Maybe Romney Should Pick Paul Ryan

At the Wall Street Journal, "Why Not Paul Ryan?":

The whispering over Mitt Romney's choice of a running mate is getting louder, and along with it we are being treated to the sotto voce angst of the GOP establishment: Whatever else Mitt does, he wouldn't dare pick Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan, would he?

Too risky, goes the Beltway chorus. His selection would make Medicare and the House budget the issue, not the economy. The 42-year-old is too young, too wonky, too, you know, serious. Beneath it all you can hear the murmurs of the ultimate Washington insult—that Mr. Ryan is too dangerous because he thinks politics is about things that matter. That dude really believes in something, and we certainly can't have that.

All of which highly recommend him for the job.

We have nothing against the other men Mr. Romney is said to be still closely considering. Tim Pawlenty twice won the governorship of Minnesota, the second time in the horrible GOP year of 2006. His working-class roots and middle American values would counter the stereotype of Mr. Romney as too rich and disconnected to average concerns. The media would say he's another middle-aged white male, just like Mitt, but he'd certainly be a safe, mature choice.

Ohio Senator Rob Portman is well respected nearly everywhere for his thoughtful, disciplined brand of conservative politics....

Marco Rubio would be a somewhat riskier choice given that he is new to the national scene and has less Washington experience. But he's a tea party favorite who would energize the GOP base while also signaling Mr. Romney's outreach to Hispanic voters...

Pawlenty and Portman? Meh. Rubio would be exciting, but so too would Ryan. I'd personally love a wonky running-mate. We could use some serious discussions about things.

Continue reading.

RELATED: At The Other McCain, "VP Tea Leaves: Is Mitt’s Short List Now Down to Pawlenty, Portman or Ryan?"

BONUS: From David Harsanyi, at the Washington Examiner, "Romney should pick Paul Ryan."