Monday, November 10, 2008

Schwarzenegger Model is Disaster for GOP

Marvin King, a political scientist who blogs at King Politics, published an interesting essay Sunday at the Clarion-Ledger in Jackson, Mississippi: "A Shrinking GOP Needs Plans for a 'Comeback'."

Marvin suggests
three routes for a GOP comeback: A "Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee" path; the "Grover Norquist/Club for Growth" path; and a route that "goes west," that is, a move "in the direction of Arnold Schwarzenegger":
While the California governor can never run for president, he epitomizes the moderate wing of the Republican Party, and a template for winning in Blue America. Schwarzenegger works with unions and business alike in trying to create a pro-business climate.

Likewise, he avoids divisive social issues. Not because he does not care; instead, he recognizes that a single-minded focus on social issues is not conducive to developing a bipartisan working environment. He is not as conservative fiscally as Norquist, nor as conservative socially as Palin, but Arnold knows how to win elections.
I've written previously that the GOP has a demographic problem and will need to appeal to the political center in future elections, but the "Schwarzenegger path" is not what I had in mind. The best evidence of this is today's news that Governor Schwarzenegger has announced his support for the same-sex marriage activists who are currently mounting statewide protests against Proposition 8. As today's Los Angeles Times reports:
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Sunday expressed hope that the California Supreme Court would overturn Proposition 8, the ballot initiative that outlawed same-sex marriage.
I can't stress this point enough: While there are a number of things the GOP must do to claw its way back to power, capitulating to the angry mobs storming the barricades to overturn the vote of a traditional California majority is not one of them.

Seventy-percent of black voters in the state supported Proposition 8, and this is California, a bastion of progressive politics and Democratic Party hegemony. Governor Scharzenegger's a dramatic exception to the rule, and for Republicans to seek a "Schwarzenegger model" at the national level will likely mean the literal break-up of the post-Goldwater GOP coalition. Simply put: Some combination of social policy conservativism with innovative economic policies attractive to the stressed middle class will be the ticket to a revived conservatism.

At the presidential level,
Barack Obama took every single demographic category except voters older than 60 years-old and white voters over the age of 30. That's it. Frankly, 2008 heralds a demographic realignment to the Democratic Party. Whether this vast bloc coalesces to resemble Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal Coaltion - which endured well into the 1960s - remains to be seen. It's almost certain, however, that Republicans won't be able to win social moderates by aping the interest group liberalism of the Democratic-left.

Note something else about the electoral demographics of Propostion 8 in California:
Jasmyne Cannick, an urban civil rights activist in Los Angeles, argues that opposition to Proposition 8 was dominated by affluent white liberals indifferent to the real needs of African Americans - needs which include jobs, safe streets and schools, and remedies to continuing inequalities ("driving while black"). Moreover, the black Yes on 8 vote was grounded in the social justice and spiritual meaning that marks the religion of the black church. That faith-based motivation is naturally antithetical to the secular humanism that drives the left-wing agenda of today's Democratic Party.

Then there's the Latino vote this year: Nationally, Latinos formed
the crucial bloc of voters in key states like Colorado, New Mexico, and Virginia. Colorado and Virginia have turned out reliably for the Republican Party for decades, and there's nothing that's particularly permanent about Latino support for the Democrats this year. In 2004, George W. Bush took roughly 44 percent of the national Latino vote, and in states like Texas, the GOP ticket secured a whopping 59 percent of the Latino electorate. This year, John McCain took just 31 percent of the Latino vote nationally, down almost 15 points from the GOP's share of that demographic in 2004.

Yet, there's
a large Protestant and Catholic bloc of Latino voters who are attentive to the political and cultural attractions of the Republican Party. Perhaps the most careless and self-destructive agenda for the GOP going forward will be to further alienate the country's Latino voting constituency.

As
Scott Rasmussen reports today, public opinion polling shows that 55 percent of Americans believe that tax cuts are good for the economy, and Rasmussen notes that Barack Obama won the presidency by promising tax cuts for 95 percent of Americans. The problem for an Obama administration is that the Democratic Congress hopes to spend billions of dollars on social programs and infrastructure - a new Works Progress Administration is being proposed - while maintaining the deployment of American troops in two ongoing conflicts abroad.

