Sunday, August 25, 2013

Leftists Looking to Galvanize New Generation of Cultists

As I've been arguing, civil rights isn't really about civil rights anymore.

But see the New York Times, FWIW, "Following King’s Path, and Trying to Galvanize a New Generation."

March on Washington photo BSbcg7tCUAAKymL_zpsebdadafa.jpg
WASHINGTON — Half a century after the emotional apex of the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, tens of thousands of people retraced his footsteps on Saturday, and his successors in the movement spoke of the still-unmet promise of America, as he did, at the Lincoln Memorial.

The anniversary of the 1963 March on Washington was less a commemoration, speakers proclaimed, than an effort to inject fresh energy into issues of economics and justice that, despite undeniable progress in overcoming racial bias, still leave stubborn gaps between white and black Americans.

The speeches that carried over the Reflecting Pool, which 50 years ago jolted Congress to pass landmark laws, took hard aim at current racial profiling by law enforcement, economic inequality and efforts to restrict voting access.

Addressing generations too young to remember, the Rev. Al Sharpton, an organizer of Saturday’s event, warned young people against the hubris of believing one’s middle class success was achieved alone. “You got there because some unlettered grandmas who never saw the inside of a college campus put their bodies on the line in Alabama and Mississippi and sponsored you up here,” he said.

A lineup of civil rights heroes, current movement leaders, labor leaders and Democratic officials addressed a vast crowd that stretched east from the Lincoln Memorial to the knoll of the Washington Monument — well out of range of loudspeakers. Organizers expected 100,000, fewer than half the number who came in 1963 when efforts to dismantle segregation had seized the national attention, often because of racist violence in the South.

Speakers included Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who on Thursday sued Texas over a strict voter ID law; Representative John Lewis of Georgia, an organizer of the original 1963 march; and Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin, the Florida teenager who was shot and killed last year.

“I gave blood on the bridge in Selma, Alabama, for the right to vote,” Mr. Lewis said in a deep and sonorous rumble. “I am not going to stand by and let the Supreme Court take the right to vote away from us.”

He and many others called the Voting Rights Act of 1965 a jewel of the civil rights movement that was under attack after the high court struck down the heart of it in June, opening the way for states including Texas and North Carolina to enforce new restrictions on voting access.

Mr. Holder, receiving a roar of welcome from the crowd, said that King’s struggle must continue “until every eligible American has the chance to exercise his or her right to vote unencumbered by discrimination or unneeded procedurals, rules or practices.”
Martin Luther King brought the moral authority of the civil rights movement to overthrow Jim Crow.

Today's regressive left --- and dredging up the March on Washington for the Obama cult is pretty regressive --- has completely squandered what little moral authority still lingers from those days a half century ago.

More here.

IMAGE CREDIT: The Obama Cult, on Twitter.

Serve and Volley is Dead

Yeah, it does seem like a long lost art.

At the Los Angeles Times, "What's happened to serve and volley in tennis?":


NEW YORK — The contrasts used to be one of the most attractive elements of tennis.

Pete Sampras standing at the net, Andre Agassi at the baseline trying to get the ball past his greatest rival.

Chris Evert, dainty but cruelly clever in the backcourt, against Martina Navratilova, who moved forward, fast as a whip, knocking a volley that Evert lunged at or just missed, eliciting a squeak of frustration from Evert.

Or John McEnroe, dancing on his toes, back and forth as Bjorn Borg stood at the back of the court and calculated the correct angle at which to whiz the ball past his rival — only to have McEnroe, with a flick of the wrist, gently drop the ball over the net, just in the spot where Borg couldn't reach it.

Billie Jean King still volunteers to coach players and teach them to serve and volley. She urged Serena and Venus Williams to learn that most difficult part of the game but couldn't persuade either of them.

As the U.S. Open tennis tournament, the final major of the year, begins Monday, it's more likely viewers will see an American man win — a longshot — than see more than a handful of serve-and-volley points.

That part of the game is gone, possibly forever.

"I don't think it's ever coming back, I really don't," said Sampras, who won 14 Grand Slam events, second only to Roger Federer. "It's difficult to learn to do, and it's hard to be successful with it at first, and kids and coaches don't like failure....
More at the link.

The French Question

I guess France is the new sick-man of Europe, after Greece, of course.

At the New York Times, "A Proud Nation Ponders How to Halt Its Slow Decline":
PARIS — For decades, Europeans have agonized over the power and role of Germany — the so-called German question — given its importance to European stability and prosperity.

Today, however, Europe is talking about “the French question”: can the Socialist government of President François Hollande pull France out of its slow decline and prevent it from slipping permanently into Europe’s second tier?

At stake is whether a social democratic system that for decades prided itself on being the model for providing a stable and high standard of living for its citizens can survive the combination of globalization, an aging population and the acute fiscal shocks of recent years.

Those close to Mr. Hollande say that he is largely aware of what must be done to cut government spending and reduce regulations weighing down the economy, and is carefully gauging the political winds. But what appears to be missing is the will; France’s friends, Germany in particular, fear that Mr. Hollande may simply lack the political courage to confront his allies and make the necessary decisions.

Changing any country is difficult. But the challenge in France seems especially hard, in part because of the nation’s amour-propre and self-image as a European leader and global power, and in part because French life is so comfortable for many and the day of reckoning still seems far enough away, especially to the country’s small but powerful unions.

The turning of the business cycle could actually be a further impediment in that sense, because as the European economy slowly mends, the French temptation will be to hope that modest economic growth will again mask, like a tranquilizer, the underlying problems.

The French are justifiably proud of their social model. Health care and pensions are good, many French retire at 60 or younger, five or six weeks of vacation every summer is the norm, and workers with full-time jobs have a 35-hour week and significant protections against layoffs and firings.

But in a more competitive world economy, the question is not whether the French social model is a good one, but whether the French can continue to afford it. Based on current trends, the answer is clearly no, not without significant structural changes — in pensions, in taxes, in social benefits, in work rules and in expectations.
RTWT.

And flashback, "THE EUROPEANIZATION OF AMERICA."




Britain and U.S. Move Toward Intervention in Syria

Okay.

We'll see how well that goes.

At the Guardian/Observer Sunday, "Syria: Cameron and Obama move west closer to intervention."


Cameron Obama Intervention in Syria photo proxy-1_zpsc524ddfe.jpg

John Lydon and Louise Mensch on Question Time

My angry commenter cited this exchange the other day.

I love John Lydon:



Saturday, August 24, 2013

'Dad, Rush Limbaugh and Me'

An interesting op-ed from Madeline Janis, at the Los Angeles Times.

Read it all. She admits to being a stereotypical leftist and she harangued her father for listening to Rush Limbaugh. (One of her biggest peeves is that he received government benefits --- the GI Bill, Social Security and Medicare --- but was still conservative, as if conservatives don't support any government role in social welfare, health and education, a common leftist fallacy.) But the conclusion caught my eye:
I suspect that our family dynamic wasn't unique, and that across America fathers and daughters and sons and mothers have learned to accommodate political differences and respect one another across the gulf. Our love for each other and our family helped my father and me transcend the enormous ideological divide between us.

It makes me wonder if there isn't something in these experiences that might help us, as Americans, transcend our political differences. Even if we don't have the same closeness as a family, Americans of all political stripes do share a love of country. And that could be a start, at least, at reaching across the gulf of ideology to work cooperatively and respectfully to solve the challenges facing the nation.
And that's another leftist fallacy, which ends up being a pernicious leftist lie, that "Americans of all political stripes share a love of country."

Leftists do not actually love this country. The left --- and that includes this presidential administration and the congressional Democrat Party --- are Democrat-Socialists marinated in class warfare rhetoric and Marxist welfare redistributionism. They don't love this country. They love what they think this country could be if they were able to fully impose their socialist program on Americans without opposition.

