Sunday, August 12, 2012

Despicable Debbie Wasserman Schultz Claims Ignornance on Priorities USA's Close Democrat Ties

First, kudos to John Roberts for calling her out on this. He mentions by name former White House deputy press secretary, Bill Burton, who is now a senior strategist with Priorities USA Action and Priorities USA. But just look at little lying Debbie. Not only does she claim ignorance on the partisan affiliation of Priorities USA, she doubles down on the "cancer" ad attacks, which have been repudiated across the board.

This is your modern Democrat Party in bold relief, via Instapundit:


See also Jazz Shaw at Hot Air, "Video: DNC Chair “doesn’t know” party affiliation of Obama Super PAC":
Okay, Ms. Wasserman Schultz. We get it. Everyone in both campaigns has to pretend they aren’t coordinating with their friends, colleagues and relatives in the Super PACs to avoid running afoul of the law. (A law, by the way, which is working brilliantly, as long as none of the tens of thousands of political operatives, candidates and elected officials living today would ever consider being dishonest or deliberately obfuscatory.) But you’re seriously going to sit there on national TV and claim that you have no clue about the party affiliation of Bill Burton? You remember Bill, right? The former White House Deputy Press Secretary? I’m guessing this little episode has something to do with a new hashtag trending on Twitter… #DebbieDoesntKnow
And at NewsBusters, "Wasserman-Schultz: 'I Have No Idea' Of Political Affiliation Of People Behind Ad Blaming Romney For Woman's Death":
Serious question: is there anything—anything!—Debbie Wasserman-Schultz won't say to promote Barack Obama?
No, there is no lie too disgusting for her. What's amazing is that there are oodles and oodles of lying gasbags just like her across the Democrat-progressive complex. You're looking at the prototype of the modern Democrat Party woman. It's perfect.

More at The Hill, "DNC chairwoman: Obama super-PAC ad raises fair questions" (via Memeorandum).

0 comments: