viczokas @IrinnaMoris_Fan @TopGlamourbabes @JamesGlamfan @boobandboobs @adultmodels2018 @sexreims 📸 @OnlyAllSites pic.twitter.com/b76pEwPuNC— Stacey Poole fan (@Stacey_poolefan) September 21, 2019
#StaceyPoole @MasturBabes @in_the_mancave @biencalmex @FaShaow @karlaclijster @jopower666 @breastlvr @nuffinbutgirls @weedod26 @bigboobsfansite @arg2012tumblr @nuffinbutgirls @angela_whitefan @sexreims 📸 @OnlyAllSites pic.twitter.com/RkLkmMhT0l— Stacey Poole fan (@Stacey_poolefan) September 28, 2019
Democrats’ Campaign Promise: We’ll Destroy America’s Energy Sector … And Economy https://t.co/iltNzul7Um pic.twitter.com/wE7A2oXz4b
— Issues & Insights (@InsightsIssues) September 30, 2019
Here's Chinese military marketing that should raise the hair on the back of your necks as look a like US war ships and military ops and technology are stolen and operationalized.
— M. Zuhdi Jasser زهدي جاسر (@DrZuhdiJasser) September 30, 2019
Keep telling yourself trade deficits don't matter... as they steal our tech and we fund it. pic.twitter.com/cFjwTILnXW
Missouri executes killer despite concern about painful death https://t.co/617A1u8t3G pic.twitter.com/iYtaGMdsFc— St. Louis Post-Dispatch (@stltoday) October 2, 2019
Bucklew's girlfriend, Stephanie Ray, left him on Valentine's Day 1996. Over the next few weeks, according to court records, he harassed her, cut her with a knife and punched her in the face.A human piece of garbage, the guy was on death row for 23 years. Boy, did he ever enjoy some due process, sheesh.
Ray feared for her life and the lives of her children, so she moved into the Cape Girardeau County mobile home that her new boyfriend, Michael Sanders, shared with his children.
On March 21, after stealing his nephew's car and taking two pistols, handcuffs and duct tape from his brother, Bucklew followed Ray to Sanders' home. Sanders confronted Bucklew with a shotgun inside the home. Bucklew fired two shots, one piercing Sanders' lung. He bled to death.
Bucklew then shot at Sanders' 6-year-old son and missed. Court records say he struck Ray in the face with the pistol, handcuffed her and dragged her to his car. He later raped Ray before heading north on Interstate 55.
A trooper spotted Bucklew's car and eventually became engaged in a gunfight near St. Louis. Both men were wounded. Bucklew later escaped from the Cape Girardeau County Jail. He attacked Ray's mother and her boyfriend with a hammer before being recaptured.
Pilate and another attorney for Bucklew, Jeremy Weis, said in a statement that Bucklew was remorseful for his crimes.
Morley Swingle, who was Cape Girardeau County prosecutor when the crimes occurred, said they were among the most heinous of his career.
"He is probably the most pure sociopath I ever prosecuted," Swingle said of Bucklew. "He was relentless in the way he came after his victims."
Why no one should be confident about who will benefit from impeachment:https://t.co/6dt6Xsk9Ih— Sean T at RCP (@SeanTrende) October 2, 2019
When reading impeachment polls, it is important to read the question wording carefully. That Monmouth poll that some see suggesting plurality support for impeachment is about an impeachment inquiry (q11X). Impeachment itself is at 44-52 (q4) for now.https://t.co/t2slQcAxxA
— Sean T at RCP (@SeanTrende) October 2, 2019
LOOK AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH! pic.twitter.com/QQYTqG4KTt— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2019
Eady Van Acker literally only has 500 followers on Social Media.She's on Instagram.
You can google her to find her if you’re so inclined, I am not going to bother posting her links. I tried to make a rule years ago to not make fun of local everyday girls, even if they were doing their best to become a fame whore.
The most essential branch of the U.S. government is collapsing before our eyes — right as it faces a historic showdown https://t.co/6HBdUg46XO— POLITICO (@politico) September 30, 2019
Even before getting into the weeds of its myriad other problems—poor staff retention, centralized decision-making, generational logjams—it’s not difficult to understand why the legislative branch is struggling to function. From the moment they launch their first campaigns, future members of Congress are entering into one giant warped incentive system that deters any meaningful challenge to The Way Things Work in Washington. Most members will profess to despise The Way Things Work in Washington, of course, especially when they first get here. But it tends to grow on them over time—not because it’s working, but because it’s comfortable. Where else can someone draw a salary of $174,000; have a staff of several dozen catering to their (and their family’s) every whim; enjoy special access to information and resources at the highest levels of government; forge lucrative relationships with people of immense power and influence; take taxpayer-funded jaunts to all corners of the country and the world; and command constant attention from the local and national media—all in exchange for producing little in the way of tangible outcomes?More at that top link.