And that's the basis of our political differences, which are irreconcilable. That some people agree to go along to get along is a testament to our national attributes of decency and pragmatism. But America as a nation will continue to stagnate as long as people remain ignorant to the true nature of leftism. The next two elections are crucial in this regard. And the GOP needs to have candidates who aren't afraid to call it like it is, people like Michele Bachmann and Allen West. And when more people like this win office and implement basic policies of decency, probity, and prudence, we'll start to turn things around.

In any case, more at the letters to the editor, "More on 'Dad, Rush Limbaugh and Me'."

The Real Reason College Costs So Much

Allysia Finley interviews Ohio University President Richard Vedder, at the Wall Street Journal:
Mr. Vedder is skeptical about the president's proposal to tie federal aid to graduation rates, among other performance metrics. "I can tell you right now, having taught at universities forever, that universities will do everything they can to get students to graduate," he chuckles. "If you think we have grade inflation now, you ought to think what will happen. If you breathe into a mirror and it fogs up, you'll get an A."

A better idea, Mr. Vedder suggests, would be to implement a national exam like the GRE (Graduate Record Examination) to measure how much students learn in college. This is not on Mr. Obama's list.
Naturally. Standards and accountability are racist.

But RTWT.

'United States of Obama' at Anniversary of March on Washington

A sick cult of black Obama worship.

Despicable.

At Fire Andrea Mitchell, "Obama flag face at MOW violates desecrates American flag."

And at Twitchy, "Pledge of aggrievance: ‘United States of Obama’ flag waves at March on Washington."

 photo 1377354218001-epa-usa-civil-rights-march_zps3d7938be.jpg

Black Teen Criminals Accused of Beating WWII Hero to Death

Black criminals.

Black teen thug criminals.

Folks need to get all the details in there.


More at Expose Liberals, "Demetruis Glenn – black thug arrested in fatal beating of Delbert Belton," and "Kenan Adams-Kinard second suspect in fatal beating of Delbert Belton."

Also, "Kenan Kinard Facebook page and Twitter."

Damned criminal mf's.

'Legendary' Britney Spears at #MTV Video Music Awards 2001 #VMAs

In which the Los Angeles Times goes all BuzzFeed, "MTV Video Music Awards: 30 moments that make it a can't-miss event."

Interestingly, I saw the piece in the hard-copy edition of the newspaper, but it's ridiculously obsolete in conveying a story like this. See all the videos at the link.


12. Britney Spears and her snake (2001). Brit’s celebrated her last few months as a teenager in a big way with her sexiest song yet, “I’m a Slave for U.” From bursting out of a cage with a tiger to slinking around with a giant yellow python. There’s something about a pop princess shaking it with a giant snake that screams legendary.

R.S. McCain Hammers Lying Liar @BrianBeutler of Liar's Lair @Salon.com

I slammed the idiot leftist Brian Beutler on Twitter yesterday.

And now Robert Stacy McCain's taken the baton, "The Foul Stench of @BrianBeutler’s Truthlessness Has Become Intolerable."



Simon Cowell Lauren Silverman Beach Stroll in South of France

Well, I guess he's not too worried about Ms. Silverman's demands for a reality show.

Must be the life, really.

Simon Cowell photo rs_293x473-130824111200-634SimonCowellLaurenSilverman282413JMD_copy_2_zpsc1cdcea3.jpg
At London's Daily Mail, "Those smiles say it all! Simon Cowell can't keep the grin off his face as he holds hands with pregnant lover Lauren Silverman during romantic beach stroll":
He's spoken out about how happy he is that his lover Lauren Silverman is pregnant.

And now Simon Cowell is fully showing just how ecstatic he is about it - by putting on a public display of affection with her during a romantic getaway in the South of France.

In fact the music mogul couldn't get the smile off his face as he held hands with Lauren while they walked along a beach on Saturday morning.

And Silverman looked equally as gleeful as she also grinned from ear to ear to show they're not just having a baby together but are also officially an item.

It is the first time the pair have been seen together since news of the pregnancy shocked the world. And it also marks the first time they've been reunited since her husband Andrew Silverman found out about their affair and they subsequently got a divorce.
Continue reading.

Imogen Thomas for Nuts

And she recently had a baby.

A pro-life babe.


And at Egotastic!, "Imogen Thomas Boobtastic Faptastic Lingerie Goodness."

Stop Playing the Victim, Baracky!

From lefty Kathleen Parker, at WaPo, "Obama’s race remarks exacerbate tensions":
If I had a son, he would look like Christopher Lane, the 22-year-old Australian baseball player shot dead while jogging in Oklahoma.

If I had a father, he’d look like Delbert Belton, the 88-year-old World War II veteran beaten to death in Spokane, Wash.

And yes, if I had a son, he’d look like the white teenager who police say drove the getaway car in the Oklahoma killing.

These are all true statements if we identify ourselves and each other only by the color of our skin, which increasingly seems to be the case. Even our president has done so.

Barack Obama helped lead the way when he identified himself with the parents of Trayvon Martin, shot by George Zimmerman in the neighborhood-watch catastrophe with which all are familiar. Stepping out from his usual duties of drawing meaningless red lines in the Syrian sand, the president splashed red paint across the American landscape:

“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

In so saying, he essentially gave permission for all to identify themselves by race with the victim or the accused. How sad, as we approach the 50th anniversary of the march Martin Luther King Jr. led on Washington, that even the president resorts to judging not by the content of one’s character but by the color of his skin — the antithesis of the great dream King articulated....

Nothing is fair about profiling, but one’s treatment by a stranger is not always necessarily linked to one’s racial or ethnic history. Sometimes it’s just . . . you.

The killings leading the news the past several days have been horrific in their apparent randomness. Were they racially motivated? Had the perps been white and the victims black, would Obama have identified with them? More to immediate concerns, did the president’s identification with Trayvon Martin nourish the killing passions of these youths?

Hard to say with any certainty, though one of those charged in the Oklahoma shooting apparently tweeted some messages this summer that unmistakenly convey racial animus toward whites. They might be dismissed as Twitter nonsense — but for the dead body.

We do know this much for certain: Had the races been reversed, the usual suspects would have had much to say. White teens beat up an elderly black veteran and leave him for dead? White teens shoot a talented black athlete visiting from another country?
Word.

Christian Air Force Veteran Relieved of Duties After Disagreeing with Homosexual Marriage

This is why they call it the "Gaystapo."

At Blazing Cat Fur, "Discrimination Complaint Filed After Christian Relieved of Duties Over Beliefs About Homosexuality."


Spending Billions, @ESPN Rules College Football Schedule

A big report at the New York Times, "College Football’s Most Dominant Player? It’s ESPN":
The nation’s annual rite of mayhem and pageantry known as the college football season begins this week, and Saturday will feature back-to-back-to-back marquee matchups.

At the Georgia Dome in Atlanta, last year’s national champions, the Alabama Crimson Tide, will battle the Virginia Tech Hokies in the Chick-fil-A Kickoff Classic.

Earlier in the day in Houston, Oklahoma State will play Mississippi State in the Texas Kickoff Classic. And that night in Arlington, Tex., Louisiana State and Texas Christian will face off in the Cowboys Classic.

The games will not just be televised by ESPN. They are creations of ESPN — demonstrations of the sports network’s power over college football.

The teams were not even on each other’s schedules until ESPN, looking to orchestrate early-season excitement and ratings, went to work. The 2013 Chick-fil-A Kickoff Classic came together more than two years ago when one of the network’s programming czars noticed that Alabama was not scheduled to play this Labor Day weekend, brought the Tide on board and found a worthy opponent.