Financing such an agenda will likely require an increase in tax rates beyond the top, high-income marginal hikes already proposed by the Obama campaign. Combine this with the super-progressive social agenda the marks today's Democratic Party, and we can see the contours of a conservative opposition-paradigm taking shape.

In all likelihood, the Schwarzenegger model will be the least attractive program for the emerging post-2008 GOP. A more serious challenge will be to find an alliance of conservative activists among the Palin-Huckabee factions and the Club for Growth cohorts that offers an atttractive economic model while not alienating racial and religious moderates and the fast-growing demographic groups likely key to a Republican Party resurgence.

18 comments:

Norm said...

Great subject for discussion. But the reality is that most politics is
local. All losing Republican candidates must work hard to improve their local name recognition; and stay active in local issues. Work on keeping their local Republican clubs meeting and organized.

Let's count on several things:
1)Much of the Obama youth vote will not be there for mid term elections;
2)Much of the Obama minority vote will not be there for the mid term elections;
3)Things may go very wrong for the Obama administration.

Let's work on the national identity of the Republican Party down the line. Work local now. Work on raising money for the mid term elections. Let's not get bogged down.

BB-Idaho said...

55% believe tax cuts are good for the economy...true, for about 3-5% of us. Otherwise, the median wage for those that still have work has decreased. Our economy will take quite a bit more than tax cuts. Just an opinion from the 45%.

AmPowerBlog said...

Anti-Christ, Philippe?

Libby said...

...anti-christ?? i think that may be giving obama too much credit...he'd like to be that strong & powerful...

Norm said...

Philippe,
I thought the anti-Christ is going to be Jewish...that's what Pat Robertson once said. And I am very excited to still be in the running. Just hope that stent holds up.

Right Truth said...

Arnold has never been a real Conservative and he certainly is not the model we want to choose. He may have some stiff competition for his office in the next election and most likely will lose to Sen. Dianne Feinstein. Unless perhaps a real Conservative runs against Arnold and wins.

Very good article.

Debbie Hamilton
Right Truth

Norm said...

Thank you Philippe for the explanation. BTW, talking about Israel...did everyone see that Robert Malley, the once fired Obama foreign policy advisor, is BACK and was sent to Egypt and Syria with a message.
So, he was only "fired" until after the election.
He is big time very anti-Israel.

This is definitely a message to the Middle East. An important message.

Anonymous said...

Wow, I was thinking that Obama was just another run of the mill socialist, not the Antichrist. Could be, though. Hey, if he is, at least he's on our side. You wouldn't want him in charge of Russia or France or Canada or some other lame country. He'll make us the undisputed number one again. I don't think it would be Arnie, tho. I see him as more of a Gozer.

King Politics said...

Hi Douglas,

Thanks for the contribution to the subject. I'll certainly agree that many Republicans may not like Arnold, but more importantly he represents the archetype of a winning model.

But, if not Arnold, then who?

Red, White, and Blue Patriot said...

The GOP is in trouble. You have the more conservative members like myself. Then the more moderate Republicans. Both are being split apart. The Republican Party, I think and this is just my opinion might break apart into a more moderate bloc and a right wing bloc. The Party is just so weak. You your moderate Schwarzeneggers you have right wingers like Mike Huckabee. The Party has to find common ground between the two groups or it could be a disater.

Law and Order Teacher said...

I think Sarah Palin can be the future, but I also worry that is so worrisome to the Republican Party insiders, we may have seen just the beginning of a campaign against her by the party insiders. It's going to be a rough row to hoe for her. Rep. Ryan, Gov. Jindal are others who are rising stars. Palin I think can have the support of the Huckabee/Romney faction. As for the Scharzenegger moderate faction, she needs to court them, but not allow them to knock her off her game. Unlike the campaign she will call her own shots.

Anonymous said...

This is a serious question: can one of you explain how sarah palin could possibly be the future in any realistic scenario? I honestly do not see this as even a remote possibility.

The WordSmith from Nantucket said...

What happened to haloscan?

