Tuesday, February 2, 2010

What's a College Degree Really Worth?

I've been in department meetings all morning, and I've still got to record those Scantrons from yesterday. So, I'll have more posting a little later. Meanwhile, here's this from the Wall Street Journal, "What's a Degree Really Worth?":

A college education may not be worth as much as you think.

For years, higher education was touted as a safe path to professional and financial success. Easy money, in the form of student loans, flowed to help parents and students finance degrees, with the implication that in the long run, a bachelor's degree was a good bet. Graduates, it has long been argued, would be able to build solid careers that would earn them far more than their high-school educated counterparts.

The numbers appeared to back it up. In recent years, the nonprofit College Board touted the difference in lifetime earnings of college grads over high-school graduates at $800,000, a widely circulated figure. Other estimates topped $1 million.

But now, as tuition continues to skyrocket and many seeking to change careers are heading back to school, some researchers are questioning the methodology behind the high projections.

Most researchers agree that college graduates, even in rough economies, generally fare better than individuals with only high-school diplomas. But just how much better is where the math gets fuzzy.

The problem stems from the common source of the estimates, a 2002 Census Bureau report titled "The Big Payoff." The report said the average high-school graduate earns $25,900 a year, and the average college graduate earns $45,400, based on 1999 data. The difference between the two figures is $19,500; multiply it by 40 years, as the Census Bureau did, and the result is $780,000.

"The idea was not to produce a definitive 'This is what you'll earn' number, but to try and give some measure of the relative value of education attainments," says Eric Newburger, a lead researcher at the Census and the paper's co-author. "It's not a statement about the future, it's a statement about today."

Mark Schneider, a vice president of the American Institutes for Research, a nonprofit research organization based in Washington, calls it "a million-dollar misunderstanding."

One problem he sees with the estimates: They don't take into account deductions from income taxes or breaks in employment. Nor do they factor in debt, particularly student debt loads, which have ballooned for both public and private colleges in recent years. In addition, the income data used for the Census estimates is from 1999, when total expenses for tuition and fees at the average four-year private college were $15,518 per year. For the 2009-10 school year, that number has risen to $26,273, and it continues to increase at a rate higher than inflation.

Dr. Schneider estimated the actual lifetime-earnings advantage for college graduates is a mere $279,893 in a report he wrote last year. He included tuition payments and discounted earning streams, putting them into present value. He also used actual salary data for graduates 10 years after they completed their degrees to measure incomes. Even among graduates of top-tier institutions, the earnings came in well below the million-dollar mark, he says.

And just like any investment, there are risks—such as graduating into a deep economic downturn. That's what happened to Kelly Dunleavy, who graduated in 2007 from the University of California, Berkeley, with $60,000 in loans. She now works as a reporter for a small newspaper in the Bay Area and earns $34,000 a year. Her father is currently paying her $700 monthly loan payments. "It's harder than what I think I expected it to be," she says.

"Averages don't tell the whole story," says Lauren Asher, president of the Institute for College Access & Success, a nonprofit group based in Berkeley, Calif. She points out that incomes vary widely, especially based on majors. "The truth is that no one can predict for you exactly what you're gong to earn," she says.
More at the link. (Via Memeorandum.) I'm with the folks at CATO on this one. See, "The College Earnings Premium — Why It’s Meaningless." Beyond variations in majors and the distribution of individual attributes (motivation, intelligence, skills), even if we broke down the gains from college in pure cost/benefit terms, there's too many intangibles that come from entering into a life of the mind. Or perhaps we might refer to Socrates, "The unexamined ..."

2 comments:

Timeshare Jake said...

I made more money before I completed my degree, and I have a technology based degree. The problem is schools have become diploma factories, and when they are pumping out graduates, it's like having a Walmart of degreed job candidates. Then you combine the amount of debt most kids get into while in school, and I can't say that I am honestly any better off with my degree.

Rusty Walker said...

CATO has it right. College or no-college, the employment successes are due to complex dynamics and depend on the specific individual and the major/or field. Colleges overuse and quote these meaningless statistics to boost enrollment.

Also, regardless of Obama's preoccupation with his former occupation, some people are not going to benefit from college and others will. The government needs to butt out of our life decisions as to how to spend our free-enterprise earnings.