Even during what would appear to be at the period of peak attendance it's just not that crowded. Check this CNN video at about 30 seconds. Pay attention to the grassy area on the left, next to the reflecting pool. It's just wide patches of grass. And then check my post from yesterday.
Roughly the same shot can be seen at this C-SPAN screencap:
And Andrew Berman states the main problem: "I still have not found a good overhead shot yet ..." Exactly. William Teach predicted that we wouldn't see any overhead shots, and we won't, unless a tea partier cruised up to the top of the Washington Monument to snap a picture. If one become available it would go viral big time. See a report from both Glenn Beck's and "One Nation" at Just a Conservative Girl, "8/28 Crowd V. 10/2 Crowd See for yourself." And at Lonely Conservative, "Rally for Socialism Fails to Draw Much of a Crowd." Plus, at RWN, "Lefty Rally at Lincoln Memorial Gets Glad Handed By Old Media, But Event a Bust." And Nice Deb has the most comprehensive roundup of the day, "One Nation of Moonbats March on Washington."
3 comments:
One of the comments at This Ain't Hell included this link.
There's your viral shot.
What I think is funny is that they also say that numbers don't matter.
Um, last I checked, numbers DO matter, because numbers get people into office!
The Blaze says Huffington has a shot from the Washington Monument: http://tinyurl.com/2fgffq8
Good photo comparisons if the HuffPo photo is authentic.
Those of us who attended 8/28 didn't get free transport, free lunch, or a T-shirt. We didn't get paid to attend. So that seems worth noting, IMHO. We went because we felt the need to. Also there's the litter comparisons, but that was almost expected: people who demand entitlements expect someone else to clean up their mess, too, evidently.
Post a Comment