I've written previously that the GOP has a demographic problem and will need to appeal to the political center in future elections, but the "Schwarzenegger path" is not what I had in mind.

I agree. I'm glad Schwarzenegger's star power helped him defeat Gray Davis, but as a general rule, I'd rather choose good over bad, rather than the lesser of two bads.

I understand the need to attract those in the center when the country is evenly divided; but diluting conservatism isn't the answer.

Rich Casebolt said...

anon ... the reason Sarah Palin is viable is that she possesses common sense and wisdom ... two attributes that are presently in short supply in DC, because it is dominated by those who believe that a high-dollar educational pedigree, and/or belief in the existing conventional wisdom, are necessary and sufficient prerequisites to assure wisdom on the part of our leaders ...

... a politico/consultant complex that IMO has been more corrosive to American governance than the Eisenhower-identified military/industrial complex so many decry.

What we are seeing out of the McCain staffers who are smearing her, is that they too have bought into that dominant viewpoint, and become the mirror image of the Dims.

There also may be a measure of fear involved ... for if a "commoner" like Sarah can run a viable campaign, the value of such staffers as royal groomers and/or ersatz kingmakers greatly diminishes ... as does the Dims ability to use the lack-of-pedigree against her and others, as she smashes their conventional wisdom in the eyes of the masses.

Now, I don't know what drives your analysis, anon, but that fearin' is drivin' a lot of the smearin' of Sarah Palin right now.

BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY, the groomers and kingmakers in DC are trying to nip her in the bud, because they know she can win if she is allowed to be herself in front of the body politic ... because that august body innately realizes that wisdom is often not conventional, and does not require a pedigree in order to have it.

The only way the body politic won't act upon that innate realization, is if the groomers and kingmakers control the flow of information, and prevent such "dissent" from their conventional wisdom from being seriously considered.

Anonymous said...

"the reason Sarah Palin is viable is that she possesses common sense and wisdom ... "

...and you can extrapolate this as fact because....?

one would think that a substantial "educational pedigree" would be an asset, if not essential to become the leader of any country, let alone the most powerful country in the world but we know you folks have a deep-seated disdain for anything academia. Considering there is relatively few of you right-wingers doing much in academic circles, that is hardly suprising.

Anonymous said...

You write: "Then there's the Latino vote this year: Nationally, Latinos formed the crucial bloc of voters in key states like Colorado, New Mexico, and Virginia. Colorado and Virginia have turned out reliably for the Republican Party for decades, and there's nothing that's particularly permanent about Latino support for the Democrats this year. In 2004, George W. Bush took roughly 44 percent of the national Latino vote, and in states like Texas, the GOP ticket secured a whopping 59 percent of the Latino electorate. This year, John McCain took just 31 percent of the Latino vote nationally, down almost 15 points from the GOP's share of that demographic in 2004."

You've got to be kidding. Bush proved that Latinos were ready to vote with the pro-small business GOP, and we've needed every one of those votes. The failure to pass a guest worker program, and the arbitrary deportation initiatives in local communities everywhere have pushed latinos out of the shrinking GOP tent. I hope the deportation lovers are happy with the result.

Righty64 said...

Basically, Gov. Benedict Arnold has given up on the Republican party. Since his "moderate" positions are not acceptable to a party that stands for limited government, personal responsibility, strong national borders and a muscular foreign policy, there is no where he can take his approach from within. I think that the first clue as to the problem is that Gov. Benedict Arnold cites Richard Nixon as a reason he is a Republican. Richard Nixon?! He was the most liberal Republican president of the 20th century (and that was not enough for the left). It does explain a lot.

Anonymous said...

Viagra works:
• Viagra (sildenafil) is a recommendation drug that works by increasing blood flow to penis. It can be used by men of all ages. If any man is unable to keep erection, it works with his needs as well as he can have the rock hard erection. It is used in the treatment of erectile disfunction.
• Viagra works to supply blood to the penis. As arteries in the penis enlarge and become firm, the veins that usually carry blood away from the penis become compacted; containing the blood flow out of the penis.
Viagra Side Effects:
Few side effects include hives, difficulty in breathing, and swelling of face, lips, tongue and throat are common phenomenon that can fade away quite easily without causing any damage.