Far beyond televising games, ESPN has become the chief impresario of college football. By infusing the sport with billions of dollars it pays for television rights — more than $10 billion on college football in the last five years alone — ESPN has become both puppet-master and kingmaker, arranging games, setting schedules and bestowing the gift of nationwide exposure on its chosen universities, players and coaches.
A great piece.

Continue reading.

And it's a three-part series, so I'll probably update on Part II tomorrow, and so forth...

Added: The piece mentions ESPN's conflicts of interest, including backing out on a PBS documentary on concussions in the NFL. See LAT, "ESPN bows out of concussion project; NFL denies exerting pressure." And NYT, "N.F.L. Pressure Said to Lead ESPN to Quit Film Project."

'Fuckin' Problem'

Well, since we're discussing civil rights progress in the black community, how's about some A$AP Rocky with Drake, 2 Chainz & Kendrick Lamar?


[Hook: 2 Chainz, Drake, and Rocky]
I love bad bitches, that's my fuckin problem
And yeah I like to fuck, I got a fuckin problem
I love bad bitches, that's my fuckin problem
And yeah I like to fuck I got a fuckin problem
I love bad bitches, that's my fuckin problem
And yeah I like to fuck, I got a fuckin problem
If finding somebody real is your fuckin problem
Bring ya girls to the crib maybe we can solve it

[Verse 1: A$AP Rocky]
Hold up bitches simmer down
Takin' hella long bitch give it to me now
Make that thing pop like a semi or a nine
Oh baby like it raw with a shimmy shimmy ya
Huh, ASAP get like me
Never met a motherfucker fresh like me
All these motherfuckers wanna dress like me
Put the chrome to your dome make you sweat like Keith
Cause I'm the nigga, the nigga nigga, like how you figure?
Getting figures and fuckin bitches, she rollin' swishers
Brought her bitches, I brought my niggas, they getting bent up off the liquor
She love my licorice, I let her lick it
They say money make a nigga act nigger-ish
But at least a nigga nigga rich
I be fuckin' broads like I be fuckin' bored
Turn a dyke bitch out have her fuckin' boys, beast

[Hook]

[Verse 2: Drake]
I know you love it when this beat is on
Make you think about all of the niggas you've been leading on
Make me think about all of the rappers I've been feeding on
Got a feeling that's the same dudes that we speakin' on, oh word?
Ain't heard my album? Who you sleepin' on?
You should print the lyrics out and have a fucking read-along
Ain't a fucking sing-along unless you brought the weed along
Then ju.. (Okay, okay, okay)
Then just drop down and get yo' eagle on
Or we can stare up at the stars and put the Beatles on
All that shit you talkin' bout is not up for discussion
I will pay to make it bigger, I don't pay for no reduction
If it's comin' from a nigga I don't know, then I don't trust it
If you comin' for my head, then motherfucker get to bustin'
Yes Lord, I don't really say this often
But this long dick nigga ain't for the long talking, I beast

[Hook]

[Verse 3: Kendrick Lamar]
Yeah ho this the finale
My pep talk turn into a pep rally
Say she's from the hood but she live inside in the valley now
Vacate in Atlanta, then she going back to Cali
Got your girl on my line, world on my line
The irony I fuck 'em at the same damn time
She eyeing me like a nigga don't exist
Girl, I know you want this dick
Girl, I'm Kendrick Lamar
Aka Benz is to me just a car
That mean your friends need to be up to a par
See my standards are pampered by threesomes tomorrow
Kill 'em all dead bodies in the hallway
Don't get involved listen what the crystal ball say
Halle Berry, hallelujah
Holla back I'll do ya, beast

[Hook]
And since I mentioned Barack Hussein, here's a flashback to the ho's playlist in the White House, "President Obama's 'Rap Palate': Why Praise Violent, Misogynistic Hip-Hop Stars?"

That bitch got a problem, mf.

Leftists Go Nuclear Over Pro-Life Community Post at BuzzFeed

Talk about intolerance and ideological tribalism.

At Twitchy, "‘Shameful’ pro-life post forces BuzzFeed to question where to draw the line."

Following the links takes us to Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke at the New York Observer, "Amid Anger Over Anti-Abortion Post, Buzzfeed Says It’s Still Figuring Out Whether To ‘Draw Lines’." And here's the offending entry, "8 Outrageous Things Planned Parenthood Was Caught Doing."

Lefties haven't learned the fundamentals of the Streisand effect. Most people would've never heard of the pro-life community post, but now it's going viral and more people will be educated on the pro-death abortion cult's lies.

Way to go progs!

Pro-Life BuzzFeed photo enhanced-buzz-16901-1377019191-19_zps68edb44e.jpg

Thousands Gather to Mark Anniversary of March on Washington

At this point it's all about grievance. Objective, demonstrable progress toward racial equality doesn't matter so much, and we have plenty of evidence on progress toward racial equality today, like, er, the black man in the White House.

But see the Washington Post, "‘Keeping the dream alive’ - Thousands gather on Mall to mark anniversary."


More, "March on Washington's 50th Anniversary."

50 Years Ago Democrats Believed In Tax Cuts

Astute Bloggers had this the other day.



Barbarians at the Campus Gates

Here's this Thomas Sowell piece at National Review from May, "Why colleges cave to the demands of student activists."

Glenn Reynolds tweeted it the other day, and it reminded me of the first hand account of the Swarthmore protests on which the Sowell piece is based. See Danielle Charette, "My Top-Notch Illiberal Arts Education: At Swarthmore, it's fine to smash 'hegemonic power structures' and silence other students."

She's discussing a campus environmental divestment protest sponsored by the group "Mountain Justice." Here's the key bit:
On May 4, the school scheduled an open board meeting on the divestment initiative so that the opinions of board members, faculty, administrators and students would receive a fair hearing. I went to the meeting to listen, and to support a friend who was planning on delivering a few remarks critical of the divestment idea. My friend never got his chance.

The board had invited two representatives from Mountain Justice to sit on a panel with them for the first half of the meeting. What the board didn't realize was that those same students were positioning themselves to grab the microphone and disrupt the proceedings. The chairman of the Board Investment Committee, Chris Niemczewski, was in the middle of delivering the opening PowerPoint presentation—which, incidentally, estimated the cost of divestment at $200 million over 10 years—when more than 100 student protesters burst into the room, waving signs and shouting.

One of the student panelists grabbed the microphone out of turn and handed it to a line of protestors who delivered speeches that condemned the "liberal script" in the name of "radical, emancipatory change" and "institutional transformation." Afterwards, my classmates defended their behavior because they were smashing "hegemonic power structures" and "flipping the power dynamic."

About 10 minutes after the takeover, I stood up and reminded the protesters that other members of the college were there to hear various perspectives. But rather than listen to what I had to say, the students began to shout and clap in unison, drowning out what I was saying. Professors sat silent in the audience. Neither Dean of Students Liz Braun, nor the college president, Rebecca Chopp, spoke up.

I crossed the aisle to speak to the meeting's moderator, but she refused to do anything. Then I appealed to Ms. Chopp, who conceded that what was unfolding was "outrageous" but said there was nothing she could do. I approached Ms. Braun as well, but she did nothing.

All of this is on video, which some classmates have posted online, exulting in the evidence of how they spoke truth to power. Meanwhile, my peers have derided me on blogs and Facebook. One accused me of "pernicious, destructive, far-reaching silencing."

They give me far too much credit: I'm an English major who wants Swarthmore to be a place where ideas are freely exchanged. To me, overthrowing a meeting of board members, who are all alumni, is wrong and juvenile.

Apparently the college doesn't see things that way. The day after disrupting the open board meeting, the protesters insisted on mandatory campus "teach-ins" for all students. Though it was the day before exams at a school that prides itself on its academic rigor, the administration acquiesced and endorsed the teach-ins to heal our "fractured community."

