From A.F. Branco:
Bias Media Well Done https://t.co/BSBEYY6uPW via @afbranco pic.twitter.com/510XeDYzJ8
— Antonio F Branco (@afbranco) January 11, 2017
Commentary and analysis on American politics, culture, and national identity, U.S. foreign policy and international relations, and the state of education - from a neoconservative perspective! - Keeping an eye on the communist-left so you don't have to!
Bias Media Well Done https://t.co/BSBEYY6uPW via @afbranco pic.twitter.com/510XeDYzJ8
— Antonio F Branco (@afbranco) January 11, 2017
Regardless of party, @acosta behavior was rude, inappropriate and disrespectful. He owes @realDonaldTrump and his colleagues an apology https://t.co/LnTkYam8IJ
— Sean Spicer (@seanspicer) January 12, 2017
An unfortunate statement. Sean you know that you threatened to throw me out of that news conference if I asked another question. #realnews https://t.co/T4dYXZbomd
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) January 12, 2017
I have covered 4 presidential campaigns. Democrats and Republicans. This has never happened. Let's deescalate, find a way to work together. https://t.co/wgNsXlwt4z
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) January 12, 2017
President-elect Donald Trump will leave his positions at the various companies of the Trump Organization, but he will not divest his ownership, raising questions about whether he has adequately addressed conflict-of-interest concerns.Well, actually, I thought Trump's attorney, Sherri Dillon, gave a fantastic presentation. I especially loved the bit about how Donald Trump's business empire is "not dissimilar to the fortunes of Nelson Rockefeller when he became Vice President, but at that time no one was so concerned."
“I could actually run my business and run government at the same time,” Trump said at a press conference Wednesday, adding that he recently turned down an offer of $2 billion to do a deal in Dubai. “I don’t like the way that looks, but I would be able to do that if I wanted to.”
Trump’s businesses, which include more than 500 companies with $3.6 billion in assets and ties to more than 20 countries, will be placed into a trust. The trust will be overseen by an independent ethics officer and managed by Trump’s sons Eric and Don Jr., and chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, who will make decisions without consulting the president. The Trump Organization will terminate all pending partnerships, and won’t enter into new international business arrangements, such as licensing deals for new hotels, while Trump remains in the White House.
“That doesn’t solve any of the problems,” said Richard Painter, who served as a top White House ethics lawyer to President George W. Bush and is now a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School. “If he owns it, he has conflicts of interest.”
Existing Trump businesses, which include hotels and golf courses, will continue to operate and enter into new agreements, such as hosting weddings, parties and other events. Those will be reviewed by the ethics officer to ensure they are conducted at arms’ length. Trump’s debts will be paid down, according to their schedules. The company will voluntarily donate hotel profits received from foreign governments to the U.S. Treasury, said Sheri Dillon, his attorney.
“President-elect Trump should not be expected to destroy the company that he built,” Dillon said.
Under the law, the Office and Government Ethics may require executive branch officials to divest assets that could pose conflicts of interest. The president himself is exempt, but the ethics office “has for more than three decades asserted authority to make nonbinding recommendations regarding a president’s conflicts of interest,” OGE head Walter Shaub said in a December letter to lawmakers.
Trump’s legal team believes he isn’t in violation of his contract at the federal General Services Administration-owned building where he operates his Trump International Hotel in Washington. Although a provision in the lease appears to prohibit elected officials from benefiting from the arrangement, it is designed to prevent sitting officials from crafting sweetheart deals, the attorney said. Trump minted the deal as a private citizen.
His lawyers similarly believe that the emoluments clause of the Constitution, which prohibits gifts from foreign governments and heads of state, doesn’t apply to fair value exchanges between businesses...
On set with @head_tennis 🎾 pic.twitter.com/LZRDFaFU4I
— Maria Sharapova (@MariaSharapova) January 10, 2017
.@nytimes -- Maria Sharapova Claims Victory and Goes on the Offensivehttps://t.co/k42vg387dU— Maria Sharapova (@MariaSharapova) October 5, 2016
Bwahaha! #Trump berates #CNN reporter Jim Acosta: 'You are fake news'. #MAGA #DonaldTrump #PressConference https://t.co/yrViSCXcgW
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) January 11, 2017
So the website BuzzFeed decided to publish a series of memos that have been floating around for months alleging all kinds of terrible things about Donald Trump.More.
Some of those terrible allegations have to do with efforts to influence the American elections and Trump. Some of them have to do with Trump’s personal sexual conduct.
Readers of this newspaper know well not to include me among Trump’s supporters. But the scurrilousness of what BuzzFeed has done here is so beyond the bounds of what is even remotely acceptable it should compel even those most outraged by Trump’s political excesses to come to his defense and to the defense of a few other people mentioned in these papers whose names are also dragged through the mud.
There is literally no evidence on offer in these memos or from BuzzFeed that any single sentence in these documents is factual or true. What’s more, we know most major news organizations in America had seen them and despite their well-known institutional antipathy toward Trump, had chosen not to publish them or even make reference to them after efforts to substantiate their charges had failed...
