Saturday, September 18, 2010

It's Hard Out There: The Radical Assault on American Power

Man, when you're subjected to a leftist death-wish campaign of this magnitude, you know you're really over the target!

So, yeah, you know it's hard out there in the 'hood sometimes. But when you be hangin' low you toughen up, mofo! You take the blows and move on. Basically, if you can't put up then shut up. Know what I'm saying, yo!?

So, no, I'm not complaining. Just thought I'd lay some of this down for my homies. My post on
the New York leftists on 9/11 really kicked off a stream of hate and invective all across the leftosphere. It all started when JBW picked up on the gaffe I made last week on Sasquatch. My bad. I know. I copped to it and told my idiot detractors to fuck off. Win a few lose a few, and all that. Still, JBW, who's been jonesin' to come up with some kind --- any kind --- of intellectual hole in one, went for the easy pickin's. Cool. The post was mostly straight reporting, but there's an interesting slur in the comments, from B to the D:
Does having a dicky-do (look it up Donny) impair cognitive capacity? Or does being a douche bag just make you say douche baggy things?
I looked it up, since I'm not that hip to the latest in weightist hate speech (see Urban Dictionary: "hey man, how am i supposed to suck yo dick, when you got a dicky do? I aint bouts ta hold all dat jelly up!").

No thanks, actually. But as I was saying ... It turns out that JBW's entry picked up a little viral action, and the Sasquatch thing became the rage at
Sadly No!, Lawyers, Gays and Marriage, and TBogg's. I'm always game for a bit of back and forth across the 'sphere, and as noted, I promptly told Tintin at Sadly No! to go ream himself. That was followed by a few Twitter exchanges, including this announcement:


That tweet links to a second post --- that's right, a second entry in two days at the hate site Sadly No! --- a sure sign that I've got my target coordinates nailed down. Although I'm not so sure what this photoshop is supposed to mean? It's not like a middle-aged man shopping at Kohl's will occasion a visit from the boys in blue, or khaki, be that as it may. And frankly, it's none of my business which dudes Tintin prefers when blowin' his rocks off. To each his own, mofo --- NTTAWWT!!


And if you check the links, there's over a thousand comments at Sadly No! hatin' on AmPow! Like I said, yo, over the target mofo!!

I love
this one:
Does Donalde have any idea how ugly his Twitter page is?
My Twitter page features a full-size background of the Statue of Liberty. I can't imagine anyone slamming that as "ugly" --- these fuckers hate America, so it's no surprise.

Another comment,
not likin' on me so much:
Douglas has already proven that he’s immune to feeling foolish. He is metafoolish; He is such an utter buffoon he is incapable of realizing that he is a complete and utter fool.
And some folks over there are obviously new to the American Power Vortex (been there done that with epic losers E.D. Kain and (O)CT(O)PUS). Lots of comments from these dolts on how they might get me fired, like this one:
This guy Don…we don’t really have anything actionable against him. He’s a moron, but I’m sure his CV makes that clear to his Dean already. He’s a prick, but that’s not a firing offense at any university I’ve ever heard of. He probably used university resources to post SASQUATCH ISRAEL. Maybe we can get him for that.
Some time back, SEK at LGM was agitating along these lines (in alleging that I engage in sexual harassment by babe blogging --- an offense which only an effete academic leftist could possibly imagine). That said, SEK joined the assault on American Power as well (in an afterthought to a post attacking right-wing commentator Jack Cashill):
Like the Donalde, Cashill’s acquired the reputation of a man who will do anything to acquire a reputation. Admittedly, he hasn’t demonstrated the “tactical elan” of an “unmatched competitor” by closing down the comments on posts where he might be challenged to back up his fightin’ words with their arguin’ kin—but remember that the Donalde is a special sort of stupid, the likes of which we almost don’t deserve.
All of these assailants, JBW at Brain Rage, the airhead commentariat at Sadly No!, and the freaks at LGM, are really unhappy that I've disabled comments to my responses at the blog. I guess this is especially maddening, since I state at my Blogger profile: "I welcome comments and debate, and I'll defend my positions vigorously." That's all true, of course. What leftists really don't like is that I'm in control. They hate the fact that they're unable to flood my comment sections with the most vile half-witted screeds on the web. For example, I opened comments on my post last night, "The Radical Assault on America's Future." And I found this in the moderation queue this morning:
Anonymous said...

Good're an asshole. David Horowitz? Really? It must really suck to wake up every morning feeling like the whole world is against you and knowing that all you've ever believed in is based on a foundation of lies and corruption. Here's a clue...get over yourself douchebag, you're nothing but a bag of meat and your thoughts and desires are meaningless and you are a worthless piece of poo.

September 18, 2010 5:28 AM
I guess there's something about the moral clarity of David Horowitz that drives these freaks batshit insane:
Behind the facade of liberalism, the Left has continued to advance its socialist schemes: to redistribute resources according to race, gender, and class and to turn Big Government into Big Brother.

David Horowitz

So, yeah, it's hard out there for a neocon mofo!
It might be new to you, but it's been like this for years ... It's blood sweat and tears when it come down to this shit ...

But when the going gets hard, I play baseball, if ya'll know what I'm saying, yo!


Amusing Bunni said...

Wow, the trolls are really out to get you! The libs are desperate now. Stay safe, these ppl are truly unbalanced. That's why I'm an alias, it's dangerous out there. Have a nice weekend and thanks for the links under my blog post today.

Left Coast Rebel said...

Donald, I don't know how you do it. I've had my share of run-ins with these vile, communist freaks. For the most part I completely ignore and disregard.

Kudos for going right into the greased-swine vortex!

Need any help?

Hoosier X said...

We at Sadly, No are very sorry we hurt your feelings.

We'll try to be more politically correct in the future.

We know how important political correctness is to you conservatives ... when it suits you.

AmPowerBlog said...

Thanks for commenting, A.B. It's good to use a pseudonym. Folks like this want to take us down, and I've been dealing with this stuff for ages now.

AmPowerBlog said...

Thanks LCR.

Actually, I let a lot of this stuff slide. But these attacks were so coordinated, it's a case study in leftist demonology. I think I'm done with this for a while, but thanks for the backup.

AmPowerBlog said...

Hoser X: You guys are fail, pure and simple. Beyond evil, as some of my readers have suggested.

Sarge Charlie said...

holy crap Donald, I never knew all that stuff about you.

exford said...

'a sure sign that I've got my target coordinates nailed down.'

Weren't you being trashed because you were raging against a sign that you thought said 'SASQUATCH ISRAEL' but actually said 'SASQUATCH IS REAL'?

Then admitting your error, and then saying 'I stand by what I said'?

AmPowerBlog said...

Idiot Exford: To err is human, no?

I admit what I said and stand by it since I know you folks hate Israel, not to mention the U.S.

Got moral clarity? No. I thought so.

Later loser.

Hoosier X said...

On top of the rest of your extremist rhetoric, you just called me "beyond evil," basically because we disagree about politics.

And yet, I'm the hateful one.

Please continue. And don't worry about how you look to people who don't agree with every word you say.

exford said...

Indeed, to err is human.

Do you mean that you stand by what you say if indeed someone had actually written a sign saying 'SASQUATCH ISRAEL' in the subjunctive sense?

I'll ask what you mean by 'you folks' later.

Opus #6 said...

Donald, clearly these losers all decided to take a day off from their Palin derangement syndrome and lay into you. You're moving up in the world! ;-)

AmPowerBlog said...

Hoser X: Absolutely. Are not coming here from Sadly No! or LGM? Otherwise, yes, beyond evil. And no, it's not disagreement. It the endlessly extreme demonic campaigns against those who YOU disagree with. Wouldn't you say? That's certainly not debate.

AmPowerBlog said...

Idiot Exford: I've already said that, yeah, I'm dumb. Call me an idiot. That's over. What's not over is this leftist lynch mob, and by "you folks" I'm talkin' bout the commentariat at Sadly No! etc.

Bad people, all around. My commenters here --- and looky, amazing!! I do have a few --- think you guys are the scum of the earth.

AmPowerBlog said...

I'm moving up!! Thanks Opus #6!

Matt @ St. Blogustine said...

I know that John McCain didn't originate this saying, and I really hate quoting John McCain, but I think it applies here:

Two reasons to never wrestle with a pig:

1) You get dirty.

2) The pig likes it.

Never let them pull you into the cesspool, nor allow them to talk you into jumping in.

Your unconquerable strength is in your ability to express the truth. They despise you for it. Let them! ;-)

exford said...

'Idiot Exford'? So we're on the same page being idiots? On what basis do you claim that I'm an idiot? I don't claim allegiance to any more than I claim allegiance to

You still haven't answered my question as to why you stand by what you said. I'm still keen to know why you make your assertions based in a sign that says 'SASQUATCH IS REAL'. It seems that you have made some assertions based on false evidence, then stuck to them based on an intuition of them being real based on subjunctivity.

Wouldn't you revoke your argument the moment that you realised that you misread the sign?

AmPowerBlog said...

Matt: Thanks.

My weakness is I like the fight. But your words are wise.

AmPowerBlog said...

Exford: You're just now noticing I called you and idiot, LOL!?

I "stand by it" in terms of taking responsibility for having said what I said. And I take responsibility for saying "fuck you" to all of those who've relished my human error. See, to err is human. To forgive, divine. You folks aren't the latter, and who else is going to point it out? We all dwell in God's grace. And by not sinking to the level of Tintin and the rest of Sadly No!, perhaps that grace will be eternal.

exford said...