Each attendee received a list of student "demands," which included making courses in ethnic studies and gender and sexuality required for graduation. The activists also demanded that Swarthmore revise its judicial process so that "sexual assault cases are no longer confidential." A refresher course in basic civility might be more useful.

After I sent several emails and a link to the video to President Chopp, she agreed to meet with me a week after the incident. Ms. Chopp conceded that the meeting was handled poorly and that the administration must do a better job of defending all of its students, not merely those with the loudest voices.

Still, I have yet to hear a public defense of our college's policies. No administrator has condemned the takeover of the board meeting. If that tantrum doesn't qualify as disorderly conduct and outright intimidation, what does? If moderate or conservative students—no doubt also a "marginalized" group on campus—behaved similarly, would they be held accountable?
Actually, the college president, Ms. Chopp, published a cowardly response at the newspaper, "Swarthmore Believes in Having All Viewpoints Heard."

Clearly Swarthmore believes no such thing.

And WSJ's letter-writers aren't in a forgiving mood either, "The Open Society and Its Enemies on Our Campuses."

Leftist regressives are destroying decency --- if not democracy --- in America.

18 Questions for the Guardian UK

From Louise Mensch:
Remember, the Guardian said they agreed to destroy their computers – all of them – that contained the intel; they professed that they did not know what David Miranda was carrying – I believe their corduroy pants to be on fire even as we speak.

If they lied and kept copies and physically shifted the data, the UK and US intelligence agencies should go after them full throttle for espionage. At the bottom of this blog we have the police opening a criminal investigation into Miranda - remember the relief against that bit is only temporary – for transporting this data… if the Guardian have done it, they should be pursued in exactly the same way. Same with the New York Times.
RTWT.

She links Anderson Cooper's interview with Greenwald and Miranda, "Glenn Greenwald 'JOURNALISM IS NOT A CRIME AND IT'S NOT TERRORISM!'"

I think he's in over his head. Good thing, too. He won't ever be allowed in either the U.S. or Britain without possibly facing charges.

More at Memeorandum, "New York Times and Guardian Will Publish More Snowden Revelations."

March on Washington's 50th Anniversary

From David Wessel, at the Wall Street Journal, "50 Years of a Dream."

Folks have moved the goalposts on civil rights progress. It used to be equal opportunity, eliminating legal barriers to full  participation in society. Nowadays it's just left-wing regressive bitching about "inequality," and the concomitant bogus claims of "racism."

Clearly, from that perspective, we have not overcome.

Friday, August 23, 2013

Bradley Manning Is Not a Woman

Seems like it would go without saying, but not in our morally depraved leftist culture.

See Kevin Williamson, at National Review (via Memeorandum):
We have created a rhetoric of “gender identity” that is disconnected from biological sexual fact, and we have done so largely in the service of enabling the sexual mutilation of physically healthy men and women (significantly more men) by medical authorities who should be barred by professional convention if not by conscience from the removal of healthy organs (and limbs, more on that later), an act that by any reasonable standard ought to be considered mutilation rather than therapy. This is not to discount the feelings of people who suffer from gender-identity disorders — to the contrary, those feelings must be taken into account in determining courses of treatment for people who have severe personality disorders. But those subjective experiences do not render inconsequential the biological facts: A man who believes he is a woman trapped in a man’s body, no matter the intensity of his feeling, is no such thing. The duty of the medical profession is not to encourage and enable delusions, but to help those who suffer from them to cope with them. It is worth noting here that as a matter of law and a matter of social expectation, the fiction of sex change is treated as the paramount good: We are not expected to treat those who have undergone the procedure as men who have taken surgical and hormonal steps to impersonate women (or vice versa) but as people who have literally changed sex, which they have not — no more than Dennis Avner, the famous “Stalking Cat” who attempted to physically transform himself into a tiger, changed species.
RTWT.

And then compare to Amanda Marcotte, "Bradley Manning Is Now Chelsea Manning. The Press Should Start Using Female Pronouns Immediately," and Kate McDonough, "Media willfully misgender Chelsea Manning."

BONUS: From AoSHQ, "Salon, the Web Magazine for Dumb People: Why Is the Media Referring to Bradley Manning, Who is a Man Named Bradley Manning, as a Man Whose Name Is Bradley Manning?," and "The New Republic Headline in 20 Point Font: 'He Is Not Bradley Manning. She Is Chelsea Manning. Deal With It'."

CEO Steve Ballmer Out at Microsoft

At the Wall Street Journal, "Microsoft Signals Change Ahead With Ballmer Departure."

And at Vanity Fair, "Microsoft’s Downfall: Inside the Executive E-mails and Cannibalistic Culture That Felled a Tech Giant."

Oberlin College Racism Hoax

Here's the CNN "mystery" report from March:



But it's all bullish*t.

William Jacobson reports, "The Great Oberlin College Racism Hoax of 2013":
I was right. Michele Malkin was right. The enormity of the hoax cannot be overstated, and it could not have taken place without the cover up by the Oberlin administration. Had Oberlin’s President gone on television or issued a statement that the acts were a hoax, the campus and media would not have devoted weeks to portraying Oberlin as having a racism problem.

The Oberlin administration has a lot of answering to do to the community, the nation, and to Oberlin alumni. How must those alumni feel to see their school smeared based on a hoax. Will Lena Dunham now tweet about it? Will CNN cover the hoax aspect as deeply as it did the incidents? Will Melissa Harris-Perry talk about the role of racist hoaxes in creating a false narrative of racism?
Yes, Michelle Malkin was right. And she updates, "See, I told you so: Oberlin hoax confirmed."

More at Twitchy, "It’s official: Oberlin race hoax perpetrated by lefties; Alumna Lena Dunham silent."



Black on White Race War

From Angry White Dude, "YOU WILL EITHER FIGHT OR DIE! BLACK ON WHITE RACE WAR IN PROCESS!":
Every day brings a new story of another “senseless death” of an innocent white person at the hands of “urban youths” somewhere in America. “Senseless death” is what the PC propaganda media refers to violent, out-of-control black on white crime. WWII vets beaten to death, babies shot between the eyes in botched robberies, Australian visitors shot for gang initiation, the ghetto contingent in America has shown both its blatant disregard for humanity but also their absolute hatred of white people. In the ghetto black community, murdering an innocent white person brings accolades and credibility! Is that what MLK dreamed for his community? I don’t think so. Is this what Trayvon would have wanted? Absolutely! Just read his Twitter comments!

The stark reality of the danger black youth present to white America is bleeding through the poisonous filter of political correctness. More and more traditionally mind-numbed by PC whites are realizing we don’t have a lot of support or concern from our President, Attorney General, government, or mainstream media. Whites are massacred every day for the pigment of their skin by ghetto thug blacks but their deaths don’t bring national attention. A Hispanic shoots a black thug teen who was bashing his head into the pavement and the entire leftist PC and race-baiting black movement kicks into high gear! The message? Nobody cares if you are shot down, beat down, raped or anything else if you are a creepy ass cracka. You’re on your own in Barack Obama’s post-racialist society in 2013!
Continue reading.

No Proof of Chemical Attack in Syria

Lots of dead bodies they say, but no hard proof of chemical weapons.

At NYT, "Images of Death in Syria, but No Proof of Chemical Attack":


BEIRUT, Lebanon — Scores of men, women and children were killed outside Damascus on Wednesday in an attack marked by the telltale signs of chemical weapons: row after row of corpses without visible injury; hospitals flooded with victims, gasping for breath, trembling and staring ahead languidly; images of a gray cloud bursting over a neighborhood.

