Thursday, June 4, 2009

San Francisco Puts Homeless Shoe-Shiner's Dreams on Hold

The San Francisco city bureaucracy provides a case study in how regulation kills the entreprenuerial economy. And in the case of Larry Moore, who's been homeless for six years, and hasn't had a drink of booze in 11 months, the city's policy is practically criminal:

Larry Moore wears a tie as he shines shoes at the corner of New Montgomery and Market.

He sleeps under a bridge, washes in a public bathroom and was panhandling for booze money 11 months ago, but now Larry Moore is the best-dressed shoeshine man in the city. When he gets up from his cardboard mattress, he puts on a coat and tie. It's a reminder of how he has turned things around.

In fact, until last week it looked like Moore was going to have saved enough money to rent a room and get off the street for the first time in six years. But then, in a breathtakingly clueless move, an official for the Department of Public Works told Moore that he has to fork over the money he saved for his first month's rent to purchase a $491 sidewalk vendor permit.

"I had $573 ready to go," Moore said, who needs $600 for the rent. "This tore that up. But I've been homeless for six years. Another six weeks isn't going to kill me."

The bureaucrat told Moore that she found out about his business after reading about his success in this paper.

Along Market Street, Moore's supporters are indignant. Nothing happens when mentally ill men wander the street talking to themselves and drunkards pee in the alleys. Yet Moore creates a little business out of thin air, builds up a client base, and the city takes nearly every penny he's earned.

Christine Falvey, spokeswoman for Public Works, said the department's contact with Moore was meant to be "educational."

"We certainly don't want to hamper anyone's ability to make a living," Falvey said. "Our education efforts are actually meant to support that effort by making our streets an enjoyable place for people to visit."

That is unlikely to mollify Moore's clients.

"Nothing like kicking someone when they are down," ranted attorney Loren Lopin, one of Moore's clients who donated $100 to help him get housing. "I am pissed."
More at the link.

Hat Tip: Memeorandum (where no leftists will touch this story with a ten-foot shoe-brush.)

Photo Credit:
San Francisco Chronicle.

4 comments:

Billiam said...

Typical Liberal bureaucratic B.S.

shoprat said...

The purpose of the poor is to empower the government. The government must stop them from empowering themselves.

Tomas said...

Yes Billiam bureaucracy has a liberal bias (apparently).

sf said...

The guy should pay the city NOTHING and wait for them to come get him.

See, most small businesses that incur a bureaucrat's wrath don't have any choice but to pay up, because if you don't, the damn government puts a tax lien on your home or business. But the shoeshine guy is, as the lawyers say, judgement-proof: All the city can do is haul him off to jail.

Is there a bureaucrat--especially in a totally, insanely Leftist city like SanFran--who is willing to so obviously stick a thumb in the eye of a poor homeless guy? I don't think so.

And if the city does get crappy with him, if there's a high-res videotape of the arrest, I'll bet the GOP will pay both him and the videographer $1000 for the right to use the footage.

Typical liberal bureaucratic BS is right.