Saturday, August 15, 2009

Obama's Town Hall at Grand Junction, Colorado: 'Nobody's Holding Insurance Companies Accountable'

President Obama spoke at a health care town hall today in Grand Junction, Colorado. With this event the president has confirmed that the Democratic political calculus has shifted away from a "robust public option" to "vilifying insurance companies." The Denver Post has the text of Obama's opening remarks, including lines like this:

These are ordinary Americans, no different than anyone else, held hostage by health insurance companies that deny them coverage, or drop their coverage, or charge fees that they can't afford for care they desperately need.

It's wrong. It's hurting too many families and businesses. And we're going to fix it when we pass health insurance reform this year.

Also:

No one is holding the insurance companies accountable for these practices. But we will. We're going to ban arbitrary caps on benefits. And we'll place limits on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses. No one in America should go broke because they get sick.
This tack comes at precisely the same time that Democrats are backing off the "public option." According to the Politico (via Memeorandum)

After the toughest week yet for health reform, leading Democrats are warning that the party likely will have to accept major compromises to get a bill passed this year – perhaps even dropping a proposal to create a government-run plan that is almost an article of faith among some liberals ....

In two town halls so far, Obama has spent far more time talking up the need to reform the insurance system than making a full-throated pitch for the public insurance option.
Still, even though the "robust public option" is apparently off the table, the president's comments this week indicate that aggressive insurance regulation is likely, including an "insurance mandate" of public insurance to "compete" with private companies (different line, same baloney).

Here's President Obama disussing insurance "
options" in Grand Junction:

... if you like your health care plan, you can keep your health plan. If you like your doctor, you can keep seeing your doctor. I don't want government bureaucrats meddling in your health care - but the point is, I don't want insurance company bureaucrats meddling in your health care either. So if you're one of the nearly 46 million people who don't have health insurance, you will finally have quality, affordable options.
But note this comment from the Heritage Foundation:
Although he once opposed the idea, President Obama is now open to the imposition of an individual mandate that would require all Americans to have federally approved health insurance. This unprecedented federal directive not only takes away your individual freedom but could cost you as well. Lawmakers are considering a penalty or tax for those who don't buy government-approved health plans.
The fact is that President Obama still wants a public national healthcare program - ObamaCare - and he's making some tactical adjustments to his public relations campaign. No matter what happens, the Democrats will attack the private marketplace and will likely frustrate private competition and consumer choice. Thus, conservatives have to keep the pressure on all the way into September and beyond. Kill health reform altoghether, if the Democrats are going to be driving the legislation.

See also, CNN, "'Arbitrary' health care policies would end, Obama tells town hall," and the New York Times, "Obama Says Insurers Are Trying to Block Change."

3 comments:

Unknown said...

As long as insurance carriers are free to charge what they want when they want and then deny deny deny, there will always be a need for another option for Insurance. We all know that while the uninsured do get care those costs that are incurred are paid for by all of us. Let's get some organization involved and make sure that those payments that are already being paid are made in a structured way with the most amount of benefit.
Miami Auto Insurance

Rich Casebolt said...

Andrew, we already have over a thousand insurance companies in this nation ... which produces an inherent check-and-balance against charging "what they want and then deny deny deny": competition.

The problem is that the state-by-state compartmentalism of the insurance market ... and the structural bias towards group plans ... limits the effect of that check and balance.

We don't need another option ... we need to free this market, to enhance consumer choice and thereby, competition.

Even now, it does work ... multiple times in my career, my employers have improved my coverage by changing companies and/or negotiating with them.

We need more of that kind of activity ... NOT some government-managed "public option" that political and economic pressures will morph into the ONLY option.

pete muldoon said...

"The fact is that President Obama still wants a public national healthcare program - ObamaCare - and he's making some tactical adjustments to his public relations campaign. No matter what happens, the Democrats will attack the private marketplace and will likely frustrate private competition and consumer choice. Thus, conservatives have to keep the pressure on all the way into September and beyond. Kill health reform altoghether, if the Democrats are going to be driving the legislation."


The fact is that Republicans have made up the name ObamaCare. It's an ad hominem attack. It allows people like you to just say "ObamaCare" without discussing the issues. Your blog is very good at this, from the posts I've read. Try some actual analysis.

The reason a free market for health care doesn't work for large numbers of people is that you can't underwrite people who are sick. More competition will not fix this. The only way to cover everyone is to have healthy people pay for sick people.

If you are ok with the US being the only developed nation that allows it's citizens to die from lack of health care, then just say so. As a matter of principle, it can't be argued.

But the reason the Democrats should be driving this legislation is because they overwhelmingly won the last election. And the one before that. You may not remember this, but you should. It was only last November.

So why don't you take the weekend to actually learn something about this issue, and then try to contribute something positive? Posting snippets of political hackery is unbecoming to the blogosphere.