But even with videos, witness accounts and testimonies by emergency medics, it was impossible to say for certain how many people had been killed and what exactly had killed them. The rebels blamed the government, the government denied involvement and Russia accused the rebels of staging the attack to implicate President Bashar al-Assad’s government.

Images of death and chaos poured out of Syria after what may be the single deadliest attack in more than two years of civil war. Videos posted online showed dozens of lifeless bodies, men wrapped in burial shrouds and children, some still in diapers. There were hospital scenes of corpses and the stricken sprawled on gurneys and tile floors as medics struggled to resuscitate them.

Getting to the bottom of the assault could well alter the course of the conflict and affect the level of the West’s involvement.
Autopsies should show how these people died. But there's a lot of invested interest against humanitarianism in Syria. I doubt anything will change.

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Girl Gives Blowjobs at Eminem Concert

And photos were posted online, natch.

Instapundit has the headline, "21ST CENTURY RELATIONSHIPS: Teenage Girl Gives Blowjobs at Eminem Concert, Pictures Posted Online, Epic Slut-Shaming Ensues."

The big roundup is at the Daily Dot, "#Slanegirl: How the Internet turned a girl's Eminem concert into a nightmare."

And the Mirror UK pretty much nails it:
#Slanegirl was stupid, the young man she was pleasuring was an oaf who won’t be getting another blow-job from anyone for a while, and the person who took and shared those pictures online in the first place is a jizzstain of the highest order."
And commentary from Sometimes, it's just a cigar, "#Slanegirl and the shaming of female sexual desire."

Added: More at New York Daily News, "‘Slane Girl' - concert-goer who was photographed performing sex acts - hospitalized after vicious cyberbullying."

LOL! #FreeKate's Father Jonesing Up an 'Anonymous' Hacker Op Against R.S. McCain!

Oh boy, these people are pathetic.

The biggest losers.

Read it all at the Other McCain, "Shocking: #FreeKate’s Father Conspires to Shut Down This Blog: ‘Media Blackout’."

Citing Shoulder Injury, Maria Sharapova Pulls Out of U.S. Open

No doubt a loss for tennis fans everywhere.

At NYT, "Sharapova, Citing Shoulder Injury, Will Miss Open."

Maria Sharapova photo Maria-Sharapova1_zps5fc42347.jpg
After an uncharacteristically tumultuous summer, third-seeded Maria Sharapova announced Wednesday night that she was withdrawing from next week’s United States Open because of a right shoulder injury.

“Maria has informed us that she will be unable to compete at the U.S. Open this year due to a right shoulder bursitis and has withdrawn from the tournament,” the tournament director, David Brewer, said in a statement. “We wish her a speedy recovery and look forward to her return to New York next year.”

Sharapova later posted on Facebook: “Withdrawing from the U.S. Open has been a really tough decision to make. I have done everything I could since Wimbledon to get myself ready but it just wasn’t enough time. I have done many tests, received several opinions and it all comes down to taking the proper amount of time to heal my shoulder injury properly.”

With Sharapova’s withdrawal, No. 4 Agnieszka Radwanska will move to the No. 3 seed, and all subsequent seeds will move up a spot. Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova of Russia will become the new No. 32 seed and a lucky loser from the final round of the qualifying tournament will take Sharapova’s slot in the 128-player draw.

The American Mardy Fish also withdrew from the tournament Wednesday, citing continuing health concerns. Fish has struggled with physical and mental health problems.

Sharapova, 26, was first affected by right shoulder problems five years ago and had surgery to repair two tears in her rotator cuff in October 2008. When she returned to the tour 10 months later, she struggled with inconsistent serving.

But Sharapova, the 2006 United States Open champion, steadily returned to previous form, returning to the No. 1 ranking and completing the career Grand Slam by winning the French Open last year. She made the French Open final again this year, but lost to Serena Williams.
Continue reading.

HAT TIP: The Other McCain, "Live at Five."

Despicable Race Hustler Joy Reid: Why is Chris Lane Shooting Being Made 'Racial'?

And poor old shufflin' Clarence Page.

The left's racial double-standards are disgusting.

It's no wonder Americans see little progress on race relations 50 years after the "I Have a Dream" speech.



And from this morning, "Michelle Malkin Slams the Left's 'Morally Deranged Culture'."

#Braves Jason Heyward Drilled by 90-MPH Fastball

My buddy lamby gave me the heads up on Twitter last night.

And here's AJC, "Jason Heyward out 4-6 weeks with broken jaw."

It's almost nauseating to listen to the impact.




#FreeKate Twitter Lulz

At the Other McCain, "#FreeKate Comic Interlude."



And the lady quit Twitter.

Poor thing. Facts are so mean.

Washington Post on Lockdown Amid Protest Against Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood

Tweeted out a few minutes ago:



And here's the background, "US Egyptians plan rally at White House against 'Brotherhood terrorism'."

Michelle Malkin Slams the Left's 'Morally Deranged Culture'

Sing it sister.

A great segment on this morning's Fox & Friends:



Louise Mensch on BBC's Newsnight

Along with computer hacker Jacob Applebaum.

A righteous rampage. See her post, "David Miranda – Snowden’s Mule, and physical data."

I love the incredible clarity of her presentation on the BBC. She just destroys this idiot Applebaum.

The short version's at the BBC, "Miranda detention : Ex-MP Mensch v computer scientist."



Bradley Manning: 'I am Chelsea'

Well, he's a weird f-ker.

At the New York Times, "After Sentencing, Manning Says, ‘I Am Female’."

And commentary from R.S. McCain, "‘The Powers That Be’: Lawful Authority, Honorable Service and a Cursed Traitor":


Regular readers know my Army son is currently training in hope of joining the elite Special Forces. My hatred of the traitor Manning is therefore perhaps as personal as it is patriotic. Have I ever said a nice word about President Obama? Is there any policy of the current administration that I support? I think readers know the answer to those questions, and yet I was stirred with pride that day at Fort Meade when I watched my son swear the oath to obey the orders of his Commander-in-Chief. Obedience is the first duty of a soldier, and obedience must be rooted in respect for lawful authority.
“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.” – Romans 13:1 (KJV)
And let all God’s children say, Amen. Contrast this sense of duty — the honor of obedient service — to the traitor Manning’s selfish and arrogant disrespect for authority...
Continue reading.

Like I said, the dude's a weird f-ker. And a traitor.

South L.A.'s Kashawn Campbell Struggles at Cal Berkeley

I meant to write about this story the other day, but was put off with so many emotions.

See, "South L.A. student finds a different world at Cal."

And from the letters to the editor, "Letters: Hard lessons":
Re “Struggling at the crossroads,” Column One, Aug. 16

My heart aches for Kashawn Campbell, but let's be real: Does anyone who read this article really believe he belongs at UC Berkeley? He's completely lost in his college writing course; does anyone really believe he'll graduate?

Shame on the utterly dysfunctional school system that confers perfect GPAs on kids who, as your article said, do one hour of homework a night and turn in one-page essays. And double shame on the defenders of affirmative action quotas who would create tens of thousands of academically doomed Kashawn Campbells just for the sake of appearances.

E.G. Rice
Marina del Rey
My thoughts exactly, but hey, affirmative action!

More from the mailbag, "UC Berkeley struggles: Readers weigh lessons of Kashawn Campbell."

Michelle Malkin Slams Leftist Richard Fowler on Murder of Australian Christopher Lane

From last night's Hannity:



Wednesday, August 21, 2013

San Diego Mayor Bob Filner on the Way Out

See the San Diego Union-Tribune, "Proposed Filner settlement reached":
Mayor Bob Filner reached a proposed settlement agreement with his legal adversaries Wednesday that likely sets the stage for the end of his brief, scandal-plagued tenure as San Diego’s 35th mayor.

