Commentary and analysis on American politics, culture, and national identity, U.S. foreign policy and international relations, and the state of education - from a neoconservative perspective! - Keeping an eye on the communist-left so you don't have to!
My point was about not recognizing now. As to the future, we have to see what it brings. A day is a long time right now in Iranian politics. So let's take this one day at a time for now.Now doesn't that just prove my point from this morning! "Sullivan's all messed up! Who knows what position he's advocating from moment to moment?"
See also,on Sullivan, "Obama: "Diplomacy With Iran Without Preconditions," and
on Walt, "That 3:00am Phone Call for Mr. Obama.")"Stand by Me. "
Ed Driscoll, at Instapundit "AND THE ROLE OF EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN WILL BE PLAYED BY…: Liberals’ Knives Come Out for Nate Silver After His Model Points to a Trump Victory..."
R.S. McCain, "'Jews Are Dead, Hamas Is Happy, and Podhoretz Has Got His Rage On ..."
Ace, "Georgia Shooter's Father Berated Him as a "Sissy" and Bought Him an AR-15 to 'Toughen Him Up'..."Free Beacon..., "Kamala Harris, the ‘Candidate of Change,’ Copies Sections of Her Policy Page Directly From Biden's Platform..."
2 comments:
Just like a libtard to not let a good waffle go to waste, eh?
"Now doesn't that just prove my point from this morning!"
It does not, as my response to that earlier post points out.
Why should any American, from Obama on down, offer Ahmadinejad any legitimacy by recognizing his right to be there--let alone meeting with him--until Iran (both its leaders, and its people) recognize him as the legitimate, elected leader?
Sullivan's position pretty obviouly always was (and remains) "just for today," or--until this thing is settled over there. Not recognizing Ahmadinejad (or Moussavi) until Iran recognizes one of them, has nothing whatsoever to do with potentially meeting with the leaders of certain countries, with or without preconditions.
Post a Comment