None of this is to say that all members of Congress are bad people who are bad at what they do. To the contrary, many of them are fine people who came here for the right reasons. And some of them are really, really good at what they do, hustling 16 hours a day to deliver for their constituents. But even honorable people with honorable intentions look out for themselves, for their families, for their careers. Members of Congress are no exception. They have wonderfully important jobs. They don’t want to lose them.
Few people come to Congress wanting to be enforcers of the status quo. Every two years, Washington welcomes a new crop of wide-eyed, idealistic lawmakers who believe—really, truly believe—that they’ve been sent to shake things up in the nation’s capital. They are going to take the tough votes. They are going to stand up to the special interests. They are going to do what’s right by their constituents, even if that means getting the boot after one term.
Naturally, that sort of idealism doesn’t last. Once a member of Congress realizes he or she will never find a better job — and most of them know they will never find a better job — many will accept that some compromises are necessary to keep it. They adjust. They adapt. They play the game. They convince themselves that a mindless vote here, or a hurtful decision there, is worth it to sustain their career. They hang around long enough to amass more power, to win a chairmanship, to exert influence over certain issues, to cash out and take a life-changing paycheck from a lobbying firm, all the while believing their ends were justified by their means.
“I won’t miss a lot of things about this place,” Raul Labrador, an Idaho Republican who agitated constantly against his party’s leadership, said prior to his retirement last year. “I think some people lose their soul here. This is a place that sucks your soul. It takes everything from you.”
Operation Gatekeeper at 25: Look back at the turning point that transformed the border https://t.co/ezRgFVsHby
— L.A. Times: L.A. Now (@LANow) September 30, 2019
Really worth a read. What U.S. Attorney John Durham has found on Ukraine may be quite different from what the Democrats are looking for, writes Michael B. Mukasey https://t.co/tqKwlmuhcF via @WSJ
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) September 30, 2019
Today, the Los Angeles Angels announced that Brad Ausmus will not return as manager in 2020. pic.twitter.com/XDGVCiG1gx
— Los Angeles Angels (@Angels) September 30, 2019
NYC Ladies’ Night ✨ pic.twitter.com/OtVRMJFNu1
— Jessica Simpson (@JessicaSimpson) September 25, 2019
Natalie Portman Showing Off A Ton Of Her Sexy Braless Cleavage And Chest, Oh My! https://t.co/x3Ospj2dQl #NataliePortman #LucyInTheSky pic.twitter.com/3OsEsCx6Kp— Popoholic (@Popoholic) September 27, 2019
ICYMI==> 'Cowardly': Des Moines Register reporter CALLED OUT for his own VILE tweets after milkshake ducking hero Carson King https://t.co/r65ojaeDZC
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) September 25, 2019
If journalist doesn’t use old posts to attack man going viral ~ $1M for charity, 4-6 doesn’t happen. Period. https://t.co/Yx4dap3FC8
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 25, 2019
Journalists & editors have a choice now: change how they approach these things or realize there are more of us than there are of them. It’s not hard.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 25, 2019
Of maybe stop hiring 22 year old social justice political twigs with a privileged axe to grind.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 25, 2019
The Cancel Culture is being lead by the media.
— Melissa Mackenzie 🌐 (@MelissaTweets) September 25, 2019
It's enabled by feckless corporations like @BuschBeer.
I find the companies that cave to this garbage even worse.
And for the people caught in the crosshairs: DON'T APOLOGIZE. Do not reward this malignant behavior.
You know what's worse than using a bad word at the age of 16?
— Melissa Mackenzie 🌐 (@MelissaTweets) September 25, 2019
RUINING SOMEONE'S LIFE.
Not a fan of journalists digging up viral celebrities' offensive high-school tweets.
— Stewart Mandel (@slmandel) September 25, 2019
The Des Moines Register did it to Carson King, the guy whose GameDay sign led to $1M raised for charity. Now it turns out the reporter has his own skeletons.