CNN going to need more than anon sources to show why the Intel report on its face really is as bad as it looks.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) January 10, 2017
.@buzzfeednews has published the explosive, secret, unverified reports on Trump and Russia https://t.co/QDXN6mdOyu
— Ben Smith (@BuzzFeedBen) January 10, 2017
Here's the note I sent to @buzzfeednews staff this evening pic.twitter.com/OcAloWzVzb
— Ben Smith (@BuzzFeedBen) January 11, 2017
Benjamin Wittes: About that Explosive Trump Story: Take a Deep Breath https://t.co/Hinep12bQv
— Lawfare (@lawfareblog) January 11, 2017
FAKE NEWS - A TOTAL POLITICAL WITCH HUNT!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 11, 2017
FAKE NEWS: Buzzfeed and CNN fall for @RealDonaldTrump Hooker Story That was 4Chan Prank https://t.co/XxBBqfnnHt
— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) January 11, 2017
SCOOP: Two USC baseball sources confirm for me that @MichaelCohen212 + son visited campus on August 29th, time report places him in Prague.
— Elaina Plott (@elainaplott) January 11, 2017
BuzzFeed Posts Unverified Claims on Trump, Stirring Debate https://t.co/2otVX1Ro2z
— NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) January 11, 2017
BuzzFeed memo "means publishing open libels and slanders is the job of reporters in 2017." https://t.co/2YONUukS0w
— Josh Kraushaar (@HotlineJosh) January 11, 2017
Bad causes attract bad people, and the problems afflicting the Women’s March are typical. Seth Mandel notes that organizers of the march include Linda Sarsour, director of the taxpayer-funded Arab American Association of New York. Sarsour is notorious for hateful rhetoric that is not just anti-Jewish, but also anti-American and anti-Christian. When criticized, Sarsour accuses her critics of being “Zionist trolls.”
We should expect only evil from a movement led by such people.
We can't heal as a nation if we don't address the wounds of racism. #womensmarch https://t.co/Ec8HOdwn1Z— Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour) January 10, 2017
A Window Into a Depraved Culture https://t.co/LNDiVXRV9E
— Manhattan Institute (@ManhattanInst) January 10, 2017
In solidarity with #Israel the Brandenburg Gate is lit up in the colors of the Israeli flag commemorating the victims of #Jerusalem attack pic.twitter.com/TjSDDLTsu6
— Embassy of Israel (@IsraelinUSA) January 9, 2017
You're telling me a coalition led by Linda Sarsour is collapsing under the weight of anger and mutual suspicion? No! https://t.co/F39hOORuYx
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) January 9, 2017
Race-related confrontations have been erupting among women planning to march against Trump. https://t.co/07LbyDrFji pic.twitter.com/quuFjJyUXP
— NYT National News (@NYTNational) January 9, 2017
No identity politics isn't a problem at all it's the source of all left-wing progress why do you ask?https://t.co/2CZvKW3d4U
— Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) January 10, 2017
Support the Women's March on Washington today. We'll see you 1.21 in D.C. https://t.co/eNUNMAL4ji pic.twitter.com/7HvxJnbXcH
— Women's March (@womensmarch) January 2, 2017
Many thousands of women are expected to converge on the nation’s capital for the Women’s March on Washington the day after Donald J. Trump’s inauguration. Jennifer Willis no longer plans to be one of them.Obviously, the event's less about pushing women's equality ---- and promoting respect ---- than it is about pushing the hard left-wing identity politics of the Democrat Party.
Ms. Willis, a 50-year-old wedding minister from South Carolina, had looked forward to taking her daughters to the march. Then she read a post on the Facebook page for the march that made her feel unwelcome because she is white.
The post, written by a black activist from Brooklyn who is a march volunteer, advised “white allies” to listen more and talk less. It also chided those who, it said, were only now waking up to racism because of the election.
“You don’t just get to join because now you’re scared, too,” read the post. “I was born scared.”
Stung by the tone, Ms. Willis canceled her trip.
“This is a women’s march,” she said. “We’re supposed to be allies in equal pay, marriage, adoption. Why is it now about, ‘White women don’t understand black women’?”
If all goes as planned, the Jan. 21 march will be a momentous display of unity in protest of a president whose treatment of women came to dominate the campaign’s final weeks. But long before the first buses roll to Washington and sister demonstrations take place in other cities, contentious conversations about race have erupted nearly every day among marchers, exhilarating some and alienating others.
In Tennessee, emotions ran high when organizers changed the name of the local march from “Women’s March on Washington-Nashville” to “Power Together Tennessee, in solidarity with Women’s March on Washington.” While many applauded the name change, which was meant to signal the start of a new social justice movement in Nashville, some complained that the event had turned from a march for all women into a march for black women.
In Louisiana, the first state coordinator gave up her volunteer role in part because there were no minority women in leadership positions at that time.
“I got a lot of flak locally when I stepped down, from white women who said that I’m alienating a lot of white women,” said Candice Huber, a bookstore owner in New Orleans, who is white. “They said, ‘Why do you have to be so divisive?’”
In some ways, the discord is by design. Even as they are working to ensure a smooth and unified march next week, the national organizers said they made a deliberate decision to highlight the plight of minority and undocumented immigrant women and provoke uncomfortable discussions about race.
"Stand by Me. "
Ed Driscoll, at Instapundit "AND THE ROLE OF EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN WILL BE PLAYED BY…: Liberals’ Knives Come Out for Nate Silver After His Model Points to a Trump Victory..."
R.S. McCain, "'Jews Are Dead, Hamas Is Happy, and Podhoretz Has Got His Rage On ..."
Ace, "Georgia Shooter's Father Berated Him as a "Sissy" and Bought Him an AR-15 to 'Toughen Him Up'..."Free Beacon..., "Kamala Harris, the ‘Candidate of Change,’ Copies Sections of Her Policy Page Directly From Biden's Platform..."