The tentative agreement centers around a lawsuit filed against the mayor and the city by a former Filner aide who accused him of sexual harassment and unwanted sexual advances. Three days of mediation — overseen by retired federal judge J. Lawrence Irving — ended late Wednesday when a group of lawyers and city leaders led by City Attorney Jan Goldsmith emerged from behind closed doors to announce a deal had been reached.

The City Council will consider the proposal at 1 p.m. Friday in closed session and Goldsmith said no details would be released until after that hearing.
More at the link.

Oh My! UPS Drops Spousal Health Coverage Over #ObamaCare

The hits keep coming.

From Doug Powers, at Michelle's, "UPS cites Obamacare as factor in cutting health coverage for 15,000 spouses":
Here’s the latest story to contradict that promise:
United Parcel Service Inc. plans to remove thousands of spouses from its medical plan because they are eligible for coverage elsewhere. The Atlanta-based logistics company points to the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as a big reason for the decision, Kaiser Health News reports.

[...]

Rising medical costs, “combined with the costs associated with the Affordable Care Act, have made it increasingly difficult to continue providing the same level of health care benefits to our employees at an affordable cost,” UPS said in a memo to employees...


PREVIOUSLY: "Michelle Malkin on Forever 21's #ObamaCare Cutbacks."

Murder of Christopher Lane Will Not Become National Touchstone of Racial and Cultural Debate

Yes, the folks at WSJ are reading my blog.

See, "For 'the Fun of It': The debate we aren't having about a murder in Oklahoma":
Three teenagers were charged Tuesday in the killing of a white college student in Duncan, Oklahoma, and part of the story is what didn't happen. There was no saturation cable TV coverage, no press conference featuring Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson, and no statement from the Oval Office. The death of Christopher Lane, while as troubling as that of Trayvon Martin, will not become a national touchstone of racial and cultural debate or reflection....

The murder is a national story in Australia, where people are contemplating the horror of such casual killing in America. Some are focusing on the ease of obtaining a gun in the U.S., as (inevitably) is the reflexive CNN, and it would almost be a relief if we could blame such a murder on guns.

Then we wouldn't have to focus on a culture that produces teenagers for whom the prospect of shooting an innocent man in the back on a Friday evening apparently raised not a scintilla of conscience. That is the deeper tragedy, and the real scandal, of too much of American life.

That is also an issue of far greater consequence to the future of young black men than the acquittal of George Zimmerman in his awful showdown with Trayvon. If only Mr. Sharpton and his fellow black leaders paid attention to what was missing in the lives of those three teenagers. Maybe President Obama would even care to use it as one of his teachable moments.
PREVIOUSLY: "Christopher Lane Murder Update — Dramatic 911 Call From 'Thrill-Kill' Murder Scene," and "Just 'Three Bored Teens'? No, It's 'Three Bored BLACK Teens' Who Gunned Down Australian Ballplayer 'For the Fun of It...'"

Christopher Lane Murder Update — Dramatic 911 Call From 'Thrill-Kill' Murder Scene

Picking up on story of the murdered Australian ballplayer, here's Moonbatty, "What Australians Ought to Be Boycotting":
In Australia, moonbats like former Australian deputy prime minister Tim Fischer are milking the Chris Lane shooting for all they can get, calling for a boycott of travel to the USA to punish us for upholding the right to bear arms. But it wasn’t a gun that killed Chris Lane for no particular reason so much as it was an ideology and a subculture, both exported from corrupted parts of the country into the otherwise decent town of Duncan, Oklahoma.
Yeah, a subculture alright, a "black" subculture of nihilism and death. And recall, "Just 'Three Bored Teens'? No, It's 'Three Bored BLACK Teens' Who Gunned Down Australian Ballplayer 'For the Fun of It...'"

More at the New York Post, "Chilling 911 call reveals moments after Australian baseball player was shot by 'bored' Oklahoma teens."

Click that link to listen.

And see Jammie Wearing Fools, "Three Teens Who Could Look Like Obama’s Son Murder Australian Man, NRA Gets Blamed," and "Jesse Jackson Frowns Upon Execution Murder of Christopher Lane."

Lane Suspects photo 1173895_10153158710295206_276012831_n_zps63c2f4fb.jpg

Bradley Manning Gets 35 Years

But he could be out in 10, the damned traitor.

At at WaPo, "Judge sentences Bradley Manning to 35 years."

Read it at the link, then gasp at more Scott Lame-ieux idiocy at Lawyers, Gangs and Murder:
And as I said before, it’s particularly appalling when you consider the Obama administration’s “look forward not back” approach on torture. It’s hard to square this life-ruining sentence with the fact that no torturer was even considered worthy of being charged. I’d also say that at this point that it’s pretty hard to the American government to complain when other countries refuse to extradite whistleblowers.
Right.

More outrage --- OUTRAGE! --- at the long-out-of-power Bush-Cheney war cabal. The U.S. waterboarded exactly three terrorist suspects, and such techniques helped the Obama administration track down and kill Osama bin Laden.

But never mind that. Lame-ieux's stuck on stupid, calling for so-last-decade war crimes tribunals. Derp.



Professor Brian Rathbun Pulls 'Intellectual Jailbait: Networking at APSA' at Duck of Minerva

"Excuse me, miss? I think you dropped your APSR."*


Brian Rathbun photo dirty-old-man-best-demotivational-posters-300x240_zpsb73359ca.jpg
Not only has Professor Rathbun pulled his post, he's also resigned as a contributor to the blog. See, "Dear Readers."

And what horrible --- HORRIBLE!! -- crime was committed by Professor Rathbun? Well, he wrote a rather milquetoast essay about networking at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, entitled "Intellectual Jailbait: Hunting for Underage Ideas at APSA." (Or thereabouts.)

That sounds just awful, I know --- especially given the tender sensibilities of leftist academics, by which even the tiniest, eensy-weeniest squeak of confident male opinion is eliminated faster than an elderly Jew at Auschwitz. But read it for yourself, or at least read what's said to be a "reconstruction" of what Professor Rathbun wrote, at Will Moore's blog, "Reconstruction of Removed Rathbun Post." And for the life of me, I'm at a stretch to find something really offensive. And even if the references to "slut" are halting, aren't they being used metaphorically, and if so, are they that offensive as to warrant crucifixion of the blogger? Well, apparently so. I'd hazard a guess on the offending passage:
But generally I think most of us go about it the wrong way. I spent a lot of time chasing down the big names – Keohane, Russett, Lake – thinking that if I could just sit down with them and convince them of my brilliance, I would be set. I’d have a big name set of letter writers and the job offers would come pouring in as some eminence grise worked the phones for me.

Maybe this works for some people, but it never really worked for me. Russett was very cordial but a bit guarded, Keohane grudgingly acceptant of my existence, and Lake never responded to my emails. And worse, it made me feel like a slut. Worse – an ugly slut who no one even wanted to sleep with. An unsuccessful slut. A virgin slut.
The irredeemably sexist faux pax passage in bold.

But go back and read the whole thing for the context.

The post isn't about women and it's not about anything of a sexual nature. It is about superordinate-subordinate relations, so thus placing such hierarchies in a gendered/sexist frame certainly didn't earn the professor any accolades. Indeed, from what I'm reading at the mea culpas and related commentaries, they guy pretty much got the standard treatment from the commissars of leftist fever swamp totalitarianism (he was mercilessly flayed, in other words). I have no clue if the Duck of Minerva commentariat is composed of mostly tenured radicals, but no matter. It could be a bunch of gaga wannabe political science undergrads unsheathing the knives. The end result is the same: There will be blood.