Unreal.https://t.co/go9C8VgqNI
4. If you’re going to pull up someone’s old tweets, write about them, and you have old racist tweets of your own, at least have the courage to take the heat, @aaronpcalvin.
— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) September 25, 2019
Taking your account private is cowardly. pic.twitter.com/SdCEfg1A6Q
I am proud to introduce #AJustSociety package today to begin the important work of building a more just and prosperous society.
— Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@RepAOC) September 25, 2019
You can read more about the legislation here: https://t.co/Cm7BdhFumU
Big day!
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) September 25, 2019
We’re rolling out our next major project: A Just Society.
It’s a 6-piece suite:
1. Recognizing Poverty Act
2. Place to Prosper Act
3. Mercy in Re-Entry Act
4. Embrace Act
5. Uplift Our Workers Act
6. Ratify the UN Covenant on Economic, Social, & Cultural Rights
⬇️ https://t.co/nPhVxIy7fQ
Wonderful essay. Have a soft spot for Irving. He was kind to me when I was young, and his writings were always so reasonable. When he "became" a neo-conservative, it wasn't so much his thinking that changed but the culture around him. https://t.co/53gKgwsnqx via @NationalAffairs
— Bill McGurn (@wjmcgurn) September 24, 2019
Hello old friend.#Pinkman2019 pic.twitter.com/CyKW8c4lox
— Aaron Paul (@aaronpaul_8) September 23, 2019
#Emmys viewership falls under 7M for 1st time to all-time low – @DeadlineDominic reports https://t.co/VFeNXj19Rd pic.twitter.com/gsyRqclH6u
— Deadline Hollywood (@DEADLINE) September 23, 2019
I miss the days when just about EVERYONE was watching the Emmys LIVE and chatting about it ...seemed so fun and happy and exciting...kinda crickets on here☹️
— Kirstie Alley (@kirstiealley) September 23, 2019
The #Emmys telecast was proof of how far television has come creatively, socially and as an industry.
— LAT Entertainment (@latimesent) September 23, 2019
And if we’re to read anything else into the show, it’s that there’s plenty more change to come, writes @LorraineAli https://t.co/IeUxtF84Pw
Peak TV. Prestige programming. The platinum age of television.
Whatever we chose to call the tsunami of innovative series that have made watching too much television a respectable pastime, the Television Academy finally managed to wrap its arms around the multiplatform beast on Sunday during the 71st Emmy Awards ceremony in Los Angeles.
From “Game of Thrones” to “Fleabag,” “Chernobyl” to “Ozark,” “Killing Eve” to “Pose,” the winners list produced during the three-hour Fox telecast was a testament to the diversity — in budget, subject matter, character and platform — that’s changed the very definition of television.
Case in point: Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s comedy “Fleabag,” about a woman’s dysfunctional relationship with her family, men and, yes, relationships. “This is getting ridiculous,” she said, somewhat stunned as she accepted the show’s fourth and biggest award of the night for comedy series.
In a huge upset, the cutting-edge artist also won the lead comedy actress Emmy over former favorite Julia Louis-Dreyfus of HBO’s powerhouse “Veep” and last year’s victor, the beloved Rachel Brosnahan of Amazon’s “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel.” Waller-Bridge also took home the prize for writing for a comedy series over strong competitors such as HBO’s “Barry.”
As television hurtles forward into what looks like another new phase of its endless new phases — get ready for streaming platforms Disney+, Apple TV+ and more to upend the game — it’s important to stop and savor the moment we’re in now. Sunday’s Emmys were the culmination of a creative renaissance that’s still so fast-moving we haven’t had the time to give it a name that sticks. But it’s made it so “Fleabag” and “Game of Thrones” occupy the same space, at least when it comes to industry respect and (respective) social media fervor.
Even Hollywood veteran Michael Douglas, who lost the comedy actor honor for his work in Netflix’s “The Kominsky Method” to “Barry’s” Bill Hader, appeared impressed by the sheer breadth of the material represented onstage Sunday.
When introducing the drama series award he described the nominees — “Better Call Saul,” “Bodyguard,” “Game of Thrones,” “Killing Eve,” “Ozark,” “Pose,” “Succession” and “This Is Us” — as “each being so different from the television we grew up on.”
It was not surprising that the night’s top honor went to “Game of Thrones.” What was unexpected? The last big water-cooler series didn’t sweep every drama category possible for its final, earth-scorching season.