No-one is condemning you for misreading the sign. It's a simple enough mistake to make. You're being made sport of because you stand by what you said. Do you agree that you're making a straw-man argument out of the 'SASQUATCH ISRAEL' sign?

Wouldn't you say that 'I'm dumb for misreading the sign' followed by 'I'm dumb for making a bunch of assertions based on a mis-read sign'?

Tenuous links to idiocy discussed later.

AmPowerBlog said...

"No-one is condemning you for misreading the sign."

Exford, you're joking, right? I can't tell you how many comments in moderation I deleted that read something to the effect of "Laern to raed." Sadly No! exists to demonize people. Making fun of folks here and there? Fine. The ugly prolonged campaigns of personal destruction like this? Not so much. I'd say my commenters here agree.

exford said...

I think that Sadly, No! exists to illustrate that chasm between the office you hold as a professor and your conduct.

'Prolonged'? It has been what- two days?

You'll be forgotten soon.

jim said...

Obscure Internet Tough Guy claims a "co-ordinated leftist death-wish campaign" is out to destroy him, shows his superior rational nature by posting videos of people being beaten to death as his response.

The only reason you have so many people commenting here is that you blogwhored this post on, & since you apparently can't talk like an adult when you use a keyboard, you're actually more pathetic than funny once the novelty of your whole Macho Neocon Warrior schtick wears thin. Yeah, sorry, it's back to 1-3 comments per post pretty soon for you.

It's your faulty arguments & over-the-top dick-waving online persona that are being destroyed, not you - & your propensity to morph into a butthurt griefer whenever you get nailed on your weak BS is already well-known, & only serves to confirm that you're an intellectual featherweight. If you can't take the snark, get off the Interwebs - I don't think such a delicate little snowflake belongs here.

PROTIP: if you want to see REAL communism at work, check out the financial history of the people who're funding a lot of the "grassroots" protests right now, the Koch brothers (much of their fortune originally came from bankrolling the Bolsheviks in order to get access to Russian oil) - or for that matter, the entire Japanese economic system.

Funny how nobody on the right seems to want to boycott Japan or China.

AmPowerBlog said...

"I think that Sadly, No! exists to illustrate that chasm between the office you hold as a professor and your conduct."

Gee, Exford, you folks like me ... you really like me!

Part of the tactical elan here is not conforming to the milquetoast rote robot role of a typical faculty member ground down in the leftist soul-grinding machine. Pigeonholing how a professor should behave socially constructs a subservient ideological stance that I reject.

Besides, with each post you seem to be changing the subject.

AmPowerBlog said...

Listen Big Jim: I already responded to your type with the big F*** You. Now head on back over to your Sadly No! shithole like a good little boy.

Damned freak. Sheesh.

Left Coast Rebel said...

Jim - Koch brothers as diabolical, scheming communists?


That's the best laugh I have had in quite some time!

Hoosier X said...

Big Jim nailed you, professor.


FGFM said...

'SASQUATCH ISRAEL' is a pretty awesome concept.

FGFM said...

So, is this Douglas guy a gym coach or something?

g said...

Does your dean know you lecture with that mouth?

Tom A. said...

"Although I'm not so sure what this photoshop is supposed to mean?"

It means that they think your tough-guy posturing (posting YouTube clips of violence, ...) is pure Walter Mitty.

Carl said...

Oooh, Donalde quotes me about his Twitter page! Only proving my point that Twitter is for twits!

So Donalde, here's the deal: I love the Statue of Liberty. I visit the Statue something on the order of once a year (as a native Noo Yawkah and for other reasons that you're about to read). I donated about a grand to the rebuilding effort. My dad's name, my mom's name, and my grandparents' names are all inscribed there. My dad won the Medal of Freedom, which was awarded at the foot of the Statue.

Your page is ugly, not because of the Statue, but because your graphic and font choice make it unreadable.

JBW said...

Sorry for missing most of the Sasquatch party Don, I've been unplugged in Vegas all weekend. My original post didn't mock you for misreading a sign (for to err is indeed human) but rather for constructing an Israeli persecution meme entirely out of whole cloth, when you've obviously never heard anything like that before. The fact that you've attracted so many haters beyond that is solely on you, dude.

You're still my favorite right-wing caricature but for the love of God, please stop trying to use slang: it's so much more embarrassing than the Sasquatch thing. Take it easy.

DarthChen731 said...

Hey everybody, I'm that kid who had the Sasquatch sign. It had nothing to do with Israel and everything to do with Bigfoot, this guy is just a bonehead and looked into it way too far, as I'm sure most of you know by now.

I see that you have to approve all of the comments, that way you can filter out the ones that you don't like (I would assume) but I hope that for the sake of reality you let this go up.