Saturday, August 8, 2009

Obama’s Intolerance Toward Dissent

From Timothy Carney, "Obama’s Pattern of Intolerance Toward Dissent":

Dissent, it turns out, is no longer patriotic. President Barack Obama’s White House and his Democratic National Committee have unleashed an all-out assault on what they call “angry,” “manufactured” and “lobbyist-funded” lies about health care reform. Look closely and you realize that’s how they classify all dissent.

Obama, when speaking at Notre Dame University last spring amid anti-abortion protests, said, “When we open up our hearts and our minds to those who may not think precisely like we do or believe precisely what we believe, that’s when we discover at least the possibility of common ground.”

But his record of dealing with actual dissent paints a different picture, one that suggests he has so much faith in his own good intentions and clever plans — and so little skepticism about the power of government to do good — that he sees all disagreement with his policies as condemnable.

“David Freddoso has made a career off dishonest, extreme hatemongering,” Obama’s presidential campaign wrote about my friend and now Examiner colleague David Freddoso last September in an effort to get a radio host to drop him.

The campaign e-mail called Freddoso a “card-carrying member of the right-wing smear machine” and said his anti-Obama book (for which I was the editor) contained “lies and smears about Barack Obama.”

The one “lie” the campaign claimed to find in the book turned out to be completely correct — that Obama “voted to raise your [taxes] if your taxable income is greater than $32,500 a year.” The Factcheck.org page the campaign cited actually proved Freddoso correct. The other “lies” they attacked were differences of interpretation.

The personal attack on Freddoso, filled with slurs and devoid of factual critiques, illuminates Obama’s current crusade against the “mobs,” “fishy e-mails” and “manufactured” dissent against his plan for massive regulations, subsidies and new government programs in the health care industry.

The White House does have a point here: Some of the protests these days are out of line. Shouting down Congress members at town halls is not practicing democracy, it’s bullying. Claiming, contrary to all evidence, that Obama is not an American citizen is not debate, but close-minded inanity — inanity possibly stemming from racism.

But Obama, through his White House, his campaign and his DNC, has lumped all dissenters in with the shouters and the birthers. There’s a political gain to this tactic, to be sure, but it certainly doesn’t reflect the open-mindedness and fairness Obama was supposed to bring.

Linda Douglass, communications director for Obama’s Office of Health Reform, said her job includes collecting “disinformation” about health care, and the White House asked Americans, “If you get an e-mail or see something on the Web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to
flag@whitehouse.gov.”

More at the link.

Related: "
Obama Reverses Stand on Drug Industry Deal" (via Memeorandum).

Cartoon Credit:
Michael Ramirez.

1 comments:

Bob Belvedere said...

Professor, FYI: The text of the e-mail I just sent to flag@whitehouse.gov...

To Whom It May Concern...

Under your definition, I--someone who believes in a free market-based health care system--am espousing 'fishy' views [your DHS did certify me, after all, a 'Rightwing (sic) Extremist'].

Under my definition of the word, everything members of the Administration have said about the current and proposed Health Care System is not simply fishy, but rotten fishy.

However, as the President put it so succinctly: 'I won'. Therefore I must conclude that your fishy definition of 'fishy' is the one that you abide by [for the moment--you are relativists, after all, and proud of it] and this is the definition you want us to apply in these denunciations.

Therefore, herewith, wherein, and heretofore, I turn my self in as a purveyor of 'fishy' views with the understanding that I will immediately be classified in your database as 'UNMUTUAL' [I would only request that the number you assign me is '6'].

I know that after proper re-education, I will be able to say with pride: 'It is all right, everything is all right, the struggle is finished. I have had won a victory over myself. I love Big Brother'. I also know that, at that point, I will be declared an 'unperson'.

Awaiting speedsend to joycamp, I remain...
Robert Oswald Belvedere, American

PS: TEA BAGS IS PEOPLE!