Still, the ceremony was less about dancing on the graves of blockbusters such as “Game of Thrones” or “Veep,” which was also expected to win big in the comedy categories but came away empty-handed. It was more about celebrating the wide-open landscape that allowed for “Killing Eve” and “Pose” to even happen, and then for their leads — Jodie Comer and Billy Porter — to win the academy’s top drama honors.
The night belonged to high-budget productions as well as fringe efforts, familiar faces doing new things — including Jason Bateman, who won for his direction in “Ozark”— and new arrivals that have bent comedy and drama norms into pop art.
The ceremony itself was as loose and far-flung as the industry it was honoring. It was the first time the show went host-less since way back in 2003 when the big four networks still won all the top awards, and it would be another year before HBO’s “The Sopranos” took home cable’s first drama series Emmy.
The show was held together by a pastiche of personalities and TV ephemera that included Homer Simpson, masked singers and a tuxedo-clad Bryan Cranston introducing a year in television that looked markedly different than it did when “Breaking Bad” arrived over a decade ago.
“Television has never been bigger,” he said. “Television has never mattered more. And television has never been this damn good.”
Emotions ran high when Jharrel Jerome accepted the award for lead actor in a limited series for his performance in Ava DuVernay’s “When They See Us.” The series followed the saga of black teens dubbed the Central Park Five by the media, who were wrongly accused and imprisoned for the brutal rape of a Central Park jogger.
Jerome, who played one of the accused, Korey Wise, in the series, dedicated the award to “the men that we know as the Exonerated Five.”
And all five men — Wise, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Raymond Santana Jr. and Yusef Salaam — were in the audience, on their feet, hands in the air as if they’d been freed once again.
“Game of Thrones” star Peter Dinklage might have put it best when he accepted the Emmy for supporting actor in a drama. “Thank you. I have no idea what I’m about to say, but here we go. I count myself so fortunate to be a member of a community that is all about tolerance and diversity, because in no other place could I be standing on a stage like this,” he said, choking up...
Greta Thunberg to world leaders at the U.N. climate summit: “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words” https://t.co/vhK7qb7Dgb pic.twitter.com/kArrseEu9f
— TIME (@TIME) September 23, 2019
“People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. And all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!”My speech in UN General Assembly in print https://t.co/8wYyCa4H01
— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) September 23, 2019
Telling children that our species is headed for imminent extinction is psychological abuse. Climate alarmists are child abusers. They aren't just wrong and stupid -- though they are those things -- they're also morally depraved.
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 23, 2019
Not interested in seeing/hearing children used as political pawns while being labeled “political activists.” And if you peddle this kind of stuff, you should be deeply ashamed of yourself. Self-reflect. Seriously.
— Jedediah Bila (@JedediahBila) September 23, 2019
Teen suicide & anxiety disorders are through the roof. Constant fearmonging from adults is only making it worse. My latest for @Ricochet. https://t.co/aQtwkzXmry
— jon gabriel (@exjon) September 23, 2019
No one has looked me in the eyes all day. pic.twitter.com/UpUTGRsUUl— Keeley Hazell (@keeleyscorner) May 3, 2019
If y'all want to hear a REAL Southern accent and see a BIG catfish, you need to watch this video. https://t.co/2gyt9HiLWU
— The Patriarch Tree (@PatriarchTree) September 22, 2019
.@AmyKinLA has the touch. https://t.co/Qk6YaJQLKk
— Robert Lloyd (@LATimesTVLloyd) September 23, 2019
Walking to my Uber passing all the boys who bought me drinks all night pic.twitter.com/00omMKbmk3
— Chicks (@Chicks) September 20, 2019
This man I am standing with (Vince Gilligan) is the reason I have a career. I would follow this man into a fire. That’s how much I trust him. This man gave me a chance back when nobody else would. In weeks people will know our secrets that we keep. Here’s to many more secrets. pic.twitter.com/NlXskGvjLa— Aaron Paul (@aaronpaul_8) September 19, 2019
Dems Will Have To Lie About Their Agenda To Win, Poll Shows https://t.co/gC7eZKmDcL— Andrew Malcolm (@AHMalcolm) September 19, 2019
