It’s been fascinating, but also disheartening, to watch the mainstream media completely miss the real story about the 60-hour terrorist rampage in Mumbai, India — which may have killed as many as 300 people, and has certainly injured hundreds more. What died in Mumbai — besides scores of innocent people in their hotel rooms and at the Mumbai Jewish Cultural Center and on the blood-drenched platform at Chatrapathi Sivaji railway terminal — were certain illusions about the war on terror, and how to deal with terrorists.There's more at the link.
One of those illusions is about who is fighting whom in the war on terror.
Many put the blame for the attack on years of Indian-Pakistani hostility and tension. In fact, relations between the two countries have never been warmer. This past month, Pakistan’s new president stunned and delighted Indians by publicly renouncing any first use of nuclear weapons. Violence in Kashmir, the principal bone of contention between India and Pakistan since 1947, is on the decline. Before the Mumbai attacks, politicians were scheduled to start talks on permitting trade across the region’s Line of Control, so that Hindu farmers in Indian Kashmir can sell their wheat or a used tractor to Muslim farmers in Pakistani Kashmir.
This is precisely what the terrorists don’t want, of course. It’s the fact that tensions over Kashmir are diminishing that prompted them to attack on the November 28 — just as al-Qaeda blew up Samarra’s Golden Mosque in Iraq back in 2006 in order to keep Shias and Sunnis hating and killing each other. The illusion that formal agreements between peoples and governments — whether between India and Pakistan or Israel and the Palestinian Authority — can somehow defuse the terrorist problem was the among the first casualties in Mumbai. Terrorists see it the other way around: the relaxation of tensions is a problem requiring bloodshed.
Islamic terrorists don’t want justice or respect for their beliefs, or restoration of some imaginary homeland. They want violence and death. The duty of every government is to make sure that terrorists get them before they can deal them out. Pakistanis will never know peace, or peace with their neighbors in Afghanistan and India, until they finally and ruthlessly root out the terrorists in their midst.
I made a similar argument, with reference to the incoming presidential administration, in "Obama's New Global Architecture?"
2 comments:
If we don't soon face the realization that the game has started and the other side is already playing then we can expect to continue to see 300, 500, 2,000 innocent people killed whenever these murdering Islamic hounds feel like it.
I'm growing increasingly bored with the West's high-minded thinkers and leaders pussyfooting around the fact that war has been declared, and Islamaland is supplying the troops.
Enough with the debates, the reasoning, the sharing the blame, the excuses. Evil is Evil. Hate is Hate. It is what it is. We have on our hands a clash of cultures an ethnic and civilizational war.
The question is, they know what they want and stand for -- do we?
Jay funny running into you here. Agreed, all I am seeing in the commentary that poses an opposing argument is ignorance of history. Trying to draw parallels between what Christians did a hundred years ago to what radical Islam is doing now is somehow seen as a nullifying argument.
If someone actually studied the development of these situations just from the Balfour Act to now. You would see an amazing trend of digression within the Muslim world.
On the flipside, look at the historical development of Christianity over the past 200 years. It gives me faith that the Muslims do have hope for the future though.
Eventually they will arrive at a point where their fringe elements will no longer control so much. Unfortunately, there will be much more bloody growing pains they will have to go through before they get there.
Whether the apologist opposition wants to admit this or not is another story. All they have to do is pick up a book and read, but I don't have that much faith in them.
Post a Comment