Child Development Experts 'Stunned' by Supreme Court's Doubts on Homosexual Parenting

This piece is a riot, at the Los Angeles Times, "Three justices' concern over gay parenting surprises experts."

The depraved leftists have been desperately trying to normalize same-sex parenting, and have recently been bullying anyone who defects from the approved narrative on how children with same-sex parents fare "as well" as children with biological, mom and dad parents. The justices were right: There isn't enough data to know the effects of same-sex marriages on the well-being of children. And note this part from the Times' piece, buried way down toward the end of the article:

Not all of the academic experts find this research [on same-sex parenting] convincing.

Douglas W. Allen, a Canadian economist, says the many positive research reports on gay parents and their children were questionable. "The samples are small and biased. The people are self-selected," he said. "If you start with a biased sample, you can't make a statement about the population as a whole."

He published data from a Canadian census survey in 2006 that found children with lesbian or gay parents were less likely to graduate from high school.

You don't say? Wouldn't want to promote those findings too much, or anything.

Small samples, political and ideologically biased. That's going to be the case on this kind of research for a long time.

But we'll see how the Court rules in June. This is going to be something else.