‘Wheeee!’ Bernie Sanders announces what else will be paid off for you if he’s elected president https://t.co/P9uq1Vtb3N
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) September 21, 2019
Kalkan has my heart! ☀️💛 pic.twitter.com/JsqsvsSb8g
— Rhian Sugden (@Rhianmarie) September 18, 2019
Plaschke: On improbable night, USC lives up to its motto and silence critics https://t.co/N1DyqTqqdh
— L.A. Times Sports (@latimessports) September 21, 2019
Teenage climate activist Greta has apologized for wearing that Antifa tee-shirt. She just borrowed it from a friend. https://t.co/ZKJQl50xyK pic.twitter.com/g91OkVH932
— Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) July 26, 2019
This is what mass hysteria looks like. 🙄 #ClimateStrike https://t.co/nCie2pTbpL
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) September 20, 2019
More mass hysteria, but #SanFrancisco’s known for it lol. #ClimateStrike 🤓 https://t.co/p55gVEgZi4
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) September 20, 2019
The Smearing Of Brett Kavanaugh Is An Attack On The Supreme Court https://t.co/akkWtmNwVt— Mollie (@MZHemingway) September 16, 2019
Shameless. New York Times continues its war on Brett Kavanaugh even after the entire premise of this story was shown to be false. They will not stop. They will not weary. https://t.co/tMYyzsPS2b— Mollie (@MZHemingway) September 17, 2019
Those making and propagating these charges against Kavanaugh aren’t interested in the truth. They ought to be called out as the smear merchants they are, writes @wjmcgurn https://t.co/a8HAbIqPYY via @WSJ— Mollie (@MZHemingway) September 17, 2019
Ana Braga Getting Gas in Only a Pair of Overalls - https://t.co/I1OfDJUkUi - pic.twitter.com/sT3ZQeYGmR
— Taxi Driver (@TaxiDriverMovie) September 11, 2019
Let me say some things so politically incorrect that Heidi Beirich at the SPLC might find them interesting: Despite all the left-wing demonization of white people that has saturated elite culture in recent years, the Nordic type is still quite a popular commodity in the dating market. A young white person who is generally attractive won’t be lonely, no matter how many academics, journalists and politicians blame them for all the evil in the world. My youngest son — so blond-haired and blue-eyed he could be a poster boy for the Hitlerjugend — is remarkably popular among his peers of all races. While the paranoid prophets of demographic doom obsess over declining white fecundity (“It’s the birth rates,” as the New Zealand shooter proclaimed in his manifesto), life is not so bad for young people who were lucky enough to be born white. Unless you’re a pathetic Beta loser, which my son is not. The doomsayers are misguided, and their fear-based perspective on demographics is not helpful. But I digress . . .More.
"His ex-wife could not be reached for comment..." I'll bet. 🙄 https://t.co/TE7BX6GjOa
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) September 14, 2019
Though-provoking essay: are Democrats, save Biden, running for president of Twitter, speaking to a progressive majority that doesn’t exist anywhere outside social media? https://t.co/ALTlZf4gel pic.twitter.com/frRPQv0YvL
— Michael Barbaro (@mikiebarb) September 14, 2019
"Arguing that the 'true founding' was the arrival of African slaves on the continent, period, is a bitter rebuke to the actual founders and Lincoln." https://t.co/4PDFklsx6w via @intelligencer
— Andrew Sullivan (@sullydish) September 13, 2019
.@MelissaTweets More on Texas' "political shift," something you've tweeted about a few times: "After mass shootings, gun advocates in #Texas worry about a political shift" 🤷♂️ cc. @DLoesch #ElPaso https://t.co/L7gpc8fkGC
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) September 14, 2019
Are Hong Kong’s Protestors More ‘American’ Than the Socialist Democrats? https://t.co/b4p6bY5zX1
— = Linda🇺🇸Wray = (@_NCPatriot_) September 14, 2019
EDDIE MONEY RIP. So sad to hear of his passing. I remember his first album which I LOVED. A fine singer through the years. My condolences to his family. pic.twitter.com/j22zMQfBXp— Paul Stanley (@PaulStanleyLive) September 13, 2019
"Stand by Me. "
Ed Driscoll, at Instapundit "AND THE ROLE OF EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN WILL BE PLAYED BY…: Liberals’ Knives Come Out for Nate Silver After His Model Points to a Trump Victory..."
R.S. McCain, "'Jews Are Dead, Hamas Is Happy, and Podhoretz Has Got His Rage On ..."
Ace, "Georgia Shooter's Father Berated Him as a "Sissy" and Bought Him an AR-15 to 'Toughen Him Up'..."Free Beacon..., "Kamala Harris, the ‘Candidate of Change,’ Copies Sections of Her Policy Page Directly From Biden's Platform..."