But again, read around for yourself. Here's Professor Rathbun, "Why I Pulled the Post." It's a poorly written entry, hardly edited, if at all. And it's not that apologetic or explanatory, and it certainly didn't feed the rabble in the comments, for example:
Instead of apologizing for your sexist language and imagery, you apologized for the offense that it caused. Instead of apologizing for contributing to the shitty environment for women in academia, you point out that your true message was lost. This is a textbook non-apology apology.
I can just imagine dozens of comments just like that at the original post, which is of course deleted. And the funny thing is, the comment's author writes anonymously, with the screen-name "Concerned." I know. Take a moment to shake off the lulz. Professor Rathbun's been banished by a horde of anonymous banshee concern trolls. Don't you just hate love the Internet?

That said, here's another one, from Professor Adrienne LeBas of American University:
As others have pointed out, you are again apologizing for others taking offense -- not for perpetuating stereotypes and modes of interaction that actually have concrete, deleterious effects on real people.
Oh brother. And these are your intellectual betters?

I could go on about that, but another commenter beat me to the punch:
The "I'm offended" card is one of the most common power plays in academia, and I'm surprised that Brian didn't see this coming.

My advice when dealing with my female and minority colleagues is to assume that they will interpret anything you say in the most negative light possible. Keep your conversations with them short and anodyne.
Exactly.

Academe nowadays (more than ever) is the egg-shells realm of the perpetually aggrieved. Who wants to be around it? I mean seriously. You can't speak your mind. And you especially can't speak your mind if you're a man. There's nothing you dare say that won't be spun into something so objectionable by the leftist thought police that you won't be on your knees begging for absolution, if not your job. It's just depressing. Or, it's depressing if you fall for that sh*t. I don't. And it's a good thing. I learned to be a little less "sensitive" about such things precisely from blogging. I mean, I didn't even have to say anything that could be objectively considered as "sexist" before I was labeled the worse sexual harasser since Democrat President William Jefferson Clinton. Oh, that's probably not the best example, since the-dude-who-came-on-the-blue-dress got a pass from the "progressive" police state feminists of the day. (Maybe Bob Filner's a better example. He's on the way out now, within days, I'm sure.)

In any case, don't miss Professor Charli Carpenter's outpouring of sympathy (wherein she deigns to throw American Power a link), "I Wear My Egg In Solidarity: Thoughts on the Perils of Academic Blogging."

Having previously gone a few rounds with Professor Carpenter I'm reluctant to gainsay her comments. I will say, however, that she's very careful at the post, apropos of someone obviously feeling personal obligation --- of some sort --- to appease the Duck's violent, unwashed, politically correct academic two-minute-hate mob.

Oh, lest I forget, there's more on Professor Carpenter here, "Dr. Charli Carpenter and the Laws of War." (It goes without saying I couldn't give a sh*t what the Duck of Minerva commentariat thinks of it.)

*****

* The quote is cribbed from Professor Moore's blog.

Behind the Investigation of Benazir Bhutto's Assassination

From Heraldo Muñoz, at Foreign Affairs, "Getting Away With Murder":

Heraldo Mu photo Munoz_GettingAwayWithMurderCover_190jpg_zps525fba86.jpg
On the evening of December 28, the day after former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was assassinated, Javed Iqbal Cheema, a retired brigadier general and spokesperson for Pakistan’s Ministry of the Interior, gave a televised press conference to set out the cause of her death as well as to name those responsible for the shooting and suicide bomb attack. He announced that Bhutto had died from an injury sustained when she hit her head on a lever of the specially designed escape hatch of the vehicle in which she had been touring. He also announced that Baitullah Mehsud, who was leader of the Pakistani Taliban at the time, and al Qaeda were responsible for the attack. As evidence, he presented an intercepted telephone conversation in Pashto, purportedly between Mehsud and a man named Maulvi Sahib, in which Mehsud was heard congratulating Maulvi on “a spectacular job.”

Cheema had been given his talking points by the Director General of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, who had attended a briefing at military general headquarters with Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan’s president at the time, and the directors of Pakistan’s other intelligence services. The remarks were met with widespread public outrage and media skepticism. Bhutto’s party, the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), and others accused the government of a cover-up. Especially doubtful, many believed, was the sudden and timely appearance of the telephone intercept, as well as the speed with which its contents were analyzed and interpreted. One senior policeman we interviewed during UN investigation said, “In 24 years of service, I have never seen such spontaneous appearance of evidence.” Many also challenged the idea that Bhutto had not been shot, and questioned how quickly that purported analysis had been done. Numerous senior PPP officials believed that, in an effort to demean Bhutto, the government wanted to imply that she had caused her own death by emerging from her vehicle to salute the crowd.

What followed in the days and months ahead tore Pakistan apart and destabilized the region...
Continue reading. For example, here:
The pervasive presence of the ISI and other intelligence agencies in all spheres of Pakistani life in Pakistan, their ongoing ties with Islamist groups that engage in violence, their involvement in past elections, and their systemic practice of unauthorized wiretapping of not only suspected terrorists and other criminals but also politicians, journalists, and social activists have lent support to the suspicion in Pakistani society, and in the international community, that the ISI, in some shape or form, was involved in the assassination of Bhutto.
And the dude's book is here, Getting Away with Murder: Benazir Bhutto's Assassination and the Politics of Pakistan.

'I was told to drink whiskey and smoke to sound more like a man' — Seattle Anchor Jean Enersen Celebrates 45 Years in Television News

I love this story, at London's Daily Mail, "'I was told to drink whiskey and smoke to sound more like a man': Female anchor celebrating 45TH YEAR in TV news reflects on how her job has changed."

There's video of Ms. Enerson at that link.

Jean Emerson photo article-2398255-1B624723000005DC-245_634x375_zps1f20c3f6.jpg

Amazing Jessica Davies

On Twitter:



And at Egotastic!, "Jessica Davies Kinky in Black for Ta-Ta-Tuesdays."

Bizarre Video: Copperhead Rattler Bites Itself After Decapitation

It's just weird how much the remnant body keeps moving anyway, and then the head just bites its former body?

Freaky.

At Alabama.com, "Copperhead bites itself after Huntsville man decapitates it."



More, "After Huntsville man films beheaded copperhead biting itself, authorities say best to leave snakes alone."

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

So I'm Watching PBS's 'Life of Muhammad'

It's on right now.

It's a politically correct program offering a sanitized version of Islam and Muhammed. Nonie Darwish made a brief appearance about 15 minutes ago, but I haven't seen Robert Spencer, who's clearly the most important expert on the truth about Muhammad.

But see the Los Angeles Times, FWIW, "Review: PBS' 'Life of Muhammad' an earnest effort to enlighten."



I mean, really. Tariq Ramadan and Karen Armstrong? Boy, that's really bringing in the diverse voices, lol.

NSA Surveillance Scours 75 Percent of All U.S. Internet Traffic

Here's that piece everybody was tweeting earlier this evening, behind the WSJ's paywall, I come to find out.

See, "New Details Show Broader NSA Surveillance Reach: Programs Cover 75% of Nation's Traffic, Can Snare Emails" (via Google):

WSJ NSA Internet photo 20130820_NSA_0_zpsba7a1476.jpg
WASHINGTON—The National Security Agency—which possesses only limited legal authority to spy on U.S. citizens—has built a surveillance network that covers more Americans' Internet communications than officials have publicly disclosed, current and former officials say.

The system has the capacity to reach roughly 75% of all U.S. Internet traffic in the hunt for foreign intelligence, including a wide array of communications by foreigners and Americans. In some cases, it retains the written content of emails sent between citizens within the U.S. and also filters domestic phone calls made with Internet technology, these people say.

The NSA's filtering, carried out with telecom companies, is designed to look for communications that either originate or end abroad, or are entirely foreign but happen to be passing through the U.S. But officials say the system's broad reach makes it more likely that purely domestic communications will be incidentally intercepted and collected in the hunt for foreign ones.

