And staying with it for a moment, compare these two screencaps from Little Green Footballs. When James Eric Fuller threatened some conservatives at this weekend's ABC News town hall in Tuscon, Johnson chalks that up to the "Wild West" atmosphere in Arizona. Completely understandable, no doubt.
But there's more.
I cruised over to Althouse earlier, and she has a hilarious post picking up on Whiskey Fire's demonic ramblings at Firedoglake: "Hoft gets this through Instadouche and, unsurprisingly, Ann Althouse, who has been looking at pictures again, something that never ends well..." The Whisky Fire proprietor is Thers. He's a classic progressive and morally-bankrupt attack blogger from the TBogg "F*ck Me Pumps" school of racist misogyny and character assassination. Or, as Ann responds, "Heh. I got FireDogLake writing in the anti-Althousiana genre." The link goes to FDL:
Jim Hoft, The Gateway Gobshite, the Dollar Store version of Michelle Malkin, is very possibly the dumbest wingnut on this or any other Internet. To be sure, he has his competition (SASQUATCH ISRAEL!). But he is rather special!Notice that? The "competition" is me, from last September and my "Sasquatch Israel" gaffe. I noticed some traffic coming in last night from the Sadly No! asshats, and I chuckled this morning at finally figuring out the source. Even better is that I'm lumped to not only with Jim Hoft, but the great Michelle Malkin. Now that's some bragging rights, yo!
But stupid is as stupid does, as they say. Or in this case, as evil does, and you can't touch the left on that. Because as I've been documenting, along with many other voices of moral clarity on the right, the aftermath of Tucson has revealed a depth of progressive depravity thus far unknown to man. I have yet to see a single progressive publish an apology or retraction for their baseless smears that came within minutes of the shooting on January 8th. It's been truly sickening. Here's Thers, for example, at Whiskey Fire, alleging "heated right-wing rhetoric" for the death and destruction at the Gabrielle Giffords event:
Busting wingnut rhetoric for these latest shootings wouldn't be like busting Al Capone for tax evasion. It would be like busting Al Capone for fucking jaywalking.These people have no shame.
The reason the Tucson nightmare fearfully resonates is not because of a simple causal relationship between say Glenn Beck and direct incitements to murder, but because "conservatives" have an insatiable appetite for crazy bullshit.
Are wingnuts opposed to incitement to murder because, well, it's incitement to murder, or because they're afraid being caught out doing it might lose them Valuable Political Points?
Dunno! But once you've gone ahead and, say, made excuses for state-sponsored torture, if you want the benefit of the doubt, fuck you.
Whiskey Fire posted these lies on Wednesday, fully four days after the shooting. By then it was fully known of Jared Loughner's insanity. But the Democrat-rats smelled a political opportunity, and that night we saw crowds erupt in applause for President Obama at the progressive's University of Tucson progressive pep rally that should have otherwise been an evening of somber reflection. It was just that morning that Zach Osler, a "best friend" to the deranged Loughner, indicated at ABC News that the shooter "didn't listen to political radio, he didn't take sides, he wasn't on the left, he wasn't on the right":
But this is how it all works.
It's the big lie of the progressive-left, as I argued yesterday, as well as Diana West earlier, "Tragedy Exposes 'The Big Lie'":
The suppression of the facts is by no means the most dangerous aspect of any Big Lie. After all, facts don't go away even amid efforts to suppress them. All sorts of inconsistencies, impossibilities and clues remain behind, and sometimes in plain sight, for anyone who cares to look. The real threat the Big Lie poses to society comes when it is not stopped in its tracks, exposed and trashed for what it is -- a lie -- but rather accepted, accommodated and, indeed, treated as if it were the truth. At that point, a Big Lie is a big success, having created an alternate reality that turns its very targets into hapless accomplices.I'm not completely down with Diana's condemnation of conservative capitulation to the left's Big Lie. Politically, it would have been much worse to hold back a response in real time, just as the nihilist hordes were building up their deceits and distortions. But she's right to place the lies squarely in the longstanding tradition of leftist totalitarian utopianism. She illustrates her blog post with the image of Joseph Stalin above, and writes: "'Never mind, they'll swallow it', said Stalin, the 20th Century's first successful progenitor of the Big Lie."
Unfortunately, that last bit describes most Republicans' supine reaction to the reaction -- the Big Lie -- about the Arizona massacre ....
In the end, though, what's worse than the Big Lie itself is the failure to reject and expose it -- the failure, in this case, to identity the lie as a naked influence operation to mute conservative political expression. This failure is the crime Republicans are guilty of each time they stoop to defend themselves within the phony terms of the lie itself.
Exactly.
I'll have more later.
Meanwhile, the Big Lie continues with the latest from Frank Rich of the New York Times, "No One Listened to Gabrielle Giffords" (via Memeorandum).
RELATED: "The Lies of Bill Maher — And the Epic Struggle Between Good and Evil in the Aftermath of Tucson, 1/8/11."
6 comments:
"Or in this case, as evil does, and you can't touch the left on that. Because as I've been documenting, along with many other voices of moral clarity on the right, the aftermath of Tucson has revealed a depth of progressive deprativity thus far unknown to man."
Wow Don, just wow. You remind me a lot of Jesus, you know that? And by "Jesus" of course I mean my Hispanic buddy who suffers from delusions of persecution and writes almost exclusively in hysterical hyperbole. Being known as Sasquatch Israel for the rest of your blogging days will be a fitting epitaph for you, my friend.
You're basically a troll around here, JBW. You don't blog anymore, obviously because you've been bawling about no one giving you any credit or hits for your Sasquatch Israel "find." Of course my Elizabeth Edwards post stirred up the lefties like nothing, and so I'm packin' some juice. Blogging and traffic's never been better around here JBW, mofo loser.
As I've said many times in the past Don, I could give two shits about getting hits on my now defunct blog. You're the one who blogwhores yourself and jerks off to your own sitemeter, not me.
And yes, I'd like the credit for inspiring the ridicule of you around the blogosphere but only because making you look foolish using your own words has always been something of a hobby of mine. Of course, if I had to choose one of us for whom the words "Sasquatch Israel" become synonymous for all time I'd gladly choose you over myself every day of the week, and twice on Sunday's.
You're right though: accusing a dead woman of not paying sufficient adoration toward your god was a great way to get yourself some hits, it was a masterful stroke at being an intolerant asshole. And you're also right that blogging has never been better around here, but that ain't saying much of course.
Might I suggest more usage of the phrase "blood libel"? I felt that your only using it four times in your frothing about Maher was unneccessarily understated. Oh, and also write more about how having a conservative political philosophy makes one an intrinsically better person than having a liberal one; I love that shit! Cheers.
Don't know nothing about "Sasquatch Israel" but for idiocy, I gotta say that "Sarah Palin murdered 6 people" because she had crop-marks on her map pretty much trumps everything.
Way to go, idiots! You started strong on stupid and somehow managed to double-down, and now, bump-bump, even Obama threw you under the bus.
JBW:
I find your comments "unneccessarily (sic) understated". There are several whole sentences without a swear word in them. Think you're persuading a lot of people?
If salty language is too rough for you Anon I'm sure there's something bland and nonthreatening on the Disney Channel right now you can go watch instead of reading what I've written here.
If you want to elaborate on your point and cite specific examples of where I'm wrong get yourself a screen name, put on your big boy pants and join the conversation. Fair warning: I don't always swear but I do speak to other adults as if they were actually adults. Have at it.
Post a Comment