The programs, code-named Blarney, Fairview, Oakstar, Lithium and Stormbrew, among others, filter and gather information at major telecommunications companies. Blarney, for instance, was established with AT&T Inc., T +0.24% former officials say. AT&T declined to comment.

This filtering takes place at more than a dozen locations at major Internet junctions in the U.S., officials say. Previously, any NSA filtering of this kind was largely believed to be happening near points where undersea or other foreign cables enter the country.

Details of these surveillance programs were gathered from interviews with current and former intelligence and government officials and people from companies that help build or operate the systems, or provide data. Most have direct knowledge of the work.

The NSA defends its practices as legal and respectful of Americans' privacy. According to NSA spokeswoman Vanee Vines, if American communications are "incidentally collected during NSA's lawful signals intelligence activities," the agency follows "minimization procedures that are approved by the U.S. attorney general and designed to protect the privacy of United States persons."

As another U.S. official puts it, the NSA is "not wallowing willy-nilly" through Americans' idle online chatter. "We want high-grade ore."

To achieve that, the programs use complex algorithms that, in effect, operate like filters placed over a stream with holes designed to let certain pieces of information flow through. After the 2001 terrorist attacks, NSA widened the holes to capture more information when the government broadened its definition of what constitutes "reasonable" collection, according to a former top intelligence official.

The NSA's U.S. programs have been described in narrower terms in the documents released by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. One, for instance, acquires Americans' phone records; another, called Prism, makes requests for stored data to Internet companies. By contrast, this set of programs shows the NSA has the capability to track almost anything that happens online, so long as it is covered by a broad court order.

The NSA programs are approved and overseen by the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. NSA is required to destroy information on Americans that doesn't fall under exceptions to the rule, including information that is relevant to foreign intelligence, encrypted, or evidence of a crime.
Read the whole thing at that Google link.

And as I always say, I don't mind so much that I'm being tracked and filtered by warrantless surveillance. What bothers me is how much this administration had to lie about, particularly after Barack Hussein and idiot leftists screamed bloody murder during the Bush years.

In any case, here's a flashback to June, "Obama Administration Surveillance Regime: Most Breathtaking Violations of Civil Liberties in U.S. History."

BONUS: More at Zero Hedge, "How The NSA Scours 75% Of The Nation's Internet Traffic - In One Chart."

Gisele Bündchen is World's Richest Model

At the New York Post, "Gisele Bündchen is the world's richest catwalker, raking in a whopping $42M last year alone."

And from the comments on Facebook:
Ok lots of these models are from other countries....I don't hear ppl yelling 'THEY ARE STEALING OUR JOBS"... don't we US have beautiful women... just saying...
LOL.

Gisele B photo 995470_10153155625460206_230114046_n_zps432685ff.jpg

This is How Stupid the 'Debate' on Crime Has Become...

Just unreal.

Three black thugs gun down an Australian ballplayer and the debate's over gun control?

You could impose a total ban on gun ownership and criminal black thugs like these three mf's would still have guns, and they'd still gun down the innocent "just for fun."

Again, the left will have blood on its hands when good and decent citizens rise up and say enough of this sh*t. Things are coming to resolution in this country. And screw the Australians if they want to descend into PC barbarism. That's their problem.

Mr. Lane didn't "pass away" in a "senseless killing." He was brutally murdered by racist criminal black thugs who've been given the run of America's cities by a PC culture that's the bane of civilization.



Earlier, "Just 'Three Bored Teens'? No, It's 'Three Bored BLACK Teens' Who Gunned Down Australian Ballplayer 'For the Fun of It...'"

'People hide behind a computer screen, and there is no accountability whatsoever. You think using Facebook is bad? For teens, this is a feeding frenzy in shark-infested waters without a cage. You have chum all over the place and you are dropped right in the middle...'

The right-on quote from Sandy Cowles, a former teacher and stay-at-home mom in Irvine, at the Los Angeles Times, "Ask.fm: New social site, same bullying."

So far five teen suicides are linked to Ask.fm, but I'm out of the loop on this one. Ima check with my 17-year-old to see what'sup.

The 'Overblown Reaction' to Arrest of David Miranda

From the formidable British neoconservative Douglas Murray, "The reaction to David Miranda’s detention is completely ridiculous":
It may not have been the smartest move to detain David Miranda, the Brazilian partner of Guardian ‘journalist’ Glenn Greenwald, under the Terrorism Act.  But the explosion of righteous anger over the episode is ridiculous.

Starting with the outraged claim that Miranda was arrested only because of his connection with Greenwald. Wrong. Greenwald himself has previously told journalists that his partner assists him in his work. That present ‘work’ consists of engineering the leak of massive amounts of classified intelligence from a source – Edward Snowden – currently granted asylum in Moscow. Greenwald’s partner was travelling through London from a meeting using plane-tickets paid for by the Guardian and – it now transpires – appears to have been carrying files from Snowden. So all those ‘this could happen to any of us’ pieces are only really relevant if you happen to use your partner as a mule for industrial-scale sabotage against states you’re planning to travel to.

However, it seems to have become a variety of received wisdom that the rights we now enjoy should include the right to steal and publish vast amounts of secret intelligence that damages the intelligence-gathering abilities and thus the future national security of the UK and our allies. Crucially, it seems to be believed, if we exercise this right to steal we must also be entirely free from harassment by the countries we are targeting.  Perhaps in future this lovely set of presumptions will come to be known to as the new ’Miranda rights’?

Like Julian Assange, Snowden, Greenwald et al fall into that class of person who when people ask, ‘who has the right to know’ answers ‘we do.’ In particular they think that they know better than any security service what should and should not be in the public domain and how best a country should carry out surveillance. Except they don’t. And it’s not their point anyway. None of these new ‘freedom of information’ campaigners are ‘journalists’ working for this or any high-minded goal. They are simple saboteurs with an increasingly clear and specific anti-Western agenda. It is wrong to say that they don’t care how hampered our intelligence services might be as a result. They do care. They want them to be hampered.
Well, they're cyber-terrorists and traitors. No need to go wobbly on the point.

But continue reading.

'Red Hot' Louise Mensch Update

I had an angry drive-by commenter pushing back hard against Louise Mensch at last night's post --- which was about Glenn Greenwald, not Ms. Mensch, which the commenter ignored in order to blast any good word for the former Conservative MP.

So she wanted to rise up the Tory hierarchy, with her sights on a possible bid for No. 10 Downing? The horrors!

In any case, here's an update, "10 Rules for Red Hot Women."

And from the interview at Red Hot Magazine:
As a novelist she wrote bestsellers, as an MP she grilled the Murdochs and as a blogger she is reinventing feminism. Saska Graville meets the unstoppable Louise Mensch at her new home in New York.
Louise Mensch photo BQrpRsDCAAEoiMZ_zps049ab757.jpg

And see her latest piece at Telegraph UK, "David Miranda detention: Why I believe the Guardian has smeared Britain's security services."

'I am so sick of people like Daily Beast author Patricia Murphy smearing Republicans like Ted Cruz...'

Patricia Murphy's not so quick on her feet, as I indicated sometime back on Twitter, after she got her ass handed to her by Melissa Francis on Fox News.

So I'm LOL at this William Jacobson post at Legal Insurrection, "The creepy Daily Beast headline is all that matters":
This is all part of the crazying of Ted Cruz by liberal publications like the Daily Beast. It doesn’t matter what the substance is, they just want to associate the word “creepy” with Ted Cruz in the minds of the public, many of whom don’t read past the headline.
Well, while Ms. Murphy might not be so smart, she's sure got the leftist smear program down.